I am somewhat impartial to this argument here, but I just want to say that you did a phenomenal job in your topic discussing inbreeding. I was able to follow your logic the whole way, while no one else could, except for Blitzkreig, who at least mostly understand your position, but still appeared be a bit behind in understanding the full scope of what you were trying to get across.
I should specify that I'm the side of the argument that souls can be created and destroyed, the idea that they can't simply doesn't make to me. That's my position on this particular argument, but I'm not really invested in it, so my input isn't necessary.
With that being said, I'm not sure what to think of some of your other arguments, such as the idea that souls don't have a sex, and thus can reincarnate as the other sex. When I first saw that, I simply wrote it off, as that is counter to the JoS doctrine as I understand it. However, once I saw how thoroughly you BTFO'd everyone in the inbreeding topic, I decided to give your other views a fair chance.
I will of course be a fair opponent to your views. I don't really care all that much about your arguments in this particular topic, I don't have a stake in that question, although I do agree with your statement that the world population is plummeting, that is 100% true. However, as this topic is loosely related to the question about if the soul has a sex, I am willing to hear out your arguments in more detail on that particular subject, as I do have a stake in that question. I will fairly oppose your views with all the intellectual rigor I can muster, but I'd like to see if you can "prove," or at least provide an extremely compelling argument for the position that the soul/spirit does not have a sex, and can reincarnate as a man or a woman. Be very thorough in your source material.
Feel free to reach out me via email as well, I'm going to go ahead and put my email in my signature.
