Welcome to the Temple of Zeus's Official Forums!

Welcome to the official forums for the Temple of Zeus. Please consider registering an account to join our community.

What Is The Perfect Way To Rule Nations?

High Priest Zevios Metathronos

Administrative High Priest
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
14,557
Website
templeofzeus.org
Meteor said:
In my debates with people here, I've encountered a fascination with authoritarianism, including concepts such as:
Government-enforced abortions and involuntary euthanasia even for minor conditions, bans on all sorts of medicine (based on the ideological notion that side effects are unacceptable, rather than leaving it up to the patients and doctors), mandatory hypnosis to address unusual sexual preferences, government-ran matchmaking systems for dating where people are discouraged from making their own decisions, similarly for career paths, and the election of leaders by a (spiritual) elite rather than democracy.
...


What people usually refer to as "Authoritarianism" is actually a normal Government that has a direction, not actually "Authoritarianism" as they imagine it. Functional Government works on a minimal scale, affecting the lives of people positively but in a way that looks like it isn't really "there".

Nowadays the word has become empty and merely means "Any Government that actually has any influence [and is of the goyim] is "Authoritarian" and "Nazi", while every Yehuborim one, even if for example does rampant global surveillance, is "Freedom and Democracy". The conversation in other words is shaped by preconceived notions of interest, rather than wanting to make a point.

The reality is in inverse, even in the regimes they claim it was a dictatorship, people had more freedoms and personal autonomy in many cases, provided the leadership of any cared about them. They were closer to actual democratic regimes or delivering promises that are done now.

Regardless, too much confusion and lack of studying has many people saying things about "Authoritarianism", which are all false.

Theoretically, "Democracy" is supposed to take the rights of people very seriously. The Constitution and other things are to be upheld on the highest regard. That is also the case in Constitutional Monarchies and other similar regimes. But can we say these are upheld now?

Based only on the Co-Vid situation, all Constitutions are being violated, and we are already in a form of junta, with excessive police and military activity, rampant censorship etc. And the Yehuborim media keeps telling us it's all "Democracy" etc, when all the basic notions of Democracy have been at least half ruined in many places worldwide already.

Even Hitler and Mussolini were elected by the people, ie, in a Democratic manner. The sense of that ruining yourself is "choice" also existed in these regimes, but it wasn't as popular to bag yourself and kill yourself. You could, but it wasn't promoted left and right to destroy yourself and everything else.

Hitler's rule was also a considerably complex thing, because on the top it was like monarchy, in the middle like Aristocracy [the best were in control everywhere, corruption was punished severely] and the people were instantly heard and their will was promoted quickly on the top. That is a rare situation, and can manifest not only because of a system, but because of the leaders [which if enlightened, can help do this]. That is a rare situation for the current state of humanity.

It's also ironic how in most of these regimes, many rights violated today were actually upheld. I doubt Hitler or these guys would rush a faked vaccine for no reason, since this invalidates one's authority to the maximum, and in these types of "Monarchical" regimes, mistakes do severely undermine the leaders. But in "Democracy" you can always lie that it's other people's faults, and therefore, it's the least responsible way to rule. You can Yehubor and shill all day in a Democracy, always blame shift and so on.

That's because Governments like this take pride in the quality of life they attain for people, while many like the modern US, are drifting away from this. But the US still maintains a very similar structure, that's why it's very successful. It has Roman elements in how it's run.

The situation that leaving everything down the slide in the modern perception of the 21st century, or that this guarantees "Freedom" and that it's an "Egalitarian" thing to do so, is a lie. Today "Egalitarianism", is used as an empty shell to promote Yehuborim ideologies, such as things that kill your Nation or equate you with invaders etc.

On the other hand, this "Egalitarianism" doesn't recognize most of the other rights of human beings, such as the right to work, life, or to maintain their property etc, breaching them constantly. But it recognizes for example the rights of invaders or whatever of the sort.

