dalightskin
New member
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2008
- Messages
- 0
I was just thinking about how the universe was always here and always will be and I started to realize that it is easier to comprehend the infinite existence of the universe than the lie that it was "created". I will explain this in words that even the simplest of people can understand but the most intelligent of scientists fail to acknowledge.
The word universe comes from the Latin word "universum" which basically means "all things", which means that before the universe would be before all things. This would be a void of nothing, not even color! Imagine no black, no white, no nothing, you can't. If there was literally *nothing* around, then *nothing* would be created from it because *nothing* would be there to create it, pretty simple right?
The same thing goes with the big bang theory. This is the theory that the universe was created by a "singularity of mass" that created a universal explosion. If *nothing* else was out there then *nothing* could have created it. And if scientists think it was there all the time until it exploded then why is it so hard for them to believe the universe was here all the time? Furthermore, why did the singularity just up and explode, and also why? Science tells us that kinetic energy (the energy of movement) cannot exist without an outside force on an object to create the energy, so if nothing was around this singularity then it couldn't have exploded!
The simple fact is that no matter what theory you use, it makes no logical or common sense, but these scientists are too busy with their heads up their asses to realize it. If half of ANY of their theories were true then there would be no universe at all, EVER!!!
It is easier to believe that everything exists all the time than to believe that at one time nothing existed, because there is no such thing as "complete nothing"
The word universe comes from the Latin word "universum" which basically means "all things", which means that before the universe would be before all things. This would be a void of nothing, not even color! Imagine no black, no white, no nothing, you can't. If there was literally *nothing* around, then *nothing* would be created from it because *nothing* would be there to create it, pretty simple right?
The same thing goes with the big bang theory. This is the theory that the universe was created by a "singularity of mass" that created a universal explosion. If *nothing* else was out there then *nothing* could have created it. And if scientists think it was there all the time until it exploded then why is it so hard for them to believe the universe was here all the time? Furthermore, why did the singularity just up and explode, and also why? Science tells us that kinetic energy (the energy of movement) cannot exist without an outside force on an object to create the energy, so if nothing was around this singularity then it couldn't have exploded!
The simple fact is that no matter what theory you use, it makes no logical or common sense, but these scientists are too busy with their heads up their asses to realize it. If half of ANY of their theories were true then there would be no universe at all, EVER!!!
It is easier to believe that everything exists all the time than to believe that at one time nothing existed, because there is no such thing as "complete nothing"