OttoHart
Member
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2024
- Messages
- 251
It is widely known to us Spiritual Satanists that Judaism and its offshoots are actively mocking Pagan/Satanic concepts, symbols and Gods in order to brainwash the masses and hide important knowledge from them. This is because a lot of us intuitively know this to be true, and each has had their own individual journey of awakening.
Many of you are aware that there isn't "empirical, categorical, undoubtable" proof of these facts, sadly. For obvious reasons:
-our knowledge of history is, by definition, all from biased parties and can't be a 100% retelling of the past
-people conspiring to slander aren't exactly leaving evidence about them conspiring to slander
This post is meant to ponder over this fact, to shed some light on the historical evidence of these things we do have at our disposal, and to discuss a bit about the subject of helping others and proving these things to others, to aid on their spiritual path. Both why you (most of the time) shouldn't bother, and how to correctly point someone to the direction of truth when it is the right kind of situation to do so.
As with my usual posts, this will be fairly lengthy, as there's quite a bit to cover. Grab something to drink and light some incense if you want.
So, one could easily just say something like "Satan is originally a Hebrew name, it's not parodying any kind of entity in another faith, there's no proof of that! Sat and Satan aren't linguistically related!"
What is this person's reason for thinking there's no connection between the two? Because Google showed him a book where someone said that it doesn't. Or maybe he can't find a book on Google that does show this connection. Or he knows nobody else that believes there is a connection, and he needs someone to imitate. We've all met this person.
Saying things like that, in behavioral psychology, is called a "thought terminating cliché". This is a technique that is self taught in an individual, to just say or think one sentence that they haven't ever doubted or pondered over, in order to avoid the anxiety of having their beliefs and worldview questioned. This kind of axiomatic thinking is a sign of a weak mind. And dealing with these kinds of people can be tedious and annoying, especially when we are personally invested in them growing as a person (family, close friends, etc.). Satanism teaches to not get overburdened with the ignorance of others, and to not force learning on others that are just not fit for that knowledge. We must strike a good balance between caring about our own advancement and being a helping hand for the people that matter to us.
That being said, let's stay on the Sat-Satan connection and see where history takes us. While there may be no handy, normie approved Wikipedia article to throw at the ignorant person, that shows this fact, we can point to historical evidence that is accepted by the mainstream.
In this case specifically, you point to Judaism's origins in Zoroastrianism.
"Judaic culture, in its inception, was heavily affected by the Persian influences of the time, including religiously. As the Judaic faith evolved, it took in aspects of Zoroastrianism. Zoroastrianism is known to have mocked Eastern, Hindu derived faith, in their theology. Active border tension led to the development of this in Zoroastrianism, with aspects like the Gods of Hindu religions being painted as evil Devas (some mythological characters were known to be evil as allegory, but this is the first large scale religion to openly view the Gods of their neighbors as pure evil forces. The vitriol against these Eastern symbols was then taken and elaborated upon by Judaism, creating an even more rigid Good vs Evil narrative, which is drastically different to how most religions and spiritual paths of history behaved and evolved. Makes you think, huh?"
This would be an answer that an SS could poke holes into. But this answer completely obeys mainstream history and still presents evidence as to this connection.
This kind of approach not only helps one be more convincing and informative for outsiders who are not as deprogrammed, but also helps one be more diligent in their statement. A clean approach to the information you tell others will improve your confidence in your own knowledge, and make sure you are actively being truthful, not just believing so.
I hope this fragment was revealing in helping us see how to address these kinds of "evidence" questions from "skeptics". However, let's also address the elephant in the room, should you even bother? If so, when exactly?
Here are my points on that:
- Do not go around debating these facts in real life, in places like school or anywhere else in public, which could lead to your privacy being attacked. You can do far more for the JoS and for bringing people to truth if you are not labeled as a Nazi, a Satanist or other kinds of terms that, depending on where you live, would make you a social pariah or land you in jail.
- Sometimes, it's just not worth it. I do not blame people for talking about spiritual knowledge online, in communities they are a part of (as long as you are not talking about things that would single you out as a Spiritual Satanist, then you're stupid and will face consequences for doing that eventually). However, you can't shove information into someone. Just as you can not imagine how someone way smarter than you thinks, you can not imagine how someone way dumber than you feels. What is intuitive to you can sound like nonsense to someone more spiritually closed, more spiritually brainwashed, or just plain less intelligent than you.
- When it comes to family or people you hold very close, the urge to see them evolve alongside you can be huge. I understand that. But it is still a case by case basis, and things can't exactly be rushed, at least not as much as you'd hope. Know that there are levels to how you should divulge or introduce this information, if you deem a specific person fit to learn it. Pick your battles, and pick your people. Don't try to convince your Christian mom that Satan is God, but maybe your close girlfriend who's atheist and into crystals would hear you out if you guided her through a Hatha Yoga session.
