Egon Friedrich Kurt Albrecht
New member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2010
- Messages
- 26
The Article below I translated from "Compreendendo o Nacional-Socialismo" by Acao Nacional-Socialista (2006).
Is National-Socialism Fascist?
There is a great misinformation when it comes to Fascism, and the reason is that most people who talk about it do not have a clue about what he it really is. The term is often used to define the European movements nationalistic and anti-communist - especially the first half of the century XX.
In fact, the term "fascism" seems to have no explanation only, since people use it for what they understand as well, is to nationalist movements or to any aspect of policy which are contrary - pejoratively.
National-Socialism is almost always related to the fascist movement the years 20 and, by many, considered as a "fascist ideology". It is often said that NS is a part of the movement of Mussolini, or that somehow was influenced by this, or even a racial Fascism with the principles applied. All false statements, resultadas defamation and speculation.
Is National-Socialism originated Fascism?
Both the Fascist Party and the National Socialist Party of German Workers (NSDAP) dating from the year 1919. Thus, the two movements emerged in same time, with no contact between them. The reason there are certain similarities is simply because they were born in a rich historical context for groups nationalist and anti-communist.
While National-Socialism arose from the formation of a Worldview, the Fascism emerged as an anti-ideological, possessed only based on the unionism sorelista post-Marxist. Appeared as a regime that circumstance, reaction to advance communist and anarchist in Italy. Fascism did not have one concrete doctrine as National Socialism, just plan counter-revolutionary For movements red. In his manifesto there was no point or any trace of doctrinal or spiritual inspiration, just simple political demands such as: female vote, reorganization of the transportation sector, lowering the minimum age for retirement, abolition of the Senate, etc ... Almost nothing revolutionary deeds if compared to the National-Socialist movement.
In 1922, the March on Rome occurs when thousands of Blackshirts can put Mussolini in power. On November 9, 1923, the National-Socialists try the same thing in Munich, and fail, resulting in mass arrests, including of Adolf Hitler. If, in any way, inspired Fascism National-Socialism was the idea of a coup and the formation of paramilitary forces like the shirts Black and SA, never in the ideological plane.
In 1920, Adolf Hitler and Gottfried Feder had already formulated the 25 points of the NSDAP and, in 1925, the book Mein Kampf was published in Germany, while Mussolini had not nothing but a nationalist discourse and anti-communist. The achievements of the Fascist Party were merely political and administrative, lacking a doctrine or a Complete worldview as National-Socialism.
Then, in 1932, appears the term "fascism" in the Encyclopedia Italiana, in a space 37 pages full of pictures and illustrations. This was the only attempt by Mussolini - Ten Years after rising to power - to include an aspect doctrinal and philosophical movement. Although the text is signed by Duce, it is known that almost entirely written off Giovanni Gentile. This same text is then published in book form in 1935 - ten years after Mein Kampf release.
Although the Führer cultivate a friendship by Mussolini for years, so no was carried away by their opinions, which were almost exclusively political and economic, as had advocated a worldview completely new. If Adolf Duce was Hitler admired for having led the Italy as the first European country to contain communism, never for their ideas.
If the fascist movement inspired Hitler and National-Socialism was only on the Practical: the idea of the coup - later abandoned by the Führer - and the creation of SA. However, it is much more likely to National-Socialist Worldview has inspired the attempt the creation of a fascist doctrine.
Deeds and Some Ideas of the Corporativist Fascist State
The Fascist philosophy never had any racial character before the contact with National-Socialism. In fact, the first anti-Zionist currents Fascists only emerged after 1938 - five years after Hitler came to power and after sixteen Mussolini. The most surprising is that there was a reasonable amount of Jews in Fascist movement and often occupying important positions and, even after 1938, very few of these Jews lost their positions in the "Italian" State.
The Fascist State declared that Jews foreigners over 65 years, and before 1938 contracted marriage with Italians - the same miscegenation that National-Socialists tried to PREVENT by the Nuremberg Laws - were now considered Italian.
The Jews did not assimilate, create a state within another and retain parasitism by other people, can never be considered as Europeans. Just a purely politics and state of Fascism and other "democracies" today Zionists can accept in their homeland and still call them national!
It is possible to be Fascist and National-Socialist?
Almost only know the similarities between Fascism and National-Socialism but their differences are much more crucial.
