On Pity

[GoldenxChild1]

I was inspired to write this based on Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche’s “The Anti Christ”, which can be found in the public domain.

This isn’t anything that most members don’t already know; however, it is to the amusement and/or benefit of those that wish to read it.

I will paste below page 47, 48, and 49 of this work.

“Christianity is called the religion of pity.—Pity stands in opposition to all the tonic passions that augment the energy of the feeling of aliveness: it is a depressant. A man loses power when he pities. Through pity that drain upon strength which suffering works is multiplied a thousandfold. Suffering is made contagious by pity; under certain circumstances it may lead to a total sacrifice of life and living energy—a loss out of all proportion to the magnitude of the cause (—the case of the death of the Nazarene). This is the first view of it; there is, however, a still more important one. If one measures the effects of pity by the gravity of the reactions it sets up, its character as a menace to life appears in a much clearer light. Pity thwarts the whole law of evolution, which is the law of natural selection. It preserves whatever is ripe for destruction; it fights on the side of those disinherited and condemned by life; by maintaining life in so many of the botched of all kinds, it gives life itself a gloomy and dubious aspect. Mankind has ventured to call pity a virtue (—in every superior moral system it appears as a weakness—); going still further, it has been called the virtue, the source and foundation of all other virtues—but let us always bear in mind that this was from the standpoint of a philosophy that was nihilistic, and upon whose shield the denial of life was inscribed. Schopenhauer was right in this: that by means of pity life is denied, and made worthy of denial—pity is the technic of nihilism. Let me repeat: this depressing and contagious instinct stands against all those instincts which work for the preservation and enhancement of life: in the rôle of protector of the miserable, it is a prime agent in the promotion of décadence—pity persuades to extinction.... Of course, one doesn’t say “extinction”: one says “the other world,” or “God,” or “the true life,” or Nirvana, salvation, blessedness.... This innocent rhetoric, from the realm of religious-ethical balderdash, appears a good deal less innocent when one reflects upon the tendency that it conceals beneath sublime words: the tendency to destroy life. Schopenhauer was hostile to life: that is why pity appeared to him as a virtue.... Aristotle, as every one knows, saw in pity a sickly and dangerous state of mind, the remedy for which was an occasional purgative: he regarded tragedy as that purgative. The instinct of life should prompt us to seek some means of puncturing any such pathological and dangerous accumulation of pity as that appearing in Schopenhauer’s case (and also, alack, in that of our whole literary décadence, from St. Petersburg to Paris, from Tolstoi to Wagner), that it may burst and be discharged.... Nothing is more unhealthy, amid all our unhealthy modernism, than Christian pity. To be the doctors here, to be unmerciful here, to wield the knife here—all this is our business, all this is our sort of humanity, by this sign we are philosophers, we Hyperboreans!—"

Now, is it not true that pity stands in direct opposition to self preservation?

There is a difference between things like compassion, empathy, and sympathy, to pity. Pity is lowering yourself to those who “appear” to be beneath you to internally raise your false sense of virtue. It borders on Martyrdom, in which seems holy and noble, yet is a complete lack of life and living.

Most people take true sacrifice out of context, for example, people see someone disabled, or see starving children, and they say, “Oh how lucky I am!” and “I would take your place if I could!”. What does this accomplish except feelings of guilt. Instead, precise action should be taken, if possible, not fake monologue.

Feeling sorry for others will make you feel sorry for yourself, and there is nothing constructive about this, no solution or antidote to the original problem.

We must be ruthlessly resolute to those who others “Pity”, not only for our sake but for their sake. For if we offer less than a solution then we are a part of the problem, adding to their already depressive state. “Your poor thing”, this is not helping, this is nothing.

All is power. We must be power, not weakness, to ourselves and those around us.
This is more to the general masses, not any SS.
HAIL SATAN

 

[Fiery Pluto]

Yes, pity is a disease as Nietzche says.

The excessive pity and the identification of the self with the opinion of others (caused by the loss of self comprension derived from the loss of human spirituality) are the means that the jewish programs like communism uses to destroy meritocracy and every ethical values based on it.

The eccessive pity is also linked to different posts that have been recently published regarding veganism and vegetarianism. These programs are promoted by jews and make a damage to people health.

Various people embrace them because they have an irrational pity for animals. They don't understand that each living being has to kill other living beings to survive.

