Question #4316: Should women go to war

[Ask Satya Operator]

Should average woman go to war or be trained to fight?Skills like using a gun and everything people learn to do in wars?
One side is always going to win in war and women on the other side will die anyways or wish they did so is it not better to die with honor and dignity?
What should women do in wars?Also is it not offensive for men to go to war when women dont?

 

[AFODO]

No. There are masculine and Feminine things. We would have seen this happen in ancient history if this would be normal. Hunting, fighting have always been a masculine thing.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

Women should absolutely never go to war. Women need to be safe and protected. Induvidual women are extremely more important and valuable than individual men for the survival of a population.

For example, if you have 49 men and one woman, the population would die because the woman would be impregnated one time, and would have one child every 9 months which is not enough to maintain the population and replace the number of people who die.

But 1 man and 49 women, the one man would be able to impregnate all of them and now there are 49 people born every 9 months, and they could have a maximum of doubling the total population size every year. There would be no risk of the population not being able to sustain itself.

Of course those are extreme examples, and neither situation is healthy. But it shows a reason how women are so much more valuable, because women have the miracle of being able to create life. A man can not create a child.

The women are also the ones who take care of the children, and educate them on how to do everything. And in this way they create the new generation of humanity.

It has always been this way. Men are simply more disposable. Men do the work, men do difficult and dangerous jobs, men fight in wars, and not all of them survive. One man dying does not do much harm to the population, the only loss is himself. But one woman dying decreases the population by herself, by all of the children that she would have had, and all of the grandchildren that she would have had. The total loss in that way is a much larger number of people. Also with other children besides her own who she may have worked to educate and teach how to do everything.

Women have also always been the keepers of history, who remembered all of the historical knowledge. And who knew all of the spiritual and magical knowledge, and taught all of these lessons to the children. An educated and knowledgeable woman dying is like the loss of a whole school, as she would have taught these to the children if she was here.


The women protect and take care of the children. And the men protect and take care of the women. This is the natural order, for the safety and protection of humanity.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

Women should absolutely have skills, knowledge, and ability in self defense. Women should have knowledge and training on how to use firearms. When a man is not there, women need to have full ability to protect both themselves and their children without depending only on a man to protect them. Proper use of a firearm is an important skill that all people should have, just like all people should be very good at cooking. Because we all need to eat, and we all may need to defend ourselves. So the skills for feeding and for protecting ourselves are necessary for all people.

 

[Crystal Lake]

This is too unrealistic. Humans are not rats. Few men and a lot of women, having a lot of children in a short time, how do you raise these children? With so many women and children and so few men, I doubt whether these children will grow up to be normal people.

If there is a war, the first consideration is how to win it. If there is a shortage of soldiers, let women join the army. If you lose the war by reducing the number of soldiers because of some strange idea, then it doesn't matter how many children you have after the war, you just wait for the next war to kill them all again.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

I never said that 1 man and 49 women is an acceptable option. I said it was a very extreme example, as a way to show an overall trend.

 

[High Priestess Lydia Coventina]

Women should absolutely have skills, knowledge, and ability in self defense. Women should have knowledge and training on how to use firearms. When a man is not there, women need to have full ability to protect both themselves and their children without depending only on a man to protect them. Proper use of a firearm is an important skill that all people should have, just like all people should be very good at cooking. Because we all need to eat, and we all may need to defend ourselves. So the skills for feeding and for protecting ourselves are necessary for all people.

Agreed. My father taught me how to use a gun and he also trained me in self-defense, even though I use none of these skills in real life. It's important to at least have the skills. And if a man can't cook, he calls him a helpless baby, lol.

Everyone should know how to take care of themselves, even if they never have the need to apply the knowledge.

Should average woman go to war or be trained to fight?Skills like using a gun and everything people learn to do in wars?
One side is always going to win in war and women on the other side will die anyways or wish they did so is it not better to die with honor and dignity?
What should women do in wars?Also is it not offensive for men to go to war when women dont?

When women go to war and do only masculine things, then it decreases femininity. All of society will be held back if we are all focused on the martial. There needs to be balance. But in case of times of emergency, women should know how to defend themselves.

 

[Persephone [NG]]

D'accordo. Mio padre mi ha insegnato a usare una pistola e mi ha anche addestrato all'autodifesa, anche se non uso nessuna di queste abilità nella vita reale. È importante almeno avere le capacità. E se un uomo non può cucinare, lo chiama un bambino indifeso, lol.

Tutti dovrebbero sapere come prendersi cura di se stessi, anche se non hanno mai bisogno di applicare le conoscenze.


