WW2 regime and inheritance

[Satanic_truth]

Since the ideology of WW2 regime is work + sacrifice = reward and position in the social hierarchy, where does it stand on inheritance? Surely inheriting an innate advantage over others from absolutely no work of your own would not be true to national socialist ideology? I remember a quote from figure of the past in which he said something along the lines of "the money left in your bank account when you die is the amount of time wasted at work". But regardless of this I have seen WW2 regime defend inheritance rights.

Can someone break this down for me?

 

[Aquarius]

Inheritance is totally normal, it's the Father's work that goes to his family, nothing wrong with it.

 

[darkmonkey666]

Since the ideology of WW2 regime is work + sacrifice = reward and position in the social hierarchy, where does it stand on inheritance? Surely inheriting an innate advantage over others from absolutely no work of your own would not be true to national socialist ideology? I remember a quote from figure of the past in which he said something along the lines of "the money left in your bank account when you die is the amount of time wasted at work". But regardless of this I have seen WW2 regime defend inheritance rights.

Can someone break this down for me?

I dont remember that being a part of WW2 regime at all. In fact I remember it being said work should be something that is done with Joy.

While yes it is and always was part of Nordic culture to work hard on things. Me included I hate wasting time. I remember something about them making wages more fair and giving people enough time away from work in the week to actually live life as well and reflect on things. This was written about in sermons before search it out.

What are you totally making stuff up.

This is what figure of the past Actually said "“The amount of money that is in your bank at the time of your death is the extra work you did which wasn't necessary”

This implies something different than what your saying.

Sacrifice yes and work are a good thing. But I believe figure of the past tried to elevate people to as high of a living standard as possible.

I also believe WW2 regime viewing work as something that should eventually be like recreation doing something one enjoys.

It's the enemy that puts all this emphasis on always working and laboring and making sacrifices for next to no reward never having time to advance or even think. That seems to be the attitude you have.

I dont think they had any problem with any kind of inheritances.

 

[Libra]

Inheritance is totally normal, it's the Father's work that goes to his family, nothing wrong with it.

As someone born into affluent conditions, I’ve always felt that it was pure degradation and bitterness to shit on inheritance. If we don’t provide a better life for our children, how will we ever advance as a society? I didn’t directly earn the advantages I had, but they’ve set me on a better life course than someone born into poverty. I don’t understand people that want to justify toiling all the time instead of making things better and better every generation. Miserable slavish toil and hard work and sacrifice are mutually exclusive. One keeps you on the wheel and one provides for the betterment of future generations.

 

[Satanic_truth]

Since the ideology of WW2 regime is work + sacrifice = reward and position in the social hierarchy, where does it stand on inheritance? Surely inheriting an innate advantage over others from absolutely no work of your own would not be true to national socialist ideology? I remember a quote from figure of the past in which he said something along the lines of "the money left in your bank account when you die is the amount of time wasted at work". But regardless of this I have seen WW2 regime defend inheritance rights.

Can someone break this down for me?

I dont remember that being a part of WW2 regime at all. In fact I remember it being said work should be something that is done with Joy.

While yes it is and always was part of Nordic culture to work hard on things. Me included I hate wasting time. I remember something about them making wages more fair and giving people enough time away from work in the week to actually live life as well and reflect on things. This was written about in sermons before search it out.

What are you totally making stuff up.

This is what figure of the past Actually said "“The amount of money that is in your bank at the time of your death is the extra work you did which wasn't necessary”

This implies something different than what your saying.

Sacrifice yes and work are a good thing. But I believe figure of the past tried to elevate people to as high of a living standard as possible.

I also believe WW2 regime viewing work as something that should eventually be like recreation doing something one enjoys.

It's the enemy that puts all this emphasis on always working and laboring and making sacrifices for next to no reward never having time to advance or even think. That seems to be the attitude you have.

I dont think they had any problem with any kind of inheritances.

This response was pretty much filled with ad hominems and personal attacks :lol: I meant no offence whatsoever and I am myself a national socialist, I'm just trying to grasp the ideology better. Sorry for getting the quote wrong, but my meaning is the same. He says any amount of money left over is not necessary and therefore seems to be quite anti-inheritence (at least in large amounts)

I suppose without the Yehubor, people would not seek to unfairly give privilege to their children by working themselves to death. Most of the issues will be resolved once the Yehuborim question is solved

 

[Shael]

Hi Shael thanks for the response. I hear what you're saying but am still a little confused. You say "how much you benefit depends solely on how much you contribute" but that is exactly my point. A person who gains enormously from inheritance has done nothing to contribute to their race or nation and yet still benefits and is at a natural advantage over others. Would there not be any taxation on inheritance, since it is a way people can benefit enormously just by right of birth?

No, because the inheritance comes from what the person's parents have contributed, and as such their child has a right to receive this. Having a natural advantage is completely fine and normal as, again, this is not communism. The country is the construct of all the individuals contributing to it, but every person also has their individuality - their own money and assets and everything, based on what they and their ancestors have worked to attain.

 

[Aquarius]

Inheritance is totally normal, it's the Father's work that goes to his family, nothing wrong with it.

