My questions

[Agartha]

1) Whilst thinking, I noticed a few things regarding language and time. Perhaps this has been asked and discussed before, but I haven’t come across it. The use of the present tense in Turkish and the present tense suffix in English are perceptually different. In Turkish, it conveys both the present moment and refers to the action in general. In English, however, it refers to things happening in the very moment, in the flow of the present. That is my understanding. Those who know English well will understand what I mean and correct me if I’m wrong. When I discussed this with an AI, it backed me up. If you’re curious, I can elaborate further. How can we use this aspect of our language correctly and establish it as an instantaneous creation?


2) If energy moves only in relation to the present moment and time is not linear, is only the ‘now’ real? If the universe does not know linear time but only perceives the ‘now’, and if there is no such thing as linear time, then this is merely a concept our minds have invented to define time. After all, we are always experiencing the present. This situation raises certain questions. Can the present be bent? Is it perceived differently in every place, as in general relativity? Were the ancient philosophers referring to this when they said ‘everything flows’?

3) When we use the term ‘permanent’ whilst making an affirmation based on the present, are we not stepping outside the present?

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

You seem to be confused about small details that are not really important. Do not worry about it.

 

[Agartha]

You seem to be confused about small details that are not really important. Do not worry about it.

These may be minor details, but they’re not insignificant. I’m not worried, I’m just curious.
I’m particularly curious by nature. If you know the answer or have any comments, please do share them.

 

[Fahari]

1) Whilst thinking, I noticed a few things regarding language and time. Perhaps this has been asked and discussed before, but I haven’t come across it. The use of the present tense in Turkish and the present tense suffix in English are perceptually different. In Turkish, it conveys both the present moment and refers to the action in general. In English, however, it refers to things happening in the very moment, in the flow of the present. That is my understanding. Those who know English well will understand what I mean and correct me if I’m wrong. When I discussed this with an AI, it backed me up. If you’re curious, I can elaborate further. How can we use this aspect of our language correctly and establish it as an instantaneous creation?


2) If energy moves only in relation to the present moment and time is not linear, is only the ‘now’ real? If the universe does not know linear time but only perceives the ‘now’, and if there is no such thing as linear time, then this is merely a concept our minds have invented to define time. After all, we are always experiencing the present. This situation raises certain questions. Can the present be bent? Is it perceived differently in every place, as in general relativity? Were the ancient philosophers referring to this when they said ‘everything flows’?

3) When we use the term ‘permanent’ whilst making an affirmation based on the present, are we not stepping outside the present?

By your perception of it wouldn't permanent directly translate to mean an 'eternal now'?

 

[Fahari]

You seem to be confused about small details that are not really important. Do not worry about it.

And what would you consider 'important' in this context?

 

[Agartha]

By your perception of it wouldn't permanent directly translate to mean an 'eternal now'?

When you look at it that way, it actually is the case.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

If you are talking about what would or would not be effective for a magical working, you are overthinking things. You are overthinking about this word "present" and are becoming confused in a way that is not productive. The idea for the affirmations is to put the energy into action. If you say "the energy will do this." When will it do that? Is the energy sitting around doing nothing, and then one day in the future it will start working? So the idea is to say "The energy is doing this." in the present tense so that the energy is immediately getting to work and doing what it should be doing.

When you say something is done permanently, it is what it sounds like. It is done permanently. It will not be undone in the future. Yes, the future exists.

 

[Agartha]

If you are talking about what would or would not be effective for a magical working, you are overthinking things. You are overthinking about this word "present" and are becoming confused in a way that is not productive. The idea for the affirmations is to put the energy into action. If you say "the energy will do this." When will it do that? Is the energy sitting around doing nothing, and then one day in the future it will start working? So the idea is to say "The energy is doing this." in the present tense so that the energy is immediately getting to work and doing what it should be doing.

When you say something is done permanently, it is what it sounds like. It is done permanently. It will not be undone in the future. Yes, the future exists.

