Photon said:
Another complaint people constantly have as in a memetic and largely emotional and unfounded argument, is about "Nuclear energy". Actually, we have done a good work in containing the waste of Nuclear energy, and no other form of energy can at this point serve for our present civilization's needs.
We are not in the 60's. We have improved on that regard. If it were not for nuclear, since we cannot have better, we would still be too far behind energetically. Nuclear may be bad, but it's of the best currently available.
Saying energy will be farted out from an imaginary currently not invented or available Tesla Plasma Generator 50 years from now doesn't change the above either. You cannot borrow from the future to pay for today in these things. These dumb low tier trailer hobotron statements are just as idiotic as the more suit and tie agenda of the Global Warmers.
According to global warmers if I stop eating bacon once a week, I will save the planet, but if others have 10 kids each which all need to have 100 smartphones during their lifetime, and all the related and luxurious commodities, we can't really say anything about this. Westerners must also castrate so that uhm that chinese can have 11 then.
Most of what is done about these topics is incessant whining, and unrealistic whining. Like sure, let us ditch Nuclear and you only have electricity in the US every 6 months, if you want to do this the Green Peace way.
Global Warming as a term does not reflect any actual problem, and it is fraudulent pseudopolitics so that Yehuborim create Green Parties that promise things that cannot even happen, or are only loosely connected with the actual problems of the earth or what needs to be done or the reality of the matter.
But it's good because it's a multi-billion dollar industry, same as Veganism and all sorts of other useless crap that doesn't seek to address any problems, but just rally soyboys and 12 year olds in protests that literally will cause no change.
If we are that good and adamant about the so called Environment, then let's take 12 hours of no electricity for all nations on earth, or let's just cut down some birthrates, will we? Of course not - it doesn't matter if we have to literally drink the melting water of ice-bergs.
How can you reasonably expect that the world pop is going to just indefinitely rise and rise, and that you will want to cover "all needs", with the current system. Why is it even moral to give earth literal cancer and risk the life of the planet in this way? Yea, I forgot, "Humanism".
Global Warming and Eco is as effective to solve climatic and waste problems of the earth as is Christianity in causing spiritual awakening. It is not only not going to do this, but only do more of the reverse.
The whole Global Warming go Eco is just intensifying the problems of the earth by providing cheap and non existent solutions. If you want actual solutions just cut some birthrates, countries who are on permanent demographic boom that is only known to literally eat out all resources of their territory, should mandate for people to not birth brainlessly first and foremost, and we can start from there.
I won't give up hotdogs because people want to have uncontrollable births.
Let's dive into chaos if that is the case and decide what is good later. I'll dive in with a hotdog, personally, and with greasy bacon and beef, despite of what muslims have to say on the subject.