DisillusionedCitizen
Active member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2022
- Messages
- 512
Thhroughout June 2025, I've reassessed my perspective on success, leading me into something unusual; in addition to the standard form of success, there's another form of success, one that, instead of benefitting people, it is achieved to their own detriment (it damages them instead of helpnig). The premise here is that, Instead of a fuckup, every step is taken correctly, but despite this, it still causes a person problems. An accomplishment of this kind can be easy to predict in fiction, but hard to see coming in real life. From that point on, I've been asking myself "if nothing went wrong with our beliefs and principles, then what worked too well?"
What is the cause of this kind of phenomenon? My hypothesis is that certain people are too confident in their beliefs, goal, ethics, and principles to the point they believe that such a thing won't backfire on them, and it may not happen right away.
Or maybe certain people pushed messages a positive attiude to avoid negativity, so much that the people trying to learn them end up being immature narcissists by accident. One example would be non-violence movement. The nonviolent activists think that, by avoiding violence, talking things out and spreading awareness, they're making positive change, but in a twist of irony, they've provided a backdoor to injustice, treachery and deceit.
That said, my guesses to this unusal kind of problem narrow down to either ethics or principles; some ethic/principle provided the Jews a means to slowly work their way to (subtle) dominance over Nations (especially Europe). My only problem is which ethic principle worked too well? It feels like I'm missing something here.
NOTE: I'm not sugeesting we should abandon our ethics and principles. I'm merely addressing the possibility that even they can work against us.
Regards
What is the cause of this kind of phenomenon? My hypothesis is that certain people are too confident in their beliefs, goal, ethics, and principles to the point they believe that such a thing won't backfire on them, and it may not happen right away.
Or maybe certain people pushed messages a positive attiude to avoid negativity, so much that the people trying to learn them end up being immature narcissists by accident. One example would be non-violence movement. The nonviolent activists think that, by avoiding violence, talking things out and spreading awareness, they're making positive change, but in a twist of irony, they've provided a backdoor to injustice, treachery and deceit.
That said, my guesses to this unusal kind of problem narrow down to either ethics or principles; some ethic/principle provided the Jews a means to slowly work their way to (subtle) dominance over Nations (especially Europe). My only problem is which ethic principle worked too well? It feels like I'm missing something here.
NOTE: I'm not sugeesting we should abandon our ethics and principles. I'm merely addressing the possibility that even they can work against us.
Regards