Vedic system has some cons and i think Placidus house system is wrong due to trapped sign thing which can let a house to comprise 3 signs. Also the science is improved and even we just discovered Pluto. Placidus lived many years ago and he lacked modern informations, naturally. That's why i'm asking if using Vedic's house system on the Western's signs system which is nearly equal to whole house system can be more accurate?
Discussion
Empirical experience, up to now, mine, demonstrates the precision of the “placidus system”. I have been using it for a long time and I don't see any "inaccuracies".
I get feedback from other people, and they are shocked, as to the accuracy of the events that happen. Some of them still check their birth chart today, even if they are not "astrologers".
But try putting it to the test, with past events of yours or with famous people.
Adding my two cents, I find that for natal astrology whole house system is inaccurate. A test I like to do is to read a natal chart with 12th house placements in both 12th house ruler sign and 1st house ruler sing, in whole house system the latter planet would be placed in the 1st house. Most times I've run this test the placidus system comes as more accurate.
I am using both 4 example if your Venus is in 9th house in placedius and 10th house in whole sing use both when you read. It works for me
CatDoll wrote:View source I am using both 4 example if your Venus is in 9th house in placedius and 10th house in whole sing use both when you read. It works for me
if we speak about natal placedius is good