Budhism SUCKS

[Silent Godess]

Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.

 

[daitsun88]

Yeah, it's rules are meant to be applied to power meditation only, not in real life. If you apply them in real life you'll destroy yourself. For example if you start power meditations you should not have any attachments to your senses or worries or criticism, you won't advance with those. But in your life you can do anything you want.

I've studied everything about Theravada Buddhism, and its actually inverted Laveyan Satanism, they are suicidal spiritual reductionist atheists, they view Buddha as the first teacher and follow his teachings not as a god or something I don't know about other sects of Buddhism though.

Our meditations are also a lot more powerful than the buddhist ones and we don't need to meditate 9 hours a day to access our powers like Buddhist monks do.

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@... wrote:

Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.

 

[[email protected]]

Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@... wrote:

Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.

 

[daitsun88]

And that's the hypocrisy here, no desires, but they do have a desire to "liberate" themselves from suffering...

"but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead."

They've predicted and made an excuse for this part as well, they think there are higher planes of existence and desires and ego is what binds us to this "lower plane" here and causes us to be reborn every time we die.

Its easy to see it is an imbalanced religion, because Buddhism is spiritual reductionism in its pure form, the complete opposite of total materialism. It tells us that the self is an illusion and any physical things are impermanent and only something beyond physical existance (it is pretty nonsensical here, because Buddhists don't believe we have a permanent soul) is real. Just the opposite of close-minded atheists who believe that only materiality exists.

I've looked into both and I like Spiritual Satanism because it is a balanced religion, and has the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism (and Laveyanism), pleasure and spiritual powers and the Gods as our guides

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@..." <moonshadow48@... wrote:

Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:

Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.

 

[davidcommer]

I love the way you sum up the value of Spiritual Satanism -- the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism. Not to mention the complete rejection of any right-hand path religion.

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "daitsun88" <daitsun88@... wrote:

And that's the hypocrisy here, no desires, but they do have a desire to "liberate" themselves from suffering...

"but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead."

They've predicted and made an excuse for this part as well, they think there are higher planes of existence and desires and ego is what binds us to this "lower plane" here and causes us to be reborn every time we die.

Its easy to see it is an imbalanced religion, because Buddhism is spiritual reductionism in its pure form, the complete opposite of total materialism. It tells us that the self is an illusion and any physical things are impermanent and only something beyond physical existance (it is pretty nonsensical here, because Buddhists don't believe we have a permanent soul) is real. Just the opposite of close-minded atheists who believe that only materiality exists.

I've looked into both and I like Spiritual Satanism because it is a balanced religion, and has the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism (and Laveyanism), pleasure and spiritual powers and the Gods as our guides


--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@" <moonshadow48@ wrote:

Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:

Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.

 

[davidcommer]

You can't even have the desire not to have desires. That sounds, ahem, seriously fucked up to me.

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@..." <moonshadow48@... wrote:

Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:

Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.

 

[Allison P]

yeah, buddhism bites. I thought I wanted to be one for a while, but
when I actually started reading about its philosophies, I said fuck
that! All that 'life is suffering' bullshit, and you must abandon
your desires...nope. Most definitely not for me! Though, Daitson's
probably right; if you apply some of their teachings to power
meditation, you might get results, but as a guide to life...no. Hail
Father Satan!

On 6/29/10, moonshadow48@... <moonshadow48@... wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from
"suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as
well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@... wrote:

Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a
few hours and it's horrible.

 

[chalchiuhnenetzin]

I looked at Buddhism only in a very superficial manner, out of curiosity basically. It is far, far too depressing!

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Allison P <apocalypseofjon@... wrote:

yeah, buddhism bites. I thought I wanted to be one for a while, but
when I actually started reading about its philosophies, I said fuck
that! All that 'life is suffering' bullshit, and you must abandon
your desires...nope. Most definitely not for me! Though, Daitson's
probably right; if you apply some of their teachings to power
meditation, you might get results, but as a guide to life...no. Hail
Father Satan!

On 6/29/10, moonshadow48@... <moonshadow48@... wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from
"suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as
well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:

Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a
few hours and it's horrible.

 

[waltermassey1]

That is a very big misconception, it is not "desire" that you are to remove from your life, but material desires. For example, excess food or entertainment (tv, computer, etc).

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "daitsun88" <daitsun88@... wrote:

And that's the hypocrisy here, no desires, but they do have a desire to "liberate" themselves from suffering...

"but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead."