Societies that do this and let things just go into any direction, just collapse. A level of cohesion is needed for States or they don't survive. Any society that does this, loses all it's rights in due time.

Democracy can be very good, but it tends to be very bad since the masses of people make good choices sometimes and sometimes they can make terrible choices out of deception. Democracy would definitely work if there wasn't the enemy to constantly dig the grave of everyone, and is considered a good state of affairs.

Democracy in the form of "mob rule" and "we wuz equal n shiet" only in the end of the day creates discord. We haven't really seen proper democracy since the Yehuborim have been controlling all vectors of society, just a Yehuborim two party control project.

Actual Democracy hasn't existed for quite sometime, and ceases to exist more and more as time goes. It existed in the Golden Age of Pericles, however, even this form would be considered "Authoritarian Dictatorship" by today's false "egalitarian" standards.

The best remains Aristocracy, which is a blend between egalitarian ideals and promotion of the best individuals. Even Democracy in the proper form is called "Polity", which has to do with election by the people, but of great individuals. So it's a blend between Aristocratic rule and Elections.

Monarchy [rule of 1 impressive person], Aristocracy [many advanced people] or "Polity" [a form where everyone involved is smart enough to make good choices, inapplicable at this level of development of humanity now, but it has happened in some historical intervals]. That is the good Aristotelian ideal.

The bad, is as follows: Tyranny [1 useless asshole that is a parasite and abuses everything pointlessly, see Geoffrey in Game of Thrones], Oligarchy [similar to present day Plutocracy where a few rich Yehuborim run everything with a couple of shills], or "Democracy" [a delusion that the people rule created by the above bad categories, or even worse, the actual mob rule that decides the worst of the worst because it has no given standards, commonly manipulated by the oligarchs].

Screen-Shot-2017-01-18-at-10.23.07-AM.png


Generally because most of humanity sucks [including many that are supposed the "Leaders" of it and too much Yehuborim influence, we tend to find ourselves in the lower spectrum of corruption no matter what is applied:

Democracy as it is today, is mob rule and/or Yehuborim rule that serves selected castes only. That's why you will see many people talk negative of it. "Democracy" ends up never serving the people in the end of the day, or the whole.

Examples we can deduct from above, is that for example, military Junta's and other things like this, can never be long-term prospects for government or anything of the sort.

Regardless, the JoS promotes we move onto the higher spectrum of spirituality and self understanding for as many people as possible, and how this is going to manifest politically. The manifestations can change with times, technology, and other effects, or as we go into the future.

No matter the system, the ONLY way a species can survive is if the supreme or spiritual elements are more powerful than the brainless mob and those who want to destroy everything.

Therefore, it's absolutely normal all Zevists who are advanced understand how necessary is this, and we all agree on this, otherwise, one can never be a Zevist, as decay and spiritual downfall can never be a good thing. As one meditates, they understand this by their own growth in understanding etc.

Therefore, "Egalitarianism" is a good value insofar what we are "Egalitarian" for, actually is advanced into something rather than remains into a self dying mass that spreads corruption. This will ruin mankind forever, it's not a political issue here, more like a natural or existence based reasoning.

In regards to the political world, it's going to be Monarchy or some form of Aristocracy, or a Polity/Republic, or even a similar form to Senatorial Roman rule, or whatever of the sort - is fine, so long the spiritual Sanatana Dharma where people and society lives and advances positively is intact.

We are opposed against all the corrupted forms of unspiritual rulership such as these three listed above, all of which destroy the creation of the Gods when they are applied.

-High Priest Zevios Metathronos
 
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a30183673/dating-app-genetics/
 
The current system was pretty much summed up by Arnold Leese

Democracy is Death by Yehubar
 
In some States (LATAM) in our constitution you have Emergency plans, which allow certain rights and not all of them to be suspended for the good of the nation and to protect legal rights.

I hope one day we can become satanic leaders of our countries.
 
