Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Welcome to Our New Forums

  • Our forums have been upgraded! You can read about this HERE

death penalty?

Shadowcat said:
Pumpkin671 said:
Shadowcat said:
The death penalty is absolutely justifiable in cases of rape and murder that are proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to administer justice to those who deserve it. A death spell exists for the same reason, especially if these types of people get off scot-free.

What I dislike is the "humane" forms of administration, such as lethal injection, as the criminal deserves a violent horrifying death in the same capacity that they administered to their victims. Disposing of them in this way is a mercy and a kindness almost, although i have heard in some cases leathal injection can cause excruciating pain. This isn't because I would want cruelty for the sake of it, but to administer justice in proportion to the offense. If I had a loved one who was violently victimized I would want the very same things done back to the criminal, to make them feel the pain and horror they themselves inflicted.

The judicial system should allow family members to choose and even to personally carry out a method of punishment for these types of crimes under lawful supervision. This would be the equivalent of cursing someone to death because they raped or murdered one of your family in the way you saw fit.

Disposing of someone out of an act of revenge should also not be punished in the case someone is avenging a loved one who was victimized by said type of violent crime. I knew an older guy I worked with on a job that was in jail for almost 20 years because he disposed of the person that he literally watched shoot his father when he was 9 years old. He wanted revenge for his father and took it when he was older, around 15. The police even told him they sympathized with him but had to process him anyway according to the law. The court knew of the circumstance and softened the sentence according to this, but he should not have had most of his life wasted just for rightfully avenging his father. Justice was served by his hand and he was punished.
Sounds more like an eye for an eye rather than justice.

So you are telling me you would rather lie down and take it instead of cursing someone to death if they raped or killed your family?

It's easy to patronize when one has lived a sheltered life.
I think justice can be served in a more sufficient way rather than an emotional response.
 
Praeceptorem666 said:
Pumpkin671 said:
Shadowcat said:
The death penalty is absolutely justifiable in cases of rape and murder that are proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to administer justice to those who deserve it. A death spell exists for the same reason, especially if these types of people get off scot-free.

What I dislike is the "humane" forms of administration, such as lethal injection, as the criminal deserves a violent horrifying death in the same capacity that they administered to their victims. Disposing of them in this way is a mercy and a kindness almost, although i have heard in some cases leathal injection can cause excruciating pain. This isn't because I would want cruelty for the sake of it, but to administer justice in proportion to the offense. If I had a loved one who was violently victimized I would want the very same things done back to the criminal, to make them feel the pain and horror they themselves inflicted.

The judicial system should allow family members to choose and even to personally carry out a method of punishment for these types of crimes under lawful supervision. This would be the equivalent of cursing someone to death because they raped or murdered one of your family in the way you saw fit.

Disposing of someone out of an act of revenge should also not be punished in the case someone is avenging a loved one who was victimized by said type of violent crime. I knew an older guy I worked with on a job that was in jail for almost 20 years because he disposed of the person that he literally watched shoot his father when he was 9 years old. He wanted revenge for his father and took it when he was older, around 15. The police even told him they sympathized with him but had to process him anyway according to the law. The court knew of the circumstance and softened the sentence according to this, but he should not have had most of his life wasted just for rightfully avenging his father. Justice was served by his hand and he was punished.
Sounds more like an eye for an eye rather than justice.

What's wrong with eye for an eye? This whole rehabilitation nonsense is Jewish shite, people should be punished not rehabilitatated.
Is that flat out no rehabilitation or are we limiting it to certain crimes?
 

These are the type of people who got bullied in school or whatever and never stood up for themselves and instead of addressing their internal weakness they instead cope by telling themselves letting others trample all over you is fine and you shouldn't feel angry at them because emotion bad.

Now in adulthood their minds are warped into a submissive mindset and want to project this onto others. Don't bother wasting your time.

Always remember that one deserves what one tolerates.
 