They've predicted and made an excuse for this part as well, they think there are higher planes of existence and desires and ego is what binds us to this "lower plane" here and causes us to be reborn every time we die.

Its easy to see it is an imbalanced religion, because Buddhism is spiritual reductionism in its pure form, the complete opposite of total materialism. It tells us that the self is an illusion and any physical things are impermanent and only something beyond physical existance (it is pretty nonsensical here, because Buddhists don't believe we have a permanent soul) is real. Just the opposite of close-minded atheists who believe that only materiality exists.

I've looked into both and I like Spiritual Satanism because it is a balanced religion, and has the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism (and Laveyanism), pleasure and spiritual powers and the Gods as our guides


--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@" <moonshadow48@ wrote:

Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:

Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.

 

[waltermassey1]

So, this is how you see it.

Siddhartha Gautama: born a prince, hidden from the bad things of life, sees the bad things, vows to change them, becomes a beggar on the streets and lives an ascetic life, finds enlightenment after a few decades of meditation, and becomes a spiritual teacher, then dies of old age.

Sun god mythology: I am going to go with Horus here, because his story is commonly known to have been stolen by the christians to become the story of their savior, jesus.

Horus born of the virgin goddess Isis in a cave, became a child teacher, had 12 disciples, performed miracles, has many followers, and then is crucified and comes back from the dead.

The ONLY similarity i see in these two is that they were both, in their own way, teachers. I do not see how Siddhartha's tale was christianized, as his birth was before the widespread adoption of the christian religion, and was in a different part of the world (across the Asian continent)

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@... wrote:

He never existed his tale is a repeat of the sun god mythology but in a christianized form. It's time to move beyond the falsehoods of the RHP and their false icons.




________________________________
From: waltermassey1 <walter_massey@...
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Fri, July 2, 2010 8:16:40 AM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS

 
Gautama Buddha (born Siddhārtha Gautama) was never considered to be a "god" in the buddhist religion, but a man who had a good idea that turned into a way of living. Even calling buddhism a religion is wrong, it is, as i have said, a way of living one's life.

He was never considered the son of a god (although in one instance he was thought to be a spirit answering a girl's prayers, but that was due to his appearance), nor did he perform miracles. He was, at his most basic, a teacher. Albeit a teacher with many students, but a teacher nonetheless.

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@ wrote:

To be honest Buddhism especially Mahayana branch is simply an enemy religion. It was designed to phase in their paradigm by covering over and corrupting the Aryan one left by the Gods. It was the first xanity. It also despite it's claims and inspite of ruling a 3rd of the earth once. Has brought no enlightenment. Only removed and corrupted enough Satanic spiritual knowledge to ensure none was to be had.  Also Buddha never existed it's the first christ character and a corruption of the Solar mytho's. About 2500 years ago the enemy struck a major blow to humanity in the East and later the West. The RHP is not more then that age, where Satanism is from the dawn of Humanity.

The Tibet issue is interesting as the Dali Lama postion is not any older then 600 years and did not have the power famed for till the 17th century. Buddism weakened Tibet internally so bad that a people once strong warriors who defeated their enemies for hundreds of years. Where toppled in a few days. Where the enemy can not take by direct force they weaken within so they will fall either by outside force  at a later time or internal subversion over time.

The xanization of the East allowed for the islamics to sweep in far as well.




________________________________
From: davidcommer <davidcommer@
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Tue, June 29, 2010 12:31:55 PM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS

 
I love the way you sum up the value of Spiritual Satanism -- the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism. Not to mention the complete rejection of any right-hand path religion.

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "daitsun88" <daitsun88@ wrote:

And that's the hypocrisy here, no desires, but they do have a desire to "liberate" themselves from suffering...

"but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead."

They've predicted and made an excuse for this part as well, they think there are higher planes of existence and desires and ego is what binds us to this "lower plane" here and causes us to be reborn every time we die.

Its easy to see it is an imbalanced religion, because Buddhism is spiritual reductionism in its pure form, the complete opposite of total materialism. It tells us that the self is an illusion and any physical things are impermanent and only something beyond physical existance (it is pretty nonsensical here, because Buddhists don't believe we have a permanent soul) is real. Just the opposite of close-minded atheists who believe that only materiality exists.

I've looked into both and I like Spiritual Satanism because it is a balanced religion, and has the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism (and Laveyanism), pleasure and spiritual powers and the Gods as our guides


--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@" <moonshadow48@ wrote:

Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:

Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.