This sermon is wonderful.
I already knew most of these things, but it is beautiful how clear it all is.
This is one of the most common questions for people who come here.
As we move forward it becomes obvious, that is the masses should be grateful when they are led by superior men.

As for the American constitution, it is a magnificent and moving legacy of your founding fathers.

The American Constitution is worth more than a thousand statues.
It is the true legacy of extraordinary men.
It is a demonstration of what happens when superior men lead the masses.
Their incredible deeds will continue to help the masses forever, whether the masses notice or not.
Just today I thought about this again, I saw a video in Italian that explained the case of Kyle Rittenhouse (in Italy this case has been distorted) strangely this video was impartial and told the facts well.

In the video they talked about the second amendment, I honestly knew about the right to have a weapon, but I did not know that you can create militias to defend their property and that they cooperate with the police to defend themselves.

I am Italian and I am proud to be, but in my country such a thing is unthinkable, sometimes there are neighbourhood patrols to maintain security, but they certainly do not go around with automatic rifles.

The BEAUTY of having this right is unbelievable.

People don't understand how much this represents true freedom.

Every white person on this planet should say thank you to the United States of America, which despite being infested by the enemy, maintains its role as a bulwark against the Yehuborim through the legacy of those great men who were the founding fathers.
 
It's natural to look up to authority figures and majority of people have an innate need to follow someone or something. That is just how society is structured on a social level. There are a few contrarians in all levels for diversification and the ability of change so that regimes are not set in their ways and are constantly evolving. The idea that everyone can have a will to power and everyone regardless of their circumstances or astrology can do everything without help is just not true. I noticed this in 1 week of dating the girl I'm with, that she's completely insecure and weak and has no will of her own. So I told her that as long as I'm with her and she comes to me for direction, then no matter what anyone says it doesn't matter because you only need one person to truly understand and connect with you. The weak must look at the strong and the strong must look either at a metaphysical or a spiritual higher level. Only in this clown world can we say that all of these people deserve a voice.
 
Jack said:
It's natural to look up to authority figures and majority of people have an innate need to follow someone or something. That is just how society is structured on a social level. There are a few contrarians in all levels for diversification and the ability of change so that regimes are not set in their ways and are constantly evolving. The idea that everyone can have a will to power and everyone regardless of their circumstances or astrology can do everything without help is just not true. I noticed this in 1 week of dating the girl I'm with, that she's completely insecure and weak and has no will of her own. So I told her that as long as I'm with her and she comes to me for direction, then no matter what anyone says it doesn't matter because you only need one person to truly understand and connect with you. The weak must look at the strong and the strong must look either at a metaphysical or a spiritual higher level. Only in this clown world can we say that all of these people deserve a voice.

I don't think dating someone weak and without a will of her will benefit you in any way. It would benefit you better to look for someone of comparable strength to you or perhaps even stronger. People on a different 'wavelength' can never truly connect on a deeper level.
 
Stormblood said:
Jack said:
It's natural to look up to authority figures and majority of people have an innate need to follow someone or something. That is just how society is structured on a social level. There are a few contrarians in all levels for diversification and the ability of change so that regimes are not set in their ways and are constantly evolving. The idea that everyone can have a will to power and everyone regardless of their circumstances or astrology can do everything without help is just not true. I noticed this in 1 week of dating the girl I'm with, that she's completely insecure and weak and has no will of her own. So I told her that as long as I'm with her and she comes to me for direction, then no matter what anyone says it doesn't matter because you only need one person to truly understand and connect with you. The weak must look at the strong and the strong must look either at a metaphysical or a spiritual higher level. Only in this clown world can we say that all of these people deserve a voice.

I don't think dating someone weak and without a will of her will benefit you in any way. It would benefit you better to look for someone of comparable strength to you or perhaps even stronger. People on a different 'wavelength' can never truly connect on a deeper level.

Generally what people might refer to as "weak" or "insecure" might range. Because for example a person like this can be a perfect match for another person, but not for someone else who might think of them as bothersome or a problem. That's how nature has designed things, and it's in good mind that this occurs.

