Welcome to the Temple of Zeus's Official Forums!

Welcome to the official forums for the Temple of Zeus. Please consider registering an account to join our community.

Temple Of Zeus Liturgical Terms: "Yehubor - Yehuborim"

The responses highlight to me that most of you care what X or Y tribe would do or "If they could join the Gods or not".

The effort and essence of actually restoring culture, basing it on highest powers, terms and literally having it's best form and function, is less important than where the Gods will be housed, how they will be perceived, or if the culture itself is restored.

For that reason the thing that highlights to me, is that a few of you don't care for the Gods would have happen as the best thing for them; rather you care what any enemy could or could not do. Indirectly, that is still worship of the enemy.

Lastly, since many of you worship Hitler or political ideologies, I will copy-paste a link for you to study, on how Hitler approved certain people of Hebraic descent and as Germans. What does this link tell you about purported races and related. Did they care about "RACE" and "DESCENT" or what PEOPLE ACTUALLY DID?

No realistic person on this planet, who is not living in wonderland, can deny that actions and who you are inside is bigger than where you descent from. As people who have consciousness can see that serving death cults, is not good, they can choose other alternatives.

Whether the Gods or not will accept them, is up to the Gods.

Yes, even Hitler which many of you try to cite, was not what you say he was; this is proven historically. He did actually make distinctions between of where one "IS" and what one "ACTUALLY IS".

I suggest laxatives and coping for those who cannot understand reality; there is nothing else I can explain.

So in the case of Emil Maurice, who was a high-ranking official close to Hitler, is true? I always thought it was media false propaganda.
 
Come on Hitler failed in large degree due to fact that his J doctor pumped him with drugs. Its this "goodheartness" almost undistinguishable from naivety in face of same ancient neanderthal enemy, that causes enemy to call people goyim, that naivety is the sense of this word. I think AH even bragged about his doctor being J as proof of not being anitsemitic or it was something similarly absurd. If I am a farmer and a group of hooked noses constantly steals my chickens, and then I read in ancient books that most of chicken thieves in history were always hook nosed, its not a damn victim mentality to point it. Damage is done and the source with 80% of the cause is pointed at. Just ride to their camp singing to Odin Viking style and deal with the pest leaving no one to spew persecution fables. Am I misusing God's name to justify my yehuboric tendencies? Genuine question. Lets forgive them christian way and allow to be robbed from everything while praying to Gods to smite Yehubor which causes hooked noses to take my chickens? Do I blaspheme now? Now after this change, I simply dont know, which is very troubling for me in a place dedicated to knowledge.
So the Constantine was influenced by spiritual Yehubor before he took usurious bribes, was blackmailed by some epstein or whatever it was? Thats the way it always spreads from j.ewish source to the remaining 20% as Prokopius of Cesarea described the filth of Justinian and j.ewess Theodora in his "Secret history". Fantastic, then Constantine was a nice guy in bad marxist yehuboric environment like every Jamal and hooked nose with all my chickens already. Paradoxically the root of the material j.ewish source is in the word yehubor itself because of perversion from IEU to IAU if Im correct.
Maybe it stems from my inability to leave material reality for spiritual which would cause more of my chickens to be stolen, make me hungry tomorrow and die allowing me to finally acheive christian sanctity.
I personally consider this change deeply marxist and dangerous. Even the forums started to look like a facebook parody with all the "juice", "J's" or whatever also with sentences like this from post #122
After thousands of years of working under Yehubor, the Yehuborim have now become Yehuborim.
where its takes lot of guessing to grasp what the author had in mind.
 
The responses highlight to me that most of you care what X or Y tribe would do or "If they could join the Gods or not".

The effort and essence of actually restoring culture, basing it on highest powers, terms and literally having it's best form and function, is less important than where the Gods will be housed, how they will be perceived, or if the culture itself is restored.

For that reason the thing that highlights to me, is that a few of you don't care for the Gods would have happen as the best thing for them; rather you care what any enemy could or could not do. Indirectly, that is still worship of the enemy.