Many of you are aware that there isn't "empirical, categorical, undoubtable" proof of these facts, sadly. For obvious reasons:
-our knowledge of history is, by definition, all from biased parties and can't be a 100% retelling of the past
-people conspiring to slander aren't exactly leaving evidence about them conspiring to slander
This post is meant to ponder over this fact, to shed some light on the historical evidence of these things we do have at our disposal, and to discuss a bit about the subject of helping others and proving these things to others, to aid on their spiritual path. Both why you (most of the time) shouldn't bother, and how to correctly point someone to the direction of truth when it is the right kind of situation to do so.
As with my usual posts, this will be fairly lengthy, as there's quite a bit to cover. Grab something to drink and light some incense if you want.
So, one could easily just say something like "Satan is originally a Hebrew name, it's not parodying any kind of entity in another faith, there's no proof of that! Sat and Satan aren't linguistically related!"
What is this person's reason for thinking there's no connection between the two? Because Google showed him a book where someone said that it doesn't. Or maybe he can't find a book on Google that does show this connection. Or he knows nobody else that believes there is a connection, and he needs someone to imitate. We've all met this person.
Saying things like that, in behavioral psychology, is called a "thought terminating cliché". This is a technique that is self taught in an individual, to just say or think one sentence that they haven't ever doubted or pondered over, in order to avoid the anxiety of having their beliefs and worldview questioned. This kind of axiomatic thinking is a sign of a weak mind. And dealing with these kinds of people can be tedious and annoying, especially when we are personally invested in them growing as a person (family, close friends, etc.). Satanism teaches to not get overburdened with the ignorance of others, and to not force learning on others that are just not fit for that knowledge. We must strike a good balance between caring about our own advancement and being a helping hand for the people that matter to us.
That being said, let's stay on the Sat-Satan connection and see where history takes us. While there may be no handy, normie approved Wikipedia article to throw at the ignorant person, that shows this fact, we can point to historical evidence that is accepted by the mainstream.
In this case specifically, you point to Judaism's origins in Zoroastrianism.
"Judaic culture, in its inception, was heavily affected by the Persian influences of the time, including religiously. As the Judaic faith evolved, it took in aspects of Zoroastrianism. Zoroastrianism is known to have mocked Eastern, Hindu derived faith, in their theology. Active border tension led to the development of this in Zoroastrianism, with aspects like the Gods of Hindu religions being painted as evil Devas (some mythological characters were known to be evil as allegory, but this is the first large scale religion to openly view the Gods of their neighbors as pure evil forces. The vitriol against these Eastern symbols was then taken and elaborated upon by Judaism, creating an even more rigid Good vs Evil narrative, which is drastically different to how most religions and spiritual paths of history behaved and evolved. Makes you think, huh?"
This would be an answer that an SS could poke holes into. But this answer completely obeys mainstream history and still presents evidence as to this connection.
This kind of approach not only helps one be more convincing and informative for outsiders who are not as deprogrammed, but also helps one be more diligent in their statement. A clean approach to the information you tell others will improve your confidence in your own knowledge, and make sure you are actively being truthful, not just believing so.
I hope this fragment was revealing in helping us see how to address these kinds of "evidence" questions from "skeptics". However, let's also address the elephant in the room, should you even bother? If so, when exactly?
Here are my points on that:
- Do not go around debating these facts in real life, in places like school or anywhere else in public, which could lead to your privacy being attacked. You can do far more for the JoS and for bringing people to truth if you are not labeled as a Nazi, a Satanist or other kinds of terms that, depending on where you live, would make you a social pariah or land you in jail.
- Sometimes, it's just not worth it. I do not blame people for talking about spiritual knowledge online, in communities they are a part of (as long as you are not talking about things that would single you out as a Spiritual Satanist, then you're stupid and will face consequences for doing that eventually). However, you can't shove information into someone. Just as you can not imagine how someone way smarter than you thinks, you can not imagine how someone way dumber than you feels. What is intuitive to you can sound like nonsense to someone more spiritually closed, more spiritually brainwashed, or just plain less intelligent than you.
- When it comes to family or people you hold very close, the urge to see them evolve alongside you can be huge. I understand that. But it is still a case by case basis, and things can't exactly be rushed, at least not as much as you'd hope. Know that there are levels to how you should divulge or introduce this information, if you deem a specific person fit to learn it. Pick your battles, and pick your people. Don't try to convince your Christian mom that Satan is God, but maybe your close girlfriend who's atheist and into crystals would hear you out if you guided her through a Hatha Yoga session.