For example, while some people consider these qualities bad, others find them sweet. Shyness and other aspects can draw the attraction of some people and deter others.

Jack will probably change his mind 6 months in after he sees how much the voice of his girlfriend will matter, especially when he hears complaints about the dishes or something he forgot.

Relationships don't have to be always based on these power dynamics. For example, the same woman that might look weak or insecure might be the best mother for children and/or extremely important in many other areas. Eventually also the relationship and through Jack's help she might fill these gaps and become better.

He also falsely calls her without a will since the girl clearly has a will and her expressed will was to be with him, so he might understand this in the future. And of course, she got him. So I don't see where her lack of will is present, I think Jack is a bit thinking only in his personal dynamic personality versus her on an individual level.

Yet relationships don't work this way past a point but rather in a united fashion more than an individual one. The choice to maintain this relationship long-term will show him quite a few important things IMO, which also were reflected in his previous post of how much he has grown in understanding the importance of women.
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Stormblood said:
Jack said:
It's natural to look up to authority figures and majority of people have an innate need to follow someone or something. That is just how society is structured on a social level. There are a few contrarians in all levels for diversification and the ability of change so that regimes are not set in their ways and are constantly evolving. The idea that everyone can have a will to power and everyone regardless of their circumstances or astrology can do everything without help is just not true. I noticed this in 1 week of dating the girl I'm with, that she's completely insecure and weak and has no will of her own. So I told her that as long as I'm with her and she comes to me for direction, then no matter what anyone says it doesn't matter because you only need one person to truly understand and connect with you. The weak must look at the strong and the strong must look either at a metaphysical or a spiritual higher level. Only in this clown world can we say that all of these people deserve a voice.

I don't think dating someone weak and without a will of her will benefit you in any way. It would benefit you better to look for someone of comparable strength to you or perhaps even stronger. People on a different 'wavelength' can never truly connect on a deeper level.

Generally what people might refer to as "weak" or "insecure" might range. Because for example a person like this can be a perfect match for another person, but not for someone else who might think of them as bothersome or a problem. That's how nature has designed things, and it's in good mind that this occurs.

For example, while some people consider these qualities bad, others find them sweet. Shyness and other aspects can draw the attraction of some people and deter others.

Jack will probably change his mind 6 months in after he sees how much the voice of his girlfriend will matter, especially when he hears complaints about the dishes or something he forgot.

Relationships don't have to be always based on these power dynamics. For example, the same woman that might look weak or insecure might be the best mother for children and/or extremely important in many other areas. Eventually also the relationship and through Jack's help she might fill these gaps and become better.

He also falsely calls her without a will since the girl clearly has a will and her expressed will was to be with him, so he might understand this in the future. And of course, she got him. So I don't see where her lack of will is present, I think Jack is a bit thinking only in his personal dynamic personality versus her on an individual level.

Yet relationships don't work this way past a point but rather in a united fashion more than an individual one. The choice to maintain this relationship long-term will show him quite a few important things IMO, which also were reflected in his previous post of how much he has grown in understanding the importance of women.

I understand your point of view. I work more based on actual nature than assumptions of what a partner is like. Also, by 'wavelength' I meant more than just power dynamics. I also meant things like a shared worldview and shared values, which I think is particularly important when it comes to children in order to avoid excessive fights on how to raise them properly. Being a parent can already be difficult enough, having to balance being an authority figure for your children and also their 'friend' in a way, without needing to have endless fights between parents about how to raise them.

I do see his understanding of women has improved a lot compared to the past.
 
Jack said:
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a30183673/dating-app-genetics/

I certainly don't trust people like him to handle the matches. Even I and many other people here with moderate to no knowledge of genomics would do a better job compared to this people who seems to even want to eliminate red hair, which are precious and the colour of Kings. I somehow think people like me would also be denied access to the app.

