Male Circumcision

[Crystallized Mushroom]

how damaging is male circumcision also what will happen to this "practice" when Satan takes over like will people be punished for forcing this and if so what would be the punishment.
also is it true the foreskin has around 20,000 nerve endings and can allow multiple orgasms?

 

[Jack]

Circumcision = Genital Mutilation = Less pleasure during sex = Not good.

 

[94n]

I've seen several circumcisions. It's quite barbaric, and babies feel the pain. The whole numbing agents stuff they go on about doesn't really work--you can see how the babies cry horribly loud and grimace and struggle to escape the pain. The aftercare is just "put some gauze and vaseline on it," mixing with all the waste from the diapers. It's very unhygienic.

There was a study a while ago that was published how the pain from circumcisions affect the baby's brain and development.

I don't recommend it for anyone. If you think about it, it's absolutely bizarre and barbaric.

 

[Poweredbythesun]

On this topic too, if you are a circumcised guy there are ways to regrow your foreskin.

Foregen being the best, but furthest away.

However, there are also manual exercises you can do to make new skin cells and regrow your foreskin. I've been doing these personally for a few months off and on, and it does work But it's a process that can take years to complete, and at the beginning months to notice any progress.

Here's the link to a sub reddit on the topic: https://www.reddit.com/r/foreskin_restoration/wiki/faq

And here's a site about this: http://www.restoringforeskin.org/


Best of luck!

 

[Crystallized Mushroom]

Also how damaging are the effects of circumcision because from what I heard it rewires the brain and may even cause increased risk of autism supposedly but how deep does the damage affect your body, sexuality and even sacral chakra?

 

[sonnenkraft]

How a Gentile will advanced Spiritually if his sexual chakras are damaged since he have been circumcised ?

 

[Powstanie Pogańskie]

I agree but what would be the punishment for forcing this on a boy or man or baby?

I would start with castration of the parent... If they're too old, then a state fine and the obligation of paying thousands to the child too as redemption.

Would be suitable..
Anyway I have heard of some cases where the foreskin would be too tight or something? And that sometimes something would be done about that?

But what the heck do I know about that. Im not a guy.

Usually what you hear is that the presence of the foreskin makes it mildly more difficult to clean down there. Which is somehow enough reason for people to justify doing this to their children.

AFK while I sever my fingertips so I don't have to trim my nails anymore.

It wouldn't surprise me to learn there's a condition in which the foreskin is too tight, in which case cleaning actually would become noticeably more difficult alongside general discomfort. But of course, at that point we've branched into actual procedures for genuine medical concerns and away from circumcision.

 

[Sunny]

I agree but what would be the punishment for forcing this on a boy or man or baby?

I would start with castration of the parent... If they're too old, then a state fine and the obligation of paying thousands to the child too as redemption.

Would be suitable..
Anyway I have heard of some cases where the foreskin would be too tight or something? And that sometimes something would be done about that?

But what the heck do I know about that. Im not a guy.

Circumcision is wrong. There are conditions of tight foreskin, from birth and also from accidents and diseases but it is not necessary to cut the foreskin or the glans or the testicles or the whole penis but it is necessary to treat and heal the glans and the foreskin. This case is used as an excuse for circumcision. Infibulation is even worse.
Infibulation (from the Latin fibula, pin) is a female genital mutilation. It consists of the removal of the clitoris (excision of the clitoris), the small lips, part of the large vaginal lips with cauterization, followed by the stitching of the vulva, leaving only one hole open to allow urine and menstrual blood to flow out.
It has religious or cultural origin, and today it is adopted and practiced in many societies in Africa, the Arabian Peninsula and Southeast Asia.
Sexual intercourse, through this practice, is prevented until defibulation (i.e. the opening of the vulva), which in these cultures, is carried out directly by the groom before the marriage. Women who have recently given birth, widows and divorced women are subjected to reinfibulation with the aim of restoring the premarital situation of purity. Relationships become painful and difficult, cystitis, urinary retention and vaginal infections often arise. The total or partial removal of the external female genital organs is performed with the aim of preventing the woman from knowing the orgasm resulting from clitoral stimulation.

Further damage occurs at the moment of delivery: the baby has to pass through a mass of scar tissue and made non-elastic due to mutilation; at that moment the fetus is no longer oxygenated by the placenta and the protraction of the birth removes oxygen from the brain, risking causing neurological damage. In countries where infibulation is practiced, moreover, it is frequent that the uterus ruptures during childbirth, resulting in the death of the mother and the child.