Lastly, since many of you worship Hitler or political ideologies, I will copy-paste a link for you to study, on how Hitler approved certain people of Hebraic descent and as Germans. What does this link tell you about purported races and related. Did they care about "RACE" and "DESCENT" or what PEOPLE ACTUALLY DID?

No realistic person on this planet, who is not living in wonderland, can deny that actions and who you are inside is bigger than where you descent from. As people who have consciousness can see that serving death cults, is not good, they can choose other alternatives.

Whether the Gods or not will accept them, is up to the Gods.

Yes, even Hitler which many of you try to cite, was not what you say he was; this is proven historically. He did actually make distinctions between of where one "IS" and what one "ACTUALLY IS".

I suggest laxatives and coping for those who cannot understand reality; there is nothing else I can explain.

Dear High Priest,
If I sincerely agree with someone, they don't cause me any concern. Besides, as far as I know, you don't need to provide a blood test to sign up for forums.

But accepting this is easy, while the hard part is this: until now, the opposite was being claimed, and accepting this means acknowledging that the priesthood can also be wrong about certain issues. This raises the concern: what if the priesthood is wrong about other things right now?

What if we are wrong about the mantras we use or other things? What if, one day, you tell us that reincarnation doesn't exist, that we will simply cease to exist when we die, so we should just live well because this is our only chance? In short, we want to know that something we accept as true today won't change tomorrow, and that we aren't being mistaken right now. If you were wrong in the past, why should we trust the priesthood? How can we trust Zevism? We cannot all communicate with the gods, so we are dependent on you here; if you can just come out and declare that you were wrong, how is this supposed to work?

These are questions actually spinning in the back of everyone's minds, and frankly, they are spinning in mine a bit, too. I have nowhere else to go, and no other community satisfies me like this one—or so I assume, I don't know. But when even our perspective on the Gods can change so easily, who can we trust? I suppose trusting the Gods is a good idea. However, these are the things everyone mumbles about but is too shy to say, High Priest.

With my respects.
 
Come on Hitler failed in large degree due to fact that his J doctor pumped him with drugs. Its this "goodheartness" almost undistinguishable from naivety in face of same ancient neanderthal enemy, that causes enemy to call people goyim, that naivety is the sense of this word. I think AH even bragged about his doctor being J as proof of not being anitsemitic or it was something similarly absurd. If I am a farmer and a group of hooked noses constantly steals my chickens, and then I read in ancient books that most of chicken thieves in history were always hook nosed, its not a damn victim mentality to point it. Damage is done and the source with 80% of the cause is pointed at. Just ride to their camp singing to Odin Viking style and deal with the pest leaving no one to spew persecution fables. Am I misusing God's name to justify my yehuboric tendencies? Genuine question. Lets forgive them christian way and allow to be robbed from everything while praying to Gods to smite Yehubor which causes hooked noses to take my chickens? Do I blaspheme now? Now after this change, I simply dont know, which is very troubling for me in a place dedicated to knowledge.
So the Constantine was influenced by spiritual Yehubor before he took usurious bribes, was blackmailed by some epstein or whatever it was? Thats the way it always spreads from j.ewish source to the remaining 20% as Prokopius of Cesarea described the filth of Justinian and j.ewess Theodora in his "Secret history". Fantastic, then Constantine was a nice guy in bad marxist yehuboric environment like every Jamal and hooked nose with all my chickens already. Paradoxically the root of the material j.ewish source is in the word yehubor itself because of perversion from IEU to IAU if Im correct.
Maybe it stems from my inability to leave material reality for spiritual which would cause more of my chickens to be stolen, make me hungry tomorrow and die allowing me to finally acheive christian sanctity.
I personally consider this change deeply marxist and dangerous. Even the forums started to look like a facebook parody with all the "juice", "J's" or whatever also with sentences like this from post #122

where its takes lot of guessing to grasp what the author had in mind.

Alright, so now after you try to defend Hitler, you undermine him - when confronted with the reality of who he was (despite of using him as shield before).

Are you done doing Atibilbil and trying to use Birbur to back up your nonsense now?

What does recognizing evil in all it's forms in clearly arrayed practical guidelines, remove from your ability to resist it and not be a fool? Nowhere. These are literal guidelines; you are not able to be damaged from any side via this. Before, you were.

