Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Putin's answer to the attack

edwardtgao8

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2006
Messages
157
Putin answered on the attack with one-sided withdrawal from the memorandum that obligates America and Russia to not attack each other if their ways cross inside Syrian battefield, but only local opponents of their allies. Which means in Russian language that now all non-Russian and non-Assad's planes crossing Syrian sky will be attacked by Russian aviation without warning and without reservation. At least so is written in Russian official news.

Which actually can mean start of war, if news are not lie. Putin officially put Russia out of agreement of peace.

http://ren.tv/novosti/2017-04-07/v-krem ... ti-poletov

The press secretary of the Russian President Dmitry Peskov commented on the unilateral withdrawal of Russia from the memorandum of safety on flights in Syria.

"The meaning (agreement) was lost tonight with strikes," Peskov said.

The question of whether Russia is considering the possibility of protecting Syrian military facilities after the US missile attack, Peskov redirected the Defense Ministry. And he recalled that the Russian Armed Forces and the VKS are legitimately located in Syria in connection with the conversion of the legitimate Syrian leadership and will therefore continue to carry out the assigned task of supporting the antiterrorist operation.

The answer to the question whether the way out of the memorandum will increase the risk of clashes with the US, according to Peskov, is obvious.

"Against the backdrop of missile strikes, it's hardly possible to talk about any further increase in the risk." The risk has allready been increased enough, "he said.

Problem is no one patriotic people commenting these news get, kikes want not Putin but Assad and his Syria down. Because it stands in the way of their greater pisrael. It may be like Russian and American kikes just made a deal: "you attack me, we play a war, I have official reason to withdraw from Sirya and betray Assad, you take it down, and our israeli masters have their Greater Israel"

http://ru.rfi.fr/v-mire/20170407-aleksa ... zhu-putina

What threatens the world with the decision of Trump to strike at the military base in Syria, and can Putin now "beautifully" turn his back on Bashar Assad, the military expert, the chief editor of the Daily Journal, Alexander Golts, said in an interview with RFI.

Alexander Golts: This is a terrible blow to Putin's prestige. Russia deployed air defense assets in Syria, hinting in every possible way that if it tries to strike an air strike against Assad, it will intervene. Now Russia has not interfered. And she left the memorandum on preventing possible incidents. This means, first, that Americans are no longer obliged to inform Russia about their actions in Syria, and secondly, Russia reserves the right to act as it sees fit.

This is the story of raising rates. And now we are in an extremely unpleasant situation, when the armed forces of the two countries may find themselves in a direct military confrontation.

Russia very successfully blackmailed President Barack Obama with the possibility of such a situation. And he tried to avoid such a situation. But Trump is not afraid. And all this can end badly.

I do not presume to say. Trump made it clear that he would act as he sees fit without consulting anyone.

... Of course, there was no investigation into the chemical attack (in Khan-Sheikhun), but the leaders of the United States and other Western countries are firmly convinced that the Assad regime is guilty.

However, the version proposed by the Russian side - that Asad's aircraft bombed a chemical ammunition plant - hardly removes responsibility from the Assad regime ... After all, in this case it turns out that either did not know what they were bombing - and then statements that The air strikes of both Russian troops and Assad forces occur only after receiving detailed intelligence information, do not cost a penny. Or they knew that they were bombing, and then it is perfectly clear that Assad's regime wanted / to arrange a chemical attack on this city.

Trump, as you said, will not give up. And it is supported by all Western allies. Is there any way out for Putin now? A "beautiful" way to withdraw, and at the same time removing the threat of the Russian-American clashes?

With some loss of face, you can leave Syria. Already, Russian officials say that we do not make all bets on the Assad regime. But now it is difficult to predict anything. The situation is quite dangerous.


 
Naturally this is a war in which kike company of Saudis, Turkey, Pissrael and neo-cohen poo company again come together. While Teheran is the only sincere Gentile force supporting anti-kike Syria. They make it clear their goal is not putin or pacifist China, but Bashar Assad and his regime. Because it is in the way of pissrael.

https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2017/04/07/ ... sledstviya

The reaction in the world to the US missile strike at the Syrian army base Shirat in the Homs province, as expected, includes a wide range of assessments - from full approval to an extremely negative attitude. To the current moment, the situation on the information field around the most pressing international topic today is as follows.

Russian President Vladimir Putin called the US administration's move aggression against a sovereign state.

