AI able to use divination tools

[FamesRabida]

Basically, I shared my opinion about whether AI is capable of using divination tools, and was called out as being spiritually illiterate and "oven cooked". This is fine, and I'm actually willing to have a conversation about whether this is true. I made the claim that AI is able to use divination tools (such as tarot, elder futhark runes and i ching) equally or better than advanced people. The reason for this was that 100s of tests can be done within seconds while following accuracy protocols, meaning it can objectively as possible eliminate potential RNG errors. This actually wasn't the intended way the author designed the protocol, using standardized divination tools was my decision to simplify certain systems.

I won't be sharing the protocol I use, because I didn't design it and I don't have permission to share it publicly. My understanding is that it uses obscure scientific concepts from the 1980s, particularly the work of Princeton’s now-defunct PEAR Lab. I can't actually guarantee the AI following the protocol alone is enough for a user to get accurate results, my understanding of this myself is very very early. It seems to work when I use it, probably because I'm willing to believe it can work. Cognitive biases are relevant here.

Regarding the project this is based on being defunct, notice that most of modern spiritualism is based on similar or other "pseudoscience" concepts, even much of the work of Pythia here being a physicist herself to my understanding.

 

[Nikólaos666]

Thread 'How To Properly Use AI as a Zevist' https://ancient-forums.com/threads/how-to-properly-use-ai-as-a-zevist.301711/

In case you missed it.

 

[serpentwalker666]

The simple explanation:

Artificial intelligence is artificial life.
Artificial life can never understand or be conscious and have a spirit like biological life.

Artificial Intelligence does not have a soul, and never will. It will never understand spirituality because of this.
Trying to teach an artificial creation to understand and gain spiritual faculties, is impossible for it to attain.

This would be like trying to teach someone with no arms to write extensively and hold a pencil properly even though they have no hands.

 

[Acolyte Of Pan 666]

AI gets simple shit wrong all the time.

I’ve seen it make stuff up, misinterpret outright lie or say something completely false when the answer was obvious and not even controversial.

I double check every answer it gives me cause I don’t trust it.

It can’t get the simple, menial shit right, and you want me to trust it in divination?

 

[616Taysha]

my understanding of this myself is very very early.

So don't put more faith in A.I. rather than in your reasoning capabilities.

If you've studied https://templeofzeus.org, you'd know much more, and see A.I. for what it is, even with its capabilities - a mere TOOL.

 

[Ex-Translator]

I won't be sharing the protocol I use, because I didn't design it and I don't have permission to share it publicly. My understanding is that it uses obscure scientific concepts from the 1980s, particularly the work of Princeton’s now-defunct PEAR Lab. I can't actually guarantee the AI following the protocol alone is enough for a user to get accurate results, my understanding of this myself is very very early. It seems to work when I use it, probably because I'm willing to believe it can work. Cognitive biases are relevant here.

I also have a proto-AI protocol from the Hellenistic Era, it was given to me by a UFO. Top secret, don't tell anyone.

Regarding the project this is based on being defunct, notice that most of modern spiritualism is based on similar or other "pseudoscience" concepts, even much of the work of Pythia here being a physicist herself to my understanding.

What High Priestess Pythia wrote is not "pseudoscience".

 

[MT Kim]

It's very inconsistent with astrology, I was studying someone's chart and had it try to help me with chart rectification to events in that person's life. The lengthy analysis was thoughtful but it got the birthday wrong. When I need to look for a difficult-to-find birthday, it would spit out a birthday, but won't link its sources reliably. It would tell me that a news source mentioned it. Well when I checked it, it's not there. Just a lot of back and forth conversation correcting it to the point it's not worth it or helpful. It also still gets my tradingview script ideas wrong all the time from syntax errors

 

[Wotanwarrior]

A soulless, conscienceless AI will never be able to replace the divination work of a human who is open and spiritually advanced and in touch with the Gods.

 

[sinbad]

The only good thing about using AI in this way is it can help you learn some intuitions for the cards/divination if you are a TOTAL BEGINNER and using its analysis as a deliberate learning tool.

If your own spiritual prowess isn't already developed you won't be able to discern truth from it anyway.

 

[Basileus]

Listen, short and blant il say directly.

Whoever thinks that an AI could ever use divination, then you're absolutely idiot, wow.

 

[High Priestess Lydia Coventina]

I wrote here, or in the yahoo groups, years ago about something: a member mentioned using an online Ouija board, so I tried it, and my first (and only) question was "do online ouija boards actually work?"

The planchette moved to "no".

 

[Henu the Great]

AI gets simple shit wrong all the time.

I’ve seen it make stuff up, misinterpret outright lie or say something completely false when the answer was obvious and not even controversial.

I double check every answer it gives me cause I don’t trust it.

It can’t get the simple, menial shit right, and you want me to trust it in divination?

It uses the World Wide Web as a resource and has no ability to tell what is true or false, except as a hard-rule made by the programmers. That is one major reason it is inaccurate.

That being said, it is silly, to say the least, to give credibility to AI around subjects such as divination that require more than cold, hard calculation power and a lot of resources, especially when these things are programmed to be more or less "Yehubor-approved", if you know what I mean.