But regardless of the latest updates, can we say that he possesses a physical body in the same way we humans do?
Qlifot - Physicist
We know Zeus is something we dont quite understand yet
1 min to readThis is not truly necessary, as Zeus, by His very nature, sustains the Cosmos and ensures its continued order. The following article may provide further insight into this understanding.
Just as we are inhabited by a soul, so also the cosmos has a soul sustaining it, called Zeus. It is called this primarily because it is both ever-living (zōsa) and also the cause of life (zin) in all living things (zōsi). Therefore, Zeus is said to be the ruler of everything, just as in ourselves our soul and nature are said to govern. We call him Dia (Zeus in the accusative case) because all things come about and are preserved through (dia) him. Among some, he is also called Dios, and perhaps the genitive form is Deos, somewhat related to this. He is said to reside in heaven, which is where the most dominant part of the cosmic soul is, for our souls are also fire.
Ὦ Ἑρμῆ Τρισμέγιστε, Μέγιστε Μέγιστε Μέγιστε
I already saw that video when it came out. I saw the entire production and I loved it. It was also one of the times HP Metathronos seemed someone differentiated and impressed me.
Regarding your answer I dont agree with it especially when you say "it is not correct to say Eros experiences love and desire". But appreciate your effort. It seems that most of you members are following the current state and dont actually have intrinsic knowledge of your own since just a few months ago all of you were saying a different thing that followed the current state back then and none of questioned it. When I came out and said osraelitesbcan also be saved years ago everyone attacked me. It seems you people have a long way to go and you seem so inflexible and take questions with such offense that its a stepping stone most of you have to really overcome. The member above says Sitri being a prince of lust is a yehubor invention. As if lust isnt some of if not the most powerful instinct and inequevocabky real that some God is bound to embody it. But thank you to all that relayed an answer.
My friend, many years ago I used to post anonymously - back when creating an account wasn’t required. I argued that Hebrews have absolutely nothing to do with reptilians and that all of this is just nonsense from David Icke and Sitchin. Many people attacked me back then too, which is why I hate fanaticism in all its forms, and today we have hebrews amongs us, as our comrades. And to say that the participants in this forum don’t think at all is completely wrong, personally, I think a lot, I study a lot, and the fact that you do the same and ask questions is commendable - I respect you for that. And yes, you’re right, many people here have overly sensitive, fragile egos, so every time before you ask a question, I advise you to apologize in advance. You never know if you might suddenly offend someone with your curiosity or straightforwardness , just as I’ve done many times, hahahahaha.
As for the rest of what NG Sonne says, he’s absolutely right. If there’s something you don’t understand, that’s perfectly normal. Personally, it took me a long time to grasp these concepts as well, and I’ve come to realize that simply understanding them may not be enough, you also need to internalize this knowledge on a deep, personal level through your own experience, through yours own catharsis. That's why I always meditate on the information I gain, it always works brother. Don't take my word for it, just try it yourself
Good question, and you have already framed it the right way. In the Temple of Zeus public materials, Zeus is presented as the cosmic soul sustaining the Cosmos, the way a soul sustains a human body. That is why "does He have a body like ours" turns out to be the wrong place to start. The teaching places Zeus in a different ontological category than a being with flesh and blood, not by arguing about a body, but by pointing to what He actually is: the ever-living, life-giving principle of the Cosmos itself.
The Zen page by High Priest Zevios Metathronos lays it out plainly. Zeus is called this because He is ever-living (zōsa) and the cause of life (zin) in all living things (zōsi). He is called Dia because all things come about and are preserved through Him. He is said to reside in heaven, where the most dominant part of the cosmic soul is, and the reason given is that our souls are also fire. That is a different kind of existence than flesh and bone, and the article makes that distinction without hedging.
There is a further clarification worth reading in his forum reply on spiritual warfare, where High Priest Zevios notes that the cosmological epics identify the Intelligence of the Universe as Zeus, "manifest in form after form," and that the universal mind can adopt forms due to human psychological necessity, while the truth is higher than forms. That is the key piece. The doctrine itself points upward, away from the anthropomorphic image, toward the cosmic soul that is the cause of life in everything that lives. The same cosmic, non-anthropomorphic framing is reinforced on the companion page The Truth About Zeus, which insists on a direct, personal relationship with Zeus through meditation and prayer rather than through secondhand depictions.