Each being is motivated by a search of a "growth of power". Each being tries to improve its life conditions, not simply to survive. If an animal has possibilities to increase its power he will do it also against other living beings.

For this reason, people who eat more meat to increase their muscles can't be blamed by vegan or vegetarian people.

Obviously, the power Nietzche talks about isn't only related to the physical power, but it is related to each quality owned by someone.

 

[sublimestatanist]

Such beautiful writing! I will have to read this book for sure! Thank you GoldenChild.

I learned something new... looked up some words.

Purgative - a thing that rids someone of unwanted feelings or memories.


And then we have this:

Purgatory

noun

• (in Roman Catholic doctrine) a place or state of suffering inhabited by the souls of sinners who are expiating their sins before going to heaven.
"all her sins were forgiven and she would not need to go to Purgatory"

adjective (archaic)

• having the quality of cleansing or purifying.
"infernal punishments are purgatory and medicinal"


You can see in real time the enemy twisting the meaning of words. Very revealing.

 

[GoldenxChild1]

Glad you guys enjoyed reading it, thanks for your insights

 

[Gearshift]

I posted this these past two days 19th/20th(Dec. 2022). I got curious on Abyssos and his interesting demeanor when communicating so I ended up watching up to 50 minutes of the 3 hour campaign for Nod in Tiberian Sun.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFUfF3Ws39E

Peace through Power!

I assume this would be something Nietzsche and others would agree with.

In search of Power there must be Peace but at the same time Peace can bring forth power as long as that power is used to bring peace.

Humans really need to pay attention to their animal instincts. We pity ourselves saying, "We aren't animals." Humans have wants and needs and in dark ways at times. Such as for example we need to kill, have sex, have instinctual properties.

How many times have we heard, "I'll kill you, motherfucker for attacking me!." We never go that far but how far has Humanity belittled itself and pitied itself. I bet a bear charges you going, "Beep beep motherfucker your my lunch."

As one member put it recently spirituality and education on our subconscious allows us to better understand reality by raising our consciousness and knowing below to above. The further below we go the more we understand above.

George Lincoln Rockwell's speeches make a point on Humanities search should go towards are our past primitive self. We have basic, intermediate, and advanced properties. We are as much an animal as any animal only more astute, intelligent, and domineering compared to other animals. Some animals have superior or inferior traits to Humans.

For example I bet sharks never realized they can be killed in more modern times past the dinosaur era. I bet the shark when killed has a WTF moment in it's soul going, "How can I be killed by this landwalker?!".

Anyways unlike other people since JoS contains a lot of Pluto in Scorpio people and people with Saturn and other traits that make us darker per say. It seems we are MUCH more comfortable expressing not just the 1A[FoE|FoS] we grant to anyone. Whether they are American or not our forums are chaotic and yet we stand for truth and freedom. But also our lower instincts and many people need to dive into it and study the Human.

Humanity is a weapon but also a temple of treasures and experience. We are the Universe and the Universe is within us. But the Universe is also outside of us and also without us. Thus we are Humble not Pitiful like xtians. As George Lincoln Rockwell states, "Compared to the Universe. We Nazis are humble!".

I've never felt pity. I've never been a Mr.T cuck going, "I pity the fool." Rather the fool is the pitier.

This is one of the many reasons xtians get destroyed in life. They definitely need a revolutionary and evolutionary shift in consciousness.
--------------------

BTW I assume you guys are reading the Thomas Wayne edition of the books and not the (((Kaufman))) translations. Unfortunately Nietzsche's work gets cucked around a lot by people of a certain tribe, cuz muh Natzizmz.

We talked about Nietzche's books by Thomas Wayne a few years ago. You can download them for free obviously it's the internet what is stopping a person from uploading it. Or you can purchase it from Agora publishing.

I think to buy all three books and I think all three books are hardback not paperback so they are built to a higher standard. Hopefully the paper is better cause, "Man WTB some nice high quality Hemp paper." Modern day book paper is cheapy crappy stuff you should feel some of the books now a days, it's like your gonna break them.

WTB some Orion Godlike-Military Grade(GMIG) paper lasts forever basically. Or using advanced metals and crystals and stones and having awesome books. I'm not the biggest reader of book because like my friend said, "I feel dumb reading things because there is such a mountain of books. You realize how little and feeble you feel. But sometimes reading books > reading internet books. Holding a book analog technology in hand is superior even a book reading tablet is less than stellar."

