Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

BOLSHEVISM from MOSES to LENIN

  • Thread starter JoS Forum Contributions
  • Start date
J

JoS Forum Contributions

Guest
BOLSHEVISM from MOSES to LENIN




A DIALOGUE BETWEEN ADOLF HITLER AND ME


by Dietrich Eckart



Translated from the German by William L. Pierce




He paused with a dark look at the Book of Hate.


II


"And so it goes, through the entire Old Testament," he began again. "Indeed, I'm telling you nothing new, but we must bring it home to ourselves as often as possible in order to be able to negate the constant hypocritical babble. Really, the Book of Joshua should suffice; such a thing of uninterrupted genocide, of bestial cruelty, of shameless rapacity and cold-blooded cunning—Hell incarnate! And everything in the name of Jehova, in fact, according to his express wish! When the city of Jericho fell victim to the Jews through the treachery of the harlot Rahab, neither man nor beast, neither young nor old remained among the living; only the harlot was spared. She and her whole, noble family were rewarded with the privilege of living in Israel. (18) And what good-natured peoples they were who, one after another, were completely exterminated! Delitzsch, who has thoroughly investigated that period, writes, for example, about the Canaanites: on all the hills, under every shady tree, they rendered adoration and reverence to the sun god and to the salutary goddess Aschera; and he compares this beautiful, poetic custom with the pious way of our Catholic villagers, serving the Almighty in remote mountain chapels." (19)

"Joshua alone," I emphasized, "was responsible for the massacre of thirty-one kings, with all their people. Among those nations exterminated in these predatory raids were several who had yielded themselves trustingly to him. Each time the sinister words, 'let none survive,' were heard. I am inclined to believe that the Pöbelvolk or at least their descendants, must have still been the obedient shock troops of the Jews, not because the work was so atrocious, but because the children of Israel have always let deluded Gentiles do their dirty work, particularly where danger was involved. Besides, they would not have been strong enough to subdue the peoples to whom they were opposed, without the bellicose enthusiasm of their brutalized comrades.

"Of particular interest is the evident satisfaction with which the Jews have deliberately enumerated each of the slain kings one is reminded of the prophet Isaiah. In one place, he raves as if possessed: 'The Lord is angry at all the Gentiles; he will deliver them to the slaughter; their land will became burning pitch; it will become a wasteland, soaked with their blood; there will be no nobles in the land; their princes will die out.' (20) Between Isaiah and Joshua were hundreds of years, but in that whole time the infernal rage of the Jews against non-Jewish royalty hadn't changed a bit."

"And in all eternity nothing will change," he proceeded, "so far as the attitude of the Jews toward our kings and our leaders is concerned. To destroy them is their eternal sin, and when they can't accomplish this by force, then they will use cunning. Whenever we have a strong leadership, the Jews are obliged to keep their noses clean. Our leadership can be truly strong, however, only if it is based completely in our people; only if it concerns itself with the welfare of the least among them just as much as with that of the wealthiest of them; only if, in the firm conviction of its own worth, it bars every alien influence from the beginning; only if it is not merely national, but is also social, down to its very bones. No matter what others may say, I assert this: a time will come when all the elite nations of the world will have such a leadership; and then everyone will be astonished to see that, instead of grating on one another as has previously been the case, they will treat one another with respect and consideration. For then there will be no more whipping up of land greed, of an itching for power, of suspicion—sentiments which exist in unmixed form only in the isolated few, and not in the more trusting general populace, anyhow. There will be an end to the lying praise of an indiscriminate human brotherhood, which would be possible, if at all, only under the supposition that one had from the first excluded that eternal mischief-maker, the Jew. But had this been done, there would be no need to push the universal brotherhood idea; the various peoples would find themselves compatible of their own accord."


III

"Tell me," I interrupted him; "strictly speaking, do you consider the Jew to be national, or international?"