You cannot even understand reality 101 - first you went on to call me an operative, for giving my people the best of the best of knowledge and higher capacities. Then, you proceed to say you merely do not understand the thought process (which was said would make sense later - likely). First you cite the quote "racial theory" as "protection" as it happened via a purported National Socialist party; it is not backed by reality to support your argument; then Hitler was "a fool that was given a lot of drugs by his Yehuborim doctor".

You don't even know what you want, or what your points are, or even how the enemy operates or even what to expect from them. But you think you recognize them or reality. On both, there is poor judgement and with this, a lot of empty accusations.

The force behind all these things, even now or before, is the one shown as Yehubor.

If you supposedly have a problem with evil undergoing now, you can manage it on Yehubor level (before political parties, before associations, before historical cover-ups, before temporal politics), not on political drivel which you yourself invalidate via invalidating whom you called earlier as basis for your arguments, and then attack him as a "failure".
 
Dear High Priest,
If I sincerely agree with someone, they don't cause me any concern. Besides, as far as I know, you don't need to provide a blood test to sign up for forums.

But accepting this is easy, while the hard part is this: until now, the opposite was being claimed, and accepting this means acknowledging that the priesthood can also be wrong about certain issues. This raises the concern: what if the priesthood is wrong about other things right now?

What if we are wrong about the mantras we use or other things? What if, one day, you tell us that reincarnation doesn't exist, that we will simply cease to exist when we die, so we should just live well because this is our only chance? In short, we want to know that something we accept as true today won't change tomorrow, and that we aren't being mistaken right now. If you were wrong in the past, why should we trust the priesthood? How can we trust Zevism? We cannot all communicate with the gods, so we are dependent on you here; if you can just come out and declare that you were wrong, how is this supposed to work?

These are questions actually spinning in the back of everyone's minds, and frankly, they are spinning in mine a bit, too. I have nowhere else to go, and no other community satisfies me like this one—or so I assume, I don't know. But when even our perspective on the Gods can change so easily, who can we trust? I suppose trusting the Gods is a good idea. However, these are the things everyone mumbles about but is too shy to say, High Priest.

With my respects.
I have received my answer:
Thread 'Meeting Metathronos, Our High Priest' https://ancient-forums.com/threads/meeting-metathronos-our-high-priest.306627/
 
Dear High Priest,
If I sincerely agree with someone, they don't cause me any concern. Besides, as far as I know, you don't need to provide a blood test to sign up for forums.

But accepting this is easy, while the hard part is this: until now, the opposite was being claimed, and accepting this means acknowledging that the priesthood can also be wrong about certain issues. This raises the concern: what if the priesthood is wrong about other things right now?

What if we are wrong about the mantras we use or other things? What if, one day, you tell us that reincarnation doesn't exist, that we will simply cease to exist when we die, so we should just live well because this is our only chance? In short, we want to know that something we accept as true today won't change tomorrow, and that we aren't being mistaken right now. If you were wrong in the past, why should we trust the priesthood? How can we trust Zevism? We cannot all communicate with the gods, so we are dependent on you here; if you can just come out and declare that you were wrong, how is this supposed to work?

These are questions actually spinning in the back of everyone's minds, and frankly, they are spinning in mine a bit, too. I have nowhere else to go, and no other community satisfies me like this one—or so I assume, I don't know. But when even our perspective on the Gods can change so easily, who can we trust? I suppose trusting the Gods is a good idea. However, these are the things everyone mumbles about but is too shy to say, High Priest.

With my respects.
I think the misunderstanding here is that you and others are treating our religion like it's meant to be a set of fixed doctrines, like some holy book that's never meant to be changed or improved upon.

Zevism works in a more dynamic, flexible way:

1) New knowledge arrives which improves on the older ideas

2) Sometimes, that new knowledge is kept back until the right time to release it arrives

This is quite foreign to other religions where nothing is expected to change for a long time or even forever, that there are things that are never to be questioned. In Zevism questioning is at our core, always truth seeking and improving, that's because we're endlessly striving for truth.

Reincarnation is real, so are souls, so the idea that we would cease to exist after death isn't true in the slightest, unless there are some kinds of spiritual attacks that could do this?

