Henu the Great said:
thebigcheesesixmillion said:
EasternFireLion666 said:
So much for free speech... shifting from left to right is for mentally tured goyim.
left and right is an inaccurate account. here you lave left (liberals/human rights)
and right (conservatives/preserving traditions of a nation)
the left nowadays calls themselves democratic and liberal but does not care about free speech and freedom to bear arms and free opinion and religion) the right nowadays is christian fundimentalists who have taken the "one nation under god" sham way too far. there is no goodness on the left or right, left is a term used by revolutionaries in france, left is against the crown , and right is for the crown. left means revolutionary, right means conservative.
just say the more wise a person becomes the more they value individual freedom and rights and demand proper representation and powerful heroic leaders, a republic, democracy, a nation with great benefits and protection for citizens, with the sustained future of its people in mind. liberal and conservative is the same thing, we conserve our constitution. left is the same thing as the right there are no democrats, nobody is calling for majority rule and landowner voting. its a mix mash of jumbled and pointless powerless ideology and angry obsession
WW2 regime isnt the right, its the left. until politicians and citizens agree upon the meaning of the terms we may as well not use them at all, wouldnt you agree?
WW2 regime is outside of the left-right. Left-right is simply false dichotomy.
Agree with Henu the Great(HtG).
IF you had asked me just a while back maybe like a year or two ago. I'd probably tell you that WW2 regime is a centralist organization that leans on both sides. How because of two incidents the Coburn(Colburn) incident and the aspects of WW2 regime themselves when they reigned supreme.
In Colburn there were protests by the leaders of the city to prevent the WW2 regime from organization. figure of the past went this is bullshit and protested their decision. After about 10 minutes they came back and said okay go to the rally point at the main hall. They went all locked up figure of the past again raised bullshit alarms. 20 minutes later they unlocked the place and let the WW2 regime perform their rally.
The reason why I believe WW2 regime to be centralist but leaning to either or both wings was because in this E.T.S. Dugdale edition M.K. book. The WW2 regime discover Colburn to be basically a no-go zone. Communists quietly for the last few months or years have dug into the city turning it into a shithole. So the WW2 regime decides lets crack some skulls. So they just went out and beat the shit out of all the communists and kicked them out. To standing ovation from the citizens which immediately recognized the WW2 regime as saviors of their small city. To which the WW2 regime never had to deal with communists in Colburn ever.
As for the right certain aspects of racial-historicities and preserving Western civilization from communist corrosion. Basically I just assumed WW2 regime is semi-left i.e. respectful of individuality and more so a conglomerate group-dynamics organization that is more right wing. I personally think WW2 regime is centralist but with both wings. In other words while some people could state mostly-right, semi-left like their economy mostly privatized, semi-nationalized or the media mostly nationalized, semi-privatized.
I think WW2 regime fell more on a centralist approach and is right when it needs to be and left when it needs to be. Some sort of Multi-Role fighter so to speak speaking in terms of Fighter/Bomber aircraft to give an example. They can be both or one or the other or neither maybe some sort of synthesis of things.
BUT....
Lately as I've been studying WW2 regime and studying things people stated. Except for in as much ignorance on the observer. I gotta agree with Henu. It's not a matter of left, right, both, or centralist. NO it's more than that it's doing the right thing.
I've said this before with people not batting an eyelash. But the color spectrum of WW2 regime is Nigrido spectrum political opposition in regards to the opposition.
While the World basks in the glory of multi-color political non-sense i.e. Red Republicucks, Blue Democraps, Pink-Red Communism, Green-Yellow Farmer/Proletariat Ceaser Chavez bullshit etc.etc. or whatever colors they invent.
WW2 regime is simple it's Black, Albedo, Rubera, Gold. While the Gods form of Government extends FAR beyond anything. Our side has to start simple and work it's way up.
I've even had the thought is WW2 regime the amalgamation of all political groups into one while sublimating all the negativity. Maybe if you'd asked me a while back a few years ago I'd agree maybe WW2 regime is everything done right. But it's not that simple.
