I have to attend and possibly testify in an upcoming custody trial of my daughter's. She is divorcing her husband and is trying to get custody of her 2 daughters. She loves me very much but has always dissapproved to a point my love of Satan and told her husband about my beliefs early in their marriage when she thought he was someone she could trust.
Her husband's lawyer is very clever and I know he will ask if I am a Satan worshipper and, even though it hurts me, I am going to have to say no. But it's because I am not, in the traditional sense. I don't hold Black Mass with a naked girl on the altar, I don't kill animals and I don't live as a criminal which is how MOST people view Satanism. So I don't think that I'm doing anything wrong here. The lawyers questions will have to be answered in straight yes and no responses. So I can't say "Yes, I'm a SPIRITUAL Satanist not LaVeyan."
Please give me any input you can on this.
a question about an upcoming trial
mobiledarkangel1 min to read
i didnt think religion should ever get to be brought up in trial. In fact it says somewhere ( dont know where but i have heard about it) that religion has no place in trial. There is suppose to be a separation between church and state.
This is only my opinion.
0
i didnt think religion should ever get to be brought up in trial. In fact it says somewhere ( dont know where but i have heard about it) that religion has no place in trial. There is suppose to be a separation between church and state.
This is only my opinion.
all i can say is father understands ur situation so dont worry about it. just do what u think is right. :)
--- In , "mobiledarkangel" <darkangelpublishing@... wrote:
I have to attend and possibly testify in an upcoming custody trial of my daughter's. She is divorcing her husband and is trying to get custody of her 2 daughters. She loves me very much but has always dissapproved to a point my love of Satan and told her husband about my beliefs early in their marriage when she thought he was someone she could trust.
Her husband's lawyer is very clever and I know he will ask if I am a Satan worshipper and, even though it hurts me, I am going to have to say no. But it's because I am not, in the traditional sense. I don't hold Black Mass with a naked girl on the altar, I don't kill animals and I don't live as a criminal which is how MOST people view Satanism. So I don't think that I'm doing anything wrong here. The lawyers questions will have to be answered in straight yes and no responses. So I can't say "Yes, I'm a SPIRITUAL Satanist not LaVeyan."
Please give me any input you can on this.
0
all i can say is father understands ur situation so dont worry about it. just do what u think is right. :)
--- In , "mobiledarkangel" <darkangelpublishing@... wrote:
I have to attend and possibly testify in an upcoming custody trial of my daughter's. She is divorcing her husband and is trying to get custody of her 2 daughters. She loves me very much but has always dissapproved to a point my love of Satan and told her husband about my beliefs early in their marriage when she thought he was someone she could trust.
Her husband's lawyer is very clever and I know he will ask if I am a Satan worshipper and, even though it hurts me, I am going to have to say no. But it's because I am not, in the traditional sense. I don't hold Black Mass with a naked girl on the altar, I don't kill animals and I don't live as a criminal which is how MOST people view Satanism. So I don't think that I'm doing anything wrong here. The lawyers questions will have to be answered in straight yes and no responses. So I can't say "Yes, I'm a SPIRITUAL Satanist not LaVeyan."
Please give me any input you can on this.
yes but since I am going to be the one babysitting it is my fear that they are going to get into all sorts of personal shit with me.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Tara Doland <[ email redacted ] wrote:
i didnt think religion should ever get to be brought up in trial. In fact it says somewhere ( dont know where but i have heard about it) that religion has no place in trial. There is suppose to be a separation between church and state.
This is only my opinion.
--
"Do what you want as long as it's paying off for you. But once it's become a liability, then something is wrong and you better find out what it is."
0
yes but since I am going to be the one babysitting it is my fear that they are going to get into all sorts of personal shit with me.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Tara Doland <[ email redacted ] wrote:
i didnt think religion should ever get to be brought up in trial. In fact it says somewhere ( dont know where but i have heard about it) that religion has no place in trial. There is suppose to be a separation between church and state.
This is only my opinion.
--
"Do what you want as long as it's paying off for you. But once it's become a liability, then something is wrong and you better find out what it is."
That doesn't mean the lawer will not mention it.
From: Sheila Barnhill <darkangelpublishing@...