Pumpkin671 said:
Shadowcat said:
The death penalty is absolutely justifiable in cases of rape and murder that are proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to administer justice to those who deserve it. A death spell exists for the same reason, especially if these types of people get off scot-free.

What I dislike is the "humane" forms of administration, such as lethal injection, as the criminal deserves a violent horrifying death in the same capacity that they administered to their victims. Disposing of them in this way is a mercy and a kindness almost, although i have heard in some cases leathal injection can cause excruciating pain. This isn't because I would want cruelty for the sake of it, but to administer justice in proportion to the offense. If I had a loved one who was violently victimized I would want the very same things done back to the criminal, to make them feel the pain and horror they themselves inflicted.

The judicial system should allow family members to choose and even to personally carry out a method of punishment for these types of crimes under lawful supervision. This would be the equivalent of cursing someone to death because they raped or murdered one of your family in the way you saw fit.

Disposing of someone out of an act of revenge should also not be punished in the case someone is avenging a loved one who was victimized by said type of violent crime. I knew an older guy I worked with on a job that was in jail for almost 20 years because he disposed of the person that he literally watched shoot his father when he was 9 years old. He wanted revenge for his father and took it when he was older, around 15. The police even told him they sympathized with him but had to process him anyway according to the law. The court knew of the circumstance and softened the sentence according to this, but he should not have had most of his life wasted just for rightfully avenging his father. Justice was served by his hand and he was punished.
Sounds more like an eye for an eye rather than justice.

The Code of Hammurabi comes from the Gods, but its current version does not resemble the original.

Source:
https://satanisgod.org/www.angelfire.com/empire/serpentis666/Azazel.html
 
Pumpkin671 said:
Shadowcat said:
Pumpkin671 said:
Sounds more like an eye for an eye rather than justice.

So you are telling me you would rather lie down and take it instead of cursing someone to death if they raped or killed your family?

It's easy to patronize when one has lived a sheltered life.
I think justice can be served in a more sufficient way rather than an emotional response.

Tell me then how you would serve justice to someone who did such horrific crimes to you or your family. Do tell...I bet your parents told you not to hit back when you got the shit kicked out of you In school. I would love to see you try to slap someone on the wrist ever so slightly ever so stoicly after they ruin a family member of yours.

Interesting how it's the euros and canadians all against the death penalty too. The EU and Trudeau certainly did your people no favors.

In Europe Practically all your governments are against the death penalty and let people go after 10 to 20 years. After taking innocent lives who will never have Justice. Remember how all the third world is raping and killing your countries. No shooting or neutralizing I guess then because ....wait Europe has banned guns! And if someone comes in your house you have to run away like a little bitch and are not allowed self-defense. No wonder, it's instilled in the culture. Many of you have a lot of programming to get over. You do realize in the witchcraft section we have an actual death spell which is an equivalent of the death penalty and that this was given for a fucking reason?

We are talking worthless scum that are irredeemable that deserve this and people are saying to let them live as a slap in the face to the victims they harm.

It's really no better than the libtards here shouting from their gated community homes that everyone needs to be inclusive while they hide themselves away from what they damn well know is no state to be living in ..gunshots nightly...robbery rape and murder. And that crowbar mark on someone's door from being broken into will always remind them that their lives could be taken at any moment before their property is stolen if they do not act with deadly force. If someone has destroyed one of your loved ones whether it is in the present moment or in the past it makes no difference that these people deserve maximum punishment. The same goes for things like rape and pedophilia. Should there be no death penalty?? Say it then when it's YOUR KID.

Live and gain some actual life experience and I guarantee when you grow the fuck up you will be singing a different tune
 
Oh by the way...Not 100 percent sure on the source but I would not be surprised if this was accurate.

th


Oy vey. Just go on living life like normal goy and don't take vengeance because this is wrong..only "god" can do that. it's Annuda shoah if you shoot back because you have to take abuse. Literally 6 gorillion jews per bullet.
 
