NY Times debunks Irish Slavery

[magus.immortalis1]

I am not an avid reader of NY Times, but I was lead to this article from an email.
What are everyone's thoughts and opinions on this article?
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/17/us/i ... 433d580bb0

 

[roybatty911]

Jew York Times denies that Whites have ever been anything but privileged oppressors through history. What else is new?

 

[hailourtruegod1]

I first read the last part as "what else is jew" instead

 

[Sam Hinkley1]

When we see an article like this, that seems on the surface to be exposing some great myth, while at the same time reinforcing the idea of how terrible black slavery was, one should be rightfully suspicious. Now its a pretty solid Rule of Thumb to NEVER trust a article written by a media company that is jew controlled. But maybe the first thing we should look at is, is it jew controlled? 
Fro[/IMG]Arthur Ochs Sulzber[/IMG]"[/B]Sulzberger's mother was of mostly English and Scottish origin and his father was of Jewish origin (both Ashkenazic and Sephardic)" Check. 
Ah, now we see the head of the beast is jewish, what about the writer himself?Doesn't look like one from his picture on the Times, but lets see what he specializes in. 
"Liam Stack covers breaking news and social and political issues for the New York Times express desk. An Arabic speaker, he worked for seven years as a Middle East correspondent, covering authoritarianism and revolution in the Arab world. "
So this is someone who has written about how the Arabs were now TOTALLY subjugated by jews after the "Arab Spring". Maybe not someone who can be totally trusted. 
Now onto the article itself. 
Third Paragraph down, mentions an open letter denouncing the "Slave Myth". Well this entire article seems to be based on this letter, why not give it a look? 
"The <e[/IMG][/IMG][/IMG] </e[/IMG]Sc[/IMG] </e[/IMG]“Irish slaves in Caribbean” </em>was evidently an important source for the “Global Research” article."
Only one paragraph in and it already is trying to convince the reader that anyone who believes the White Slave Trade happened is racist and wrong. 
"More damaging still is that your promotion of it, for a number of years, has added a veneer of credibility to what is a well known white nationalist conspiracy theory more commonly found on Neo-Nazi and Neo-Confederate forums."

Second paragraph, starting to shift blame and make the reader believe that anyone who believes the White Slave Trade is a Neo Nazi and Confederate. 
"Further[/IMG][/IMG][/IMG]the Irish Examiner (update: now withdrawn) </em>stand over the claim that an “Irish Slave Trade” was abolished in 1839? Or that “Irish slaves”, not enslaved Africans, were the victims of the Zong Massacre?"

Oh I'm sorry, do you need to see that again?
"WE WILL NOT GO THROUGH THE INACCURACY OF EACH LINE HERE, THAT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY."
So not only are you an evil racist confederate baby killer if you believe in the White Slave Trade, but you should just believe us that it is fake because we aren't going to prove it. 
With the Open Letter already debunked, there is no need to go through the rest of the article due to the fact that it is all based upon the Letter. 
Conclusion? Total and utter bullshit made by kikes to try and make all Whites feel that we have never had a bad thing happen to us, and that we should all be so thankful that we weren't slaves and so sorry that slavery happened and that even though slavery was brought to America by jews all Whites need to beg forgiveness for it. 
Fuck those bastards. 
HAIL SATAN FOREVER!
On Sunday, August 27, 2017 4:50 PM, "magus.immortalis@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  I am not an avid reader of NY Times, but I was lead to this article from an email.
What are everyone's thoughts and opinions on this article?
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/17/us/i ... 433d580bb0

 

[zolaluckystar1]

I spent a lot of time answering you on this. And then the computer froze, and i was unable to send it. I'll try again later.

 

[Alec Wynn]

Whites are not privileged oppressors. You're confusing with Kikes. Whites are masters and shapers of civilisations.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 at 2:13 a.m., roybatty91@... [JoyofSatan666]<[email protected] wrote:   Jew York Times denies that Whites have ever been anything but privileged oppressors through history. What else is new?

 

[Alec Wynn]

Egyptians had White people as their rulers. In fact the Pharaohs found are all fair-skinned with blue eyes and red hair. There is no Black Pharaoh. Same for what concerns Sumerians, Babylonians, Ancient Greeks, Ancient Romans and Ancient Hindus. In Atlantis (Kumara Kandam), Hitler ruled for sometime in a precedent incarnation. He was a Pharaoh in Egypt some times later.

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 at 2:13 a.m., roybatty91@... [JoyofSatan666]<[email protected] wrote:   Jew York Times denies that Whites have ever been anything but privileged oppressors through history. What else is new?

 

[zolaluckystar1]

Attachments :
<ol>bf5670dc6e3f4eef09236685a1b270e3--irish-republican-army-irish-baby.jpg</ol>Hi Magus, I actually spent at least an hour yesterday replying and then of course the computer froze and crashed, so I was unable to send it and all my work was gone. So, I'm trying again now
The British treated the Irish abominably. They invaded Ireland and occupyed Her. The Irish were treated as less than human. If you were sold by another black in Africa to some jew in America (and thats the way it really was - blacks sold other blacks to jews....and the whites were blamed), or if you were forced to emigrate to America or starve as it was very bad in Ireland thanks to the British (the potato famine was manufactured, for example, as a way to clear the land of the indiginous people for the British) and thus being dirt poor the ONLY way to afford the passage was to sell yourself into indentured slavery.....feels like semantics to me. Its still in my eyes slavery. Oh, they couldn't flog them openly or brand them but I'm sure they were worked to death just the same and treated like sub-human animals, just the same.
The differences to me are merely semantics. That picture says a lot. The slave owners were mainly jews, and I'm willing to make the bet that a lot of the ones holding the indentured slaves papers were jews too, and to them we are none of us human, but just animals. I doubt there was much differnece in practial day to day working between the two. Of course that is just my opinion.
I mean, this 'debunking' is coming from the Jew York Times. The biggest fucking liars around. If they say its a lie, its probably true.
And, in the 'sense that any form of coerced labor can be described as slavery', what the heck does this tell us about today? Most people I know HATE their jobs, they do them because they have rent to pay and bills and kids to pay for. But this jewified fucking system keeps us all in debt slavery. we work the first six months of every years total income actually is snatched away by the jews as 'taxes', then theres the hidden kocher food tax (don't know if you got that in America but its big in Canada - a hidden tax on everything we eat - HUGE income for Israel there) - these motherfucking kikes gouge the shit out of us everyway they can. Its totally disgusting. This is a slave system and economy we are all in right now. Slaves then, slaves now. Nothing different really. here in Canada, the kids learning to be doctors are being taught to treat the young people first, the old last or not at all. The old are throw away as they don't produce anymore but consume so its best they die fast. This is a jew approach, if ever I heard one. OMG how I HATE them! I knew from a young age this was a slave system. I have hated and resented it all my LIFE.
Oh, one thought about the Irish. They fought this british invasion since 1649 and in fact are still fighting it as the IRA who 'surrendered' in 1997 well, this wasn't something looked on favorably and so the real IRA or RIRA, they carry on the fight for Irish Nationalism. These guys are armed, professional and serious. which definitely makes me think that when the rapefugees start trying their shit like they do in Sweden for example, raping little kids, they will be meeting the RIRA. Who don't take prisoners.
Oh, and in Scotland, well good fucking luck. I heard of a family who were part scottish and they were white, they moved to the village that their mom came from and bought the local pub. They were shunned as non-Scottish, nobody would buy from them, within three years they were broke and had to return here to Canada....so imagine some negro from Somalia....good fucking luck!
https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=9cc_1454106586