Quando le donne vanno in guerra e fanno solo cose maschili, allora diminuisce la femminilità. Tutta la società sarà trattenuta se siamo tutti concentrati sul marziale. Ci deve essere equilibrio. Ma in caso di emergenza, le donne dovrebbero sapere come difendersi.

Io, nel mio piccolo, credo che l'uomo e la donna siano due facce della stessa medaglia. Lasciate che siano la compensazione dell'altro. Come è sempre stato, anche in natura, la donna è colei che ha il miracolo di procreare e quindi di garantire la continuazione della specie a cui appartiene; l'uomo, invece, ha sempre fornito cibo, protetto e amato la sua famiglia, garantendone la longevità. Ovviamente in questi giorni, a mio parere, le donne devono avere almeno una conoscenza di base dell'autodifesa e dell'uso delle armi, nel caso in cui si trovino di fronte a un pericolo e abbiano bisogno di proteggere se stesse e i loro figli. È sbagliato pensare che sia una competizione come fanno molti comuni: "non è giusto che la donna rimanga a casa e io lavori" o esempi simili, o donne che lottano per l'uguaglianza di genere quando è giusto che ognuno abbia il suo ruolo, è l'equilibrio delle cose. Ci devono essere collaborazione e sostegno, incoraggiamento e forza. Dobbiamo essere uniti e fare tutto il possibile affinché la guerra sia vinta in modo che i nostri figli possano avere un futuro migliore sotto la guida di Padre Satana e degli Dei.

 

[Recycler1337]

Massively and considered the norm as in pisszrael - no.



Individual women can be very strong and militant, if they want to be, no one can forbid them).

 

[Persephone [NG]]

Sorry, I don't know why the previous comment was published in another language. I am rewriting for correctness.

I, in my small way, believe that man and woman are two sides of the same coin. Let them be each other's compensation.
As has always been the case, even in nature, the woman is the one who has the miracle of procreating and therefore guaranteeing the continuation of the species to which she belongs; man, on the other hand, has always provided food, protected and loved his family, ensuring their longevity.


Obviously these days, in my opinion, women need to have at least a basic understanding of self-defense and the use of weapons, in case they are faced with danger and need to protect themselves and their children.

It is wrong to think that it is a competition as many municipalities do: "it is not right that the woman stays at home and I work" or similar examples, or women fighting for gender equality when it is right that everyone has their role, it's the balance of things.

There must be collaboration and support, encouragement and strength. We must be united and do everything we can to ensure that the war is won so that our children can have a better future under the guidance of Father Satan and the Gods.

 

[Ashtup ILum Mari]

But 1 man and 49 women, the one man would be able to impregnate all of them

Genghis Khan mode on

 

[Priest - Alexandros Iowno]

The question often arises because of a psyop that is expected to be existent in our world. Women going to war, men are more likely to go and enrol in war. In reality it is just a marketing scheme to influence men to go to war. The females are rarely deployed in the armed conflict, but should be placed in desk military jobs that can have contact with the soliders. I will expose some facts on another level, and the nuance here is complex. If you are running a country or you are a commander, you should be able to employ in certain positions women "to go to war", but this is done to entice soldiers, morale and market people to enroll. Most people cannot do anything else exceptional in their lives but go to fucking war, only now unfortunately most purpose of any war is absolute a LIE and not ethical. There's nothing to even die for in this fucking world in a war, but for the safety of your family and lineage, which is the war every man endures in all forms in life.

However, in an ideal scenario this is a strategic move, and it is not a debate of the power of a woman in armed conflict, but a marketing asset and element of ease among the active soldiers. This element needs to be present, because there is another issue present here. A solider in foreign or innate land will need to have a sense of proximity with a feminine element and won't even mention why.

Females are needed in war but in other ways than armed conflict. Females should fight the psychological war. They have an active job of keeping themselves and families safe and protecting the lineage and the soldier knowing this as a fact. Select few are also needed to be in proximity of the soldiers consciousness - active memory and acknowledgement of females forces a man to be a MAN - have a sense of control over the unimaginable chaos of war.

In war, you have to be reminded that you are not a pussy but a man. Sorry to put it directly, you have to remember that you possess a dick, and you are a dominating and brave, assertive force that is able to take lives, execute and be an assassin as much as accepting death when it comes. This in levels cannot happen but in relation to a female anyway - lover, mother, family, children etc. are all product of female and male working together.

For a war to be won, men and women need to work together and play their role societally and individually.