The official representative of the Iranian Foreign Ministry, Bahram Kasemi, has stated that Tehran has strictly condemned "such unilateral strikes" which "will strengthen terrorists in Syria and will only complicate the situation in this country and throughout the region." Reports on this are broadcast by the Iranian media.

Western media at the moment emphasize the fact that as a result of strikes by cruise missiles Tomahawk, "distinguished by increased accuracy," from the Mediterranean Sea "Russian sector" on the basis of "Shayrat" was not affected. At the same time, Reuters, Associated Press, France-Presse and other leading information spokespersons of the West note the presence of Russian servicemen at this military facility, 40 km southeast of the city of Homs.

In this regard, CNN reports that the American command in the Middle East had "accurate information" about the deployment of "Russians" based on "Shayrat".

Recall, it was from this Syrian Air Force object that attacks were struck by government aviation in the Khan-Sheikhun area of ​​the province of Idlib on April 4, allegedly with "the use of chemical weapons" (nerve gas sarin is most often mentioned).

The Washington Post noted one of the great advantages of the Tomahawks, which the US military had repeatedly used in conflicts in the Middle East. The missile can be launched at a distance of up to 2,500 km from the target, easily overcoming not the most advanced air defense systems of the enemy.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu supported the "strong and clear signal" of the United States. "In a word, President Trump sent a strong and clear signal today that the use and spread of chemical weapons is unacceptable," the statement by the Chancellery of the head of government said.

[my note, kike Natanyahu never nentioned if he consideres acceptable his own use of NUCLEAR weapon on Syria:

Tactical Nuclear Weapons used in SYRIA by ISIS CIA ISRAELI Terror Forces https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANkCagPLBfw "the secret is that we have America" - Natanyahu]

The Israeli side stressed that it had been advised by the United States of the strikes in advance.

On the issue of "preliminary warning" by the Pentagon of the Russian military before the rocket launches on the base "Shayrat" conflicting information arrives. The American media referring to their sources in the US Department of Defense, according to data on the morning of Friday, continued to insist that such an alert still took place. Although, as previously reported by EADaily, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson spoke on this issue extremely categorically: "We did not give such information to Russians either before or after the strikes."

Indirect evidence of the lack of prior notification was Moscow's decision to suspend the memorandum on the prevention of incidents and ensuring aviation safety during operations in Syria. [my note, war door open]

Turkey at high political and military levels approved the actions of the United States. For example, Vice Prime Minister Numan Kurtulmush noted Ankara's "positive" perception of the step of the American NATO ally, adding that "the international community should continue to express its position against the barbarity of the Syrian regime." This Kurtulmush said in an interview with Fox TV. According to him, Syrian President Bashar Assad should be punished, and the process of Syrian settlement must be intensified.

In this regard, it should be recalled that a few hours before the missile launches of the US Navy, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan directly stated his country's readiness to join the US military operation against the "Syrian regime."

Saudi Arabia expressed its "full support" for the missile strike, adding that it considers him "a bold decision" of President Donald Trump, the television channel Al Jazeera reported.

[my note Saudi Arabia is owned and ruled by kikes:
http://www.whitedeathofislam.josru.com/ ... al-family/
http://www.whitedeathofislam.josru.com/ ... ypto-jews/ ]

Approving comments of the Trump administration's actions are most often accompanied by Western authors stating the "belatedness" of such a step. This, in particular, said the former US Ambassador to Iraq, James Jeffrey.

There are also unequivocal warnings that in case of "repeated use of chemical weapons by Asad," even more serious consequences await him, and the military power of the United States allows "to destroy Assad in one night" (the comment of the former deputy chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff US Jack Keane).

In a conversation with the Air Force, the head of the British Defense Ministry, Michael Fallon, pointed to the "close contact" of the British government with the US "at all levels" in front of the missile strike at the Shayrat base. According to him, launches of cruise missiles were carried out "very carefully" in order to avoid hitting the "Russians in Syria" and "stop future chemical attacks".

China reacted by calling on all parties to exclude further confrontation, France-Presse reported.

Syrian media, referring to the local authorities of the province of Homs, referred to the victims among civilians. The exact figure of the dead and wounded is being specified. According to the latest information, on the basis of "Shayrat"

Statement of the Foreign Ministry: Russia suspends the Memorandum with the United States on Syria
More: https://eadaily.com/en/news/2017/04/07/ ... a-po-serii

In connection with the night missile attack on the airfield of the Syrian army "Shayrat" in Homs, the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued an official statement stating the suspension of the Memorandum on the prevention of incidents and ensuring aviation safety during operations in Syria concluded with the United States, as well as the urgent need Convocation of the UN Security Council.