A truth-seeking system will always try to improve upon itself to reach closer to truth. I reckon Zevism will continue changing and evolving to places we didn't even fathom, to even more powerful heights beyond imagination.

The Gods reveal more and more truth to those who have evolved to higher heights. We should consider ourselves grateful that we have Champions like Lady Maxine, HPHC and others who are not only worthy to receive such holy knowledge but generous to share it with us and help us evolve to heights most of us wouldn't reach on our own.
 
I think the misunderstanding here is that you and others are treating our religion like it's meant to be a set of fixed doctrines, like some holy book that's never meant to be changed or improved upon.

Zevism works in a more dynamic, flexible way:

1) New knowledge arrives which improves on the older ideas

2) Sometimes, that new knowledge is kept back until the right time to release it arrives

This is quite foreign to other religions where nothing is expected to change for a long time or even forever, that there are things that are never to be questioned. In Zevism questioning is at our core, always truth seeking and improving, that's because we're endlessly striving for truth.

Reincarnation is real, so are souls, so the idea that we would cease to exist after death isn't true in the slightest, unless there are some kinds of spiritual attacks that could do this?

A truth-seeking system will always try to improve upon itself to reach closer to truth. I reckon Zevism will continue changing and evolving to places we didn't even fathom, to even more powerful heights beyond imagination.

The Gods reveal more and more truth to those who have evolved to higher heights. We should consider ourselves grateful that we have Champions like Lady Maxine, HPHC and others who are not only worthy to receive such holy knowledge but generous to share it with us and help us evolve to heights most of us wouldn't reach on our own.
I believe that the High Priest Hooded Cobra possesses the power to create something lasting and eternal. I suggest taking a look at Priest Alexandros's last read.
Thank you for the answer.
 
When Hitler’s mother became sick, he was still a young man and he did not even have enough money to properly take her to a doctor. At that time a doctor in Linz, Eduard Bloch, who was a member of the tribe you mentioned, examined Hitler’s mother Klara Hitler and diagnosed her with advanced breast cancer. The illness was already very serious and her chance of survival was very low. She needed surgery and several difficult medical treatments. This process caused her a lot of pain, and her son Adolf Hitler returned home to take care of her. Klara Hitler died on 21 December 1907.

Dr. Bloch knew that the Hitler family did not have a good financial situation, so he asked for almost no payment for his services except for the cancer treatment. After his mother died, Hitler thanked the doctor for everything he had done, and they parted on good terms. In later years Hitler spoke positively about Dr. Bloch. After he came to power, he allowed Bloch’s medical office to remain protected and ensured his safety. Dr. Bloch later emigrated to the United States.



Even this story alone should tell you many things.

Greetings, NG Sonne.
Here is you, before answering to another Zevist who asked you about this doctor.
"We know that there were various categories of Yehuborim. There were also exempted Yehuborim, and Dr. Bloch was among them. There were also Germans who were not racially Yehuborim but who were interested in Kabbalah and behaved like a Yehubor in terms of conduct. While Herr Hitler selectively showed mercy to certain Yehuborim, he did not accept them. They simply were not punished as harshly as the others. However, in every respect they lived under the same restricted conditions as other Yehuborim, and when the territorial matter was resolved, they too would be deported. Dr. Bloch subsequently emigrated to America. In general, due to the foreign relations of the period, the NSDAP government approached the steps they would take regarding Yehuborim with great caution. Some decisions may seem absurd today, but when the conditions of the era are taken into account, the measures taken were appropriate to the circumstances of the time. It would be more accurate to evaluate them within that context.
Here, while answering a members question about why was this thing treated different than others, you are emphasizing how there was no actual acceptence of this thing.

But now, today in this thread you are telling members "look, here is a good j-w, even Lord Hitler liked him." This looks like a contradiction.

Here, High Priest Hooded Cobra also emphasizes on how there was no actual acceptance, rather these people were in no place to have negative influence, so they were left to live in their bubble under Lord Hitler's rule. They couldn't do evil even if they wanted anyways.
I have replied about this before I think, but I do not recall the place where I did this.