The concept is correct. The only problem is that matching criteria need to defined by someone mentally sound. These criteria should also take into account certain things genetics nowadays hasn't even discovered, such as values and so on, which are encoded in the DNA just like the rest of the soul is. Obviously, not just the encoding needs to be taken into account for this, but also gene expression.
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Stormblood said:
Jack said:
It's natural to look up to authority figures and majority of people have an innate need to follow someone or something. That is just how society is structured on a social level. There are a few contrarians in all levels for diversification and the ability of change so that regimes are not set in their ways and are constantly evolving. The idea that everyone can have a will to power and everyone regardless of their circumstances or astrology can do everything without help is just not true. I noticed this in 1 week of dating the girl I'm with, that she's completely insecure and weak and has no will of her own. So I told her that as long as I'm with her and she comes to me for direction, then no matter what anyone says it doesn't matter because you only need one person to truly understand and connect with you. The weak must look at the strong and the strong must look either at a metaphysical or a spiritual higher level. Only in this clown world can we say that all of these people deserve a voice.

I don't think dating someone weak and without a will of her will benefit you in any way. It would benefit you better to look for someone of comparable strength to you or perhaps even stronger. People on a different 'wavelength' can never truly connect on a deeper level.

Generally what people might refer to as "weak" or "insecure" might range. Because for example a person like this can be a perfect match for another person, but not for someone else who might think of them as bothersome or a problem. That's how nature has designed things, and it's in good mind that this occurs.

For example, while some people consider these qualities bad, others find them sweet. Shyness and other aspects can draw the attraction of some people and deter others.

Jack will probably change his mind 6 months in after he sees how much the voice of his girlfriend will matter, especially when he hears complaints about the dishes or something he forgot.

Relationships don't have to be always based on these power dynamics. For example, the same woman that might look weak or insecure might be the best mother for children and/or extremely important in many other areas. Eventually also the relationship and through Jack's help she might fill these gaps and become better.

He also falsely calls her without a will since the girl clearly has a will and her expressed will was to be with him, so he might understand this in the future. And of course, she got him. So I don't see where her lack of will is present, I think Jack is a bit thinking only in his personal dynamic personality versus her on an individual level.

Yet relationships don't work this way past a point but rather in a united fashion more than an individual one. The choice to maintain this relationship long-term will show him quite a few important things IMO, which also were reflected in his previous post of how much he has grown in understanding the importance of women.
I think I used insecure in a wrong way. I think I meant to say Shy and reserved in comparison to my speaking ability.


Btw ,I'm not doing dishes. :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Stormblood said:
Jack said:
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a30183673/dating-app-genetics/

I certainly don't trust people like him to handle the matches. Even I and many other people here with moderate to no knowledge of genomics would do a better job compared to this people who seems to even want to eliminate red hair, which are precious and the colour of Kings. I somehow think people like me would also be denied access to the app.

The concept is correct. The only problem is that matching criteria need to defined by someone mentally sound. These criteria should also take into account certain things genetics nowadays hasn't even discovered, such as values and so on, which are encoded in the DNA just like the rest of the soul is. Obviously, not just the encoding needs to be taken into account for this, but also gene expression.
This is the concept upon which something can be built. We need actual Eugenicists after reviving that field which has long since been dormant.
 
Stormblood said:
Jack said:
It's natural to look up to authority figures and majority of people have an innate need to follow someone or something. That is just how society is structured on a social level. There are a few contrarians in all levels for diversification and the ability of change so that regimes are not set in their ways and are constantly evolving. The idea that everyone can have a will to power and everyone regardless of their circumstances or astrology can do everything without help is just not true. I noticed this in 1 week of dating the girl I'm with, that she's completely insecure and weak and has no will of her own. So I told her that as long as I'm with her and she comes to me for direction, then no matter what anyone says it doesn't matter because you only need one person to truly understand and connect with you. The weak must look at the strong and the strong must look either at a metaphysical or a spiritual higher level. Only in this clown world can we say that all of these people deserve a voice.

