ToZ WIKIPEDIA PAGE???

[Artanis]

Sorry if i dont remember correctly, if this has been stated in here already before, but we have a WIKIPEDIA PAGE??

 

[Artanis]

Temple of Zeus (organization) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

(Accidentally pressed send too early)

 

[ChildrenOfTheGods]

Yes we have wikipedia page but we also have our own wiki https://tozwiki.org/

 

[Hárbarðr]

Sorry if i dont remember correctly, if this has been stated in here already before, but we have a WIKIPEDIA PAGE??

It has been up for more than 6 months. See this thread:

Temple of Zeus (organisation) [from Wikipaedia]

I just thought I'd let you know, in case you didn't know and in case you might be interested, that the ToZ is on Wikipaedia. Everything below, including the pictures, is taken, and copied-and-pasted (misspellings and bad English and all) directly from the Wikipaedia entry on its "Article" tab; I...

ancient-forums.com

 

[Hárbarðr]

They have updated it. Previously, only the first paragraph said that it's the Temple of Zeus and called Zevism. The rest of the page reflected the beliefs of JoS in the early 2000's and never once did it use the names Zeus and Zevist. Now they seem to have caught up and rewritten the entire page, even though they still mention some of the old stuff.

 

[Nuclear Bunny]

This organization always had a wikipedia page.

 

[Hárbarðr]

This organization always had a wikipedia page.

No, it didn't. That page is very new, a bit more than 6 months old.

The reason for that is that around 2005-2006 the anti-JoS people created a wikipedia page that said that the JoS is a Nazi alien cult, and our guys edited it back, and there were many edit wars causing that page to be deleted and locked permanently, preventing anyone from creating it. For almost 20 years, it was impossible to create a JoS wikipedia page because it was locked (and the name "Joy of Satan" is still locked)

Only with the change to ToZ was a page created there, because it uses a different name.

 

[Nuclear Bunny]

No, it didn't. That page is very new, a bit more than 6 months old.

The reason for that is that around 2005-2006 the anti-JoS people created a wikipedia page that said that the JoS is a Nazi alien cult, and our guys edited it back, and there were many edit wars causing that page to be deleted and locked permanently, preventing anyone from creating it. For almost 20 years, it was impossible to create a JoS wikipedia page because it was locked (and the name "Joy of Satan" is still locked)

Only with the change to ToZ was a page created there, because it uses a different name.

I remember vividly reading a jos page on wkipedia in the 2010's

 

[AFODO]

Yeah it's not the best but not absolutely bad. It has inaccuracies and disrespect.

 

[Sakra]

Sorry if i dont remember correctly, if this has been stated in here already before, but we have a WIKIPEDIA PAGE??

Yeah it's been up since 2020, though wikipedia isn't in our favor so don't try to praise any of them. A lot of it is just supporting other articles unrelated to the ToZ.

No, it didn't. That page is very new, a bit more than 6 months old.

The reason for that is that around 2005-2006 the anti-JoS people created a wikipedia page that said that the JoS is a Nazi alien cult, and our guys edited it back, and there were many edit wars causing that page to be deleted and locked permanently, preventing anyone from creating it. For almost 20 years, it was impossible to create a JoS wikipedia page because it was locked (and the name "Joy of Satan" is still locked)

Only with the change to ToZ was a page created there, because it uses a different name.

It's basically the same article plastered with ToZ now. I'm quite surprised actually since wikipedia hasn't been this lenient. Back then, there wasn't as much coverage as there was now and other members kept trying to use the JoS website as a source, which wasn't accepted and perceived as spam, so the admins blocked people from creating the "Joy of Satan" article, but it didn't stop others from creating other variations of the name such as The Joy of satan, Joy of satan ministries etc..

Then I think it got lifted when there was a rework on the theistic/satanism articles and found the JoS had coverage, so the article was built off from that. I wouldn't give too much attention to it since the narrative fluctuates all the time.