Canada has no death penalty for criminals, but they have "medically assisted suicide" for all of their citizens. People who have simple medical problems that can easily be fixed are strongly pressured by their doctors to just die, because killing the person would save a little bit of money compared to the cost of treating the real problem. This is where your socialist medical system gets you, when the government pays for everything they decide what they will not pay for.

Hundreds of thousands of Canadians have already been murdered by doctors, from basic uncomfortable bodies caused by an unhealthy lifestyle, to depression. Instead of helping a depressed person to become better and have a happier life, they would rather just kill them.

Now they just said last week that they have the answer for homelessness, they are going to kill all of the homeless people and that is the only way to solve it. I am not making this up.


Where is all the "oyy vey 6 gorillians" crying about the Canadian government genociding all of these innocent people? Seems like nobody cares.


But no, you could never kill the criminal who has raped and murdered your children. You just have to accept this because punishment is not rehabilitation.

It's like how liberals love to say, as if they have some great "check mate" in a debate, "Conservatives want the death penalty for violent criminals, but they say abortion is murder."
Uhh, yeah exactly. Exactly our point. Death penalty for violent criminals who have chosen to forfeit their lives by doing these horrible crimes against people. And no death penalty for innocent babies who have never done anything wrong. This is exactly our sense of morals and justice. But you have an extremely large number of people who believe exactly the opposite, that it is absolutely evil to kill a violent criminal, but perfectly fine to kill babies.
 
Ol argedco luciftias said:
Canada has no death penalty for criminals, but they have "medically assisted suicide" for all of their citizens. People who have simple medical problems that can easily be fixed are strongly pressured by their doctors to just die, because killing the person would save a little bit of money compared to the cost of treating the real problem. This is where your socialist medical system gets you, when the government pays for everything they decide what they will not pay for.

Hundreds of thousands of Canadians have already been murdered by doctors, from basic uncomfortable bodies caused by an unhealthy lifestyle, to depression. Instead of helping a depressed person to become better and have a happier life, they would rather just kill them.

Now they just said last week that they have the answer for homelessness, they are going to kill all of the homeless people and that is the only way to solve it. I am not making this up.


Where is all the "oyy vey 6 gorillians" crying about the Canadian government genociding all of these innocent people? Seems like nobody cares.


But no, you could never kill the criminal who has raped and murdered your children. You just have to accept this because punishment is not rehabilitation.

It's like how liberals love to say, as if they have some great "check mate" in a debate, "Conservatives want the death penalty for violent criminals, but they say abortion is murder."
Uhh, yeah exactly. Exactly our point. Death penalty for violent criminals who have chosen to forfeit their lives by doing these horrible crimes against people. And no death penalty for innocent babies who have never done anything wrong. This is exactly our sense of morals and justice. But you have an extremely large number of people who believe exactly the opposite, that it is absolutely evil to kill a violent criminal, but perfectly fine to kill babies.

trump-to-trudeau-no-thanks-last-time-i-grabbed-a-pussy-became-national-scandal.jpg
:lol: :lol:
 
Shadowcat said:
Pumpkin671 said:
Shadowcat said:
So you are telling me you would rather lie down and take it instead of cursing someone to death if they raped or killed your family?

It's easy to patronize when one has lived a sheltered life.
I think justice can be served in a more sufficient way rather than an emotional response.

Tell me then how you would serve justice to someone who did such horrific crimes to you or your family. Do tell...I bet your parents told you not to hit back when you got the shit kicked out of you In school. I would love to see you try to slap someone on the wrist ever so slightly ever so stoicly after they ruin a family member of yours.

Interesting how it's the euros and canadians all against the death penalty too. The EU and Trudeau certainly did your people no favors.