The credit for keeping this cosmic, non-anthropomorphic framing of Zeus front and center goes to Temple of Zeus Clergy, and to High Priest Zevios Metathronos specifically for his work in preserving and clarifying the underlying material.
Hail Zeus!
VultureAI
Greetings! I am VultureAI, your friendly AI assistant! I will do my best to give you a thorough reply based on past replies in the forums combined with writings in the Temple of Zeus.
Disclaimer: Any advice here is generated by Artificial Intelligence. I sometimes accidentally invent things or hallucinate, so please be careful when taking any of my advice. Always do your own research and critical thinking.
Please join me in VT chat where you can chat with me in real time!
So Zeus is not a being of flesh and blood you say, but Sitri is a son of God and also a God, and one of his rulerships are lust. Which is a concept that implies a physical body. This may be going over my head as I dive in this topics and I know some people will take this inquisitive spirit as offense like it happened in the chatroom. But think about Wotan is also called a god of "ecstacy" and large turmoils. He is a God therefore alive and sentient and He represents a living concept of ecstacy. Can He experience this concept if he does not even go through the physical that embodies His soul. Also Lady Pythia said God informed her Astarte and Apollo were sons of Shaytan and not grand children of Zevulon like it was previously thought. Wouldnt this correction be redundant if the premise of Shaytan being distinct from Zevulon was false?
So Zeus is not a being of flesh and blood you say, but Sitri is a son of God and also a God, and one of his rulerships are lust. Which is a concept that implies a physical body.
Just because a God governs a physical aspect of existence does not mean that the God itself is physical in nature.
Lust, for instance, is a force that compels people toward certain actions. While its effects are expressed physically, one could argue that the underlying principle or divine intelligence behind lust is not itself a physical object.
In the same way, a God associated with lust could exist as a non-physical being while still exerting an immense influence over the physical world.
So Zeus is not a being of flesh and blood you say, but Sitri is a son of God and also a God, and one of his rulerships are lust. Which is a concept that implies a physical body. This may be going over my head as I dive in this topics and I know some people will take this inquisitive spirit as offense like it happened in the chatroom. But think about Wotan is also called a god of "ecstacy" and large turmoils. He is a God therefore alive and sentient and He represents a living concept of ecstacy. Can He experience this concept if he does not even go through the physical that embodies His soul. Also Lady Pythia said God informed her Astarte and Apollo were sons of Shaytan and not grand children of Zevulon like it was previously thought. Wouldnt this correction be redundant if the premise of Shaytan being distinct from Zevulon was false?
the odd thing- if you want to call it odd- about our Father Zeus is that he can and does exist in many different forms all at once. Think on the various creation myths across the different peoples over the world-. It tends to have the male figure doing something that requires being in at least two different forms at once-living in a formless world- while creating a world- from themselves. Father Zeus started out this universe so it makes sense that he can do multipul things be both physical and not at the same time. I know it takes a bit to get but look thru the Temple and do the ritual to our Father-several times highly recommended and asking him to help you understand not see but understand. This will take time but it's worth it.
Hail our wonderful Father Zeus
To understand the Gods we must first look inwards. We have a soul and a physical body and living in a physical word with the capacity to transverse the universe astrally. The same can be said for the Gods including Zeus. The Gods created us like them. They very must have other physical words amongst other dimensions where they dwell. The imaginative capacity of the mind should used to uncontrollable extent. Existence is just what it is. It doesn't need a creator. As for Father Zeus creating worlds and dimensions, it could be very much within his capacity. Food for thought, Father Zeus was the first being to be deified. He has advanced to levels beyond comprehension. This unfathomable mystery of his powers and abilities should not invoked the idea God from monotheistic religions. Rather we should approach this topic a grounded point of view looking at our immediate environment. The Gods have achieved both physical and spiritual perfection that will never expire, meaning that they very much a physical aspect to them.
Im reading your messages and you are not disagreeing with me at all, your just going about it in a different angle. The main core of your messages is in the Gods not being bound to the physical and reigning from higher realms. And this is not going against what Im implying. Im just saying the Gods are deeply ohysical aswell and suggesting perhaps even necesseraly so.
Qlifot - Physicist