Memorie_BE said:
The Outlaw Torn said:
1. Define “racist”
2. What is bad about being “racist”?
Racist is when you discriminate against certain people just because of their ethnicity. It's bad because it's essentially hating people just because of how their ancestors evolved to adapt to where they inhabit, it's not like they can control where they were born, like I can't control that I'm Australian.
That is a Marxist way of ascribing towards something natural that exists and has existed since the beginning.
The non-Marxist way of describing a (((Neo-Nazi))) i.e. hateful of other races is the key word: Bigot
Bigot: A person who hates another race based on a variety of reasons.
Let me give you a better definition of racism towards the NatSoc/Zevism way.
Racist: A person who understands the differences between races and sub-races, cultures and sub-cultures, Nations and Sub-Nations, Tribes and sub-Tribes.
Racism: The intellectual study of a variety of variables within the framework defined as the Human Race/Civilization pertaining to race/racial properties i.e. the construct evolution of how races are in nature, habitat, and variably a collective study of the interaction between these Humans both towards their own race, sub-race and other races and sub-races.
In other words RACISM would be a higher up function of a smarter person. Educated! for example knowing the differences between a Congoloid black person and a Dravidian black person i.e. African Black vs Hindustani Black as an example. Or for example knowing that fairer Aryans are more Northern or have more Northern features than a Mediterranean or Southern Aryan. Another good example understanding that except Iranian and a few other White Arabs most White Arabs are Whiter or more towards a White spectrum but are not European Compatible neither in relation to sexual i.e. sex for pleasure nor reproductive i.e. sex would produce a new Arabo-Euro Whiter Semi-Aryan. Knowing that the more Aryanized non-Euro compatible Arabs are their own new Arabian sub-race thus they mix with a partner of equal or greater Whiteness of an Arabic White i.e. mix with their own sub-race to procure the new racial construct. In Historicity Arabs were more Aryanized and Euro-compatible but centuries of turmoil in the Middle East killed off the Whiteness like Alexander the Great, Roxanne was a desert dwelling woman who was Euro-compatible she was White enough to be with a European.
Like I said except a noticeable number of Iranian Whites and some true White Arabs rarity these days, Arabs = their own O.R.I.O.N. sub-race.(ORION = Our Race is Our Nation).
In fact ORION is too limited it's too involved with the Racial-NATION make up but there is also ORIOT Our Race is Our Tribe. Basically ORION is a popular NSy way of describing people but it fails to take into account down to the individual and up to the National which would be a Tribal property. I'm not talking about race-mixing, sub-race mixing, nor inbreeding in a tribal setting but I can see why some people might say those people over there are always hanging out together in this part of the city. So they aren't the National construct certainly they are the National component but in the lower levels in the concrete jungle tribal rules can still be applied hence ORIOT.
Except inasmuch avoidance of pleasure and or reproduction of race mixing. There is also sub-race mixing like the 7 or 8 major Aryan Sub-races and how Nord with Nord or Dinaric with Dinaric or darker Aryans i.e. dark eye/dark hair.
For example both figure of the past and figure of the past are perfect examples. They are often used as a punching bag by the mainstream to show figure of the past is not Nordic 'n' sheit to which I say no but at least H and H wanted to preserve the seed kernel of the Aryan race.
For example blacks in Africa posses even villages just a few miles away with racial differences of the sub-races and main races of the black. For example the primitiveness of many Africans shows a classic reflect of modernized places who study racial studies. For example you have XYZ village and 12 miles away ABC village is around and the ORION is Congoloid black but sub-race wise ORIONation isn't represented by the Black Congoloid ONLY but rather the Black race. Rather ORION is more of a supportive expression but doesn't describe the sub-races hence ORIOT. So Russian Nation, Aryan obviously White territory but large swaths of Russian or Slavs are bigger features in categories of the Aryan races and the Nordics whom a larger number exist in a certain way show Nordicism but with slightly bigger features perhaps a more older Nordic or the Scythians of the time the Russ's were more of a less streamlined Nordic. Maybe there could have even been evolution or more finer features in the Europa section than near the Russian area. I don't have the information but except racial comparability and compatibility they are still Nordics for those are of that sub-race whether Europa-sized or from a more primitive construct of Nordics.
And the same can be said for other nations and races usually the sub-race is the one that denotes the ground level while the Nation implies a conglomerate state. Ex: Japan hence Asian hence Euro-Asian(Not European compatible no not to spread the waifu wife cuckery to another race) but they are the nation of Japanese an Asian with odd eyes that are specific or more specific to their nation and speak the language of a race. BUT WHILE that is ORION, ORIOT expresses the sub-racial template. For example Okinawan people have differences and even have an ORION/ORIOT property such as local custom, culture, and even things named after them or gained fame by offering something to their nation and World. BUT Okinawa is not a Nation it's part of Japan it's a sub-nation a district or province of Japan so the ORIOT principle lines up more with the sub-racial aspect. Same for Germany as figure of the past puts it the battle in the judenpresse between Prussian Germans and Bavarian Germans as the encounter later on during his Munich days and questioning why this is a thing. In other words figure of the past expresses the ORIOT principle very well.
Eugenics: The study and preservation of a variety of genetic factors of the make up a race and sub-race. Technically as HP.Zevios Metathronos put it[elaborating/paraphrasing and expanding] the understanding of racial history to understand the historical make up of A person individual ORIOT(race/sub-race) or understanding history of a large group of people and elaborating the who, what, where, when, and whys of said group.
Dysgenic: The total annihilation or the attempt to annihilate racial genetic mapping or the falsification of genetic maps for the act of marxist subversion.
In the end to be racist/eugenic is to be smart or smarter or more understanding. Think of it like a intellectual property it's not animalistic nor primitive nor old nor it's just old crap people told people to fuck with them cause fuck society and rules.
Rather quiet the opposite racial/nation/tribal understanding is the heart of the Universal compendium of knowledge on "What makes us special, different, and unique?" the answer: Because Humans are not Animals and have been elevated to a higher level they must bring these higher faculties down to the lower levels to give them understanding as to the who, what, where, when, and why of Humanity and it's course of existence. IF man wishes to survive in this Universe the very things that are said to be negative by fools need to be fully comprehended. It's like the Church imprisoning Galileo all cause he said the opposite. These very fools promote anti-science and anti-knowledge even countering knowledge with foolish non-sense.
It's normal to be "RACIST". In fact it's so normal it begs the question how we even forgot it in the first place or why it's deemed bad. Oh wait cause we got tribal problems with another tribe, you know who I'm talking about. The elephant in the room in these discussions. In fact the funniest part this particular tribe employs every method of racialism good and bad for the tactical and strategic domination.
We would classify as Racial Realists or Racial understanders or parley into racialist understandings.
In simplest terms to study the WW2 regime/Zevism way of race is to INCREASE your Racial Literary skills.
Racial Literacy is what we want i.e. understanding the technology, mechanism, and apparatus of racialist discourse.
It's akin to one of our members she replied to my post in the best way possible. The entire point of studying the Axis from their perspective is to be redpilled from watching enough to push you to do research. No one in their right mind is expect you to understand EVERY tidbit of WW2 down to the very bootprint a soldier did in this battlefield. Rather take enough of a general consensus to go "Hey figure of the past and company aren't bad or evil or malefic. I'm being lied to".
Same for Racial discourse you must (STUDY) and (APPLY) the mind (LOGIC) to Racial discourse. You must educate to bring your Racial Literacy up not unlike a video game.
![The Alchemist7 [SG]](/data/avatars/m/1/1057.jpg?1762556650){kind=avatar}