"The state is a means to an end. Its purpose is the conservation and progress of a community from the point of view of physical and spiritual. "
"The human right nullifies the law of the State."
Adolf Hitler
By National-Socialism, the state is a MEANS to preserve the breed, to improve Man, is an organic instrument created by man for man. The state in National-Socialist concept exists only as long as the people accept it as it exists for them.
Only races create culture, values and civilization. The State retains only the and collaborates in its progress. The state is the administrative and policy of a series values developed naturally over time by the people.
"Nothing outside the State, nothing against the State, all for the State"
Benito Mussolini
For Fascism, the State is everything. The State formulates and implements the life of Male. Individual needs are suppressed, while the purpose is ALWAYS State. The state does not exist for man, but man for the state. The State produce, the state creates the nation and people.
Fascism never believed in a natural and organic community, did not have the idea of blood, or even people, it was just a model on a political state geographical space demarcated by maps.
Fascism does not differ much from the current "democracies" that are merely as political states without preserving race and culture and without great moral or value. So as European governments now accept non-Aryans immigrants, the Fascist State
also accepted and even regarded them as legitimate.
The Fascist conception of the State is, in principle, purely political and administrative. Thus, totally unnatural and therefore anti-National-Socialist. Its view of the world is in a perpetual conflict with ours, so there would never be State that was both Fascist and National-Socialist.
Several of those who proclaim themselves National-Socialists also consider themselves Fascists - usually because they are of Italian origin - but this is only a demonstration of ignorance and no study on what Fascism really is.
It is absolutely impossible to be Fascist and National-Socialist simultaneously by they entail radically opposing ideologies and doctrines at crucial points. The National-Socialism presents a worldview grounded in natural laws and driven by noble ideals where conservation and progress of the people is the goal of life, and through the state, this purpose is achieved. As for the people is not Fascism anything, the state is everything and people are only súditas government. We have nothing to do with the fascist "movement" or "doctrine". A National-Socialist is just a National-Socialist.
"When temptation comes, I give my covenant to him that trusts in me" - Satan
"<[/IMG]Devemos assegurar a exitência da nossa raça e um futuro para as Crianças Brancas[/I]" - David Lane
Egon Albrecht
http://www.joyofsatan.org
http://www.666blacksun.com
Is National-Socialism Fascist?
There is a great misinformation when it comes to Fascism, and the reason is that most people who talk about it do not have a clue about what he it really is. The term is often used to define the European movements nationalistic and anti-communist - especially the first half of the century XX.
In fact, the term "fascism" seems to have no explanation only, since people use it for what they understand as well, is to nationalist movements or to any aspect of policy which are contrary - pejoratively.
National-Socialism is almost always related to the fascist movement the years 20 and, by many, considered as a "fascist ideology". It is often said that NS is a part of the movement of Mussolini, or that somehow was influenced by this, or even a racial Fascism with the principles applied. All false statements, resultadas defamation and speculation.
Is National-Socialism originated Fascism?
Both the Fascist Party and the National Socialist Party of German Workers (NSDAP) dating from the year 1919. Thus, the two movements emerged in same time, with no contact between them. The reason there are certain similarities is simply because they were born in a rich historical context for groups nationalist and anti-communist.
While National-Socialism arose from the formation of a Worldview, the Fascism emerged as an anti-ideological, possessed only based on the unionism sorelista post-Marxist. Appeared as a regime that circumstance, reaction to advance communist and anarchist in Italy. Fascism did not have one concrete doctrine as National Socialism, just plan counter-revolutionary For movements red. In his manifesto there was no point or any trace of doctrinal or spiritual inspiration, just simple political demands such as: female vote, reorganization of the transportation sector, lowering the minimum age for retirement, abolition of the Senate, etc ... Almost nothing revolutionary deeds if compared to the National-Socialist movement.
In 1922, the March on Rome occurs when thousands of Blackshirts can put Mussolini in power. On November 9, 1923, the National-Socialists try the same thing in Munich, and fail, resulting in mass arrests, including of Adolf Hitler. If, in any way, inspired Fascism National-Socialism was the idea of a coup and the formation of paramilitary forces like the shirts Black and SA, never in the ideological plane.