"Neither," was the answer. "One who really feels international has as much regard for the rest of the world as he does for his own nation. Were our so-called international swarms really like that — fine. But I fear that they are secretly more concerned with the attitude of the rest of the world toward themselves than with their own attitude toward the world. Internationalism requires basically good intentions. But the Jew fundamentally and completely lacks these. He hasn't the remotest idea of classifying himself with the rest of humanity. His aim is to dominate others in order to extort from them at his leisure. Were he really interested in comradeship, he has had the longest and most abundant opportunity for it. Jehovah command to him to make no alliances with foreign peoples, but, on the contrary, to devour one after the other, went straight to his heart. (21) Everywhere one greeted him with cordiality, at first: in ancient Egypt, in Persia, in Babylonia, in Europe; the cloven hoof appeared everywhere. The early Germanic conquerors found him with a number of arrogated rights and made no move to dispossess him of these. He was allowed to do business wherever and however he wanted, even in the slave trade, toward which he has always been peculiarly inclined. Like everyone else, he could hold public office, including the magistracy; and his so-called religion was protected by the state. Thus wrote Otto Hauser, who is an excellent source of fascinating illuminations regarding the Jews." (22)

"I should say so!" I nodded. "One must partake of him with caution though, otherwise one may not see the black forest for the 'blond' trees. (23) On the whole, I prefer Werner Sombart, even though his Berlin lectures swarm with Jews."

"Now, he says the same thing!" he cried. "According to him the Jews were by no means always second-class citizens. In antiquity one even found them often with special privileges which absolved them from certain duties, such as military service. (24) It was never their strong side to risk armed conflict. In the War of Liberation, (25) the Jews of Deutsch-Krone, in Pomerania, sent a petition to the king, requesting permission to remain home from the campaign in return for money. In this petition they argued that ten thousand talers would be of much more use in the war effort than the frankly questionable fighting ability of a Jew. The petition was accepted, not only from them, but also from the Jews of five more of the seven Prussian districts." (26)

"Yes, I know that place in Hauser," I added; "it is authentic. He also quotes there from Mayer's Encyclopedia, however, a statement which calmly claims that the Jews, through their heroic spirit in the War of Liberation, proved themselves as worthy German citizens."

"Just as they did in the World War," he winked expressively. "If I had my way, I'd require placards to be hung in all the schools, at every street corner, and in every public room, on which would be printed nothing but Schopenhauer's description of the Jews: 'Great masters of the lie'! (27) There is no better description. And it applies without exception to every Jew equally, whether high or low, stock exchange tycoon or rabbi, baptized or circumcised. Our servile people! Provoked for thousands of years! And the innocents are taken in again and again by this blatant swindle. It is understandable that they become surly with the Jews, but only after the latter have shamelessly abused their naive good nature and plundered them to the skin with their usury and fraud. And that has been the case everywhere: in the old Roman Empire, in Egypt, in Asia, later in England, Italy, France, Poland, Holland, Germany, and even, as Sombart writes, 'in the Iberian peninsula, where the Jews have experienced so many blessings'!