As someone born into affluent conditions, I’ve always felt that it was pure degradation and bitterness to shit on inheritance. If we don’t provide a better life for our children, how will we ever advance as a society? I didn’t directly earn the advantages I had, but they’ve set me on a better life course than someone born into poverty. I don’t understand people that want to justify toiling all the time instead of making things better and better every generation. Miserable slavish toil and hard work and sacrifice are mutually exclusive. One keeps you on the wheel and one provides for the betterment of future generations.

Well said.

 

[darkmonkey666]

Since the ideology of WW2 regime is work + sacrifice = reward and position in the social hierarchy, where does it stand on inheritance? Surely inheriting an innate advantage over others from absolutely no work of your own would not be true to national socialist ideology? I remember a quote from figure of the past in which he said something along the lines of "the money left in your bank account when you die is the amount of time wasted at work". But regardless of this I have seen WW2 regime defend inheritance rights.

Can someone break this down for me?

I dont remember that being a part of WW2 regime at all. In fact I remember it being said work should be something that is done with Joy.

While yes it is and always was part of Nordic culture to work hard on things. Me included I hate wasting time. I remember something about them making wages more fair and giving people enough time away from work in the week to actually live life as well and reflect on things. This was written about in sermons before search it out.

What are you totally making stuff up.

This is what figure of the past Actually said "“The amount of money that is in your bank at the time of your death is the extra work you did which wasn't necessary”

This implies something different than what your saying.

Sacrifice yes and work are a good thing. But I believe figure of the past tried to elevate people to as high of a living standard as possible.

I also believe WW2 regime viewing work as something that should eventually be like recreation doing something one enjoys.

It's the enemy that puts all this emphasis on always working and laboring and making sacrifices for next to no reward never having time to advance or even think. That seems to be the attitude you have.

I dont think they had any problem with any kind of inheritances.

This response was pretty much filled with ad hominems and personal attacks :lol: I meant no offence whatsoever and I am myself a national socialist, I'm just trying to grasp the ideology better. Sorry for getting the quote wrong, but my meaning is the same. He says any amount of money left over is not necessary and therefore seems to be quite anti-inheritence (at least in large amounts)

I suppose without the Yehubor, people would not seek to unfairly give privilege to their children by working themselves to death. Most of the issues will be resolved once the Yehuborim question is solved

Ok sorry didn't mean to attack that much I know for a fact the point of life is not to work so much you have no time for anything else or to even enjoy it and die. I also know the point in the opposite way is not to be completly lazy and do nothing or barley anything. We need to find a balance in this just like everything else. I think figure of the past knew this. Your fine and learning that's good.

 

[Tyrone1978]

Since the ideology of WW2 regime is work + sacrifice = reward and position in the social hierarchy, where does it stand on inheritance? Surely inheriting an innate advantage over others from absolutely no work of your own would not be true to national socialist ideology? I remember a quote from figure of the past in which he said something along the lines of "the money left in your bank account when you die is the amount of time wasted at work". But regardless of this I have seen WW2 regime defend inheritance rights.

Can someone break this down for me?

I dont remember that being a part of WW2 regime at all. In fact I remember it being said work should be something that is done with Joy.

While yes it is and always was part of Nordic culture to work hard on things. Me included I hate wasting time. I remember something about them making wages more fair and giving people enough time away from work in the week to actually live life as well and reflect on things. This was written about in sermons before search it out.

What are you totally making stuff up.

This is what figure of the past Actually said "“The amount of money that is in your bank at the time of your death is the extra work you did which wasn't necessary”

This implies something different than what your saying.

Sacrifice yes and work are a good thing. But I believe figure of the past tried to elevate people to as high of a living standard as possible.

I also believe WW2 regime viewing work as something that should eventually be like recreation doing something one enjoys.

It's the enemy that puts all this emphasis on always working and laboring and making sacrifices for next to no reward never having time to advance or even think. That seems to be the attitude you have.

I dont think they had any problem with any kind of inheritances.

This response was pretty much filled with ad hominems and personal attacks :lol: I meant no offence whatsoever and I am myself a national socialist, I'm just trying to grasp the ideology better. Sorry for getting the quote wrong, but my meaning is the same. He says any amount of money left over is not necessary and therefore seems to be quite anti-inheritence (at least in large amounts)

I suppose without the Yehubor, people would not seek to unfairly give privilege to their children by working themselves to death. Most of the issues will be resolved once the Yehuborim question is solved

You mentioned tax and that is what I was thinking. I remember an old man once saying how he's struggling to work out how to keep his wealth intact after his passing for his family.

He had a sense of dismay at how the State would tax his estate to pieces.

I feel it's the Poos usurping people's wealth to create their egalitarian society. I believe what people earn needs to go to whoever it's left to.

But don't worry about people getting a head start by inherited money.

It's been said that inherited wealth tends to get lost because it wasn't worked for and they don't have the knowledge to keep it.

A man that thinks about business and makes himself will have a more solid base to keep his wealth than someone that inherited it but didn't learn how to keep it.

Also I believe work must pay. I'm just about to go into work now. And I'm jealous because of all these benefits people about.

It's not free those living off benefits. People like me are getting worked to death and not getting wealthy because tax just robs all the surplus earnings.

I'm going to do a working to help me ease my work load I think. I believe in justice. Not equality. I'm not lazy. It's the Poos in power making all of these tax and inheritance laws that rob us.