I believe if you buy all the Wayne books it's like 100 dollars. Not gonna suggest that as not everyone wants to spend 100 dollars. But if you value supporting and American company and value a truer reading experience then there you go.

 

[Sundara]

I was inspired to write this based on Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche’s “The Anti Christ”, which can be found in the public domain.

This isn’t anything that most members don’t already know; however, it is to the amusement and/or benefit of those that wish to read it.

I will paste below page 47, 48, and 49 of this work.

“Christianity is called the religion of pity.—Pity stands in opposition to all the tonic passions that augment the energy of the feeling of aliveness: it is a depressant. A man loses power when he pities. Through pity that drain upon strength which suffering works is multiplied a thousandfold. Suffering is made contagious by pity; under certain circumstances it may lead to a total sacrifice of life and living energy—a loss out of all proportion to the magnitude of the cause (—the case of the death of the Nazarene). This is the first view of it; there is, however, a still more important one. If one measures the effects of pity by the gravity of the reactions it sets up, its character as a menace to life appears in a much clearer light. Pity thwarts the whole law of evolution, which is the law of natural selection. It preserves whatever is ripe for destruction; it fights on the side of those disinherited and condemned by life; by maintaining life in so many of the botched of all kinds, it gives life itself a gloomy and dubious aspect. Mankind has ventured to call pity a virtue (—in every superior moral system it appears as a weakness—); going still further, it has been called the virtue, the source and foundation of all other virtues—but let us always bear in mind that this was from the standpoint of a philosophy that was nihilistic, and upon whose shield the denial of life was inscribed. Schopenhauer was right in this: that by means of pity life is denied, and made worthy of denial—pity is the technic of nihilism. Let me repeat: this depressing and contagious instinct stands against all those instincts which work for the preservation and enhancement of life: in the rôle of protector of the miserable, it is a prime agent in the promotion of décadence—pity persuades to extinction.... Of course, one doesn’t say “extinction”: one says “the other world,” or “God,” or “the true life,” or Nirvana, salvation, blessedness.... This innocent rhetoric, from the realm of religious-ethical balderdash, appears a good deal less innocent when one reflects upon the tendency that it conceals beneath sublime words: the tendency to destroy life. Schopenhauer was hostile to life: that is why pity appeared to him as a virtue.... Aristotle, as every one knows, saw in pity a sickly and dangerous state of mind, the remedy for which was an occasional purgative: he regarded tragedy as that purgative. The instinct of life should prompt us to seek some means of puncturing any such pathological and dangerous accumulation of pity as that appearing in Schopenhauer’s case (and also, alack, in that of our whole literary décadence, from St. Petersburg to Paris, from Tolstoi to Wagner), that it may burst and be discharged.... Nothing is more unhealthy, amid all our unhealthy modernism, than Christian pity. To be the doctors here, to be unmerciful here, to wield the knife here—all this is our business, all this is our sort of humanity, by this sign we are philosophers, we Hyperboreans!—"

Now, is it not true that pity stands in direct opposition to self preservation?

There is a difference between things like compassion, empathy, and sympathy, to pity. Pity is lowering yourself to those who “appear” to be beneath you to internally raise your false sense of virtue. It borders on Martyrdom, in which seems holy and noble, yet is a complete lack of life and living.

Most people take true sacrifice out of context, for example, people see someone disabled, or see starving children, and they say, “Oh how lucky I am!” and “I would take your place if I could!”. What does this accomplish except feelings of guilt. Instead, precise action should be taken, if possible, not fake monologue.

Feeling sorry for others will make you feel sorry for yourself, and there is nothing constructive about this, no solution or antidote to the original problem.

We must be ruthlessly resolute to those who others “Pity”, not only for our sake but for their sake. For if we offer less than a solution then we are a part of the problem, adding to their already depressive state. “Your poor thing”, this is not helping, this is nothing.

All is power. We must be power, not weakness, to ourselves and those around us.
This is more to the general masses, not any SS.
HAIL SATAN

Thank you! I pity no one. This is a great reminder.

 

[Sundara]

I was inspired to write this based on Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche’s “The Anti Christ”, which can be found in the public domain.