"And the game they're playing today, they have been at for two thousand years," he continued. "I think that suffices to characterize the nature of Jewish internationalism. Now we still have left to consider the national feeling of the Jews. Naturally not that of the one for Germany, of the other for England, and so on. Not many mice are to be caught with that bait any longer. 'Send me a box full of German soil, so that I can at least symbolically defile the accursed country,' wrote the German Jew, Börne; (28) and Heinrich Heine sniffed out Germany's future from a toilet bowl. (29) The physicist, Einstein, whom the Jewish publicity agents celebrate as a second Kepler, explained he would have nothing to do with German nationalism. He considered 'deceitful' the custom of the Central Association of German Citizens of Jewish Faith (30) of concerning themselves only with the religious interests of the Jews and not with their racial community also. A rare bird? No, only one who believed his people already safely in control, and thus considered it no longer necessary to keep up pretenses. In the Central Association itself, the mask has already fallen. A Dr. Brünn frankly admitted there that the Jews could have no German national spirit. (31) We always mistake their unprincipled exertions to accommodate themselves to all and everyone for impulses of the heart. Whenever they see an advantage to be gained by adopting a certain pose, they never hesitate, and certainly wouldn't let ethical considerations stand in their way. How many Galician Jews have first become Germans, then Englishmen, and finally Americans! And every time in the twinkling of an eye. With startling rapidity they change their nationality back and forth, and wherever their feet touch, there resounds either the 'Watch on the Rhine,' or the 'Marsellaise,' or 'Yankee Doodle.' Dr. Heim does not once question the fact that our Warburgs, our Bleichroders, or our Mendelssohns are able to transfer their patriotism as well as their residence of today to London or to New York on the morrow. 'On the sands of Brandenburg an Asiatic horde!' Walther Rathenau once blurted out about the Berlin Jews. (32) He forgot to add that the same horde is on the Isar, the Elbe, the Main, the Thames, the Seine, the Hudson, the Neva, and the Volga. And all of them with the same deceit toward their neighbors. Our charmers and wizards, however, distinguish between respectable and not-so-respectable, between settled and newly immigrated, between western and eastern Jews, and if worse comes to worst, they shrug their shoulders and mutter, 'Every country has the Jews it deserves.' It means nothing to them that it was a Jew who coined this fine-sounding phrase. Nor that in the case of Germany, considering the quality of the Jews we have 'deserved,' it becomes a resounding slap in the face. 'All Israel stands openly in the British camp!' announced the American union leader Samuel Gompers in 1916. And that includes the German Jews too, as the American, Ford, well knew. He has written of the faithlessness of the so-called 'German' Jews toward the country where they live, of the fact that they have united themselves with the rest of the world's Jews toward the ruin of Germany. 'Why?' jeers the Jew. 'Because the German is a vulgar scoundrel, a backward, medieval creature, who hasn't the faintest idea of our worth. And we should help such rabble? No, he has the Jews he deserves!' Such arrogance is indeed staggering to behold."
 
Great conversation between Eckart and Hitler.

What the Satanist today needs to realize is that before the 1960's, other Satanists could have referred to our enemies of "evil" and "devils." This does not make them any less of a Satanist. People just wrote differently during different times.

In this article, not only were they exposing our enemies (Jews), but also bashed Judeo/Christianity and they defended what we know as Satanism. It takes a true Satanist to be able to see this.

I'm behind on messages, I'll try to write more of a reply to this later.

666/88!!

High Priest Jake Carlson
http://www.joyofsatan.com



--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "mageson6666" <mageson6666@... wrote:

BOLSHEVISM from MOSES to LENIN




A DIALOGUE BETWEEN ADOLF HITLER AND ME


by Dietrich Eckart



Translated from the German by William L. Pierce




He paused with a dark look at the Book of Hate.


II


"And so it goes, through the entire Old Testament," he began again. "Indeed, I'm telling you nothing new, but we must bring it home to ourselves as often as possible in order to be able to negate the constant hypocritical babble. Really, the Book of Joshua should suffice; such a thing of uninterrupted genocide, of bestial cruelty, of shameless rapacity and cold-blooded cunning—Hell incarnate! And everything in the name of Jehova, in fact, according to his express wish! When the city of Jericho fell victim to the Jews through the treachery of the harlot Rahab, neither man nor beast, neither young nor old remained among the living; only the harlot was spared. She and her whole, noble family were rewarded with the privilege of living in Israel. (18) And what good-natured peoples they were who, one after another, were completely exterminated! Delitzsch, who has thoroughly investigated that period, writes, for example, about the Canaanites: on all the hills, under every shady tree, they rendered adoration and reverence to the sun god and to the salutary goddess Aschera; and he compares this beautiful, poetic custom with the pious way of our Catholic villagers, serving the Almighty in remote mountain chapels." (19)

