Blackdragon666 [JG said:
" post_id=389941 time=1664012031 user_id=19170]Tate was banned on all social media platforms, YouTube and every other major platform that is controlled by the enemy. His instagram was just him posting his wealthy lifestyle, nothing about the videos that were triggering. Instagram banned him without notice, simultaneously with all other major platforms. He was also banned by most banks like Barclays which froze his money that was in there, banned by companies like Uber, Airbnb, money transfer platforms like PayPal, it was just ridiculous.
Eventually you can see this wasn't about women. Why on earth would Uber ban you for being misogynistic, assuming that was even true? This is just the enemy trying to silence someone who was talking too much about the fact the world is a sort of simulation run by some shady people. Nowadays, when you even remotely refer to the enemy even without mentioning them, they don't hesitate to ban you. I've never even heard of anyone who got banned to that extent.
And of course many people, us included won't agree with some of the things he says. But why should anyone be banned on social media, let alone every other application you need to have a life? The enemy preys on people's petty feelings to censor anyone they consider dangerous for their agenda.
Unfortunately for them, Tate is pretty wealthy and there's nothing they can do about it. Hustler's University alone brings him several million dollars every month. After YouTube banned him he went on Rumble and got half a million subscribers in a few days. Rumble stock also went up. Tate now focuses solely on exposing them (at least at the capacity of what he knows) and is bigger than ever. I suspect they'll try black magic or assassination at this point because not only is he exposing how the financial system enslaves people, but also talks about the fake climate change agenda, the fake pandemic and other things that would make Klaus Schwab have a heart attack. (nothing extreme that validates being banned even by Airbnb or something).
Perhaps I shouldn't say this cause either it make me completely arrogant or quite the opposite.
There is no middle ground with what I'm going to say. So I'll just say it outright.
Companies from various parts of the World, banned him. Yes, yes they did, several including even life sustaining ones like for example Uber whether the car or the food. Sure there is a ton more food apps but seriously food?
But my question isn't about that. My question isn't simply banned.
My question no matter how naive has never been asked by anyone neither on this forums, nor the cancels of the past other people(Real News London interview with David Icke March/April 2020. Icke was like Alex Jones on Tim Cast IRL not even being controversial nothing was said like HP.Cobra said "He named the enemy without naming them"). Or any other person in the entire World famous or not famous.
A company or companies go "You rabble rouser we deny you our services". Which I assume this is technically illegal or can violate legalities or can be sueable. I suppose this might be like websites that enforce if using our website you agree to our services. If I never hit the okay or yes or understand button. I'm using your website without agreeing to your terms. Or servers your renting our servers. Even if you own the servers you don't really own them your putting it out in public and letting random people come. If anything it reminds me of video game servers which kick or ban you only to make you wonder can they really do that? What if someone was an expert hacker and turned it around on it's owners they kick and ban the entire clan and open it up to the public or unban people.
My question is:
How can companies in one or more countries or around the World. How or whom do they just up and ban a person?
Like seriously I'm asking doesn't it seem strange several companies agree to do this and be almost above the law?
I've never heard a person ask or say "If we have companies. Whom are the people in this company that go "person XYZ did ABC we must crush him". How or what entity or entities in this building this large building whether a long building or a skyscraper.
It's like I'm imagining people going "Sir CEO we need to ban Andrew Tate we just need to brutalize him for doing wrong think, wrong speech, and plainly cause fuck him".
No seriously how does a person, persons inside a company gravitate to such stupidity and get one person barred from some company.
I tell you this reminds me of back in the late 80s-90s when these personal revenge issues popped up(potential false flags in modern day thinking?) came out and people would come to work armed and shoot up their work office. It's like the 1996-1997 game Postal it was made cause one or more people did end up "going postal".
I wonder is there a cabal of people who decide this stuff. Who are the lunatic companies freezing(read stealing) their account. How can your money just be stolen by a bank. Or how can you be banned from these places it makes no sense.
It's almost like they're enforcing of meme. It's like companies want someone to shoot them up or sue them or break them apart or have a government smash them.
Seriously inside a company. Is there a CBO(Chief Banning Officer) official or *shoo* wink, wink he works here but hush secret lol kekeke.
No seriously how does a company just decide to ban a person?
And then people wonder why there is Rumble and Parallel Economies and people making money in organizations being counter-firing all this cancel, woke non-sense. It reminds me of airports are we going to have alt companies providing services to cancelled people in front of normal banning airline companies.
Is it going to enter the half-communist, half-Anti groups being in countries or especially here in the U.S. where this shit is popping up. And be like okay divided we stand from now on.
Seriously who decides to ban these people?