My questions aren’t being fully understood because of the language barrier. This is partly due to translation errors and partly because the questions I’m asking require a certain level of linguistic knowledge. In Turkish, the present tense suffix ‘yor’ doesn’t just cover the present tense; it also covers the general present and habitual actions. But you’re using ‘ing’, and that only covers what’s happening right at this very moment. This isn’t a problem for you. But if we’re using the present tense suffix and the general tense crosses our minds, why shouldn’t that have an effect? I only realised this much later, and at that moment, it seemed more logical to focus solely on the present. I just wanted to learn the nuances of this. I’m not a paranoid person who gets hung up on details.
We don’t say “energy does this” verbally. We say “energy is doing this”, but in our Turkish language, this also means “energy does this”. We need to mentally code this distinction as simply “energy is doing this”. However, since this is ingrained in our language and a habit, it’s a difficult thing to do, and I’ve been asking from the very beginning how we can do this effectively.

Also, a sentence I thought I’d written hasn’t been conveyed properly. I meant to say that I’m particularly curious about knowledge.

I’m not just speculating; I’m simply looking for an answer. It’s not something I’ve been thinking about non-stop all day and night.

Moreover, why does energy perceive only the present moment? That’s another question of mine.

As for time, what I’m actually trying to say is: if time isn’t linear, as is claimed, does this have any bearing on the fact that energy perceives only the present moment?

 

[I.Am.Radiant]

1) Whilst thinking, I noticed a few things regarding language and time. Perhaps this has been asked and discussed before, but I haven’t come across it. The use of the present tense in Turkish and the present tense suffix in English are perceptually different. In Turkish, it conveys both the present moment and refers to the action in general. In English, however, it refers to things happening in the very moment, in the flow of the present. That is my understanding. Those who know English well will understand what I mean and correct me if I’m wrong. When I discussed this with an AI, it backed me up. If you’re curious, I can elaborate further. How can we use this aspect of our language correctly and establish it as an instantaneous creation?


2) If energy moves only in relation to the present moment and time is not linear, is only the ‘now’ real? If the universe does not know linear time but only perceives the ‘now’, and if there is no such thing as linear time, then this is merely a concept our minds have invented to define time. After all, we are always experiencing the present. This situation raises certain questions. Can the present be bent? Is it perceived differently in every place, as in general relativity? Were the ancient philosophers referring to this when they said ‘everything flows’?

3) When we use the term ‘permanent’ whilst making an affirmation based on the present, are we not stepping outside the present?

I find the differences in meaning between the languages intriguing, as the descriptions of "actions" and "things happening" strike me as so similar.

I believe past, present and future all correlate to one another. Quite possibly where "flow" together or from one to another occurs?

While we live in the now, we must also recognize what is over, what we still hold onto, what we are walking towards honestly, and where we are currently.

Lastly, using the term "permanent", based on the present, doesn't always make it so, sometimes. I know that sounds vague, i just know from experience things that seemed so permanent at the time quickly changed, once I got new information.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

My questions aren’t being fully understood because of the language barrier. This is partly due to translation errors and partly because the questions I’m asking require a certain level of linguistic knowledge. In Turkish, the present tense suffix ‘yor’ doesn’t just cover the present tense; it also covers the general present and habitual actions. But you’re using ‘ing’, and that only covers what’s happening right at this very moment. This isn’t a problem for you. But if we’re using the present tense suffix and the general tense crosses our minds, why shouldn’t that have an effect? I only realised this much later, and at that moment, it seemed more logical to focus solely on the present. I just wanted to learn the nuances of this. I’m not a paranoid person who gets hung up on details.
We don’t say “energy does this” verbally. We say “energy is doing this”, but in our Turkish language, this also means “energy does this”. We need to mentally code this distinction as simply “energy is doing this”. However, since this is ingrained in our language and a habit, it’s a difficult thing to do, and I’ve been asking from the very beginning how we can do this effectively.

Also, a sentence I thought I’d written hasn’t been conveyed properly. I meant to say that I’m particularly curious about knowledge.

I’m not just speculating; I’m simply looking for an answer. It’s not something I’ve been thinking about non-stop all day and night.

Moreover, why does energy perceive only the present moment? That’s another question of mine.