I don't think dating someone weak and without a will of her will benefit you in any way. It would benefit you better to look for someone of comparable strength to you or perhaps even stronger. People on a different 'wavelength' can never truly connect on a deeper level.
By Will of her own ,what I mean is that she does not have a particular direction she's going in which she has pre determined. I asked her what's the most important thing to her in her life and she told me that it's about being and growing old with someone she loved and watching her grandkids play. If someone asked me the same question, my answer would be "spiritual Liberation." So now I can bestow my beliefs about the world onto her because she has a blank slate.

Compare this to someone who would have said " I want to be the CEO of my own company. " I would instantly see that that woman did not care about her role in this world. In male female relationships I personally believe that there needs to be a leader and he needs to be going in a certain direction with the woman helping him. Two A Type personalities cannot co exist indefinitely without constantly butting heads. That's just my personal opinion and experience. I think I used the words wrong. What I meant to say was "submissive."
 
Béla said:
Thank you for writing.

Sorry for writing this here. But I would like to request the deletion of this profile. Unfortunately, I'm very busy, I haven't been able to get on the profile for a while. I don't want a standing here. And if I want to come back I can create another profile anyway.

Ha alapból visszaterveztél jönni, akkor minek akarod töröltetni a profilod, te titokban zseni? :roll:
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Meteor said:
In my debates with people here, I've encountered a fascination with authoritarianism, including concepts such as:
Government-enforced abortions and involuntary euthanasia even for minor conditions, bans on all sorts of medicine (based on the ideological notion that side effects are unacceptable, rather than leaving it up to the patients and doctors), mandatory hypnosis to address unusual sexual preferences, government-ran matchmaking systems for dating where people are discouraged from making their own decisions, similarly for career paths, and the election of leaders by a (spiritual) elite rather than democracy.
...
...
-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666

I see cobra, that you are a so "hardcore enemy" of the yewish people, that when you are speaking about politics, you can give an example from the Game of trones. Actually my lil snake guy. I can just congratulate for your hard work. ;)
 
Jack said:
It's natural to look up to authority figures and majority of people have an innate need to follow someone or something. That is just how society is structured on a social level. There are a few contrarians in all levels for diversification and the ability of change so that regimes are not set in their ways and are constantly evolving. The idea that everyone can have a will to power and everyone regardless of their circumstances or astrology can do everything without help is just not true. I noticed this in 1 week of dating the girl I'm with, that she's completely insecure and weak and has no will of her own. So I told her that as long as I'm with her and she comes to me for direction, then no matter what anyone says it doesn't matter because you only need one person to truly understand and connect with you. The weak must look at the strong and the strong must look either at a metaphysical or a spiritual higher level. Only in this clown world can we say that all of these people deserve a voice.

I agree that there should be a meritocratic hierarchy, but I also think this is different from someone having a weak will. Maybe they might have a weak will to do a certain task, but they shouldn't have a weak will in general. Women are more yin, of course, and so they need help balancing their yang characteristics.

What do you suppose would happen if this girl did a Sun Square? This is not mutually exclusive with her feminity either. Any of the female demons have solar characteristics probably a million times greater than the men here, but they aren't masculinized lesbians either.

In a similar manner, men need to work on their yin characteristics, and there is no reason why this should effeminize one either. Someone who has high water in their chart only acts weaker due to the lack of fire, not just the presence of water. When you look at someone who is high water/high fire, this presents not as effeminate, but as strongly emotional.

The above is also seen in the Scorpio sign, which is similar to a mix of water and fire.

I think you are correct for looking out for her, though. People who have weaker wills can be subjected to the wills of angry retards. It is not prosperous for one to override another not on merit, but on sheer will alone. Not many people have a decent level of respect for another anymore, in part due to nonstop gang rap.
 