This isn’t anything that most members don’t already know; however, it is to the amusement and/or benefit of those that wish to read it.

I will paste below page 47, 48, and 49 of this work.

“Christianity is called the religion of pity.—Pity stands in opposition to all the tonic passions that augment the energy of the feeling of aliveness: it is a depressant. A man loses power when he pities. Through pity that drain upon strength which suffering works is multiplied a thousandfold. Suffering is made contagious by pity; under certain circumstances it may lead to a total sacrifice of life and living energy—a loss out of all proportion to the magnitude of the cause (—the case of the death of the Nazarene). This is the first view of it; there is, however, a still more important one. If one measures the effects of pity by the gravity of the reactions it sets up, its character as a menace to life appears in a much clearer light. Pity thwarts the whole law of evolution, which is the law of natural selection. It preserves whatever is ripe for destruction; it fights on the side of those disinherited and condemned by life; by maintaining life in so many of the botched of all kinds, it gives life itself a gloomy and dubious aspect. Mankind has ventured to call pity a virtue (—in every superior moral system it appears as a weakness—); going still further, it has been called the virtue, the source and foundation of all other virtues—but let us always bear in mind that this was from the standpoint of a philosophy that was nihilistic, and upon whose shield the denial of life was inscribed. Schopenhauer was right in this: that by means of pity life is denied, and made worthy of denial—pity is the technic of nihilism. Let me repeat: this depressing and contagious instinct stands against all those instincts which work for the preservation and enhancement of life: in the rôle of protector of the miserable, it is a prime agent in the promotion of décadence—pity persuades to extinction.... Of course, one doesn’t say “extinction”: one says “the other world,” or “God,” or “the true life,” or Nirvana, salvation, blessedness.... This innocent rhetoric, from the realm of religious-ethical balderdash, appears a good deal less innocent when one reflects upon the tendency that it conceals beneath sublime words: the tendency to destroy life. Schopenhauer was hostile to life: that is why pity appeared to him as a virtue.... Aristotle, as every one knows, saw in pity a sickly and dangerous state of mind, the remedy for which was an occasional purgative: he regarded tragedy as that purgative. The instinct of life should prompt us to seek some means of puncturing any such pathological and dangerous accumulation of pity as that appearing in Schopenhauer’s case (and also, alack, in that of our whole literary décadence, from St. Petersburg to Paris, from Tolstoi to Wagner), that it may burst and be discharged.... Nothing is more unhealthy, amid all our unhealthy modernism, than Christian pity. To be the doctors here, to be unmerciful here, to wield the knife here—all this is our business, all this is our sort of humanity, by this sign we are philosophers, we Hyperboreans!—"

Now, is it not true that pity stands in direct opposition to self preservation?

There is a difference between things like compassion, empathy, and sympathy, to pity. Pity is lowering yourself to those who “appear” to be beneath you to internally raise your false sense of virtue. It borders on Martyrdom, in which seems holy and noble, yet is a complete lack of life and living.

Most people take true sacrifice out of context, for example, people see someone disabled, or see starving children, and they say, “Oh how lucky I am!” and “I would take your place if I could!”. What does this accomplish except feelings of guilt. Instead, precise action should be taken, if possible, not fake monologue.

Feeling sorry for others will make you feel sorry for yourself, and there is nothing constructive about this, no solution or antidote to the original problem.

We must be ruthlessly resolute to those who others “Pity”, not only for our sake but for their sake. For if we offer less than a solution then we are a part of the problem, adding to their already depressive state. “Your poor thing”, this is not helping, this is nothing.

All is power. We must be power, not weakness, to ourselves and those around us.
This is more to the general masses, not any SS.
HAIL SATAN

Nietzsches work is so great. I think people unfortunately give way to interpretating this as feeling a need to not help or defend anyone which is not what Nietzsche is saying. Many of his words translated to English aren’t accurate either. Even animals defend each other and take care of one another. So they become these shallow and wrongfully selfish people.

 

[Sundara]

I was inspired to write this based on Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche’s “The Anti Christ”, which can be found in the public domain.

This isn’t anything that most members don’t already know; however, it is to the amusement and/or benefit of those that wish to read it.

I will paste below page 47, 48, and 49 of this work.