To:
Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 4:20:47 AM
Subject: Re: a question about an upcoming trial
yes but since I am going to be the one babysitting it is my fear that they are going to get into all sorts of personal shit with me.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Tara Doland <[ email redacted ] wrote:
i didnt think religion should ever get to be brought up in trial. In fact it says somewhere ( dont know where but i have heard about it) that religion has no place in trial. There is suppose to be a separation between church and state.
This is only my opinion.
--
"Do what you want as long as it's paying off for you. But once it's become a liability, then something is wrong and you better find out what it is."
0
That doesn't mean the lawer will not mention it.
From: Sheila Barnhill <darkangelpublishing@...
To:
Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 4:20:47 AM
Subject: Re: a question about an upcoming trial
yes but since I am going to be the one babysitting it is my fear that they are going to get into all sorts of personal shit with me.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Tara Doland <[ email redacted ] wrote:
i didnt think religion should ever get to be brought up in trial. In fact it says somewhere ( dont know where but i have heard about it) that religion has no place in trial. There is suppose to be a separation between church and state.
This is only my opinion.
--
"Do what you want as long as it's paying off for you. But once it's become a liability, then something is wrong and you better find out what it is."
exactly
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:34 PM, David Poston <[ email redacted ] wrote:
That doesn't mean the lawer will not mention it.
From: Sheila Barnhill <[ email redacted ]
To:
Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 4:20:47 AM
Subject: Re: a question about an upcoming trialyes but since I am going to be the one babysitting it is my fear that they are going to get into all sorts of personal shit with me.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Tara Doland <[ email redacted ] wrote:
--
"Do what you want as long as it's paying off for you. But once it's become a liability, then something is wrong and you better find out what it is."
0
exactly
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:34 PM, David Poston <[ email redacted ] wrote:
That doesn't mean the lawer will not mention it.
From: Sheila Barnhill <[ email redacted ]
To:
Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 4:20:47 AM
Subject: Re: a question about an upcoming trialyes but since I am going to be the one babysitting it is my fear that they are going to get into all sorts of personal shit with me.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Tara Doland <[ email redacted ] wrote:
--
"Do what you want as long as it's paying off for you. But once it's become a liability, then something is wrong and you better find out what it is."
First of all an attorneys questions never have to be answered with a simple yes or no, the way you respond is to clarify the answer first and then say yes or no. Example:
Attorney: "Is it true that you are a Satan Worshipper"
You: "There are many inaccuracies, misunderstandings, false information and flat out lies about my spiritual journey. Most of what people think about my spiritual path is wrong and very few people ever even make an attempt at learning the truth, we are a law abiding peaceful group who has a deep belief in who we know to be the creator of this world. Most people know nothing of what it is to be a spiritual Satanist "
The point here is that you answered the question but only after you explained the answer. In order to prepare for this trial you may want to work with another attorney to learn how to answer a question, or if you have a college or university in your area that has a speech communications department (especially if they have a debate team) they also should have someone who can help you prepare for the trial.
Phantom
--- In , "mobiledarkangel" <darkangelpublishing@... wrote:
I have to attend and possibly testify in an upcoming custody trial of my daughter's. She is divorcing her husband and is trying to get custody of her 2 daughters. She loves me very much but has always dissapproved to a point my love of Satan and told her husband about my beliefs early in their marriage when she thought he was someone she could trust.
Her husband's lawyer is very clever and I know he will ask if I am a Satan worshipper and, even though it hurts me, I am going to have to say no. But it's because I am not, in the traditional sense. I don't hold Black Mass with a naked girl on the altar, I don't kill animals and I don't live as a criminal which is how MOST people view Satanism. So I don't think that I'm doing anything wrong here. The lawyers questions will have to be answered in straight yes and no responses. So I can't say "Yes, I'm a SPIRITUAL Satanist not LaVeyan."
Please give me any input you can on this.
