Humans as gold-mining slaves

[FancyMancy]

https://www.satanisgod.org/www.angelfire.com/empire/serpentis666/ABOUT.html

As we know, satanisgod.org is the new site, yet it is still saying that we were to be gold-mining slaves, after which we were to be destroyed. I thought that was something that stitchin or whomever came up with and is bullshit, yet it is still on here, on our new site. It also says those who were to use us changed their minds and then decided to love us and uplift us instead. Did I miss something?

https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=13232 seems to explain that it was from a Yehubor who said that, but on the ABOUT.html page it is saying that was Satan and the Gods' and Goddesses' intention, but then changed Their minds. If it was just a Yehubor's idea which is false, then it shouldn't be on the page, saying that that was the intention, at all. If it was not the original intention, then it should not be on the ABOUT.html page, or it must be on it for whatever confusing reason, then it should say that that was just a Yehubor's idea and was not the original intended purpose for Humans.

Why am I still confused about this?

 

[Vaal]

Also, on the main website, you can still see the circles around the pentagram.

 

[Shael]

I think there have been two different theories going around.

1) Humans were intended to be slaves, but then befriended by our Gods who changed their mind and decided to make us like them.

2) Humans were from the start intended to be made like the Gods, and the "mining for gold" was just an allegory for attaining immortality.

In either case, the following events followed;
The idea of us humans becoming immortal made some Gods furious as they did not like the idea of others becoming as powerful as them. These Gods went to become the "enemy Nordics" that we talk about today, and ended up banding together with Reptilians to start the war that is going on today.

This is all the knowledge we publicly have available as far as I'm aware. Maybe some other members can share more knowledge than what I did here.

 

[Vaal]

Also, on the main website, you can still see the circles around the pentagram.

Not that I have any problem with it. Just saying.

 

[Baelfire]

Also, on the main website, you can still see the circles around the pentagram.

A circle around a pentagram (without Yehuborim letters) is fine. But the circle around the Baphomet means binding, and that's bad.

 

[Stormblood]

I don't think enemy nordics are gods.

 

[Vaal]

Also, on the main website, you can still see the circles around the pentagram.

A circle around a pentagram (without Yehuborim letters) is fine. But the circle around the Baphomet means binding, and that's bad.

I'm talking about a circle around Baphomet in the JOS logo. You can still kinda see purple rounds , if you look closely.

 

[Stormblood]

Also, on the main website, you can still see the circles around the pentagram.

A circle around a pentagram (without Yehuborim letters) is fine. But the circle around the Baphomet means binding, and that's bad.

Circles are binding all-in-all. If one wants to use a symbol as container of power, the Ing rune is the most suited.

 

[Seby]

It makes sense to me that Father Satan created us to expand His empire. We're both His army and His family.
If we were Gods when the reptilians attacked the war would have ended sooner.

 

[Baelfire]

Also, on the main website, you can still see the circles around the pentagram.

A circle around a pentagram (without Yehuborim letters) is fine. But the circle around the Baphomet means binding, and that's bad.

Circles are binding all-in-all. If one wants to use a symbol as container of power, the Ing rune is the most suited.

https://www.ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=3007

The Pythagoreans showed creation as the pentagram within the circle with the number 666.

The pentagram (5 elements) and the circle (kundalini).

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

...however, now we're saying that these "lower race of (enemy) Nordics" don't actually exist in the sense of being enemies, but do exist and are not our enemies, because it is just greys projecting such images of them/Them into people's minds..., and they never actually defected from Satan for being upset that we could be more powerful than they/They. So then, who is/are "The Demons" who "are the Nephilim, [the Original Gods] the ancient extra-terrestrials who came to Earth to mine for gold thousands of years ago."? Satan, etc. who then changed His and Their minds? The reptillians/others, who are being called gods and goddesses here? If the reptilians, etc., cannot advance like, nor as far as, we can, then they are not gods nor goddesses and should not be called such.

This is something that I have told you because it is my opinion, and some other people have agreed. But obviously I'm not a god and I don't really know.

Also, that page is old and not all correct. It is partly based on Zachariah Sitchin's writings, who is a rat and a liar. It needs to be updated and corrected. So don't just take all that it says as the truth.

 

[Stormblood]

A circle around a pentagram (without Yehuborim letters) is fine. But the circle around the Baphomet means binding, and that's bad.

Circles are binding all-in-all. If one wants to use a symbol as container of power, the Ing rune is the most suited.

https://www.ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=3007

The Pythagoreans showed creation as the pentagram within the circle with the number 666.

The pentagram (5 elements) and the circle (kundalini).

When you quote, please don't put words in the author's mouth. Were did Mageson state the circle is the kundalini? Nowhere. The circle is a symbol for the Sun and spirit. Kundalini is the lightning bolt going into the pentagram.

 

[FancyMancy]

...however, now we're saying that these "lower race of (enemy) Nordics" don't actually exist in the sense of being enemies, but do exist and are not our enemies, because it is just greys projecting such images of them/Them into people's minds..., and they never actually defected from Satan for being upset that we could be more powerful than they/They. So then, who is/are "The Demons" who "are the Nephilim, [the Original Gods] the ancient extra-terrestrials who came to Earth to mine for gold thousands of years ago."? Satan, etc. who then changed His and Their minds? The reptillians/others, who are being called gods and goddesses here? If the reptilians, etc., cannot advance like, nor as far as, we can, then they are not gods nor goddesses and should not be called such.

This is something that I have told you because it is my opinion, and some other people have agreed. But obviously I'm not a god and I don't really know.

Also, that page is old and not all correct. It is partly based on Zachariah Sitchin's writings, who is a rat and a liar. It needs to be updated and corrected. So don't just take all that it says as the truth.

n00bs will, and that is my point.

 

[Baelfire]

Circles are binding all-in-all. If one wants to use a symbol as container of power, the Ing rune is the most suited.

https://www.ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=3007

The Pythagoreans showed creation as the pentagram within the circle with the number 666.

The pentagram (5 elements) and the circle (kundalini).

When you quote, please don't put words in the author's mouth. Were did Mageson state the circle is the kundalini? Nowhere. The circle is a symbol for the Sun and spirit. Kundalini is the lightning bolt going into the pentagram.

I'm sorry. I didn't mean to say that he stated that. I read that in the previous forum, so I added it to my reply.

 

[Stormblood]

https://www.ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=3007

The pentagram (5 elements) and the circle (kundalini).

When you quote, please don't put words in the author's mouth. Were did Mageson state the circle is the kundalini? Nowhere. The circle is a symbol for the Sun and spirit. Kundalini is the lightning bolt going into the pentagram.

I'm sorry. I didn't mean to say that he stated that. I read that in the previous forum, so I added it to my reply.

I read on other topic what you meant. The serpent circling the pentagram. I don't know what to tell you about that. It probably a way of fusing the two meanings: the kundalini and the circle. Is that right? No need to be sorry. It's all fine.