There were categories of Yehuborim. One type of "Yehubor" that was spared, of which there were many, were Yehuborim who were not racially Yehuborim, but converts to Freemasonry/Kabbalah, and all the related garbage, who were nevertheless of Germanic stock. Albeit rare, this category actually existed back then, as it exists today. Upon racial verification up to 300 years, if one was found to be a Gentile or a recent convert, they were left alone and they were spared.

Most of it however is just lies and exaggerations. Hitler just gave selective mercy to some Yehuborim, but they didn't accept them or anything. They just did not punish them as severely. They still remained limited in every regard, and they would be driven out when the case of their land (a world problem undecided still back then) would be resolved.

Hitler didn't attack them brutally and in a savage way as they lied to that he did after the war. The case with this treatment was to build global trust between the newfound state of Nazi Germany with other Nations of the time, as doing deplorable acts would make them hated and nobody would want any peace, negotiations, trade agreements, and so forth.

Yehuborim in military positions were in particular a difficult topic to resolve, as they couldn't just pull them out of the military, and they had to treat them in a reasonable way as to avoid potential military coup and worse. These were also very few in number, and they were not in any serious intelligence or otherwise branch. None of these could get any offices in press, publications, nor any other important or affecting aspect of NS society. They just lived in a limbo.

Most of these categories all bent the knee to Hitler when he came in power, and the Nazis had to look into the longterm resolution, because this was not an easy matter. All part Yehuborim had most of their rights within the German State removed under Hitler, so they were effectively non-existent in the public assembly.
Now, we can't get a clear yes or no answer on whether a j-w can become a Zevist or not.
Here, Lady Maxine cleary states that it's very much racial.
Is this information outdated? If so, please inform us.
 
HP,
Where did I defend AH, and write about racial theory as protection in this thread?? Do you mean somewhere in my past posts? Yes, whole Nature is racial. This racialism is what keeps species a species. Thats why j.ews are extremely racial and at the same time are undermining this racialism for everyone else, thus weaponizing laws of Nature against her and usurping them for themselves as a weapon. In that sense I defend AH as a healthy racialist rooted in Nature in his writings but Im pointing that gaslighting of antisemitism or simply some form of underestimation of danger from enemy caused him to hire j.ewish doctor who poisoned him. Maybe it was naively incomprehensible for him to assume a socially respected trade of a doctor could be used to harm when occupied by a j.ew, when correspondence between j.ews simply says "become doctors to kill goyim"? If thats the case, its this goyish naivety and "good heart" which is being exploited since always by this parasite. Whole christianity hinges on exploitation of this naivety of the good heart to the point of suicide. This good heart should be expressed only among the members of the same race. Verified with DNA tester? Why the fuck not? Because some j.ew says otherwise securing himself by this a door to my racial group in the name of my suicidal mercy, compassion or inclusivity? Its not water proof protection but at least on the level of the Nature itsef in harmony with her laws. Anything else is worse and against Nature. Maybe AH failed because he failed to obey the laws of Nature he was writing about and got himself a doctor from another race he clearly knew was the enemy. Its similar situation with j.ews praising saving them with some food in WW2, and now they are purposefully destroying food for people in Gaza.
Its always this small fucking back-gate of benefit of the doubt to the henhouse and a second later its already too late.
I didn't call you operative, undelete my post then please. But yes, it could sound like that. The change is so shocking for me in a marxist way that it caused me to wonder if you were approached by usual suspects to push this change which in material reality benefits only them by diluting j.ews in a crowd of collective yehuborim. In my opinion collective yehuborim dangerously waters down the enemy in a group which they intentionally create with usury, blackmail and their monotheisms to hide in. Its a collectivization of losses for them. I think this new non materialistic nature of yehubor makes it unreachable, distant and in effect non attackable in any way. It removes identity. With no identified identity of the enemy you can't react. You can only pray to Gods, while they steal your chickens from the backyard. It plays only for them in my opinion and this is why i wrote what I wrote. Another thing I noticed is this new behaviour of cultish christian-like mob collectively chanting on the forums "yehubor! yehubor! yehubor!" when there is some critics or difference of opinions. Thats the effect of dematreializing the enemy and moving it to semi-abstract physically unreachable space.
Or maybe Im just a fool, simpleton, nazi bigot with no understanding of reality.
Im done ranting. I will reread what you wrote probably few times and think about it, but im quite open to possibility that I won't process this.
Thank you
 
I have posted my question just before High Priest Hooded Cobra's audio message, about this topic, was shared, so there is more clarification now.

