Ol argedco luciftias
Well-known member
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Off topic, your avatar is gorgeous, what's the anime?Edelwise said:If only I could make an animation out of this...![]()
Sverige interviews Loki: Vegan Die-etAquarius said:Nobody:
**
Literally nobody ever:
**
Material related to health and wellness (652 files)
***
Top[/size]
:lol:Ol argedco luciftias said:Sverige interviews Loki: Vegan Die-etAquarius said:Nobody:
**
Literally nobody ever:
**
Material related to health and wellness (652 files)
***
Top[/size]
Vegan for years, now eating all raw meat because both of those are totally healthy logical diets
HP Mageson666 said:There is a tale of Pythagoras when he wanted to be admitted to the Egyptian school they would only allow him within if he spent many weeks in spiritual solace doing a certain pranayama. When Pythagoras returned to the gates of the school he stated he had returned as a new being as before he was only intellectual and had no spiritual consciousness.
Nietzsche knew all this as his job was a professor in such Hellenic knowledge. Nietzsche's work is very much that of Schopenhauer of whom he was a disciple of. Both believed that nature was spiritual not materialistic like the Darwinist school and had a purpose of moving humans towards a psycho-physical, spiritual wholeness and perfection. This was the Teleology of man. Nietzsche and Schopenhauer both believed the higher man was one who practiced spiritual ascetism and obtained spiritual maturity and thus became psychologically whole. The archetype of such men is within the book the Anti-Christ as the golden class of society. Nietzsche's ideal of the higher man is one who by internal discipline has washed out of their psyche the state of Christianity psychology. He made no mistake about this.
loki88 said:Thanks for the insight, its good to have a greater sense of Nietzsche from JOS perspective. I always thought Shopenhauer as educator was a critique of the latter by Nietzsche claiming that Shopenhauer was a 'preacher of death' by advocating snuffing out the 'Will' by way of his Indian philosophy orientation
HP Mageson666 said:Nietzsche's situation with Schopenhauer is the same with Wagner. He started off in total agreement with him then later turns on him. But can never escape him. Nietzsche in the end was Schopenhauer's ideal even in how he lived his actual life. Nietzsche even pays tribute to Schopenhauer in the concept of the overman as he states kindness is the highest virtue of such. Nietzsche's disagreement seems to be over what he believes is Schopenhauer's view of compassion for human suffering which is born out normal empathy. He believes its taken to a level were its a Christian fetishization of suffering. Were the overman's sense of compassion is from a natural empathy without such. In the end Nietzsche even ponders if the type of practices that Schopenhauer mentions are needed to create self realization and even his character Zarathustra is a device to this ideal and much a salute to Schopenhauer however with Nietzsche's aim towards such.
Schopenhauer believes that untamed desires lead to disaster and one should overcome such by practices to transform the will of life towards a higher goal. Nietzsche states the will or desire should be embraced and used to build the worthwhile life in the world he believes that Schopenhauer is denying life in how he comes to the situation of life.
However both understood the individual needs to have internal spiritual-psychic development to become a higher being. How they choose to then orientate their own model around such psychologically and idealistically is whatever. And that is what the ancient philosophers also understood its internal spiritual development that is the goal to be an ancient philosopher one had to be a spiritual practitioner.
loki88 said:Thanks for the insight, its good to have a greater sense of Nietzsche from JOS perspective. I always thought Shopenhauer as educator was a critique of the latter by Nietzsche claiming that Shopenhauer was a 'preacher of death' by advocating snuffing out the 'Will' by way of his Indian philosophy orientation
loki88 said:Thanks for the insight. For those unaware of esotericism and coming as I have been from a more exoteric outsider's view of these philosophers one gets only a dim glimpse into the meaning of their philosophy. I assume Neitzsche was a Dionysian(ie. Satanist). I assume also there are no historical records to reveal what he did in terms of esoteric practice?
You've been here for like 2 months, what is there to say about you?Harry said:Please post/create a Slothz tale on me because i want to be a superstar![]()
That's not how it works. Now with this post you most likely are never gonna be in such post. :lol:Harry said:Please post/create a Slothz tale on me because i want to be a superstar![]()