"Joshua alone," I emphasized, "was responsible for the massacre of thirty-one kings, with all their people. Among those nations exterminated in these predatory raids were several who had yielded themselves trustingly to him. Each time the sinister words, 'let none survive,' were heard. I am inclined to believe that the Pöbelvolk or at least their descendants, must have still been the obedient shock troops of the Jews, not because the work was so atrocious, but because the children of Israel have always let deluded Gentiles do their dirty work, particularly where danger was involved. Besides, they would not have been strong enough to subdue the peoples to whom they were opposed, without the bellicose enthusiasm of their brutalized comrades.

"Of particular interest is the evident satisfaction with which the Jews have deliberately enumerated each of the slain kings one is reminded of the prophet Isaiah. In one place, he raves as if possessed: 'The Lord is angry at all the Gentiles; he will deliver them to the slaughter; their land will became burning pitch; it will become a wasteland, soaked with their blood; there will be no nobles in the land; their princes will die out.' (20) Between Isaiah and Joshua were hundreds of years, but in that whole time the infernal rage of the Jews against non-Jewish royalty hadn't changed a bit."

"And in all eternity nothing will change," he proceeded, "so far as the attitude of the Jews toward our kings and our leaders is concerned. To destroy them is their eternal sin, and when they can't accomplish this by force, then they will use cunning. Whenever we have a strong leadership, the Jews are obliged to keep their noses clean. Our leadership can be truly strong, however, only if it is based completely in our people; only if it concerns itself with the welfare of the least among them just as much as with that of the wealthiest of them; only if, in the firm conviction of its own worth, it bars every alien influence from the beginning; only if it is not merely national, but is also social, down to its very bones. No matter what others may say, I assert this: a time will come when all the elite nations of the world will have such a leadership; and then everyone will be astonished to see that, instead of grating on one another as has previously been the case, they will treat one another with respect and consideration. For then there will be no more whipping up of land greed, of an itching for power, of suspicion—sentiments which exist in unmixed form only in the isolated few, and not in the more trusting general populace, anyhow. There will be an end to the lying praise of an indiscriminate human brotherhood, which would be possible, if at all, only under the supposition that one had from the first excluded that eternal mischief-maker, the Jew. But had this been done, there would be no need to push the universal brotherhood idea; the various peoples would find themselves compatible of their own accord."


III

"Tell me," I interrupted him; "strictly speaking, do you consider the Jew to be national, or international?"

"Neither," was the answer. "One who really feels international has as much regard for the rest of the world as he does for his own nation. Were our so-called international swarms really like that — fine. But I fear that they are secretly more concerned with the attitude of the rest of the world toward themselves than with their own attitude toward the world. Internationalism requires basically good intentions. But the Jew fundamentally and completely lacks these. He hasn't the remotest idea of classifying himself with the rest of humanity. His aim is to dominate others in order to extort from them at his leisure. Were he really interested in comradeship, he has had the longest and most abundant opportunity for it. Jehovah command to him to make no alliances with foreign peoples, but, on the contrary, to devour one after the other, went straight to his heart. (21) Everywhere one greeted him with cordiality, at first: in ancient Egypt, in Persia, in Babylonia, in Europe; the cloven hoof appeared everywhere. The early Germanic conquerors found him with a number of arrogated rights and made no move to dispossess him of these. He was allowed to do business wherever and however he wanted, even in the slave trade, toward which he has always been peculiarly inclined. Like everyone else, he could hold public office, including the magistracy; and his so-called religion was protected by the state. Thus wrote Otto Hauser, who is an excellent source of fascinating illuminations regarding the Jews." (22)

"I should say so!" I nodded. "One must partake of him with caution though, otherwise one may not see the black forest for the 'blond' trees. (23) On the whole, I prefer Werner Sombart, even though his Berlin lectures swarm with Jews."