 

[Lunar Dance 666]

I would start with castration of the parent... If they're too old, then a state fine and the obligation of paying thousands to the child too as redemption.

Would be suitable..
Anyway I have heard of some cases where the foreskin would be too tight or something? And that sometimes something would be done about that?

But what the heck do I know about that. Im not a guy.

Circumcision is wrong. There are conditions of tight foreskin, from birth and also from accidents and diseases but it is not necessary to cut the foreskin or the glans or the testicles or the whole penis but it is necessary to treat and heal the glans and the foreskin. This case is used as an excuse for circumcision. Infibulation is even worse.
Infibulation (from the Latin fibula, pin) is a female genital mutilation. It consists of the removal of the clitoris (excision of the clitoris), the small lips, part of the large vaginal lips with cauterization, followed by the stitching of the vulva, leaving only one hole open to allow urine and menstrual blood to flow out.
It has religious or cultural origin, and today it is adopted and practiced in many societies in Africa, the Arabian Peninsula and Southeast Asia.
Sexual intercourse, through this practice, is prevented until defibulation (i.e. the opening of the vulva), which in these cultures, is carried out directly by the groom before the marriage. Women who have recently given birth, widows and divorced women are subjected to reinfibulation with the aim of restoring the premarital situation of purity. Relationships become painful and difficult, cystitis, urinary retention and vaginal infections often arise. The total or partial removal of the external female genital organs is performed with the aim of preventing the woman from knowing the orgasm resulting from clitoral stimulation.

Further damage occurs at the moment of delivery: the baby has to pass through a mass of scar tissue and made non-elastic due to mutilation; at that moment the fetus is no longer oxygenated by the placenta and the protraction of the birth removes oxygen from the brain, risking causing neurological damage. In countries where infibulation is practiced, moreover, it is frequent that the uterus ruptures during childbirth, resulting in the death of the mother and the child.

Dang I knew that sexual intercourse for a woman who was subjected to that torture could either die during the precedure due to infection.. and that sexual intercourse was PAINFUL. (its also done in some islamic cultures), but I wouldn't imagine that they'd ReDo the darn thing, and that women could die because of it.
it's simply barbaric. (can't come up with any other words that would describe it).

Thanks for the extra info Master.

 

[Cast Cat]

I doubt he ever said that, circumcision is extremely harmful and we Pagans would never have done something so sick.

After seeing the evidence that I had provided showing that the ancient Egyptians did indeed practice circumcision even all way back to the 6th dynasty; do you still now doubt that he said it?

Yes, yes I do.

And why is that?

 

[Aquarius]

After seeing the evidence that I had provided showing that the ancient Egyptians did indeed practice circumcision even all way back to the 6th dynasty; do you still now doubt that he said it?

Yes, yes I do.

And why is that?

Because common sense, Brother.

 

[Sunny]

Would be suitable..
Anyway I have heard of some cases where the foreskin would be too tight or something? And that sometimes something would be done about that?

But what the heck do I know about that. Im not a guy.

Circumcision is wrong. There are conditions of tight foreskin, from birth and also from accidents and diseases but it is not necessary to cut the foreskin or the glans or the testicles or the whole penis but it is necessary to treat and heal the glans and the foreskin. This case is used as an excuse for circumcision. Infibulation is even worse.
Infibulation (from the Latin fibula, pin) is a female genital mutilation. It consists of the removal of the clitoris (excision of the clitoris), the small lips, part of the large vaginal lips with cauterization, followed by the stitching of the vulva, leaving only one hole open to allow urine and menstrual blood to flow out.
It has religious or cultural origin, and today it is adopted and practiced in many societies in Africa, the Arabian Peninsula and Southeast Asia.
Sexual intercourse, through this practice, is prevented until defibulation (i.e. the opening of the vulva), which in these cultures, is carried out directly by the groom before the marriage. Women who have recently given birth, widows and divorced women are subjected to reinfibulation with the aim of restoring the premarital situation of purity. Relationships become painful and difficult, cystitis, urinary retention and vaginal infections often arise. The total or partial removal of the external female genital organs is performed with the aim of preventing the woman from knowing the orgasm resulting from clitoral stimulation.

