What they didn't implement during COVID, they are implementing now. UK digital ID. Speak ill of the government or publish “misinformation” online, and your digital identity and access to the financial system will be revoked.
Latest News
Digital ID
- Thread starter StyleCoin
- Start date
Acolyte Of Pan 666
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2024
- Messages
- 1,132
Luckily voting can change this. Remember to pick up a sign, march down the street and shout a phrase 2000 times as well. Don't forget to signal your discormfort to them online as well about this, that'll change their mind.
Vote right to halt (insert evil agenda here) pushed by the left, then they just keep it going or make it worse. Vote left to halt (insert evil agenda here) pushed by the right, then they just keep it going or make it worse. Round and round the stupid wheel we go.
The sheep didn't get it 100 years ago, they won't get it now and never will.
Vote right to halt (insert evil agenda here) pushed by the left, then they just keep it going or make it worse. Vote left to halt (insert evil agenda here) pushed by the right, then they just keep it going or make it worse. Round and round the stupid wheel we go.
The sheep didn't get it 100 years ago, they won't get it now and never will.
ChildrenOfTheGods
New member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2023
- Messages
- 64
Now we are waiting only for complete digitalization of money...
AFODO
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2022
- Messages
- 4,147
In Hungary the Digital Citizenship Program is not that bad. But why would they revoke your right to financial system for speaking ill of the government? In here they have no right to control that + we have at least this much free speech. Banks have their own will for what they terminate service for a customer.
It doesn't change much for us, only that now you can get a lot of things done online. Some things you can only do online, some things offline, some both. But do they have more power over us now? I don't see that, they can do whatever they could do already. Socials are also not connected to this.
But it could be different in Britain, idk about that, they gone wild with a lot of stuff nowadays. I hope the patience of the British people are coming to an end.
It doesn't change much for us, only that now you can get a lot of things done online. Some things you can only do online, some things offline, some both. But do they have more power over us now? I don't see that, they can do whatever they could do already. Socials are also not connected to this.
But it could be different in Britain, idk about that, they gone wild with a lot of stuff nowadays. I hope the patience of the British people are coming to an end.
DisillusionedCitizen
Active member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2022
- Messages
- 530
Nonviolent protest being useless aside, the people need to think outside the official narrative and realize that the (Abrahmic) religions they support is the problem, not (primarily) the politicians (this is still half-true). These religions either meddle in politics/government (like the late Frank Zappa mentioned), and/or need a political guise to carry out their plans effectively.
Recently, I've looked into the narrative fallacy. Just as recently, I've realized that the narrative is one of the only few things going for these religions; ever since the choice to separate religion and government was made in response to religious tyranny in the Middle Ages, a large number of people (Atheists primarily) simply assume incorrectly that only the government and the politicians are the problem and religion have nothing to do with it simply because of the narrative from that one choice in history. Nowadays, I find narratives to be a crutch at worst; while stories can be used to make sense of the world, people (outside this place, that is) have this tendency to over-rely on them to piece things together. And when they fail to have ALL the pieces, they double down and try again with the same method, thinking they would succeed in their next attempt.
In any case, people need to take official and extreme measures to declare physical war on Judaism, Christianity, and Islam in every capacity; without the politicians protecting these religions, things would quickly go downhill for them, and more critically, the Jewish plans for their conquest.
Recently, I've looked into the narrative fallacy. Just as recently, I've realized that the narrative is one of the only few things going for these religions; ever since the choice to separate religion and government was made in response to religious tyranny in the Middle Ages, a large number of people (Atheists primarily) simply assume incorrectly that only the government and the politicians are the problem and religion have nothing to do with it simply because of the narrative from that one choice in history. Nowadays, I find narratives to be a crutch at worst; while stories can be used to make sense of the world, people (outside this place, that is) have this tendency to over-rely on them to piece things together. And when they fail to have ALL the pieces, they double down and try again with the same method, thinking they would succeed in their next attempt.
In any case, people need to take official and extreme measures to declare physical war on Judaism, Christianity, and Islam in every capacity; without the politicians protecting these religions, things would quickly go downhill for them, and more critically, the Jewish plans for their conquest.
Similar threads
