Was Napoleon a Zevist Leader of the 19th Century?

[Megistomedes]

I was interested in this question when I saw that one of the symbols that were used in the First Empire was the Eagle, which later, a century later, also used by figure of the past in 1930s regime. Even the name Reich is analogous to the Empire in German.

Some more facts, this is the literal unification of most of Europe under the leadership of England (where there were especially many yehuborim at that time), against the state of Napoleon. Absolutely similar to what the Entente countries did during World War II.

Also, and I think this is the main thing, it is that Napoleon literally returned the monarchy to France after the bloody revolution. In one of the books I read that the revolution in France was the first of a series of Yehuborim attempts to overthrow the monarchy in order to achieve full power. Others of a similar success in the Russian Empire (in 1917) and was largely based on the "achievements" of the French.

I ask the French Zevism, or any other people who have studied this question, to answer.

I don't know if Napoleon is an Zevism but Masons were behind this revolution (original masons, not shekel masters) and revolution caused so many damage to Catholic Church. Napoleon, as one of the commanders of revolution, he is definitely potential person of the Gods and not a non-spiritual person. Being Zevism not necessary for being a good leader. Goebbels was also not an Zevism but he was good at propaganda and helped our case.

 

[Bogow]

I was interested in this question when I saw that one of the symbols that were used in the First Empire was the Eagle, which later, a century later, also used by figure of the past in 1930s regime. Even the name Reich is analogous to the Empire in German.

Some more facts, this is the literal unification of most of Europe under the leadership of England (where there were especially many yehuborim at that time), against the state of Napoleon. Absolutely similar to what the Entente countries did during World War II.

Also, and I think this is the main thing, it is that Napoleon literally returned the monarchy to France after the bloody revolution. In one of the books I read that the revolution in France was the first of a series of Yehuborim attempts to overthrow the monarchy in order to achieve full power. Others of a similar success in the Russian Empire (in 1917) and was largely based on the "achievements" of the French.

I ask the French Zevism, or any other people who have studied this question, to answer.

I don't know if Napoleon is an Zevism but Masons were behind this revolution (original masons, not shekel masters) and revolution caused so many damage to Catholic Church. Napoleon, as one of the commanders of revolution, he is definitely potential person of the Gods and not a non-spiritual person. Being Zevism not necessary for being a good leader. Goebbels was also not an Zevism but he was good at propaganda and helped our case.

Yes, I agree about the damage done by the revolution to the Catholic Church. But it is worth considering that the Yehuborim (((proletarian))) revolution in Russia also blew up churches and destroyed the class of Christian clerics.

As for the real Freemasonry that made the revolution, could you tell us more about this?

From the facts known to me of what the followers of the revolution have done at the conceptual level, for example:
1) Introducing a 10 day week instead of a 7 day week
2) Changing the names of all months and days (which were based on astrology and pagan symbolism) to fictitious.
3) Change of all former Catholic churches to "temples of the mind", with the worship of "mind" as God.

All of these things don't fit well with real non-Yehuborim Freemasons.

 

[Megistomedes]

I was interested in this question when I saw that one of the symbols that were used in the First Empire was the Eagle, which later, a century later, also used by figure of the past in 1930s regime. Even the name Reich is analogous to the Empire in German.

Some more facts, this is the literal unification of most of Europe under the leadership of England (where there were especially many yehuborim at that time), against the state of Napoleon. Absolutely similar to what the Entente countries did during World War II.

Also, and I think this is the main thing, it is that Napoleon literally returned the monarchy to France after the bloody revolution. In one of the books I read that the revolution in France was the first of a series of Yehuborim attempts to overthrow the monarchy in order to achieve full power. Others of a similar success in the Russian Empire (in 1917) and was largely based on the "achievements" of the French.

I ask the French Zevism, or any other people who have studied this question, to answer.

I don't know if Napoleon is an Zevism but Masons were behind this revolution (original masons, not shekel masters) and revolution caused so many damage to Catholic Church. Napoleon, as one of the commanders of revolution, he is definitely potential person of the Gods and not a non-spiritual person. Being Zevism not necessary for being a good leader. Goebbels was also not an Zevism but he was good at propaganda and helped our case.

Yes, I agree about the damage done by the revolution to the Catholic Church. But it is worth considering that the Yehuborim (((proletarian))) revolution in Russia also blew up churches and destroyed the class of Christian clerics.

As for the real Freemasonry that made the revolution, could you tell us more about this?

From the facts known to me of what the followers of the revolution have done at the conceptual level, for example:
1) Introducing a 10 day week instead of a 7 day week
2) Changing the names of all months and days (which were based on astrology and pagan symbolism) to fictitious.
3) Change of all former Catholic churches to "temples of the mind", with the worship of "mind" as God.

All of these things don't fit well with real non-Yehuborim Freemasons.

I don't know French history but here is the source: https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=7

Though Mageson is a traitor or a Yehubor, HPHC didn't delete this one. Seems like what's written is correct.