 

[Hui Lin]

how can u say he never existed? there are actual records of his birth and stuff. whether u believe in his teachings or not, cause xians did corrupt alot of it. and i was a buddhist before i converted, but i still practice it every other time. real buddhism doesnt suck and if u know the actual truth, then u would know. then again the real books are in chinese, im chinese, maybe it makes a difference. ive read some books that are in english and the translation are so wrong, i dont even pick an english book up anymore. so there!

From: waltermassey1 <walter_massey@...
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, July 2, 2010 7:56:11 AM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS

  So, this is how you see it.

Siddhartha Gautama: born a prince, hidden from the bad things of life, sees the bad things, vows to change them, becomes a beggar on the streets and lives an ascetic life, finds enlightenment after a few decades of meditation, and becomes a spiritual teacher, then dies of old age.

Sun god mythology: I am going to go with Horus here, because his story is commonly known to have been stolen by the christians to become the story of their savior, jesus.

Horus born of the virgin goddess Isis in a cave, became a child teacher, had 12 disciples, performed miracles, has many followers, and then is crucified and comes back from the dead.

The ONLY similarity i see in these two is that they were both, in their own way, teachers. I do not see how Siddhartha's tale was christianized, as his birth was before the widespread adoption of the christian religion, and was in a different part of the world (across the Asian continent)

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@... wrote:

He never existed his tale is a repeat of the sun god mythology but in a christianized form. It's time to move beyond the falsehoods of the RHP and their false icons.




________________________________
From: waltermassey1 <walter_massey@...
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Fri, July 2, 2010 8:16:40 AM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS

 
Gautama Buddha (born Siddh&#257;rtha Gautama) was never considered to be a "god" in the buddhist religion, but a man who had a good idea that turned into a way of living. Even calling buddhism a religion is wrong, it is, as i have said, a way of living one's life.

He was never considered the son of a god (although in one instance he was thought to be a spirit answering a girl's prayers, but that was due to his appearance), nor did he perform miracles. He was, at his most basic, a teacher. Albeit a teacher with many students, but a teacher nonetheless.

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@ wrote:

To be honest Buddhism especially Mahayana branch is simply an enemy religion. It was designed to phase in their paradigm by covering over and corrupting the Aryan one left by the Gods. It was the first xanity. It also despite it's claims and inspite of ruling a 3rd of the earth once. Has brought no enlightenment. Only removed and corrupted enough Satanic spiritual knowledge to ensure none was to be had.  Also Buddha never existed it's the first christ character and a corruption of the Solar mytho's. About 2500 years ago the enemy struck a major blow to humanity in the East and later the West. The RHP is not more then that age, where Satanism is from the dawn of Humanity.

The Tibet issue is interesting as the Dali Lama postion is not any older then 600 years and did not have the power famed for till the 17th century. Buddism weakened Tibet internally so bad that a people once strong warriors who defeated their enemies for hundreds of years. Where toppled in a few days. Where the enemy can not take by direct force they weaken within so they will fall either by outside force  at a later time or internal subversion over time.

The xanization of the East allowed for the islamics to sweep in far as well.




________________________________
From: davidcommer <davidcommer@
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Tue, June 29, 2010 12:31:55 PM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS

 
I love the way you sum up the value of Spiritual Satanism -- the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism. Not to mention the complete rejection of any right-hand path religion.

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "daitsun88" <daitsun88@ wrote:

And that's the hypocrisy here, no desires, but they do have a desire to "liberate" themselves from suffering...

"but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead."

They've predicted and made an excuse for this part as well, they think there are higher planes of existence and desires and ego is what binds us to this "lower plane" here and causes us to be reborn every time we die.

Its easy to see it is an imbalanced religion, because Buddhism is spiritual reductionism in its pure form, the complete opposite of total materialism. It tells us that the self is an illusion and any physical things are impermanent and only something beyond physical existance (it is pretty nonsensical here, because Buddhists don't believe we have a permanent soul) is real. Just the opposite of close-minded atheists who believe that only materiality exists.

I've looked into both and I like Spiritual Satanism because it is a balanced religion, and has the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism (and Laveyanism), pleasure and spiritual powers and the Gods as our guides


--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@" <moonshadow48@ wrote:

Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:

Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.

 

[daitsun88]

Umm no, the original buddhist books are in Pali and Sanskrit, not in Chinese, sorry. They were translated to chinese later on somewhere in the 13th century. How do you know that the chinese translations are not wrong either?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tripi%E1%B9%ADaka

And yes, real buddhism sucks, but they try to make it more attractive by saying it doesn't teach the absence of desire.