0
First of all an attorneys questions never have to be answered with a simple yes or no, the way you respond is to clarify the answer first and then say yes or no. Example:
Attorney: "Is it true that you are a Satan Worshipper"
You: "There are many inaccuracies, misunderstandings, false information and flat out lies about my spiritual journey. Most of what people think about my spiritual path is wrong and very few people ever even make an attempt at learning the truth, we are a law abiding peaceful group who has a deep belief in who we know to be the creator of this world. Most people know nothing of what it is to be a spiritual Satanist "
The point here is that you answered the question but only after you explained the answer. In order to prepare for this trial you may want to work with another attorney to learn how to answer a question, or if you have a college or university in your area that has a speech communications department (especially if they have a debate team) they also should have someone who can help you prepare for the trial.
Phantom
--- In , "mobiledarkangel" <darkangelpublishing@... wrote:
I have to attend and possibly testify in an upcoming custody trial of my daughter's. She is divorcing her husband and is trying to get custody of her 2 daughters. She loves me very much but has always dissapproved to a point my love of Satan and told her husband about my beliefs early in their marriage when she thought he was someone she could trust.
Her husband's lawyer is very clever and I know he will ask if I am a Satan worshipper and, even though it hurts me, I am going to have to say no. But it's because I am not, in the traditional sense. I don't hold Black Mass with a naked girl on the altar, I don't kill animals and I don't live as a criminal which is how MOST people view Satanism. So I don't think that I'm doing anything wrong here. The lawyers questions will have to be answered in straight yes and no responses. So I can't say "Yes, I'm a SPIRITUAL Satanist not LaVeyan."
Please give me any input you can on this.
And if you have an attorney that only wants an yes or no answere. They will ask the judge for make you answere yes or no. Been though that before. HAIL SATAN
From: Mark Scott <scott.mark06@...
To:
Sent: Fri, November 26, 2010 3:01:47 PM
Subject: Re: a question about an upcoming trial
First of all an attorneys questions never have to be answered with a simple yes or no, the way you respond is to clarify the answer first and then say yes or no. Example:
Attorney: "Is it true that you are a Satan Worshipper"
You: "There are many inaccuracies, misunderstandings, false information and flat out lies about my spiritual journey. Most of what people think about my spiritual path is wrong and very few people ever even make an attempt at learning the truth, we are a law abiding peaceful group who has a deep belief in who we know to be the creator of this world. Most people know nothing of what it is to be a spiritual Satanist "
The point here is that you answered the question but only after you explained the answer. In order to prepare for this trial you may want to work with another attorney to learn how to answer a question, or if you have a college or university in your area that has a speech communications department (especially if they have a debate team) they also should have someone who can help you prepare for the trial.
Phantom
--- In , "mobiledarkangel" <darkangelpublishing@... wrote:
I have to attend and possibly testify in an upcoming custody trial of my daughter's. She is divorcing her husband and is trying to get custody of her 2 daughters. She loves me very much but has always dissapproved to a point my love of Satan and told her husband about my beliefs early in their marriage when she thought he was someone she could trust.
Her husband's lawyer is very clever and I know he will ask if I am a Satan worshipper and, even though it hurts me, I am going to have to say no. But it's because I am not, in the traditional sense. I don't hold Black Mass with a naked girl on the altar, I don't kill animals and I don't live as a criminal which is how MOST people view Satanism. So I don't think that I'm doing anything wrong here. The lawyers questions will have to be answered in straight yes and no responses. So I can't say "Yes, I'm a SPIRITUAL Satanist not LaVeyan."
Please give me any input you can on this.
0
And if you have an attorney that only wants an yes or no answere. They will ask the judge for make you answere yes or no. Been though that before. HAIL SATAN
From: Mark Scott <scott.mark06@...
To:
Sent: Fri, November 26, 2010 3:01:47 PM
Subject: Re: a question about an upcoming trial
First of all an attorneys questions never have to be answered with a simple yes or no, the way you respond is to clarify the answer first and then say yes or no. Example:
Attorney: "Is it true that you are a Satan Worshipper"
You: "There are many inaccuracies, misunderstandings, false information and flat out lies about my spiritual journey. Most of what people think about my spiritual path is wrong and very few people ever even make an attempt at learning the truth, we are a law abiding peaceful group who has a deep belief in who we know to be the creator of this world. Most people know nothing of what it is to be a spiritual Satanist "
The point here is that you answered the question but only after you explained the answer. In order to prepare for this trial you may want to work with another attorney to learn how to answer a question, or if you have a college or university in your area that has a speech communications department (especially if they have a debate team) they also should have someone who can help you prepare for the trial.
