I'm not sure if this post is a question or a statement, but I'll address it as a question just for good measure. Yes the bible is completely stolen and corrupt and rotten from the core, but many truths did survive. One such being how in the bible Satan never killed anyone, just as he never did before the absolute defemation of him in the bible. Similarly so he is the 'rebel'. Alot of people view this archetype as an anarchist character, and our jewed society hates rebelion for obvious reasons l, but to rebel is not a bad thing. We rebel against the karmic cycle, our mortality, our past morality, the current form of humanity, the religions forced upon us, the ideologies thrust upon us and more. One can rebel away from lower things, such as the case with Satan. It is when one "rebels" against higher things that there is the problem. Honestly speaking though it's not much of a rebellion. Hedonism and banal decadence are easy, to rebel is to do the hard thing. It's just framed as a "rebellion" to quicken the trashing of society and playing both sides against the middle. The "decent" people play into what they're told because they're sheep, the "rebellious" people play into what they're told because they're called 'rebels' and think they're running contrary to whatever they think they're running contrary too. All the while both end up cucked. It's all about what you're fighting against