Thank you HP Hooded Cobra, for your continuous contributions, in the mean time I will re-listen your sermon again and again to internalize and understand.
 
And let me ask again the question of WiseDragon:
If Yehu is Yahwe, why call it sacred? If "bor" is "without" then its "without Yahwe"?
Is it self-defeating (for non-J's) cursing of those without Yahwe?
Or everything is based on inversion of hebrew kabalistic terminology of empty shells / husks to shoot this shit back at them because they are empty shells with kabalah stolen from Egypt and Grece? In this case, again, why Yehu is called "sacred" like its used in Yehuda (name) or Yehudi (group of people)?
Or the "Yehu" itself was also stolen and does not belong to them?
Lots of possibilities and lots of questions.
I hope this explains what I meant by using term "blurring"
Thank you
We have already been shattering the protection of the purer Yehuborim agents with the 'Shattering Yehuborim Soul Protection' ritual. The very first word of the ritual starts with "EE-AAHN-OH-DA", where EE-AAHN is derived from Yah. Yah is an ancient Egpytian divine syllable (Yah is pronounced EE-AH. The EE as in 'see' & AH like the interjection 'ah', ends with a breathy H). This pronunciation is different from the Hebrew version which is perverted, where the hebrew pronunciation encompasses a breathing mechanism we use in magick to release/direct energy, so when a human says YHWH while looking at a christian cross or the Kaaba cube, they direct the energy towards it with more focus present in the exhaling. It's in the phonetics of this word, it's very cunningly perverted.

HP Cobra has also stated that the term YHWH is a perversion of the four lettered named IAEO; which is very powerful.

There exists further Birburim in this regards.

In ancient Egypt, Lah which is also written as Yah/Jah/Aa/Aah, was a Moon God, who is Zeus. For WH in YHWH is very much coming from Weh/Wah, which in ancient Egyptian means to endure/last/forever/permanence. As ancient Egyptian was a powerful language I believe this word allowed for a stronger manifestation of enemy in our world. The moon God Lah in Arabia is Hubal(Baal/Zeus) this is also where the enemy introduced a part of the thoughtform "Allah", which is perverted from not just Al-llah, Al-Malik, but also from AL from Hubal(BAAL), and Lah from God Lah. This phonology adds power to the word "Allah" when uttered by a large number of humans, even though it's a perverted thoughtform, it still generates some energy. All that matters here for the enemy is that a large number of humans vibrate it>>>generate its energies>>>directs it to the cube>>>Isrealites to put cubes(tefllin) on their head to harness and direct the energy for their cause and race.

As they stole and learned our knowlegde. They projected themselves as yhwh for it's perversion and not the Divine. This is where Weh/Wah I believe plays an important role in more stronger manifestation of the existence of the Yehuborim races. YHWH would roughly translate to "Yehuborim endures", so it's not just generating power along with the energies directed for harvest, it's also a short and to the point affirmation at the same time.

This is all where the term YHWH is perverted from, from ancient power words of our Gods.

This word play is part of their Yehuborim's Birburim & witchcraft to harness power through us, to better manifest their will through our power words, and our energies.

Seeing how similar Yehu is to Yah, it seems powerful enough to reverse Yehubor energies with just one vibration. I think one can feel at least some difference in their mood, emotions, and thinking since the day we have come across it, especially through the prayer.
 
I already read it, yes it was a fascinating read.
I know my answer upset you, but you did the same to me. I cannot understand why you feel the need to give fake answers here, viewing "counter-attacking" someone when they ask a question as a proof of loyalty. Your initial goal wasn't to help me; you perceive my doubts as disloyalty and pretend to answer me just to prove you don't share that same "disloyalty." I believe you are acting on a different instinct, and the sad part is, you aren't the only one—most people here act this way.