"Now, he says the same thing!" he cried. "According to him the Jews were by no means always second-class citizens. In antiquity one even found them often with special privileges which absolved them from certain duties, such as military service. (24) It was never their strong side to risk armed conflict. In the War of Liberation, (25) the Jews of Deutsch-Krone, in Pomerania, sent a petition to the king, requesting permission to remain home from the campaign in return for money. In this petition they argued that ten thousand talers would be of much more use in the war effort than the frankly questionable fighting ability of a Jew. The petition was accepted, not only from them, but also from the Jews of five more of the seven Prussian districts." (26)

"Yes, I know that place in Hauser," I added; "it is authentic. He also quotes there from Mayer's Encyclopedia, however, a statement which calmly claims that the Jews, through their heroic spirit in the War of Liberation, proved themselves as worthy German citizens."

"Just as they did in the World War," he winked expressively. "If I had my way, I'd require placards to be hung in all the schools, at every street corner, and in every public room, on which would be printed nothing but Schopenhauer's description of the Jews: 'Great masters of the lie'! (27) There is no better description. And it applies without exception to every Jew equally, whether high or low, stock exchange tycoon or rabbi, baptized or circumcised. Our servile people! Provoked for thousands of years! And the innocents are taken in again and again by this blatant swindle. It is understandable that they become surly with the Jews, but only after the latter have shamelessly abused their naive good nature and plundered them to the skin with their usury and fraud. And that has been the case everywhere: in the old Roman Empire, in Egypt, in Asia, later in England, Italy, France, Poland, Holland, Germany, and even, as Sombart writes, 'in the Iberian peninsula, where the Jews have experienced so many blessings'!

"And the game they're playing today, they have been at for two thousand years," he continued. "I think that suffices to characterize the nature of Jewish internationalism. Now we still have left to consider the national feeling of the Jews. Naturally not that of the one for Germany, of the other for England, and so on. Not many mice are to be caught with that bait any longer. 'Send me a box full of German soil, so that I can at least symbolically defile the accursed country,' wrote the German Jew, Börne; (28) and Heinrich Heine sniffed out Germany's future from a toilet bowl. (29) The physicist, Einstein, whom the Jewish publicity agents celebrate as a second Kepler, explained he would have nothing to do with German nationalism. He considered 'deceitful' the custom of the Central Association of German Citizens of Jewish Faith (30) of concerning themselves only with the religious interests of the Jews and not with their racial community also. A rare bird? No, only one who believed his people already safely in control, and thus considered it no longer necessary to keep up pretenses. In the Central Association itself, the mask has already fallen. A Dr. Brünn frankly admitted there that the Jews could have no German national spirit. (31) We always mistake their unprincipled exertions to accommodate themselves to all and everyone for impulses of the heart. Whenever they see an advantage to be gained by adopting a certain pose, they never hesitate, and certainly wouldn't let ethical considerations stand in their way. How many Galician Jews have first become Germans, then Englishmen, and finally Americans! And every time in the twinkling of an eye. With startling rapidity they change their nationality back and forth, and wherever their feet touch, there resounds either the 'Watch on the Rhine,' or the 'Marsellaise,' or 'Yankee Doodle.' Dr. Heim does not once question the fact that our Warburgs, our Bleichroders, or our Mendelssohns are able to transfer their patriotism as well as their residence of today to London or to New York on the morrow. 'On the sands of Brandenburg an Asiatic horde!' Walther Rathenau once blurted out about the Berlin Jews. (32) He forgot to add that the same horde is on the Isar, the Elbe, the Main, the Thames, the Seine, the Hudson, the Neva, and the Volga. And all of them with the same deceit toward their neighbors. Our charmers and wizards, however, distinguish between respectable and not-so-respectable, between settled and newly immigrated, between western and eastern Jews, and if worse comes to worst, they shrug their shoulders and mutter, 'Every country has the Jews it deserves.' It means nothing to them that it was a Jew who coined this fine-sounding phrase. Nor that in the case of Germany, considering the quality of the Jews we have 'deserved,' it becomes a resounding slap in the face. 'All Israel stands openly in the British camp!' announced the American union leader Samuel Gompers in 1916. And that includes the German Jews too, as the American, Ford, well knew. He has written of the faithlessness of the so-called 'German' Jews toward the country where they live, of the fact that they have united themselves with the rest of the world's Jews toward the ruin of Germany. 'Why?' jeers the Jew. 'Because the German is a vulgar scoundrel, a backward, medieval creature, who hasn't the faintest idea of our worth. And we should help such rabble? No, he has the Jews he deserves!' Such arrogance is indeed staggering to behold."
 