In Europe Practically all your governments are against the death penalty and let people go after 10 to 20 years. After taking innocent lives who will never have Justice. Remember how all the third world is raping and killing your countries. No shooting or neutralizing I guess then because ....wait Europe has banned guns! And if someone comes in your house you have to run away like a little bitch and are not allowed self-defense. No wonder, it's instilled in the culture. Many of you have a lot of programming to get over. You do realize in the witchcraft section we have an actual death spell which is an equivalent of the death penalty and that this was given for a fucking reason?

We are talking worthless scum that are irredeemable that deserve this and people are saying to let them live as a slap in the face to the victims they harm.

It's really no better than the libtards here shouting from their gated community homes that everyone needs to be inclusive while they hide themselves away from what they damn well know is no state to be living in ..gunshots nightly...robbery rape and murder. And that crowbar mark on someone's door from being broken into will always remind them that their lives could be taken at any moment before their property is stolen if they do not act with deadly force. If someone has destroyed one of your loved ones whether it is in the present moment or in the past it makes no difference that these people deserve maximum punishment. The same goes for things like rape and pedophilia. Should there be no death penalty?? Say it then when it's YOUR KID.

Live and gain some actual life experience and I guarantee when you grow the fuck up you will be singing a different tune
Self-defense is a human right in my opinion but what goes beyond that measure is killing and or destroying those who committed crimes to your loved ones. Revenge is probably the best word for it..you would call it justice...similar ideologies of revenge killing is expressed else where and punished with jail time. And if that is the case then we are no better than the criminals who commit murder and destroy others for the sake of it. If my opinion qualifies me to a liberal or euro then so be it but a differnece of opinion is also something that is unique.
 
Pumpkin671 said:
Shadowcat said:
Pumpkin671 said:
I think justice can be served in a more sufficient way rather than an emotional response.

Tell me then how you would serve justice to someone who did such horrific crimes to you or your family. Do tell...I bet your parents told you not to hit back when you got the shit kicked out of you In school. I would love to see you try to slap someone on the wrist ever so slightly ever so stoicly after they ruin a family member of yours.

Interesting how it's the euros and canadians all against the death penalty too. The EU and Trudeau certainly did your people no favors.

In Europe Practically all your governments are against the death penalty and let people go after 10 to 20 years. After taking innocent lives who will never have Justice. Remember how all the third world is raping and killing your countries. No shooting or neutralizing I guess then because ....wait Europe has banned guns! And if someone comes in your house you have to run away like a little bitch and are not allowed self-defense. No wonder, it's instilled in the culture. Many of you have a lot of programming to get over. You do realize in the witchcraft section we have an actual death spell which is an equivalent of the death penalty and that this was given for a fucking reason?

We are talking worthless scum that are irredeemable that deserve this and people are saying to let them live as a slap in the face to the victims they harm.

It's really no better than the libtards here shouting from their gated community homes that everyone needs to be inclusive while they hide themselves away from what they damn well know is no state to be living in ..gunshots nightly...robbery rape and murder. And that crowbar mark on someone's door from being broken into will always remind them that their lives could be taken at any moment before their property is stolen if they do not act with deadly force. If someone has destroyed one of your loved ones whether it is in the present moment or in the past it makes no difference that these people deserve maximum punishment. The same goes for things like rape and pedophilia. Should there be no death penalty?? Say it then when it's YOUR KID.

Live and gain some actual life experience and I guarantee when you grow the fuck up you will be singing a different tune
Self-defense is a human right in my opinion but what goes beyond that measure is killing and or destroying those who committed crimes to your loved ones. Revenge is probably the best word for it..you would call it justice...similar ideologies of revenge killing is expressed else where and punished with jail time. And if that is the case then we are no better than the criminals who commit murder and destroy others for the sake of it. If my opinion qualifies me to a liberal or euro then so be it but a differnece of opinion is also something that is unique.

Yes, Pumpkin I realize this is your view and that this whole post is repeating yourself in essence.
Revenge in proportion is giving justice. This is my point. Revenge killing for proven rape murder or pedophilia should not be punishable by law but are because oy vey the judge with the big long nose says so. The judicial system is full of kikes. You might as well be berating Maxine for giving us a death spell then. Your opinion is your own albeit a diluted one.
 
