Welcome to the Temple of Zeus's Official Forums!

Welcome to the official forums for the Temple of Zeus. Please consider registering an account to join our community.

For Future Updates

Joined
Jan 14, 2026
Messages
112
I think it would be much better if clergy is to drop updates that heavily conflict with previous levels of understanding, to do it in a way that directly addresses this.

A good example is the recent one. It could have gone like, "For a long time we have had the understanding that Hebrews are entirely of the enemy, with claims going in the direction of them being a creation of the enemy and eternally damned to that level of existence. We are now entering a new, more truthful and truthful level of understanding the problem."

"The Hebrews are regular people who got hijacked and corrupted by Yehubor, a process that can happen to anyone and has historically happened to many all over the world. Petty name calling and hate keeps the world in an unending cycle of abuse and victimisation, keeping the world perpetually damned and controlled by Yehubor. To raise the temple above these limiting and undoubtedly problematic contexts, we are leaving the era of petty antisemitism behind, politics, pointless hate and anything else related. The following material will explain everything in depth, and anyone who has a question is welcome to ask."

Virtually no one would have had an issue, unless they are Yehuborim or plain dumb.

Instead we are forced to confront things we got from clergy themselves and had come to deeply understand as absolute truth, and then attacked for experiencing obstacles absorbing the new information immediately or having certain reactions.

Those who go as far as attacking clergy directly are definitely in another category, but I believe people are not crazy for believing what clergy itself taught them.

An approach similar to the one I've described will help many people advance to the next level in understanding quickly.

Much thanks to clergy for all their work. I write this because I believe there will be many more updates that completely contrast old knowledge that people undoubtedly have strong attachment to. This doesn't make them evil, it simply shows their conviction in the works of HPS Maxine and the older works of HPHC.
 
I think it would be much better if clergy is to drop updates that heavily conflict with previous levels of understanding, to do it in a way that directly addresses this.

A good example is the recent one. It could have gone like, "For a long time we have had the understanding that Hebrews are entirely of the enemy, with claims going in the direction of them being a creation of the enemy and eternally damned to that level of existence. We are now entering a new, more truthful and truthful level of understanding the problem."

"The Hebrews are regular people who got hijacked and corrupted by Yehubor, a process that can happen to anyone and has historically happened to many all over the world. Petty name calling and hate keeps the world in an unending cycle of abuse and victimisation, keeping the world perpetually damned and controlled by Yehubor. To raise the temple above these limiting and undoubtedly problematic contexts, we are leaving the era of petty antisemitism behind, politics, pointless hate and anything else related. The following material will explain everything in depth, and anyone who has a question is welcome to ask."
If this did not happen inside one's mind as one read the update, then there is a bit of dumbness involved, sorry. And they did state that anyway, simply with a bit different wording. Semantics.
 
This is also a factor of mental “plasticity.” When knowledge is lacking, one cannot connect the dots, leading to adverse reactions stemming from the inability to make the connection.

For this reason, it has been suggested that you meditate on this, rather than lashing out, so that the Gods may guide you toward the connections you are missing, in order to gain clarity.

The concept of “evil,” in reality, has never belonged to anyone. Even in ancient civilizations, the polarization of the universe was already mentioned. Just as in the Jos and the ToZ.

The point here is that the update provided is very straightforward, and it is clear that there is no error. Because it reflects exactly how things are.

If it were true that “evil” were a race, this would imply that “evil” could be permanently eradicated. But this is not possible. The universe itself would collapse.

True evil is that which deceives (Yehubor), not that which destroys.
 
If this did not happen inside one's mind as one read the update, then there is a bit of dumbness involved, sorry. And they did state that anyway, simply with a bit different wording. Semantics.
Surface explanation. Decades of information repeated and reinforced doesn't just get put aside because it was vaguely hinted that the old knowledge is outdated.

Some new people who were reading clergy's own extensive antisemitic material from the past had to just take the new update and don't even know what to do with the old material.

It is necessary to address outdated knowledge and explain why it is outdated.
 
This is also a factor of mental “plasticity.” When knowledge is lacking, one cannot connect the dots, leading to adverse reactions stemming from the inability to make the connection.