Http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/spok ... id/2717798
[official governmental resource of Foreign Ministry of Russia. mid.ru, mid = МИД, Министерство Иностранных Дел, there is English version there, badly automatically translated, I translate below]

7.04.1710: 27
Foreign Ministry statement on US military action in Syria on April 7, 2017

692-07-04-2017

De-DE1 en-GB1 es-ES1 en-RU1 fr-FR1

"The United States conducted strikes against the Syrian government in the early hours of April 7, using chemical weapons attacks in the Idlib Province as a pretext.

The US opted in for the show of force, for military action.

It is not the first time that the US chooses an irresponsible approach that aggravates problems the world is facing, and threatens international security. The very presence of military personnel from the United States and other countries in Syria without consent from the Syrian government or a UN Security Council can not be justified. While previous initiatives of this kind were presented as efforts to combat terrorism, now they are clearly an act of aggression against a sovereign Syria. Actions taken by the US today inflict further damage to the Russia-US relations.

Russia has expressed on numerous occasions that it was ready to cooperate on resolving the most urgent issues. However, we will never agree to an unsanctioned action against the legitimate Syrian government that has been waging an uncompromising war on international terrorism for a long time.

Seeking to justify military action Washington has completely distorted what happened in Idlib. The US were well informed that Syria could not use the chemical weapons there. Damascus simply does not have them, as confirmed by a number of times by qualified experts. This was achieved through the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). Over the past few years this organization has been involved in the Syria's chemical weapons program. As for Idlib, the terrorists operating there used to produce toxic land mines for use in Syria and Iraq. These manufacturing facilities were carried out by the Syrian air force.

The US pretends that it does not understand obvious things, turning a blind eye to the use of chemical weapons in Iraq, officially confirmed by Baghdad [my note, they mean ISIL]. The US refuses to believe the evidence provided by certified documents. In doing so, the US is abetting international terrorism and making it stronger. New WMD attacks can be expected.

There is no doubt that the military action has been carried out by the US-led coalition and has escalated humanitarian disaster.

It is obvious that the cruise missile attack was prepared in advance. Any expert understands that Washington's decision on air strikes predates the Idlib events, which is simply served as a pretext for a show of force.

Russia suspends the Memorandum of Understanding on Prevention of Flight Safety Incidents in the course of operations in Syria signed with the US.

We call on the UN Security Council to hold an emergency meeting to discuss the latest developments."

- Foreign Ministry statement on US military action in Syria on April 7, 2017
 
Kike friends (neo-cohens&pissrael) fighting together, and both helping ISIL and coordinating their efforts with it:

US used Israel to attack air base "Shayrat" in Syria
https://riafan.ru/706038-ssha-ispolzova ... at-v-sirii



Syria, April 8. A source in the Lebanese Army told the Federal News Agency (FAN) details of the attack by Tomahawk cruise missiles at the Shayrat airbase.

Two destroyers of the US Navy Porter and Ross, equipped with Aegis missile defense complexes, were still on the 5th of April in the Sicily area of ​​the Mediterranean Sea. At the same time, both destroyers are armed with Tomahawk cruise missiles, anti-aircraft and anti-submarine missiles.

"On April 6, the destroyers Porter and Ross made a sudden and rapid transition, 40 miles southwest of Tel Aviv. At 3.26 (local time, - editorial note), the first volley was fired with Tomahawk missiles, at 3.48 - the second. At the same time, the airspace of Israel and Lebanon was opened for the passage of missiles, "the Lebanese source said, stressing that many military men in Lebanon are outraged by such frank form of US support.

In addition, the very fact of the throw from Sicily to the coast of Israel on the morning of April 6 means that the US decision on the attack was taken much earlier than announced to the allies.

The source also explained the reasons why the Shayrat base was vulnerable to cruise missiles.

"The base" Shayrat "is located 200 kilometers deep in the territory of Syria, far from Russian air defense. Part of the missiles could pass in the region of the Golan Heights, part through Lebanon, using the relief for cover. So, the rockets went at an altitude of about 50 meters straight through the valleys. Russian air defense deployed in Tartus and Khemeymim did not see missiles in the blind zone of radars, "the FAN source explained.