Most fascinating! Thanks for posting this.

On 8/9/09, hammerofthegods_666 <hammerofthegods_666@... wrote:
Great conversation between Eckart and Hitler.

What the Satanist today needs to realize is that before the 1960's, other
Satanists could have referred to our enemies of "evil" and "devils." This
does not make them any less of a Satanist. People just wrote differently
during different times.

In this article, not only were they exposing our enemies (Jews), but also
bashed Judeo/Christianity and they defended what we know as Satanism. It
takes a true Satanist to be able to see this.

I'm behind on messages, I'll try to write more of a reply to this later.

666/88!!

High Priest Jake Carlson
http://www.joyofsatan.com



--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "mageson6666" <mageson6666@...
wrote:

BOLSHEVISM from MOSES to LENIN




A DIALOGUE BETWEEN ADOLF HITLER AND ME


by Dietrich Eckart



Translated from the German by William L. Pierce




He paused with a dark look at the Book of Hate.


II


"And so it goes, through the entire Old Testament," he began again.
"Indeed, I'm telling you nothing new, but we must bring it home to
ourselves as often as possible in order to be able to negate the constant
hypocritical babble. Really, the Book of Joshua should suffice; such a
thing of uninterrupted genocide, of bestial cruelty, of shameless rapacity
and cold-blooded cunning—Hell incarnate! And everything in the name of
Jehova, in fact, according to his express wish! When the city of Jericho
fell victim to the Jews through the treachery of the harlot Rahab, neither
man nor beast, neither young nor old remained among the living; only the
harlot was spared. She and her whole, noble family were rewarded with the
privilege of living in Israel. (18) And what good-natured peoples they
were who, one after another, were completely exterminated! Delitzsch, who
has thoroughly investigated that period, writes, for example, about the
Canaanites: on all the hills, under every shady tree, they rendered
adoration and reverence to the sun god and to the salutary goddess
Aschera; and he compares this beautiful, poetic custom with the pious way
of our Catholic villagers, serving the Almighty in remote mountain
chapels." (19)

"Joshua alone," I emphasized, "was responsible for the massacre of
thirty-one kings, with all their people. Among those nations exterminated
in these predatory raids were several who had yielded themselves
trustingly to him. Each time the sinister words, 'let none survive,' were
heard. I am inclined to believe that the Pöbelvolk or at least their
descendants, must have still been the obedient shock troops of the Jews,
not because the work was so atrocious, but because the children of Israel
have always let deluded Gentiles do their dirty work, particularly where
danger was involved. Besides, they would not have been strong enough to
subdue the peoples to whom they were opposed, without the bellicose
enthusiasm of their brutalized comrades.

"Of particular interest is the evident satisfaction with which the Jews
have deliberately enumerated each of the slain kings one is reminded of
the prophet Isaiah. In one place, he raves as if possessed: 'The Lord is
angry at all the Gentiles; he will deliver them to the slaughter; their
land will became burning pitch; it will become a wasteland, soaked with
their blood; there will be no nobles in the land; their princes will die
out.' (20) Between Isaiah and Joshua were hundreds of years, but in that
whole time the infernal rage of the Jews against non-Jewish royalty hadn't
changed a bit."