How about hard labor without the possibility for release? Certain crimes are too serious and the perpetrators can never be rehabilitated. Why just kill them and have them return to do more of the same (I know it's not as simple as that but still) when they can produce something or be used for something like medical experimentation. Is death too good for some crimes? What would you suggest as a way to have them give back to society knowing that what they took can never be compensated for? As someone mentioned there's always the death spell or similar methods of justice but for the sake of argument how can serious crimes be punished other than with death? Crime can be eliminated by removing the root cause. In the meantime we have to have a better system than the present one.
 
Shadowcat said:
Yes, Pumpkin I realize this is your view and that this whole post is repeating yourself in essence.
Revenge in proportion is giving justice. This is my point. Revenge killing for proven rape murder or pedophilia should not be punishable by law but are because oy vey the judge with the big long nose says so. The judicial system is full of kikes. You might as well be berating Maxine for giving us a death spell then. Your opinion is your own albeit a diluted one.

This guy is just fedposting at this point, careful with what you type regarding "revenge killing".


Satan gives one the tools to pursue justice for a reason, nothing else needs to be said.
 
Dahaarkan said:
Shadowcat said:
Yes, Pumpkin I realize this is your view and that this whole post is repeating yourself in essence.
Revenge in proportion is giving justice. This is my point. Revenge killing for proven rape murder or pedophilia should not be punishable by law but are because oy vey the judge with the big long nose says so. The judicial system is full of kikes. You might as well be berating Maxine for giving us a death spell then. Your opinion is your own albeit a diluted one.

This guy is just fedposting at this point, careful with what you type regarding "revenge killing".


Satan gives one the tools to pursue justice for a reason, nothing else needs to be said.

image-2.jpeg
 
Shemsu said:
How about hard labor without the possibility for release? Certain crimes are too serious and the perpetrators can never be rehabilitated. Why just kill them and have them return to do more of the same (I know it's not as simple as that but still) when they can produce something or be used for something like medical experimentation. Is death too good for some crimes? What would you suggest as a way to have them give back to society knowing that what they took can never be compensated for? As someone mentioned there's always the death spell or similar methods of justice but for the sake of argument how can serious crimes be punished other than with death? Crime can be eliminated by removing the root cause. In the meantime we have to have a better system than the present one.

I personally believe, as I've stated before that the only two possible solutions are permanent destruction of the soul, or total rehabilitation on a mental, physical and most importantly spiritual sense. These are the only two possible solutions to permanently remove a criminal, and everything else is placebo.

Generally speaking victims will pursue harsh punishments for harm inflicted on them, though I personally think the ideal solution is rehabilitation, followed by compensation to the victims for minor crimes. Very serious crimes, the kind that leave scars for lifetimes and propagates spiritual rot should be treated with the utmost and severe of permanent solutions.


Regardless, crime in general is a symptom of greater issues, and addressing those issues is a better solution than to wait until a crime happens and then punish the criminal, preventing the crime all-together is the superior option.

Poverty and Spiritual rot are the root cause of the vast majority of crimes. Both of which can be addressed and eliminated fairly easily if not for the jewish programs that perpetuate spiritual rot, and jewish economic terrorism that perpetuates poverty, things that have been happening throughout all of history pretty much.

Exposing and removing the harmful elements of jewish influence on religious and economic sectors will eliminate almost all crime within 2 or 3 generations.
 
Shadowcat said:
Praeceptorem666 said:
Pumpkin671 said:
Sounds more like an eye for an eye rather than justice.

What's wrong with eye for an eye? This whole rehabilitation nonsense is Jewish shite, people should be punished not rehabilitatated.