It should be noted that some observers blundered the "Tomahawks" attack from the territory of Israel with the attack of the Israeli Air Force. For example, the Sky News Arabia television channel referring to Syrian opposition sources reported that the Israeli Air Force attacked the military facilities of the Lebanese organization Hezbollah and the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) in the provinces of Damascus and Dar'a on the night of April 7.

In fact, observers recorded the passage of missiles through the territories of Lebanon, Israel and further on the Syrian provinces of Darya, Damascus and Homs. At the same time, according to FAN correspondents, who are in the attack area near the Shayrat airbase, the Tomahawk missiles attacked not only the territory of the base itself, but also checkpoints along the Homs-Palmira route.



"The checkpoints attacked by US missiles protect the highway from the ISIL fighters *. Immediately after the missile attack units of radical Islamists tried to cut the highway, which supplies the group in Palmyra. Thus, we see coordination of actions between ISIL and the US Navy, "correspondents of the FAN were surprised.
 
So state secretary of USA Tillerson went to Moscow to make "ultimatum" to Russian Minster of Foreign Affairs Lavrov: either you choose "Syria, Iran "Hezbolla terrorists" and related" or you choose USA.

https://www.gazeta.ru/politics/2017/04/ ... html#page1

"Secretary of State Rex Tillerson gave Russia an ultimatum. According to the American diplomat, Moscow must decide whether it supports the US and its allies or the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad."

All kike world (Turkey, US neo-con government, Holland's France, whore Merkel, Red China etc.) try to intimidate Russia and push Her into betrayal of Syria. Right now Lavrov and Putin are like "well, I dunno... need further negotiation"

Kike Holland is persuading Russia to betray Assad:
https://news.rambler.ru/world/36599622- ... koy-atake/

This is what China said:
https://ria.ru/syria/20170410/149190177 ... n_partners
According to Tillerson, Xi Jinping said that he "understands" the US actions "because of the death of children." [he means false flag chemical attack]

Tillerson did everything to force Russia (persuade Lavrov and Putin) to "put" Assad "out of office" like if Syria were some kind of Russian chinese puppet so you need to go to Lavrov to tell him to put Syrian president here or there:

https://news.rambler.ru/politics/366037 ... -k-kontsu/

"US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson at a news conference with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that the US position is that the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria is coming to an end.
"Our position is that the Assad regime is coming to an end," Tillerson said.
He noted that Russia "can help understand this reality."

Lavrov said they do not need neither Assad nor any other "puppet", just regime:
"The main thing in Syria is not to remove a certain political character, but to agree on how this state will be organized," Lavrov told reporters at the final press conference.
At the same time, Tillerson noted that the departure of Bashar Assad should "go on in an organized manner" and "take some time"
yet Putin comforted Tillerson that Russia is willing to restore relationship:
https://news.rambler.ru/politics/365859 ... -po-sirii/
"Russian President Vladimir Putin, during a meeting with the US Secretary of State, announced Russia's readiness to return to the memorandum on the prevention of incidents in Syria, should the US confirm the goal of the fight against terrorism."

While they were "making ultimatums" (which Putin called "chinese puppet theatre") to each other, their so called "puppet" Bashar Assad being a real man he is, bombed their neo-con's base in Syria successfully and destroyed a lot of US weapon (freely granted to ISIL). So Mr. Tillerson had to return back where he belongs and ask smb else to "put Assad here and there".

https://news.rambler.ru/world/36567334- ... rroristov/

"Attacks on the airbase in Syria The United States tried to raise the spirit of terrorists, but Washington failed to achieve its goals. This was stated by Syrian President Bashar Assad during a telephone conversation with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani.

"The US failed to achieve its goals with this aggression, trying to raise the morale of the terrorist groups they supported after the victories of the Syrian army and people, which proved that they are determined to destroy terrorism on every scrap of Syrian land," SANA quotes Bashar Al-Assad. Rowhani, in turn, condemned "US aggression on Syrian soil" and confirmed that "American aggression is a grave violation of Syrian sovereignty and all international rules and treaties."

"White NS" "anti-migrant" Trump raising islamic spirit in Syria... and even in this he failed.

So neo-cons jewed away from Syria and moved to try to pick up with North Korea. And Red China moved their 150 000 troops to North Korean border, nuclear weapon is ready to be used, because all 3 countries have it a lot.

[in English] https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3304141/k ... ea-latest/
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Shaitan

Back
Top