Phantom
--- In , "mobiledarkangel" <darkangelpublishing@... wrote:
I have to attend and possibly testify in an upcoming custody trial of my daughter's. She is divorcing her husband and is trying to get custody of her 2 daughters. She loves me very much but has always dissapproved to a point my love of Satan and told her husband about my beliefs early in their marriage when she thought he was someone she could trust.
Her husband's lawyer is very clever and I know he will ask if I am a Satan worshipper and, even though it hurts me, I am going to have to say no. But it's because I am not, in the traditional sense. I don't hold Black Mass with a naked girl on the altar, I don't kill animals and I don't live as a criminal which is how MOST people view Satanism. So I don't think that I'm doing anything wrong here. The lawyers questions will have to be answered in straight yes and no responses. So I can't say "Yes, I'm a SPIRITUAL Satanist not LaVeyan."
Please give me any input you can on this.
isnt ur attorney allowed to cross-examine u? if so then this is ur chance to explain ur answer.
--- In , David Poston <david.poston@... wrote:
And if you have an attorney that only wants an yes or no answere. They will ask
the judge for make you answere yes or no. Been though that before.
HAIL SATAN
________________________________
From: Mark Scott <scott.mark06@...
To:
Sent: Fri, November 26, 2010 3:01:47 PM
Subject: Re: a question about an upcoming trial
Â
First of all an attorneys questions never have to be answered with a simple yes
or no, the way you respond is to clarify the answer first and then say yes or
no. Example:
Attorney: "Is it true that you are a Satan Worshipper"
You: "There are many inaccuracies, misunderstandings, false information and flat
out lies about my spiritual journey. Most of what people think about my
spiritual path is wrong and very few people ever even make an attempt at
learning the truth, we are a law abiding peaceful group who has a deep belief in
who we know to be the creator of this world. Most people know nothing of what it
is to be a spiritual Satanist "
The point here is that you answered the question but only after you explained
the answer. In order to prepare for this trial you may want to work with another
attorney to learn how to answer a question, or if you have a college or
university in your area that has a speech communications department (especially
if they have a debate team) they also should have someone who can help you
prepare for the trial.
Phantom
--- In , "mobiledarkangel"
<darkangelpublishing@ wrote:
I have to attend and possibly testify in an upcoming custody trial of my
daughter's. She is divorcing her husband and is trying to get custody of her 2
daughters. She loves me very much but has always dissapproved to a point my love
of Satan and told her husband about my beliefs early in their marriage when she
thought he was someone she could trust.
Her husband's lawyer is very clever and I know he will ask if I am a Satan
worshipper and, even though it hurts me, I am going to have to say no. But it's
because I am not, in the traditional sense. I don't hold Black Mass with a naked
girl on the altar, I don't kill animals and I don't live as a criminal which is
how MOST people view Satanism. So I don't think that I'm doing anything wrong
here. The lawyers questions will have to be answered in straight yes and no
responses. So I can't say "Yes, I'm a SPIRITUAL Satanist not LaVeyan."
Please give me any input you can on this.
0
isnt ur attorney allowed to cross-examine u? if so then this is ur chance to explain ur answer.
--- In , David Poston <david.poston@... wrote:
And if you have an attorney that only wants an yes or no answere. They will ask
the judge for make you answere yes or no. Been though that before.
HAIL SATAN
________________________________
From: Mark Scott <scott.mark06@...
To:
Sent: Fri, November 26, 2010 3:01:47 PM
Subject: Re: a question about an upcoming trial
Â
First of all an attorneys questions never have to be answered with a simple yes
or no, the way you respond is to clarify the answer first and then say yes or
no. Example:
Attorney: "Is it true that you are a Satan Worshipper"
You: "There are many inaccuracies, misunderstandings, false information and flat
out lies about my spiritual journey. Most of what people think about my
spiritual path is wrong and very few people ever even make an attempt at
learning the truth, we are a law abiding peaceful group who has a deep belief in
who we know to be the creator of this world. Most people know nothing of what it
is to be a spiritual Satanist "
The point here is that you answered the question but only after you explained
the answer. In order to prepare for this trial you may want to work with another
attorney to learn how to answer a question, or if you have a college or
university in your area that has a speech communications department (especially
if they have a debate team) they also should have someone who can help you
prepare for the trial.