There is no actual rehabilitation in prison because the system is screwed up and does not focus on reprogramming people constructively. People that are otherwise redeemable in the long run do the time for whatever crime nonetheless, and most come out worse than before, with even innocents ending up in prison for crimes they did not commit. Others go in that are already far beyond redemption and are utterly disposable. Punishment is to be administered in proportion, which does not always require full throttle except for the most worse cases as mentioned.

That's true to an extent, I'm commenting on the mentality not the results, I do agree with rehabilitation for small things, as was implied but maybe rather poorly.
 
Pumpkin671 said:
Praeceptorem666 said:
Pumpkin671 said:
Sounds more like an eye for an eye rather than justice.

What's wrong with eye for an eye? This whole rehabilitation nonsense is Jewish shite, people should be punished not rehabilitatated.
Is that flat out no rehabilitation or are we limiting it to certain crimes?

Rehab for small crimes.
 
Shadowcat said:
Pumpkin671 said:
Shadowcat said:
Tell me then how you would serve justice to someone who did such horrific crimes to you or your family. Do tell...I bet your parents told you not to hit back when you got the shit kicked out of you In school. I would love to see you try to slap someone on the wrist ever so slightly ever so stoicly after they ruin a family member of yours.

Interesting how it's the euros and canadians all against the death penalty too. The EU and Trudeau certainly did your people no favors.

In Europe Practically all your governments are against the death penalty and let people go after 10 to 20 years. After taking innocent lives who will never have Justice. Remember how all the third world is raping and killing your countries. No shooting or neutralizing I guess then because ....wait Europe has banned guns! And if someone comes in your house you have to run away like a little bitch and are not allowed self-defense. No wonder, it's instilled in the culture. Many of you have a lot of programming to get over. You do realize in the witchcraft section we have an actual death spell which is an equivalent of the death penalty and that this was given for a fucking reason?

We are talking worthless scum that are irredeemable that deserve this and people are saying to let them live as a slap in the face to the victims they harm.

It's really no better than the libtards here shouting from their gated community homes that everyone needs to be inclusive while they hide themselves away from what they damn well know is no state to be living in ..gunshots nightly...robbery rape and murder. And that crowbar mark on someone's door from being broken into will always remind them that their lives could be taken at any moment before their property is stolen if they do not act with deadly force. If someone has destroyed one of your loved ones whether it is in the present moment or in the past it makes no difference that these people deserve maximum punishment. The same goes for things like rape and pedophilia. Should there be no death penalty?? Say it then when it's YOUR KID.

Live and gain some actual life experience and I guarantee when you grow the fuck up you will be singing a different tune
Self-defense is a human right in my opinion but what goes beyond that measure is killing and or destroying those who committed crimes to your loved ones. Revenge is probably the best word for it..you would call it justice...similar ideologies of revenge killing is expressed else where and punished with jail time. And if that is the case then we are no better than the criminals who commit murder and destroy others for the sake of it. If my opinion qualifies me to a liberal or euro then so be it but a differnece of opinion is also something that is unique.

Yes, Pumpkin I realize this is your view and that this whole post is repeating yourself in essence.
Revenge in proportion is giving justice. This is my point. Revenge killing for proven rape murder or pedophilia should not be punishable by law but are because oy vey the judge with the big long nose says so. The judicial system is full of kikes. You might as well be berating Maxine for giving us a death spell then. Your opinion is your own albeit a diluted one.
Sounds good.
 
Dahaarkan said:
Shadowcat said:
Yes, Pumpkin I realize this is your view and that this whole post is repeating yourself in essence.
Revenge in proportion is giving justice. This is my point. Revenge killing for proven rape murder or pedophilia should not be punishable by law but are because oy vey the judge with the big long nose says so. The judicial system is full of kikes. You might as well be berating Maxine for giving us a death spell then. Your opinion is your own albeit a diluted one.

This guy is just fedposting at this point, careful with what you type regarding "revenge killing".


Satan gives one the tools to pursue justice for a reason, nothing else needs to be said.
Ok
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top