Other #80523 Jews in science

[Ask Satya Operator]

I am currently in university studying physics, and I noticed that there is an extremely high percentage of Jewish physicists, from whom a substantial amount of academic material and fundamental discoveries are based off. Our textbooks are filled with Jewish names. I know that this is the case with other sciences too. Do we need a careful approach to their findings? Is there something to be skeptical about? How do we “navigate” the high percentage of Jewish professors/students/faculty and r&d workers? What do Zevists pursuing a career in STEM/Academia need to know? I have not seen a lot of information on this.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

I am currently in university studying physics, and I noticed that there is an extremely high percentage of Jewish physicists, from whom a substantial amount of academic material and fundamental discoveries are based off. Our textbooks are filled with Jewish names. I know that this is the case with other sciences too. Do we need a careful approach to their findings? Is there something to be skeptical about? How do we “navigate” the high percentage of Jewish professors/students/faculty and r&d workers? What do Zevists pursuing a career in STEM/Academia need to know? I have not seen a lot of information on this.

There are many jews who are very smart. They would have never accomplished all that they have done if they all were stupid. So there are jews who have actually made advancements and discoveries in science in things like math or physics.

It is also extremely common that humans have worked and discovered great things, only to be ignored and mostly forgotten by history and for their discoveries to falsely be related to jews who only copied them later. Einstein is one of the biggest frauds and plagiarists in history. His entire document about Relativity is not written like a scientific or academic document, it does not contain even one single citation about anything, and it is written more like the style of a children's story book. And he gets all of the credit for relativity? He literally stole and plagiarized everything from the work of dozens of scientists who actually are the ones who discovered and described these things. Dozens of French, Swiss, and German scientists. For the most basic quick example, the actual equations that are used to make conversions of Relativity are the Lorentz equations discovered by Lorentz many years before Einstein ever wrote anything. How can you be the "discoverer" of a concept when the concept not only is already known, but is already mapped out with specific equations?

A website talking about this and giving all of the evidence, proof, and examples of the dozens of scientists who actually discovered these things is called something like Einstein The Incorrigible Plagiarist.

 

[Umun]

There are many jews who are very smart. They would have never accomplished all that they have done if they all were stupid. So there are jews who have actually made advancements and discoveries in science in things like math or physics.

It is also extremely common that humans have worked and discovered great things, only to be ignored and mostly forgotten by history and for their discoveries to falsely be related to jews who only copied them later. Einstein is one of the biggest frauds and plagiarists in history. His entire document about Relativity is not written like a scientific or academic document, it does not contain even one single citation about anything, and it is written more like the style of a children's story book. And he gets all of the credit for relativity? He literally stole and plagiarized everything from the work of dozens of scientists who actually are the ones who discovered and described these things. Dozens of French, Swiss, and German scientists. For the most basic quick example, the actual equations that are used to make conversions of Relativity are the Lorentz equations discovered by Lorentz many years before Einstein ever wrote anything. How can you be the "discoverer" of a concept when the concept not only is already known, but is already mapped out with specific equations?

A website talking about this and giving all of the evidence, proof, and examples of the dozens of scientists who actually discovered these things is called something like Einstein The Incorrigible Plagiarist.

That's a good resource. There's others as well that document the same thing. Here it is:

Albert Einstein : the incorrigible plagiarist : Bjerknes, Christopher Jon, 1965- : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

408 pages ; 22 cm

archive.org

I'm fascinated by the various attempts to formulate a grand unifying theory / theory of everything and spent the last couple of years brushing up on my mathematical knowledge that was rather basic and with holes in some areas in order to be able to understand what they're explaining. I still have some way to go but now I get most of what they're saying to a reasonable degree for someone who hasn't had formal education in physics and mathematics. Lately I've been looking at Eric Weinstein and his geometric unity theory. A hideous creature, definitely don't recommend looking at videos of him talking, but some parts of his theory are very interesting. There's a lecture he did at Oxford where it was first presented and it's a lot to digest at once but after going over it again it's got some novel ideas and perspectives that might prove to be useful in the quest for a GUT.

Any thoughts on this as it ties in to the original post in a wider context?

SWP

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

That's a good resource. There's others as well that document the same thing. Here it is:

Albert Einstein : the incorrigible plagiarist : Bjerknes, Christopher Jon, 1965- : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

408 pages ; 22 cm

archive.org

I'm fascinated by the various attempts to formulate a grand unifying theory / theory of everything and spent the last couple of years brushing up on my mathematical knowledge that was rather basic and with holes in some areas in order to be able to understand what they're explaining. I still have some way to go but now I get most of what they're saying to a reasonable degree for someone who hasn't had formal education in physics and mathematics. Lately I've been looking at Eric Weinstein and his geometric unity theory. A hideous creature, definitely don't recommend looking at videos of him talking, but some parts of his theory are very interesting. There's a lecture he did at Oxford where it was first presented and it's a lot to digest at once but after going over it again it's got some novel ideas and perspectives that might prove to be useful in the quest for a GUT.

Any thoughts on this as it ties in to the original post in a wider context?

SWP

I listened to his presentation before. It's hard because I don't know anything about what he was talking about, I don't know what the pieces actually are for the types of structures that he was describing. But intuitively, what he was saying sounded like a very clean and harmonious explanation. It intuitively sounded like the type of simple concept where everything just fits perfectly.