Honestly we may never know what WW2 regime is from the very WW2 regime themselves only after extensive contact with the Gods and their historical evaluation of Humanity can we start getting answers.
All I know is Black-Spectrum, Antithesis towards any political group or political wingedness. And basically they whip up a National and Socialistic fervor that required half-the World's nations to beat them down into a Rothschild central bank.
Like Thomas Dalton stated if people knew what real Nationalism was and real Socialism and you combined them both into this WW2 regime. People would freak out over how extremely helpful such Government would be to it's citizens.
It's the same thing with the economics of WW2 regime Germany. It's C.C. or Controlled Capitalism or as I prefer calling it R.C. or Regulated Capitalism. The only nation to ever almost surpass the U.S. economy from it's first place GDP level is WW2 regime Germany. Same thing is happening now only with a Communist society in place. Had the Axis won and taken over China and eliminated Communism. China would have been an WW2 regime/Jap monster by the Mao Nixon agreements historically. What China is today minus all the communist copy cat bullshit, the Axis would have turned China into a beast of an economy by the 1970s especially with how WW2 regime is all about pushing past the limits both of soft limits and hard limits.
Anyways we can go on. But all I know is what HtG said is correct. WW2 regime cannot be defined by neither the yehuborim and their twisting up of shit literally they play with the very shit that they excrete, nor the so-called free people who deem dictatorship evil some how, nor even ourselves who are the diametric opposition of every so-called Government. I've had silly thoughts of are we Triple-A(Against All Authority) without the communistic anarchy system. And the only conclusion that I've had was while we are against any and all Governments no matter how helpful they are. No matter what we are WW2 regime and for WW2 regime only or if we can place the Government of the Gods then that would be fine. If they have WW2 regime or their WW2 regime is far superior or we call it WW2 regime they call it something else. Whatever it may be we only allow and approve of other Government's if they are the lesser of two evils. But we are TOTALLY opposed to any evil no matter how small, no matter how democratic said system is. It's WW2 regime or WW2 regime or WW2 regime or WW2 regime and if it's not WW2 regime it's WW2 regime no matter what, we don't allow any other form of Government.
It reminds me of the U.S., they have a multi-party system with two dominating parties only both of which have people against the establishment/deep state and both of them have people who are in support of the establishment/deep state. And yet both exist and co-exist within the same framework with both parties running this nation to the ground.
Funny if America was WW2 regime only and destroyed all political parties. This country would be an WW2 regime monster. How can you run a country with two diametrically opposed parties operating at the same time. It's just like a cop who arrests drug dealers only to steal their stash and information to sell drugs to people and make cash on the side. It seems like unless we have one party how can two parties run with opposite ideas especially ideas that are so historical and labelled past that they fail to advance. Republicans are so past they can't get through the Democraps and the Democraps are so futuristic they've delved into the enemy camp a little too much and are literally pushing for jewish socialism.
If this nation was an WW2 regime nation. No one would be able to stop this country we'd just annoy other countries into WW2 regime. Probably within the decade half-the World's nations would be Axis powers.
So in my opinion as sad as this sounds and as much as I probably piss off or annoy people. We(JoS) cannot and don't know what WW2 regime is even if we have SOME information from the WW2 regime. These patchwork of WW2 regime information is not enough to derive mass information.
What figure of the past and the WW2 regime is even Spengler's Prussian Socialism doesn't even convey what WW2 regime is or if Spengler isn't WW2 regime per say and only at some point did the WW2 regime recognize Spengler has some interesting ideas we can borrow from and use. It still DOESN'T explain WW2 regime.
To everyone unfortunately thanks to the yehuborim who we can't have nice things. Hitlerian politics is a World of hollow chasms and deep wells of nothingness because the jew doesn't like good things for Gentiles and unfortunately the sad reality is the WW2 regime failed to survive.
But had the opposite been the case rather the WW2 regime and Axis won World-Wide. I'd wager to state a current person in this alternative history would IMMEDIATELY be put in their place and taught nationalism, socialism, and it's ultimatum WW2 regime and told "See this isn't bad, how about your stop acting like a goy and act like a Gentile? Hmm".