I hope you're not sympathizing with it or trying to soft soap it or you may be in the same situation as "waltermassey1"...

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Hui Lin <shatterose09@... wrote:

how can u say he never existed? there are actual records of his birth and stuff. whether u believe in his teachings or not, cause xians did corrupt alot of it. and i was a buddhist before i converted, but i still practice it every other time. real buddhism doesnt suck and if u know the actual truth, then u would know. then again the real books are in chinese, im chinese, maybe it makes a difference. ive read some books that are in english and the translation are so wrong, i dont even pick an english book up anymore. so there!




________________________________
From: waltermassey1 <walter_massey@...
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Fri, July 2, 2010 7:56:11 AM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS

 
So, this is how you see it.

Siddhartha Gautama: born a prince, hidden from the bad things of life, sees the bad things, vows to change them, becomes a beggar on the streets and lives an ascetic life, finds enlightenment after a few decades of meditation, and becomes a spiritual teacher, then dies of old age.

Sun god mythology: I am going to go with Horus here, because his story is commonly known to have been stolen by the christians to become the story of their savior, jesus.

Horus born of the virgin goddess Isis in a cave, became a child teacher, had 12 disciples, performed miracles, has many followers, and then is crucified and comes back from the dead.

The ONLY similarity i see in these two is that they were both, in their own way, teachers. I do not see how Siddhartha's tale was christianized, as his birth was before the widespread adoption of the christian religion, and was in a different part of the world (across the Asian continent)

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@ wrote:

He never existed his tale is a repeat of the sun god mythology but in a christianized form. It's time to move beyond the falsehoods of the RHP and their false icons.




________________________________
From: waltermassey1 <walter_massey@
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Fri, July 2, 2010 8:16:40 AM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS

 
Gautama Buddha (born Siddhārtha Gautama) was never considered to be a "god" in the buddhist religion, but a man who had a good idea that turned into a way of living. Even calling buddhism a religion is wrong, it is, as i have said, a way of living one's life.

He was never considered the son of a god (although in one instance he was thought to be a spirit answering a girl's prayers, but that was due to his appearance), nor did he perform miracles. He was, at his most basic, a teacher. Albeit a teacher with many students, but a teacher nonetheless.

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@ wrote:

To be honest Buddhism especially Mahayana branch is simply an enemy religion. It was designed to phase in their paradigm by covering over and corrupting the Aryan one left by the Gods. It was the first xanity. It also despite it's claims and inspite of ruling a 3rd of the earth once. Has brought no enlightenment. Only removed and corrupted enough Satanic spiritual knowledge to ensure none was to be had.  Also Buddha never existed it's the first christ character and a corruption of the Solar mytho's. About 2500 years ago the enemy struck a major blow to humanity in the East and later the West. The RHP is not more then that age, where Satanism is from the dawn of Humanity.

The Tibet issue is interesting as the Dali Lama postion is not any older then 600 years and did not have the power famed for till the 17th century. Buddism weakened Tibet internally so bad that a people once strong warriors who defeated their enemies for hundreds of years. Where toppled in a few days. Where the enemy can not take by direct force they weaken within so they will fall either by outside force  at a later time or internal subversion over time.

The xanization of the East allowed for the islamics to sweep in far as well.




________________________________
From: davidcommer <davidcommer@
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Tue, June 29, 2010 12:31:55 PM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS

 
I love the way you sum up the value of Spiritual Satanism -- the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism. Not to mention the complete rejection of any right-hand path religion.

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "daitsun88" <daitsun88@ wrote:

And that's the hypocrisy here, no desires, but they do have a desire to "liberate" themselves from suffering...

"but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead."

They've predicted and made an excuse for this part as well, they think there are higher planes of existence and desires and ego is what binds us to this "lower plane" here and causes us to be reborn every time we die.

Its easy to see it is an imbalanced religion, because Buddhism is spiritual reductionism in its pure form, the complete opposite of total materialism. It tells us that the self is an illusion and any physical things are impermanent and only something beyond physical existance (it is pretty nonsensical here, because Buddhists don't believe we have a permanent soul) is real. Just the opposite of close-minded atheists who believe that only materiality exists.

I've looked into both and I like Spiritual Satanism because it is a balanced religion, and has the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism (and Laveyanism), pleasure and spiritual powers and the Gods as our guides


--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@" <moonshadow48@ wrote:

Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:

Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.