If gun violence is real, then why does Iceland has guns and no violence?

[Nimrod33]

I remember reading years ago an article that said that Iceland has gun rights and almost no gun violence case. Despite this, however, many normies falsely believes that gun causes violence because of what some criminals does in the US. How can the anti-gun "agument" can be a fact when it is nothing more than a strawman made in order to ban guns?

 

[Henu the Great]

Iceland's population is very homogenous. This creates high social cohesion which results in low crime.

The opposite is true for the US.

The above plays a much higher role than the number of guns in circulation. If all firearms were taken away from North Americans, they would start using forks and knives to hurt each other, sadly.

 

[Satnam666]

Normies are idiots in some cases,
(Oh we don't want guns guns bes dangerous even pictures of guns are dangerous)
While they like it when the government has guns, then when the corrupted being yehuborim in the government turn on them they are like,
(Oh if only we had guns to defend ourselves)
Useful idiots,gonna useful idiot

 

[Head Guardian Blitzkreig]

because america doesnt have a gun problem we have a BROWN problem

The Gods created all races, so the problem is not the race itself but the advancement of the soul. We can recognize a discrepancy in advancement between races or individuals, but we should also recognize that they have had no real chance to actually improve themselves either.

 

[Pumpkin671]

Well Iceland is an island so can be easier to ban firearms if they so choose. The U.S. is in no position to do this because it shares borders with Mexico and Canada. People can smuggle guns in the U.S. if they like (not a good idea tho).
There are also so many guns in the U.S. that it is almost a joke to try and ban anything firearm related.

 

[luis]

Iceland's population is very homogenous. This creates high social cohesion which results in low crime.

The opposite is true for the US.

The above plays a much higher role than the number of guns in circulation. If all firearms were taken away from North Americans, they would start using forks and knives to hurt each other, sadly.

This is very true but if we go and explain this to anyone in the US they will say you are a racist. The other big reason is that the enemy does create a lot of those gun violence problems, they are trying to take them away so they create any situation that will make it happen.

 

[Henu the Great]

Iceland's population is very homogenous. This creates high social cohesion which results in low crime.

The opposite is true for the US.

The above plays a much higher role than the number of guns in circulation. If all firearms were taken away from North Americans, they would start using forks and knives to hurt each other, sadly.

This is very true but if we go and explain this to anyone in the US they will say you are a racist. The other big reason is that the enemy does create a lot of those gun violence problems, they are trying to take them away so they create any situation that will make it happen.

I think the key is to not include just about anyone in important discussions and plans moving forward, but those who hold merit, are influential (at least to a degree), and work with facts rather than with emotions or with ideology in their respective fields. I'm sure there are such people in the US even today. But you are right that the average response would be emotional and not based on reality.

 

[luis]

Iceland's population is very homogenous. This creates high social cohesion which results in low crime.

The opposite is true for the US.

The above plays a much higher role than the number of guns in circulation. If all firearms were taken away from North Americans, they would start using forks and knives to hurt each other, sadly.

This is very true but if we go and explain this to anyone in the US they will say you are a racist. The other big reason is that the enemy does create a lot of those gun violence problems, they are trying to take them away so they create any situation that will make it happen.

I think the key is to not include just about anyone in important discussions and plans moving forward, but those who hold merit, are influential (at least to a degree), and work with facts rather than with emotions or with ideology in their respective fields. I'm sure there are such people in the US even today. But you are right that the average response would be emotional and not based on reality.

Yeah luckily not everyone is completely brainwashed and they can use logic rather than emotions to judge the situation. But the "normies" would not really understand.