What is your goal? Are you trying to feel a sense of belonging, or are you trying to prove to the High Priestess that you are more worthy of rising within this hierarchy? I think this is a "Yehuboric" approach, and even if someone adopting this mindset succeeds in gaining power, it would be dangerous for us.

Until now, it was said that "someones" have no 7 chakras and could never be Zevist even if they wanted to, yet there is a clear realization of this error here. I am aware that the High Priest is not the cause of this error, but your answer of "I believe in the evolution of Zevizm" to someone pointing out this reality wasn't meant to help; it was an attempt to suppress an "impertinent" person like me and prove you are supposedly more loyal. It seems like I'm only attacking you, but this isn't strictly about you—too many people here adopt this terrible attitude. Honestly, this approach is the reason the High Priest is accused of a sort of dictatorship; he is NOT bu you are tarnishing his reputation.

Things go south when we play this game, don't they? Didn't my reply make you feel like crap (because that was my intention)? You felt the need to come and tell me like a loser that you read Priest Alexandros's post, and I think we just wasted energy. We need to stop this—all of us.
 
The responses highlight to me that most of you care what X or Y tribe would do or "If they could join the Gods or not".

The effort and essence of actually restoring culture, basing it on highest powers, terms and literally having it's best form and function, is less important than where the Gods will be housed, how they will be perceived, or if the culture itself is restored.

For that reason the thing that highlights to me, is that a few of you don't care for the Gods would have happen as the best thing for them; rather you care what any enemy could or could not do. Indirectly, that is still worship of the enemy.

Lastly, since many of you worship Hitler or political ideologies, I will copy-paste a link for you to study, on how Hitler approved certain people of Hebraic descent and as Germans. What does this link tell you about purported races and related. Did they care about "RACE" and "DESCENT" or what PEOPLE ACTUALLY DID?

No realistic person on this planet, who is not living in wonderland, can deny that actions and who you are inside is bigger than where you descent from. As people who have consciousness can see that serving death cults, is not good, they can choose other alternatives.

Whether the Gods or not will accept them, is up to the Gods.

Yes, even Hitler which many of you try to cite, was not what you say he was; this is proven historically. He did actually make distinctions between of where one "IS" and what one "ACTUALLY IS".

I suggest laxatives and coping for those who cannot understand reality; there is nothing else I can explain.

I don't know about this one. I've always been aware that there are good Israelites, or rather, those who live a normal life like any other Gentile, with their challenges and minor issues as every other normal person. However, these are like 5% or less.

Yehuborim being anyone possessed of the spirit of the Yehubor is very truthful. I mean, the Grays were once a normal, thriving civilisation but here we are today with they being Yehuborim that harass people down here.

This new understanding is very much needed, but asking us to accept that there can be good Israelites will just give the rotten ones (who are the majority) an opening they can use to latch onto Gentiles and keep abusing them.

I feel like antisemitism will push the good Israelites to do something about the insanity among their lot. They can't be doing all these evils at a collective level but get a free pass just because they are good.

We keep forgetting about the beefs, burying the hatchet, but their collective lot keeps seeking vengeance and doing more and more evil. How can we not be radical antisemites?
 
Dear High Priest,
If I sincerely agree with someone, they don't cause me any concern. Besides, as far as I know, you don't need to provide a blood test to sign up for forums.

But accepting this is easy, while the hard part is this: until now, the opposite was being claimed, and accepting this means acknowledging that the priesthood can also be wrong about certain issues. This raises the concern: what if the priesthood is wrong about other things right now?

What if we are wrong about the mantras we use or other things? What if, one day, you tell us that reincarnation doesn't exist, that we will simply cease to exist when we die, so we should just live well because this is our only chance? In short, we want to know that something we accept as true today won't change tomorrow, and that we aren't being mistaken right now. If you were wrong in the past, why should we trust the priesthood? How can we trust Zevism? We cannot all communicate with the gods, so we are dependent on you here; if you can just come out and declare that you were wrong, how is this supposed to work?

These are questions actually spinning in the back of everyone's minds, and frankly, they are spinning in mine a bit, too. I have nowhere else to go, and no other community satisfies me like this one—or so I assume, I don't know. But when even our perspective on the Gods can change so easily, who can we trust? I suppose trusting the Gods is a good idea. However, these are the things everyone mumbles about but is too shy to say, High Priest.