In 1920, Adolf Hitler and Gottfried Feder had already formulated the 25 points of the NSDAP and, in 1925, the book Mein Kampf was published in Germany, while Mussolini had not nothing but a nationalist discourse and anti-communist. The achievements of the Fascist Party were merely political and administrative, lacking a doctrine or a Complete worldview as National-Socialism.
Then, in 1932, appears the term "fascism" in the Encyclopedia Italiana, in a space 37 pages full of pictures and illustrations. This was the only attempt by Mussolini - Ten Years after rising to power - to include an aspect doctrinal and philosophical movement. Although the text is signed by Duce, it is known that almost entirely written off Giovanni Gentile. This same text is then published in book form in 1935 - ten years after Mein Kampf release.
Although the Führer cultivate a friendship by Mussolini for years, so no was carried away by their opinions, which were almost exclusively political and economic, as had advocated a worldview completely new. If Adolf Duce was Hitler admired for having led the Italy as the first European country to contain communism, never for their ideas.
If the fascist movement inspired Hitler and National-Socialism was only on the Practical: the idea of the coup - later abandoned by the Führer - and the creation of SA. However, it is much more likely to National-Socialist Worldview has inspired the attempt the creation of a fascist doctrine.
Deeds and Some Ideas of the Corporativist Fascist State
The Fascist philosophy never had any racial character before the contact with National-Socialism. In fact, the first anti-Zionist currents Fascists only emerged after 1938 - five years after Hitler came to power and after sixteen Mussolini. The most surprising is that there was a reasonable amount of Jews in Fascist movement and often occupying important positions and, even after 1938, very few of these Jews lost their positions in the "Italian" State.
The Fascist State declared that Jews foreigners over 65 years, and before 1938 contracted marriage with Italians - the same miscegenation that National-Socialists tried to PREVENT by the Nuremberg Laws - were now considered Italian.
The Jews did not assimilate, create a state within another and retain parasitism by other people, can never be considered as Europeans. Just a purely politics and state of Fascism and other "democracies" today Zionists can accept in their homeland and still call them national!
It is possible to be Fascist and National-Socialist?
Almost only know the similarities between Fascism and National-Socialism but their differences are much more crucial.
"The state is a means to an end. Its purpose is the conservation and progress of a community from the point of view of physical and spiritual. "
"The human right nullifies the law of the State."
Adolf Hitler
By National-Socialism, the state is a MEANS to preserve the breed, to improve Man, is an organic instrument created by man for man. The state in National-Socialist concept exists only as long as the people accept it as it exists for them.
Only races create culture, values and civilization. The State retains only the and collaborates in its progress. The state is the administrative and policy of a series values developed naturally over time by the people.
"Nothing outside the State, nothing against the State, all for the State"
Benito Mussolini
For Fascism, the State is everything. The State formulates and implements the life of Male. Individual needs are suppressed, while the purpose is ALWAYS State. The state does not exist for man, but man for the state. The State produce, the state creates the nation and people.
Fascism never believed in a natural and organic community, did not have the idea of blood, or even people, it was just a model on a political state geographical space demarcated by maps.
Fascism does not differ much from the current "democracies" that are merely as political states without preserving race and culture and without great moral or value. So as European governments now accept non-Aryans immigrants, the Fascist State
also accepted and even regarded them as legitimate.
The Fascist conception of the State is, in principle, purely political and administrative. Thus, totally unnatural and therefore anti-National-Socialist. Its view of the world is in a perpetual conflict with ours, so there would never be State that was both Fascist and National-Socialist.
Several of those who proclaim themselves National-Socialists also consider themselves Fascists - usually because they are of Italian origin - but this is only a demonstration of ignorance and no study on what Fascism really is.
It is absolutely impossible to be Fascist and National-Socialist simultaneously by they entail radically opposing ideologies and doctrines at crucial points. The National-Socialism presents a worldview grounded in natural laws and driven by noble ideals where conservation and progress of the people is the goal of life, and through the state, this purpose is achieved. As for the people is not Fascism anything, the state is everything and people are only súditas government. We have nothing to do with the fascist "movement" or "doctrine". A National-Socialist is just a National-Socialist.
"When temptation comes, I give my covenant to him that trusts in me" - Satan
"<[/IMG]Devemos assegurar a exitência da nossa raça e um futuro para as Crianças Brancas[/I]" - David Lane
Egon Albrecht
http://www.joyofsatan.org
http://www.666blacksun.com