"And in all eternity nothing will change," he proceeded, "so far as the
attitude of the Jews toward our kings and our leaders is concerned. To
destroy them is their eternal sin, and when they can't accomplish this by
force, then they will use cunning. Whenever we have a strong leadership,
the Jews are obliged to keep their noses clean. Our leadership can be
truly strong, however, only if it is based completely in our people; only
if it concerns itself with the welfare of the least among them just as
much as with that of the wealthiest of them; only if, in the firm
conviction of its own worth, it bars every alien influence from the
beginning; only if it is not merely national, but is also social, down to
its very bones. No matter what others may say, I assert this: a time will
come when all the elite nations of the world will have such a leadership;
and then everyone will be astonished to see that, instead of grating on
one another as has previously been the case, they will treat one another
with respect and consideration. For then there will be no more whipping up
of land greed, of an itching for power, of suspicion—sentiments which
exist in unmixed form only in the isolated few, and not in the more
trusting general populace, anyhow. There will be an end to the lying
praise of an indiscriminate human brotherhood, which would be possible, if
at all, only under the supposition that one had from the first excluded
that eternal mischief-maker, the Jew. But had this been done, there would
be no need to push the universal brotherhood idea; the various peoples
would find themselves compatible of their own accord."


III

"Tell me," I interrupted him; "strictly speaking, do you consider the Jew
to be national, or international?"

"Neither," was the answer. "One who really feels international has as much
regard for the rest of the world as he does for his own nation. Were our
so-called international swarms really like that — fine. But I fear that
they are secretly more concerned with the attitude of the rest of the
world toward themselves than with their own attitude toward the world.
Internationalism requires basically good intentions. But the Jew
fundamentally and completely lacks these. He hasn't the remotest idea of
classifying himself with the rest of humanity. His aim is to dominate
others in order to extort from them at his leisure. Were he really
interested in comradeship, he has had the longest and most abundant
opportunity for it. Jehovah command to him to make no alliances with
foreign peoples, but, on the contrary, to devour one after the other, went
straight to his heart. (21) Everywhere one greeted him with cordiality, at
first: in ancient Egypt, in Persia, in Babylonia, in Europe; the cloven
hoof appeared everywhere. The early Germanic conquerors found him with a
number of arrogated rights and made no move to dispossess him of these. He
was allowed to do business wherever and however he wanted, even in the
slave trade, toward which he has always been peculiarly inclined. Like
everyone else, he could hold public office, including the magistracy; and
his so-called religion was protected by the state. Thus wrote Otto Hauser,
who is an excellent source of fascinating illuminations regarding the
Jews." (22)

"I should say so!" I nodded. "One must partake of him with caution though,
otherwise one may not see the black forest for the 'blond' trees. (23) On
the whole, I prefer Werner Sombart, even though his Berlin lectures swarm
with Jews."

"Now, he says the same thing!" he cried. "According to him the Jews were
by no means always second-class citizens. In antiquity one even found them
often with special privileges which absolved them from certain duties,
such as military service. (24) It was never their strong side to risk
armed conflict. In the War of Liberation, (25) the Jews of Deutsch-Krone,
in Pomerania, sent a petition to the king, requesting permission to remain
home from the campaign in return for money. In this petition they argued
that ten thousand talers would be of much more use in the war effort than
the frankly questionable fighting ability of a Jew. The petition was
accepted, not only from them, but also from the Jews of five more of the
seven Prussian districts." (26)

"Yes, I know that place in Hauser," I added; "it is authentic. He also
quotes there from Mayer's Encyclopedia, however, a statement which calmly
claims that the Jews, through their heroic spirit in the War of
Liberation, proved themselves as worthy German citizens."

