AgainstAllAuthority said:
I tend to agree with you, however until recently we didn't have the tools to make an efficient currency that keeps prices stable. Money that is limited in quantity tends to make prices decrease due to the constant increases in efficiency of production of goods and services. A deflationary tendency makes people afraid to take loans and afraid to take risks. Risk taking for the benefit of society should be encouraged and rewarded if we want progress to happen. With deflationary money you are rewarding those that do not take any risk but just sit on it and wait. Rewarding the lazy while punishing the creative has disastrous long term evolutionary consequences that are hard to undo.
That's not necessarily true. People can take risks in other ways that do not involve money and benefit from it.
AgainstAllAuthority said:
If you can't sustain yourself then you become a drag on society. I'm not saying that you should not help others. I'm saying that you should help yourself first. A lot of poverty has been caused by priests telling the poor that if they gave their last penny to the church they would be rewarded. "Selfish" is a guilt word invented by the enemy. Just like "anti-semitism" or "racism." They should be deleted from the dictionary.
That it's not what is meant by selfish. Selfish is putting yourself first at the expense of others, failing to recognise there are things greater than yourself, such as your children, your race and so on. And one should feel very guilt about it and ashamed about themselves. You can put your race, children and so on, first without neglecting your own growth. It's not either or like the enemy tries to teach but a balanced between yourself and others, which how relationships work. Compromise. Treating others like shit because you are priority number 1 will make you isolated and dead, because human beings cannot survive alone, as they are designed to be specialists, not generalists. Any fool that wouldn't put themselves in danger to prevent their children from being harmed does not deserve to be called human.
AgainstAllAuthority said:
:arrow: in your first point "money is not time", you offer a simplistic explanation of what happens. Gains usually do not go exclusively to the seller, but to every employee of a business. Most likely, the sales agent is earning very little. It also doesn't apply to every area of business. Selling a hot chocolate for £2.40, for example, or the most basic pizza for £10 is extortion plain and simple.
There's no such thing as "employee." It's another word that should be deleted from the dictionary. Everyone is in business. "Employer" should just be called "client." Instead of using "employee" try using "seller" or "service provider." By poisoning our vocabulary, the enemy has turned a positive activity, wealth creation, into a negative one.
If I'm selling hot chocolates for £100 and people are happy to pay for that then there's nothing wrong with it. If I'm selling hot chocolates for £100 and people are NOT happy to pay for that then that's fine as well. No one forces anyone to buy anything.
Negotiation is a fundamental part of any business transaction. People that are not in a position to negotiate have either bad luck or they have neglected to put themselves as priority number 1.
[/quote]
You are misunderstanding my message based on your own personal vocabulary. Let me break it down for you. Each item bought from a business pays the business owner, the HR team, the operations team, the sales team, the logistics team, the security team and so on. The business owner isn't the only fee earner, as the other people's wages do no just appear out of thin air or grow on a dollar tree.
And yes, it is morally and ethically wrong to sell hot chocolate for £100 if that amount of money is disproportionate to the cost of living (especially the mean wages). Just because many people silently comply to it because they are lazy and don't want to buy the ingredients and make it at their own place, it doesn't make it any more legitimate. Saying it's all right, it's the same as saying the covid 'vax' is good because the majority is taking it. It's not.
Spiritual Satanism (= WW2 regime) is by nature anti-capitalistic and anti-communist as it is against slavery. This is not a path without morality and ethics. Morality and ethics are forms of wisdom developed as one grows in this path, as it's natural. There is a reason why merchants weren't upper class nor royalty in the most advanced civilisation on Earth (Ancient Egypt, Sumer, Babylon, Vedic India, pre-Flavian Rome, Ancient Greece, Norse, Druids...), and the reason is because they are the second-most selfish of individuals, being profit-oriented. As one reaches higher stages of refinement, they will lose this aspect. For example, right above merchants were guardians (e.g. military, law enforcement, lawyers, etc) who devoted their lives to defending people. And right above them, at the pinnacle, were the philosophers, the teachers, the priests, the healers and the rulers, who devoted themselves to serving their own community, ensuring upliftment and eternal beneficial growth.
Service in its pure meaning has nothing to do with total abnegation, but rather doing everything in your power to put your nation first, which obviously includes personal development because being at your best helps you better serve your people. The system worked. Hence why, for example, Ancient Egypt remained virtually unchanged for more than 8000 years (Pyramids were built in 10,000 BSE). Sumerian people and other Mesopotamic civilisations literally had a lifespan of almost 1000 years, with no poverty. Why? Because the Zevism system works. They were the most just, fair and reasonable societies. Before them, the Vedic Empire spanned the entire White world for tens of thousands of years before it was fragmented due to the enemy attacking Earth.
I'm not taking anything personally. Just making a statement of fact.