Stormblood said:
Jack said:
It's natural to look up to authority figures and majority of people have an innate need to follow someone or something. That is just how society is structured on a social level. There are a few contrarians in all levels for diversification and the ability of change so that regimes are not set in their ways and are constantly evolving. The idea that everyone can have a will to power and everyone regardless of their circumstances or astrology can do everything without help is just not true. I noticed this in 1 week of dating the girl I'm with, that she's completely insecure and weak and has no will of her own. So I told her that as long as I'm with her and she comes to me for direction, then no matter what anyone says it doesn't matter because you only need one person to truly understand and connect with you. The weak must look at the strong and the strong must look either at a metaphysical or a spiritual higher level. Only in this clown world can we say that all of these people deserve a voice.

I don't think dating someone weak and without a will of her will benefit you in any way. It would benefit you better to look for someone of comparable strength to you or perhaps even stronger. People on a different 'wavelength' can never truly connect on a deeper level.

As far as I can tell there are only 2 types of women who match Jack‘s character. The first one is exactly this kind of woman who is Jack‘s gf right now.
And the other type (which is exceptionally rare) would someone who is just like Jack, similar nature, who shares similar views, beliefs and mindset like him.
He either needs someone who follows him, or someone who can fully keep up with him, and that they are on the same level. (Which is super rare)

This is just the picture I have from Jack.
 
Giszmon666 said:
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Meteor said:
In my debates with people here, I've encountered a fascination with authoritarianism, including concepts such as:
Government-enforced abortions and involuntary euthanasia even for minor conditions, bans on all sorts of medicine (based on the ideological notion that side effects are unacceptable, rather than leaving it up to the patients and doctors), mandatory hypnosis to address unusual sexual preferences, government-ran matchmaking systems for dating where people are discouraged from making their own decisions, similarly for career paths, and the election of leaders by a (spiritual) elite rather than democracy.
...
...
-High Priest Zevios Metathronos

I see cobra, that you are a so "hardcore enemy" of the yewish people, that when you are speaking about politics, you can give an example from the Game of trones. Actually my lil snake guy. I can just congratulate for your hard work. ;)

You seem to know more about this show than I do and what makes it Yehuborim.

I have only watched a youtube video or two on this whole Game of Thrones fad. At some point, this was one of the most famous shows on the whole planet. Regardless, the situation is that all Trve Antisemites live in mommy's basement, with a big Nazi poster on the wall, a lot of paper since they jack off all day, and they judge with sticky fingers people greater than they on their so called "Hardcoreness". I speak not to such Trve Antisemites as I'm no deserving of it.

I am just a good for nothing, "done more damage to the Yehubor than you will do in the whole existence of yours", person. I also confess I have watched possibly about three videos of Game Of Thrones. May the tribunal of the basement dwelling and wanna be gangsta "antisemites" that hasn't achieved 0.5% of what I have against the enemy, judge me wisely.

I stand in awe of your greatest achievement in all this will be writing mean comments to the user "Bela" a girl online and calling her stupid in another language, was also the pinnacle of how great, antisemetic, manly and useful you are.
 
Jack said:
Stormblood said:
Jack said:
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a30183673/dating-app-genetics/

I certainly don't trust people like him to handle the matches. Even I and many other people here with moderate to no knowledge of genomics would do a better job compared to this people who seems to even want to eliminate red hair, which are precious and the colour of Kings. I somehow think people like me would also be denied access to the app.

The concept is correct. The only problem is that matching criteria need to defined by someone mentally sound. These criteria should also take into account certain things genetics nowadays hasn't even discovered, such as values and so on, which are encoded in the DNA just like the rest of the soul is. Obviously, not just the encoding needs to be taken into account for this, but also gene expression.
This is the concept upon which something can be built. We need actual Eugenicists after reviving that field which has long since been dormant.

Get a stem degree
 
Stormblood said:
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Giszmon666 said:
....

I remember people asking me about this tv shows and I was like "What is that?", and they look at me like I had committed some crime lol I watched the first episode at some point. It was too boring, so I decided not to watch. The only thing I remember I took a personality test once and House Stark came out, which didn't sound too bad.