With my respects.

Ideas and concepts in all areas of life change as a result of the exploration itself turning up new information. It is smart to update any existing theories and databanks with new info; that is not called "being wrong".

I believe you are seeing this from a cynical view. Look at it the other way: HP is our forefront expert on the matter. He also empowers us to make our own discoveries on the topic, too. So it is not like a situation of one changing fact collapsing the whole system, but a system of thought and discovery which is ever evolving and growing in clarity.
 
I know my answer upset you, but you did the same to me. I cannot understand why you feel the need to give fake answers here, viewing "counter-attacking" someone when they ask a question as a proof of loyalty. Your initial goal wasn't to help me; you perceive my doubts as disloyalty and pretend to answer me just to prove you don't share that same "disloyalty." I believe you are acting on a different instinct, and the sad part is, you aren't the only one—most people here act this way.

What is your goal? Are you trying to feel a sense of belonging, or are you trying to prove to the High Priestess that you are more worthy of rising within this hierarchy? I think this is a "Yehuboric" approach, and even if someone adopting this mindset succeeds in gaining power, it would be dangerous for us.

Until now, it was said that "someones" have no 7 chakras and could never be Zevist even if they wanted to, yet there is a clear realization of this error here. I am aware that the High Priest is not the cause of this error, but your answer of "I believe in the evolution of Zevizm" to someone pointing out this reality wasn't meant to help; it was an attempt to suppress an "impertinent" person like me and prove you are supposedly more loyal. It seems like I'm only attacking you, but this isn't strictly about you—too many people here adopt this terrible attitude. Honestly, this approach is the reason the High Priest is accused of a sort of dictatorship; he is NOT bu you are tarnishing his reputation.

Things go south when we play this game, don't they? Didn't my reply make you feel like crap (because that was my intention)? You felt the need to come and tell me like a loser that you read Priest Alexandros's post, and I think we just wasted energy. We need to stop this—all of us.

I honestly don’t know where this came from. Your answer did not upset me at all.

I explained my perspective on how I viewed the change and perhaps how some people misunderstood it and how Zevism could change over time.

Then I just factually said that I already read the post you cited about HPHC before you recommended it to me.

There was no manipulation or demeaning intented from me. I apologise if you interpreted it that way, that was not my intention in the slightest. I was not and never did put anyone down for expressing a different opinion. I often have opinions that could get attacked by others myself and don’t shy away from stating them.

I can be a bit direct and insensitive at times, and sometimes can sound demeaning when explaining my view to others. I didn’t mean that. I also despise “power plays”.

I don’t believe in putting others down to raise myself up, I don’t see the need for it and would only make me look a bully, which I’m not.

I again apologise if I seemed that way, I was only explaining how I viewed the change and then said I read the post before.
 
I honestly don’t know where this came from. Your answer did not upset me at all.

I explained my perspective on how I viewed the change and perhaps how some people misunderstood it and how Zevism could change over time.

Then I just factually said that I already read the post you cited about HPHC before you recommended it to me.

There was no manipulation or demeaning intented from me. I apologise if you interpreted it that way, that was not my intention in the slightest. I was not and never did put anyone down for expressing a different opinion. I often have opinions that could get attacked by others myself and don’t shy away from stating them.

I can be a bit direct and insensitive at times, and sometimes can sound demeaning when explaining my view to others. I didn’t mean that. I also despise “power plays”.

I don’t believe in putting others down to raise myself up, I don’t see the need for it and would only make me look a bully, which I’m not.

I again apologise if I seemed that way, I was only explaining how I viewed the change and then said I read the post before.
I apologize for what I wrote, brother. This process has made me very emotional, and I’ve said things you didn't deserve at all. Believe me, I’m having so many sudden emotional outbursts and acting so inconsistently that you shouldn't take a single word I wrote seriously. I just haven't been feeling well and I projected my negative energy onto you. Please forgive me if I made you feel guilty; the change is just making me overly emotional, and I'm having a hard time managing myself.
I am really sorry.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Shaitan

Back
Top