The Gods #76871 About the name Satan

[𝐄𝐧𝐢𝐠𝐦𝐮𝐬]

As we clear all the enemy's curses and power, the beings that have been underneath them [Satan/Zeus/Baal - all our Gods, Ancient Egyptian, Babylonian, Sumerian, Hindu and what-not] are bound to re-emerge in their actual identities.

The enemy's context is no longer valid or existing. Adoption of a false and dead context in anyway, is simply dwelling in the past.

The enemy knows better than anyone what I am doing here, they cannot stop it either.

We are actually bringing back the Gods in pure form; not in anyway as the enemy wanted this to be. The enemy wanted us to be in their context, for of course, their usual lies, deception and control.


.....

Yes, the entity we call Satan or Satanas is many things; for one, he is the incarnation of the Truth. Past that, He is an entity, but above all, he is also an essence of Truth itself. The name Satan has it's source in the Satanama and Satya mantra; the literalization of this was called before Zeus or Dheus Pater, or simply Truth.

Yehuborim took this out of context and made it into some evil character in the Bible, who nevertheless, they reveal was the Head God of the Romans, Ancient Egyptians, Greeks and basically everyone else predating them.



Behind the general code-word for the essence, there are many things. There is nothing abnormal with any of these distinctions. The general concept of Sa or Sat [Truth] divides itself in many ways. The concept of Sa and Sat [existing in Ancient Egypt & Sanskrit very evidently] does divide into many things later on.

This is like saying Bob is a father to someone, but Bob is also a construction worker, Bob is also a tax payer, and Bob is also wearing clothes; all of these things are real in the same time. It's still Bob or Truth in that case, simultaneously fulfilling many tasks and roles.

 

[𝐄𝐧𝐢𝐠𝐦𝐮𝐬]

Even the Names the enemy used in many cases, are not blasphemous or wrong to the Gods, but they are falsely perceived that way by the mindwashed folk.

Satan or Satanas is nothing bad of a Name, it has other origins; but the question is that the people have been strongly embed and instructed to not see it that way.

As they first encounter the real Gods and then they understand this was the nasty work of the Yehuborim [in that order] they will see it more openly like we have seen it here ourselves.

Then it starts making far more direct sense, than let's say, starting from the Yehuborim standpoint and deconstructing it.

We want to bring people in with clarity and the full truth, not to hide anything.

 

[Symmachos-ZEUS/SHAITAN]

Why do important forum members now say Satan and Satanism are Yehuborim inventions? I thought it's known that Satan as a name predated the Yehuborim?The Yehuborim stole the names and slandered them, but they didn't invent them. Wasn't this the whole teaching of JoS? Maxine and Cobra both went to great lengths to dispel this myth that Satan and Satanism are part of christianity. Satanama, Anastas, all other names and symbols. All the sermons telling us how Satan is a very ancient name. Is this all wrong now?

I like the name Satan. I am not stuck in the "gothic" "christian" interpretation as one member says, I am following the knowledge that this name is ancient and not related to the Yehuborim or christianity. Why is this not accepted anymore?

The names are valid and always will be. Satanas is a sacred name. It will always be so. What is wrong is the lore that has been created around this name. Now that lore must be lost. You can use the name SATANAS. For example, in meditations. Of course. But this continuing to identify Satan in relation to the Yehuborim context and "it predates Judaism, but then the Yehuborim..." is useless now. You can rediscover the Gods as the Gods were known when the Yehuborim were not yet a real threat. You're welcome.