For this reason, it has been suggested that you meditate on this, rather than lashing out, so that the Gods may guide you toward the connections you are missing, in order to gain clarity.

The concept of “evil,” in reality, has never belonged to anyone. Even in ancient civilizations, the polarization of the universe was already mentioned. Just as in the Jos and the ToZ.

The point here is that the update provided is very straightforward, and it is clear that there is no error. Because it reflects exactly how things are.

If it were true that “evil” were a race, this would imply that “evil” could be permanently eradicated. But this is not possible. The universe itself would collapse.

True evil is that which deceives (Yehubor), not that which destroys.
I don't know why you're adopting a holier than thou attitude when I am already past the block I had initially. Just explaining how we can have less issues in the future. Where did I disagree with anything for you to lecture and correct me? Chill.
 
Surface explanation. Decades of information repeated and reinforced doesn't just get put aside because it was vaguely hinted that the old knowledge is outdated.

Some new people who were reading clergy's own extensive antisemitic material from the past had to just take the new update and don't even know what to do with the old material.

It is necessary to address outdated knowledge and explain why it is outdated.
Since when dumbing down the occult became a good idea?
 
Releasing this knowledge during a Mercury Retrograde was not the best of ideas either.

You'd both be ovening and lambasting anyone else other than HP if they had said "not all hebrews are bad" just 2 weeks ago, but now it's an "evolution" because HP said so, not necessarily because I disagree with it, I don't. I thought the whole "anyone with even 0.1% hebrew DNA is pure evil" rhetoric was dumb as fuck, but if I said that 2 weeks ago I'd get ovened, but HP wished a "r a b b i" a long happy life and everyone's ok with it, and to be fair I do respect Tzadok as he clearly has a lot of good knowledge, but again, if I or anyone else had wished Tzadok a long happy life, we'd get mass ovened.

Disciple said nothing wrong. Patronising him like this is.
 
Surface explanation. Decades of information repeated and reinforced doesn't just get put aside because it was vaguely hinted that the old knowledge is outdated.

Some new people who were reading clergy's own extensive antisemitic material from the past had to just take the new update and don't even know what to do with the old material.

It is necessary to address outdated knowledge and explain why it is outdated.

Misunderstanding decades of information is not the same as us flipping.

People also misunderstood "no mediators" to this day. People misunderstood "enemy Nordics" to this day, in spite of clarification.
People on this Forum TO THIS DAY state that the Gods are only aliens and not something greater, not because more clarification wasn't given, but out of ignorance.

Did you read the sermon on "Demistifying Israel"? Doesn't that make it clear that Israelites weren't "ontologically opposite", but rather corrupted over time?

Does ANY material in ToZ say that the tribe of Israel came here on spaceships? It doesn't? Good, so that means that their basic semitic biology was created and engineered on by the Gods.
Oh, it actually says they struck Yehuboric deals? Good, makes sense.

"But it says they had different souls! Doesn't that make them ontologically different?"

I think a lot of people aren't making a certain conclusion that ToZ was clear on from the very beginning. A soul isn't binary.

Stating that Israelites are missing this or that Chakra doesn't mean they are ontologically different, because of one thing: Most Gentiles don't have these either.

The soul structure ToZ explains is purely theoretical for Joey on the street who doesn't meditate. "You and an Israelite don't have the same soul" in the exact same way that you and Joey on the street don't have the same soul.
ToZ has always been clear that the soul is a complex mechanism and that a lot of it is BUILT.

To see the Hebrew soul as fundamentally different out of some "born wrong" mentality and not as corrupted by Yehubor influence is the same pitfall people who take pride in their skin alone and have no achievements to show for it fall into.

"I have this Gentile soul and that makes me so great, I can do this and that that a Hebrew definitely can't do." It's a lot of "can do", not a lot of done. For all intents and purposes, all Gentile souls are equally atrophied before any work is done.
Most Israelites are simply in a much, much worse karmic position. Nothing else.

To say this has always been the case is not rewriting history.
 
Releasing this knowledge during a Mercury Retrograde was not the best of ideas either.