You watched the first episode? Now you aren't an antisemite let alone a serious one. If you watch the whole series, you might burn in hellfire. It's forbidden to watch any show as a Trve Antisemite based on the Gizmo standard. So be careful of this.

Anyway trolling aside, I don't understand what's bad about the show granted the plot summary I read was actually a very Pagan one. Even the idea of the eternal winter is an idea from Nordic lore. It looks similar to Lord of the Rings. Especially the Dragon symbolism and everything was nice. Would definitely want to read the book. I also saw a lot of Alchemical allegory in the show and in the descriptions online.

That aside people said it was ruined in the final season anyway, which was due to two Yehuborim taking the series and ruining the whole story. Not sure if it had race mixing themes and the usual Yehubor propaganda. Another typical thing is that the evil king in this Joffrey was again picked up to be a Blonde person, which is very usual in all hollywood productions. Jon Snow also looked like a very good and heroic character.

I can't imagine the author's pain after they write books that ended up being world favorites and having the series destroyed by two lazy Yehuborim in the end of it all.
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Stormblood said:
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:

I remember people asking me about this tv shows and I was like "What is that?", and they look at me like I had committed some crime lol I watched the first episode at some point. It was too boring, so I decided not to watch. The only thing I remember I took a personality test once and House Stark came out, which didn't sound too bad.

You watched the first episode? Now you aren't an antisemite let alone a serious one. If you watch the whole series, you might burn in hellfire. It's forbidden to watch any show as a Trve Antisemite based on the Gizmo standard. So be careful of this.

Anyway trolling aside, I don't understand what's bad about the show granted the plot summary I read was actually a very Pagan one. Even the idea of the eternal winter is an idea from Nordic lore. It looks similar to Lord of the Rings. Especially the Dragon symbolism and everything was nice. Would definitely want to read the book. I also saw a lot of Alchemical allegory in the show and in the descriptions online.

That aside people said it was ruined in the final season anyway, which was due to two Yehuborim taking the series and ruining the whole story. Not sure if it had race mixing themes and the usual Yehubor propaganda. Another typical thing is that the evil king in this Joffrey was again picked up to be a Blonde person, which is very usual in all hollywood productions. Jon Snow also looked like a very good and heroic character.

I can't imagine the author's pain after they write books that ended up being world favorites and having the series destroyed by two lazy Yehuborim in the end of it all.

My impression was that it's not fantasy enough for me. I don't like really political intrigue and similar as a genre. I only like fantasy, sci-fi, adventure and investigative things.

Maybe the book is better. I generally prefer reading a book to how they butcher things in Hollywood. I remember loving the Inheritance Cycle from Christopher Paolini, then they destroyed it in the one and only film they released (Eragon).
 
Stormblood said:
Jack said:
Stormblood said:
I certainly don't trust people like him to handle the matches. Even I and many other people here with moderate to no knowledge of genomics would do a better job compared to this people who seems to even want to eliminate red hair, which are precious and the colour of Kings. I somehow think people like me would also be denied access to the app.

The concept is correct. The only problem is that matching criteria need to defined by someone mentally sound. These criteria should also take into account certain things genetics nowadays hasn't even discovered, such as values and so on, which are encoded in the DNA just like the rest of the soul is. Obviously, not just the encoding needs to be taken into account for this, but also gene expression.
This is the concept upon which something can be built. We need actual Eugenicists after reviving that field which has long since been dormant.

Get a stem degree
I have a Bachelors in Zoology, I don't see how that's relevant.
 
Jack said:
Stormblood said:
Jack said:
This is the concept upon which something can be built. We need actual Eugenicists after reviving that field which has long since been dormant.

Get a stem degree
I have a Bachelors in Zoology, I don't see how that's relevant.

For you to be one of the of those eugenicists. Zoology won't be good for that, I am afraid, but definitely an advantage compared to people without stem degrees.
 

Official Temple of Zeus Links

Back
Top