"Just as they did in the World War," he winked expressively. "If I had my
way, I'd require placards to be hung in all the schools, at every street
corner, and in every public room, on which would be printed nothing but
Schopenhauer's description of the Jews: 'Great masters of the lie'! (27)
There is no better description. And it applies without exception to every
Jew equally, whether high or low, stock exchange tycoon or rabbi, baptized
or circumcised. Our servile people! Provoked for thousands of years! And
the innocents are taken in again and again by this blatant swindle. It is
understandable that they become surly with the Jews, but only after the
latter have shamelessly abused their naive good nature and plundered them
to the skin with their usury and fraud. And that has been the case
everywhere: in the old Roman Empire, in Egypt, in Asia, later in England,
Italy, France, Poland, Holland, Germany, and even, as Sombart writes, 'in
the Iberian peninsula, where the Jews have experienced so many blessings'!

"And the game they're playing today, they have been at for two thousand
years," he continued. "I think that suffices to characterize the nature of
Jewish internationalism. Now we still have left to consider the national
feeling of the Jews. Naturally not that of the one for Germany, of the
other for England, and so on. Not many mice are to be caught with that
bait any longer. 'Send me a box full of German soil, so that I can at
least symbolically defile the accursed country,' wrote the German Jew,
Börne; (28) and Heinrich Heine sniffed out Germany's future from a toilet
bowl. (29) The physicist, Einstein, whom the Jewish publicity agents
celebrate as a second Kepler, explained he would have nothing to do with
German nationalism. He considered 'deceitful' the custom of the Central
Association of German Citizens of Jewish Faith (30) of concerning
themselves only with the religious interests of the Jews and not with
their racial community also. A rare bird? No, only one who believed his
people already safely in control, and thus considered it no longer
necessary to keep up pretenses. In the Central Association itself, the
mask has already fallen. A Dr. Brünn frankly admitted there that the Jews
could have no German national spirit. (31) We always mistake their
unprincipled exertions to accommodate themselves to all and everyone for
impulses of the heart. Whenever they see an advantage to be gained by
adopting a certain pose, they never hesitate, and certainly wouldn't let
ethical considerations stand in their way. How many Galician Jews have
first become Germans, then Englishmen, and finally Americans! And every
time in the twinkling of an eye. With startling rapidity they change their
nationality back and forth, and wherever their feet touch, there resounds
either the 'Watch on the Rhine,' or the 'Marsellaise,' or 'Yankee Doodle.'
Dr. Heim does not once question the fact that our Warburgs, our
Bleichroders, or our Mendelssohns are able to transfer their patriotism as
well as their residence of today to London or to New York on the morrow.
'On the sands of Brandenburg an Asiatic horde!' Walther Rathenau once
blurted out about the Berlin Jews. (32) He forgot to add that the same
horde is on the Isar, the Elbe, the Main, the Thames, the Seine, the
Hudson, the Neva, and the Volga. And all of them with the same deceit
toward their neighbors. Our charmers and wizards, however, distinguish
between respectable and not-so-respectable, between settled and newly
immigrated, between western and eastern Jews, and if worse comes to worst,
they shrug their shoulders and mutter, 'Every country has the Jews it
deserves.' It means nothing to them that it was a Jew who coined this
fine-sounding phrase. Nor that in the case of Germany, considering the
quality of the Jews we have 'deserved,' it becomes a resounding slap in
the face. 'All Israel stands openly in the British camp!' announced the
American union leader Samuel Gompers in 1916. And that includes the German
Jews too, as the American, Ford, well knew. He has written of the
faithlessness of the so-called 'German' Jews toward the country where they
live, of the fact that they have united themselves with the rest of the
world's Jews toward the ruin of Germany. 'Why?' jeers the Jew. 'Because
the German is a vulgar scoundrel, a backward, medieval creature, who
hasn't the faintest idea of our worth. And we should help such rabble? No,
he has the Jews he deserves!' Such arrogance is indeed staggering to
behold."
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Shaitan

Back
Top