Further damage occurs at the moment of delivery: the baby has to pass through a mass of scar tissue and made non-elastic due to mutilation; at that moment the fetus is no longer oxygenated by the placenta and the protraction of the birth removes oxygen from the brain, risking causing neurological damage. In countries where infibulation is practiced, moreover, it is frequent that the uterus ruptures during childbirth, resulting in the death of the mother and the child.

Dang I knew that sexual intercourse for a woman who was subjected to that torture could either die during the precedure due to infection.. and that sexual intercourse was PAINFUL. (its also done in some islamic cultures), but I wouldn't imagine that they'd ReDo the darn thing, and that women could die because of it.
it's simply barbaric. (can't come up with any other words that would describe it).

Thanks for the extra info Master.

It's been a pleasure.

 

[Cast Cat]

1. It's a ridiculous idea. Absolutely cruel, evil, disgusting, and alien in every way.

The Ancient Egyptians didn't think so.

2. You keep saying that Mageson said that, but you have not given any source of him saying that. Does not sound like something he would say, and you have no proof of that.

Old forum...no way to access the sermon anymore.

3. You link to some nonsense amateur bullshit source by someone who admits himself to not be an actual historian (in the About Me tab). This source says a bunch of unsubstantiated nonsense trying to say that an absolutely pure alien and evil concept was actually started as a gentile tradition. (Please believe me, goy) The only "proof" that is given are modern drawings writen in pen and paper that show an image of circumcision surgery. Except none of those images are actually from any egyptian source, especially not any ancient source. It is a modern drawing in pen and paper, probably only a few years old, that just happens to be drawn in an art style kind of similar to the ancient egyptian images. I can draw a picture like that too, showing whatever I want to draw, but that does not make it historical. Draw some stick figures, and some hieroglyphic looking symbols, and have it be a picture of anything. You can't backfill and backwrite history by drawing a picture in this moment, and saying that the picture is 40,000 years old. The entire thing is jehova bullshit nonsense.

There are many other sources saying the exact same thing:

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=ancient+egyptians+circumsision&t=brave&ia=web

Knock yourself out.

4. You seem to be taking this personally, like you are being weirdly defensive. Seems like you have had this barbaric disfigurement done to you and you are trying to promote an idea that it is normal or good. That is still not a good excuse to be spreading lies.

If I am spreading lies then so was Mageson and everyone else who has written on the subject (see link above).

It's OK to be wrong Aquarius.

It's how you handle it that matters.

And...you haven't handled it very well up to this point; attacking me personally and what not.

We'll chalk it up to cognitive dissonance.

 

[Stormblood]

...

You reasoning remains to the level of unsupported claims. You appear to be of the same brand of nama enki, another user. Are you in the same outside group or something?

Library of Thoth and the Satanic Encyclopedia contain everything, including sermons. If there ever was a sermon like that, it's in those. Burden of proof lies on the claimant, not on us, especially since your claims defy any degree of Satanic experience and wisdom held by many members here.

 

[Cast Cat]

I do accept when I’m wrong, but this is clearly not the case, as you are just spreading bullshit that has been scientifically disproved(try and guess why israel is the country with the most usage of viagra).

This has nothing to do with science but history.

And history explain's that the ancient Egyptians did indeed practice circumcision.

The historical community agrees to that fact and you do not...sounds like your problem is with them and not me.

As for that sermon you mention, I doubt that Mageson ever wrote such thing, it’s possible that you just misinterpreted it, or that it’s info that was just wrong, which can happen, but I doubt he even wrote that in the first place.

So were you not on the old forums or do you just not read?

You didn’t deny you’re circumcised, probably to feel better you gave to push this circumcise=good bullshit agenda of yours to feel ok about it. It’s bad, really bad, but don’t worry mate I got you covered https://www.foregen.org/ now you can use science to regrow your skin and stop trying to feel good about being circumcised, it’s a win win for you!

This isn't about me this is about your denial of the evidence. Evidence which corroborates what Mageson had said.

 

[Cast Cat]

You reasoning remains to the level of unsupported claims. You appear to be of the same brand of nama enki, another user. Are you in the same outside group or something?

Whoever that is...no.

Library of Thoth and the Satanic Encyclopedia contain everything, including sermons. If there ever was a sermon like that, it's in those.

Probably so but I wouldn't even know where to begin.

Burden of proof lies on the claimant, not on us, especially since your claims defy any degree of Satanic experience and wisdom held by many members here.

That is why I provided heaps of evidence to back my claim.