Welcome to the Temple of Zeus's Official Forums!

Welcome to the official forums for the Temple of Zeus. Please consider registering an account to join our community.

believe it or not

clayton

New member
Joined
Sep 2, 2013
Messages
34
David Icke says that Genesis chapter 6 where it states "The sons of '''God''' " , etc. is actually interpreted as '''Gods''', as in "The sons of the '''Gods'''. He says '''Gods''' is used throughout the old testament as the REAL meaning of God.
I checked the 'online Strong Concordance' of the bible. For Genesis 6, the definition of God is God and Gods. No apostrophe. Straight letters G O D S (plural. Gods!
Genesis 3 states "Let '''US''' make man in '''OUR''' image." Hmmmm.
It also states after Adam and Eve fell, "Man is like '''US''' knowing good from evil.
So it would look as if David Icke has a 50 percent chance of being right. (At least 50.)
IT IS RIGHT THERE IN THE CHRISTIAN'S OWN BOOK AND DICTIONARY.
So it looks like we might be right abandoning the notion that a guy called '''God''' made us. AND 'THEM'. (THE WATCHERS, SONS OF GOD,,, ER,,, GODS, FALLEN ANGELS, REPTIALIANS, NEPHILIM PARENTS, ETC.
Also,,, the 'Lamsa' translation of the bible written by Joseph Lamsa which is in the Aramaic language states on Roman number page vii, which is page 7 in Roman numbers, (footnotes before the scripture starts), that Isaiah 14:12 is translated in Aramaic as '''Howl''', which is confused with the Hebrew word '''light'''. Aparently, the ancient Aramaic was talking about the '''King of Babylon''' and NOT '''Lucifer'''.
So it would appear that che christians have it wrong, AGAIN.
 
Why exactly are you spewing this crap in here.

We have nothing to do with christianity, or their book of lies. It dosn't matter what they got wrong or right. Its all stolen and corrupted from ancient knowledge. It is a tool, there is nothing to be gained from it, no lessons learnt.

-En Haradren Amlug.

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "clayton" <pachelbeld@... wrote:

David Icke says that Genesis chapter 6 where it states "The sons of '''God''' " , etc. is actually interpreted as '''Gods''', as in "The sons of the '''Gods'''. He says '''Gods''' is used throughout the old testament as the REAL meaning of God.
I checked the 'online Strong Concordance' of the bible. For Genesis 6, the definition of God is God and Gods. No apostrophe. Straight letters G O D S (plural. Gods!
Genesis 3 states "Let '''US''' make man in '''OUR''' image." Hmmmm.
It also states after Adam and Eve fell, "Man is like '''US''' knowing good from evil.
So it would look as if David Icke has a 50 percent chance of being right. (At least 50.)
IT IS RIGHT THERE IN THE CHRISTIAN'S OWN BOOK AND DICTIONARY.
So it looks like we might be right abandoning the notion that a guy called '''God''' made us. AND 'THEM'. (THE WATCHERS, SONS OF GOD,,, ER,,, GODS, FALLEN ANGELS, REPTIALIANS, NEPHILIM PARENTS, ETC.
Also,,, the 'Lamsa' translation of the bible written by Joseph Lamsa which is in the Aramaic language states on Roman number page vii, which is page 7 in Roman numbers, (footnotes before the scripture starts), that Isaiah 14:12 is translated in Aramaic as '''Howl''', which is confused with the Hebrew word '''light'''. Aparently, the ancient Aramaic was talking about the '''King of Babylon''' and NOT '''Lucifer'''.
So it would appear that che christians have it wrong, AGAIN.
 
David Icke he is a two-bit moron. I respected him initially when he talked about the Illuminati and the fucking reptilians taking over the world. But I lost total respect for him when he said that Indians, Sumerians and Egyptians were blood thirsty reptilian worshipers and still drink blood in secret rituals (is he serious??), especially taking his sources from the bible. He is a fucking Jewish bastard. I have doubts that he himself is a shape shifting reptilian trying to destroy the gentiles.

