David Icke says that Genesis chapter 6 where it states "The sons of '''God''' " , etc. is actually interpreted as '''Gods''', as in "The sons of the '''Gods'''. He says '''Gods''' is used throughout the old testament as the REAL meaning of God.
I checked the 'online Strong Concordance' of the bible. For Genesis 6, the definition of God is God and Gods. No apostrophe. Straight letters G O D S (plural. Gods!
Genesis 3 states "Let '''US''' make man in '''OUR''' image." Hmmmm.
It also states after Adam and Eve fell, "Man is like '''US''' knowing good from evil.
So it would look as if David Icke has a 50 percent chance of being right. (At least 50.)
IT IS RIGHT THERE IN THE CHRISTIAN'S OWN BOOK AND DICTIONARY.
So it looks like we might be right abandoning the notion that a guy called '''God''' made us. AND 'THEM'. (THE WATCHERS, SONS OF GOD,,, ER,,, GODS, FALLEN ANGELS, REPTIALIANS, NEPHILIM PARENTS, ETC.
Also,,, the 'Lamsa' translation of the bible written by Joseph Lamsa which is in the Aramaic language states on Roman number page vii, which is page 7 in Roman numbers, (footnotes before the scripture starts), that Isaiah 14:12 is translated in Aramaic as '''Howl''', which is confused with the Hebrew word '''light'''. Aparently, the ancient Aramaic was talking about the '''King of Babylon''' and NOT '''Lucifer'''.
So it would appear that che christians have it wrong, AGAIN.
I checked the 'online Strong Concordance' of the bible. For Genesis 6, the definition of God is God and Gods. No apostrophe. Straight letters G O D S (plural. Gods!
Genesis 3 states "Let '''US''' make man in '''OUR''' image." Hmmmm.
It also states after Adam and Eve fell, "Man is like '''US''' knowing good from evil.
So it would look as if David Icke has a 50 percent chance of being right. (At least 50.)
IT IS RIGHT THERE IN THE CHRISTIAN'S OWN BOOK AND DICTIONARY.
So it looks like we might be right abandoning the notion that a guy called '''God''' made us. AND 'THEM'. (THE WATCHERS, SONS OF GOD,,, ER,,, GODS, FALLEN ANGELS, REPTIALIANS, NEPHILIM PARENTS, ETC.
Also,,, the 'Lamsa' translation of the bible written by Joseph Lamsa which is in the Aramaic language states on Roman number page vii, which is page 7 in Roman numbers, (footnotes before the scripture starts), that Isaiah 14:12 is translated in Aramaic as '''Howl''', which is confused with the Hebrew word '''light'''. Aparently, the ancient Aramaic was talking about the '''King of Babylon''' and NOT '''Lucifer'''.
So it would appear that che christians have it wrong, AGAIN.