You'd both be ovening and lambasting anyone else other than HP if they had said "not all hebrews are bad" just 2 weeks ago, but now it's an "evolution" because HP said so, not necessarily because I disagree with it, I don't. I thought the whole "anyone with even 0.1% hebrew DNA is pure evil" rhetoric was dumb as fuck, but if I said that 2 weeks ago I'd get ovened, but HP wished a "r a b b i" a long happy life and everyone's ok with it, and to be fair I do respect Tzadok as he clearly has a lot of good knowledge, but again, if I or anyone else had wished Tzadok a long happy life, we'd get mass ovened.

Disciple said nothing wrong. Patronising him like this is.

If this was the case, which it was, for many people, they should in fact be feeling even better and even more relaxed by this. I had to do it first.

As I have said, despite of my antagonists perceiving me as evil or "Demonic" and liable to extermination; I hold no lesser hatred for them and I will recognize their merits as misguided souls who can also, find the Truth. This distinct us from the enemy, who is rife with empty hatred. We have escaped this loop collectively and surpassed the limitation of this.

To show good will for a person who literally went open, in spite of potentially risking their life and being inside peak Yehubor around him, to prove major conclusive points - not for us, but for the sake of facts, is not bad. He literally dismantled on his own, major aspects of the Yehubor, by himself. This was a net positive for us in general. Religious fundies in Israel might not like it, so they have a problem with Tzadok in general especially.

Yehubor's leader Tzadok is a very rare case of an actually meditating person; he is somewhere advanced, saw some segments of facts, returned back and said certain facts openly which would be highly upsetting to others who are total fundamentalists. He understands "Israel" is not the only "Chosen People" but he cannot speak about it (his life will be the cost). Further, Tzadok is NOT the first one historically to do this;

Elisha ben Avuyah, known as "Acher" (the Other). He is the one who, upon entering Pardes (he ascended highly spiritually by meditation), "cut the plantings" it's called in Hebrew Kabbalah - which is interpreted as becoming a heretic in Judaism. He saw the Metatron seated (given permission to sit on that dimension) and concluded there must be "two powers in heaven" - which was considered heresy in rabbinic Judaism. He saw in other words our Gods. After this, he deserted Judaism.

Even popes, such as Pope Sylvester II, went a bit far spiritually and saw the Gods by accident; he privately betrayed the Vatican and engaged in "pagan studies", "demonology", "astrology" and everything that was forbidden by the Church. Pope Honorius the third, also went far into Demonology and privately abandonned the Church; which considered him to be under "Demonic Agency".

Tzadok, Sylvester and Honorius, have been affected by the Gods; as the Gods stand ABOVE the Yehubor in their culture. Original seekers who meddle with the Gods, will be influenced by them whether they like it or not. They were in the enemy's structure, but they privately and in many cases without their will, worked for the benefits of the Gods.

There is also another case; "REBBE SATANOV" - Issac Satanov. This one literally had the name "SATAN" etched into his name (I wonder where the statements that they cannot stand the word Satan come from... Anyway.

Isaac SATANov, who was a Rebbe or religious leader in Judaism, also did another fatal sin and rebellion against Judaism; this was to attempt instating regular, epistemological knowledge for Hebrews. But here is the irony that makes him diagnostically significant: Satanow's prolific literary endeavors, which were, for the most part, traditional in nature, also provided the tools for the erosion of the accepted tenets of Judaism.

When he understood most of Judaism is literally Birbur and Atibilbil, he tried to amend it from the inside; he was called heretic by many contemporary hebrews as he tried to, "Gods forbid", promote secular and logical knowledge for Judaism. His literary activities coincide with the beginning of the important process of the destruction of traditional Judaic values and some fundamental concepts of classical Hebraic civilization. They saw him as someone who was destroying core-Judaism, pretty much. As about his name, I will leave you to think about it.

Certainly, I have no bad wishes for him or anyone who does this. They might in the future desert Yehuboric constructs and join the Truth. That is not up to me to decide; the Gods influenced them to try to quell the expansion and fundamentalism of the Yehubor; they might not have succeeded, but they serve as examples.

Stop underestimating the Gods. People can figure things out. If they advance outside of Yehuboric influence, they can actually do good things. Yes, even some who are infested while growing in the culture of Yehubor.

Now these points are not only able to be said, but they can be put on proper grounds.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Shaitan

Back
Top