“Christianity is called the religion of pity.—Pity stands in opposition to all the tonic passions that augment the energy of the feeling of aliveness: it is a depressant. A man loses power when he pities. Through pity that drain upon strength which suffering works is multiplied a thousandfold. Suffering is made contagious by pity; under certain circumstances it may lead to a total sacrifice of life and living energy—a loss out of all proportion to the magnitude of the cause (—the case of the death of the Nazarene). This is the first view of it; there is, however, a still more important one. If one measures the effects of pity by the gravity of the reactions it sets up, its character as a menace to life appears in a much clearer light. Pity thwarts the whole law of evolution, which is the law of natural selection. It preserves whatever is ripe for destruction; it fights on the side of those disinherited and condemned by life; by maintaining life in so many of the botched of all kinds, it gives life itself a gloomy and dubious aspect. Mankind has ventured to call pity a virtue (—in every superior moral system it appears as a weakness—); going still further, it has been called the virtue, the source and foundation of all other virtues—but let us always bear in mind that this was from the standpoint of a philosophy that was nihilistic, and upon whose shield the denial of life was inscribed. Schopenhauer was right in this: that by means of pity life is denied, and made worthy of denial—pity is the technic of nihilism. Let me repeat: this depressing and contagious instinct stands against all those instincts which work for the preservation and enhancement of life: in the rôle of protector of the miserable, it is a prime agent in the promotion of décadence—pity persuades to extinction.... Of course, one doesn’t say “extinction”: one says “the other world,” or “God,” or “the true life,” or Nirvana, salvation, blessedness.... This innocent rhetoric, from the realm of religious-ethical balderdash, appears a good deal less innocent when one reflects upon the tendency that it conceals beneath sublime words: the tendency to destroy life. Schopenhauer was hostile to life: that is why pity appeared to him as a virtue.... Aristotle, as every one knows, saw in pity a sickly and dangerous state of mind, the remedy for which was an occasional purgative: he regarded tragedy as that purgative. The instinct of life should prompt us to seek some means of puncturing any such pathological and dangerous accumulation of pity as that appearing in Schopenhauer’s case (and also, alack, in that of our whole literary décadence, from St. Petersburg to Paris, from Tolstoi to Wagner), that it may burst and be discharged.... Nothing is more unhealthy, amid all our unhealthy modernism, than Christian pity. To be the doctors here, to be unmerciful here, to wield the knife here—all this is our business, all this is our sort of humanity, by this sign we are philosophers, we Hyperboreans!—"

Now, is it not true that pity stands in direct opposition to self preservation?

There is a difference between things like compassion, empathy, and sympathy, to pity. Pity is lowering yourself to those who “appear” to be beneath you to internally raise your false sense of virtue. It borders on Martyrdom, in which seems holy and noble, yet is a complete lack of life and living.

Most people take true sacrifice out of context, for example, people see someone disabled, or see starving children, and they say, “Oh how lucky I am!” and “I would take your place if I could!”. What does this accomplish except feelings of guilt. Instead, precise action should be taken, if possible, not fake monologue.

Feeling sorry for others will make you feel sorry for yourself, and there is nothing constructive about this, no solution or antidote to the original problem.

We must be ruthlessly resolute to those who others “Pity”, not only for our sake but for their sake. For if we offer less than a solution then we are a part of the problem, adding to their already depressive state. “Your poor thing”, this is not helping, this is nothing.

All is power. We must be power, not weakness, to ourselves and those around us.
This is more to the general masses, not any SS.
HAIL SATAN

Nietzsches work is so great. I think people unfortunately give way to interpretating this as feeling a need to not help or defend anyone which is not what Nietzsche is saying. Many of his words translated to English aren’t accurate either. Even animals defend each other and take care of one another. So they become these shallow and wrongfully selfish people.

And those people are the ones that cherry pick or literally can’t understand. “Ruthlessly resolute” and uplifting are great ways. Not just being “ruthless”

Large conglomerates like Christianity always seek to form together. I do think the mass spreading of the mental virus is largely just from the dark ages in general. And those who were immune were hidden. Or even attacked by large conglomerates. People ARE moving out of this massively. No matter what.

 

[Sundara]

...


Thank you! I pity no one. This is a great reminder.

Can I email you about something sister? it is of great import and I couldn't find your email on the forums, so I create this account to ask thx.

That’s nice, I’m not of much help to anyone right now but I would love to help otherwise. What does it pertain?