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "clayton" <pachelbeld@... wrote:

David Icke says that Genesis chapter 6 where it states "The sons of '''God''' " , etc. is actually interpreted as '''Gods''', as in "The sons of the '''Gods'''. He says '''Gods''' is used throughout the old testament as the REAL meaning of God.
I checked the 'online Strong Concordance' of the bible. For Genesis 6, the definition of God is God and Gods. No apostrophe. Straight letters G O D S (plural. Gods!
Genesis 3 states "Let '''US''' make man in '''OUR''' image." Hmmmm.
It also states after Adam and Eve fell, "Man is like '''US''' knowing good from evil.
So it would look as if David Icke has a 50 percent chance of being right. (At least 50.)
IT IS RIGHT THERE IN THE CHRISTIAN'S OWN BOOK AND DICTIONARY.
So it looks like we might be right abandoning the notion that a guy called '''God''' made us. AND 'THEM'. (THE WATCHERS, SONS OF GOD,,, ER,,, GODS, FALLEN ANGELS, REPTIALIANS, NEPHILIM PARENTS, ETC.
Also,,, the 'Lamsa' translation of the bible written by Joseph Lamsa which is in the Aramaic language states on Roman number page vii, which is page 7 in Roman numbers, (footnotes before the scripture starts), that Isaiah 14:12 is translated in Aramaic as '''Howl''', which is confused with the Hebrew word '''light'''. Aparently, the ancient Aramaic was talking about the '''King of Babylon''' and NOT '''Lucifer'''.
So it would appear that che christians have it wrong, AGAIN.
 
Probably drugs. Lol. Hail Satan.

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "En Haradren Amlug" <hecktic_shadow@... wrote:

Why exactly are you spewing this crap in here.

We have nothing to do with christianity, or their book of lies. It dosn't matter what they got wrong or right. Its all stolen and corrupted from ancient knowledge. It is a tool, there is nothing to be gained from it, no lessons learnt.

-En Haradren Amlug.

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "clayton" <pachelbeld@ wrote:

David Icke says that Genesis chapter 6 where it states "The sons of '''God''' " , etc. is actually interpreted as '''Gods''', as in "The sons of the '''Gods'''. He says '''Gods''' is used throughout the old testament as the REAL meaning of God.
I checked the 'online Strong Concordance' of the bible. For Genesis 6, the definition of God is God and Gods. No apostrophe. Straight letters G O D S (plural. Gods!
Genesis 3 states "Let '''US''' make man in '''OUR''' image." Hmmmm.
It also states after Adam and Eve fell, "Man is like '''US''' knowing good from evil.
So it would look as if David Icke has a 50 percent chance of being right. (At least 50.)
IT IS RIGHT THERE IN THE CHRISTIAN'S OWN BOOK AND DICTIONARY.
So it looks like we might be right abandoning the notion that a guy called '''God''' made us. AND 'THEM'. (THE WATCHERS, SONS OF GOD,,, ER,,, GODS, FALLEN ANGELS, REPTIALIANS, NEPHILIM PARENTS, ETC.
Also,,, the 'Lamsa' translation of the bible written by Joseph Lamsa which is in the Aramaic language states on Roman number page vii, which is page 7 in Roman numbers, (footnotes before the scripture starts), that Isaiah 14:12 is translated in Aramaic as '''Howl''', which is confused with the Hebrew word '''light'''. Aparently, the ancient Aramaic was talking about the '''King of Babylon''' and NOT '''Lucifer'''.
So it would appear that che christians have it wrong, AGAIN.
 
david kike can go fuck himself. Stop reading and posting worthless SHIT that does not do any good to anyone.

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "clayton" <pachelbeld@... wrote:

David Icke says that Genesis chapter 6 where it states "The sons of '''God''' " , etc. is actually interpreted as '''Gods''', as in "The sons of the '''Gods'''. He says '''Gods''' is used throughout the old testament as the REAL meaning of God.
I checked the 'online Strong Concordance' of the bible. For Genesis 6, the definition of God is God and Gods. No apostrophe. Straight letters G O D S (plural. Gods!
Genesis 3 states "Let '''US''' make man in '''OUR''' image." Hmmmm.
It also states after Adam and Eve fell, "Man is like '''US''' knowing good from evil.
So it would look as if David Icke has a 50 percent chance of being right. (At least 50.)
IT IS RIGHT THERE IN THE CHRISTIAN'S OWN BOOK AND DICTIONARY.
So it looks like we might be right abandoning the notion that a guy called '''God''' made us. AND 'THEM'. (THE WATCHERS, SONS OF GOD,,, ER,,, GODS, FALLEN ANGELS, REPTIALIANS, NEPHILIM PARENTS, ETC.
Also,,, the 'Lamsa' translation of the bible written by Joseph Lamsa which is in the Aramaic language states on Roman number page vii, which is page 7 in Roman numbers, (footnotes before the scripture starts), that Isaiah 14:12 is translated in Aramaic as '''Howl''', which is confused with the Hebrew word '''light'''. Aparently, the ancient Aramaic was talking about the '''King of Babylon''' and NOT '''Lucifer'''.
So it would appear that che christians have it wrong, AGAIN.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Shaitan

Back
Top