Phantom
--- In , "mobiledarkangel"
<darkangelpublishing@ wrote:
I have to attend and possibly testify in an upcoming custody trial of my
daughter's. She is divorcing her husband and is trying to get custody of her 2
daughters. She loves me very much but has always dissapproved to a point my love
of Satan and told her husband about my beliefs early in their marriage when she
thought he was someone she could trust.
Her husband's lawyer is very clever and I know he will ask if I am a Satan
worshipper and, even though it hurts me, I am going to have to say no. But it's
because I am not, in the traditional sense. I don't hold Black Mass with a naked
girl on the altar, I don't kill animals and I don't live as a criminal which is
how MOST people view Satanism. So I don't think that I'm doing anything wrong
here. The lawyers questions will have to be answered in straight yes and no
responses. So I can't say "Yes, I'm a SPIRITUAL Satanist not LaVeyan."
Please give me any input you can on this.
Would "Define Satanism" as an answer to such a question be a bad move? he/she would then, perhaps pose hise/her vision of it, then it would be safe to state "no", because, 99% says the will define it in a too xian-ly inappropriate way.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ave Satanas! Ave Demones Inferno!
From: morticia <morticiasixx@...
To:
Sent: Mon, November 29, 2010 8:08:13 AM
Subject: Re: a question about an upcoming trial
________________________________
From: Mark Scott <scott.mark06@...
To:
Sent: Fri, November 26, 2010 3:01:47 PM
Subject: Re: a question about an upcoming trial
--- In , "mobiledarkangel"
<darkangelpublishing@ wrote:
0
Would "Define Satanism" as an answer to such a question be a bad move? he/she would then, perhaps pose hise/her vision of it, then it would be safe to state "no", because, 99% says the will define it in a too xian-ly inappropriate way.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ave Satanas! Ave Demones Inferno!
From: morticia <morticiasixx@...
To:
Sent: Mon, November 29, 2010 8:08:13 AM
Subject: Re: a question about an upcoming trial
________________________________
From: Mark Scott <scott.mark06@...
To:
Sent: Fri, November 26, 2010 3:01:47 PM
Subject: Re: a question about an upcoming trial
--- In , "mobiledarkangel"
<darkangelpublishing@ wrote:
that's what i've been thinking..lol
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Marek Litnevski <[ email redacted ] wrote:
Would "Define Satanism" as an answer to such a question be a bad move? he/she would then, perhaps pose hise/her vision of it, then it would be safe to state "no", because, 99% says the will define it in a too xian-ly inappropriate way.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ave Satanas! Ave Demones Inferno!
From: morticia <[ email redacted ]
To:
Sent: Mon, November 29, 2010 8:08:13 AM
Subject: Re: a question about an upcoming trial
________________________________
From: Mark Scott <scott.mark06@...
To:
Sent: Fri, November 26, 2010 3:01:47 PM
Subject: Re: a question about an upcoming trial
--- In , "mobiledarkangel"
<darkangelpublishing@ wrote:--
"Do what you want as long as it's paying off for you. But once it's become a liability, then something is wrong and you better find out what it is."
0
that's what i've been thinking..lol
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Marek Litnevski <[ email redacted ] wrote:
Would "Define Satanism" as an answer to such a question be a bad move? he/she would then, perhaps pose hise/her vision of it, then it would be safe to state "no", because, 99% says the will define it in a too xian-ly inappropriate way.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ave Satanas! Ave Demones Inferno!
From: morticia <[ email redacted ]
To:
Sent: Mon, November 29, 2010 8:08:13 AM
Subject: Re: a question about an upcoming trial
________________________________
From: Mark Scott <scott.mark06@...
To:
Sent: Fri, November 26, 2010 3:01:47 PM
Subject: Re: a question about an upcoming trial
--- In , "mobiledarkangel"
<darkangelpublishing@ wrote:--
"Do what you want as long as it's paying off for you. But once it's become a liability, then something is wrong and you better find out what it is."