As for time, what I’m actually trying to say is: if time isn’t linear, as is claimed, does this have any bearing on the fact that energy perceives only the present moment?

It is not a problem. You really are worried about nothing. It does not matter if there is some small differences between different languages. What matters is your intentions. And what is harmful and can make a magical working fail is having doubts and worrying about insignificant things.

 

[Fahari]

It is not a problem. You really are worried about nothing. It does not matter if there is some small differences between different languages. What matters is your intentions. And what is harmful and can make a magical working fail is having doubts and worrying about insignificant things.

They are not overthinking,they are simply trying to 'Think' and understanding a complexity and difference in their own language,
Sound is the core of programming energy as much as as intent is ,they aren't mutually exclusive,
Only intent is important? Please go and reread this

Opening of the Mouth: Complete Public Explanations and Aspects of the Ritual

Opening of the Mouth: Complete Public Explanations and Aspects of the Ritual Light Emanation of the Gods Within Oneself There's a ritual in Ancient Egypt that predates the pyramids, predates the dynasties, predates written history itself. Archaeological finds of the peseshkaf, the fish-tail...

ancient-forums.com

Let people freely ask questions instead of downplaying their concerning or assuming their fears and doubts for them, it's just counterintuitive to the purpose of the forum

 

[Agartha]

I find the differences in meaning between the languages intriguing, as the descriptions of "actions" and "things happening" strike me as so similar.

I believe past, present and future all correlate to one another. Quite possibly where "flow" together or from one to another occurs?

While we live in the now, we must also recognize what is over, what we still hold onto, what we are walking towards honestly, and where we are currently.

Lastly, using the term "permanent", based on the present, doesn't always make it so, sometimes. I know that sounds vague, i just know from experience things that seemed so permanent at the time quickly changed, once I got new information.

I once read somewhere that scientists believe future events, at the quantum level, can alter and influence the past.
Time may be more complex than we realise.

 

[Agartha]

It is not a problem. You really are worried about nothing. It does not matter if there is some small differences between different languages. What matters is your intentions. And what is harmful and can make a magical working fail is having doubts and worrying about insignificant things.

I’m not really worried. I just had a question pop into my head and thought I’d ask it on the forum. If I can’t do that, what’s the point of the forum?

 

[Agartha]

...

Thanks, mate.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

You can ask whatever you want. But I am answering your question truthfully. You can hopefully trust that I have some experience with this and I am telling you the truth. I can tell you that a working will be done correctly with no problem.

Maybe it is being translated differently when I say "worrying" to make it sound worse than what I mean. I mean that you do not need to have a doubt or think that what you are doing will not work. Your magical working is successful. But doubting or believing that it will not work is what can cause it to fail. You do not need to believe that some slight difference between 2 languages will cause a failure. Like there are many words that have multiple different meanings. Could you not use any of these words because "What if it doesn't know which definition I meant?" No, this is not a problem. It does not work that way.

Your intention and what you are willing with your will power, your focus, and your energy of the intention that you are putting out is what it will do. Whatever you mean and intend and focus on is what it will do. You do not need to be doubtful over small details that are not really a problem, because then the real problem is the doubt itself.

That topic from High Priest Zevios Metathronos is about not going around and accidentally cursing people or things like that. And it is about being careful what you are actually focusing on or willing or what energies or forces you are really putting out. If you are having doubts or believing that your working is failed or is not correct, this doubt is the real problem and is what will actually cause it to fail.

The correct answer to help you and tell you what will actually work is literally "Don't worry about it." I am not joking and I am not being dismissive when I say this.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

If you worry, if you doubt, if you question and think that something will fail and not succeed. Then now it will fail because your doubt made it fail. You need to be confident and focused. Worrying about small, insignificant, and unimportant details is not going to help. What you are focused on, what you mean, what you intend, what you visualize and imagine. This is the most important thing.

 

[Gladius]

1) Whilst thinking, I noticed a few things regarding language and time. Perhaps this has been asked and discussed before, but I haven’t come across it. The use of the present tense in Turkish and the present tense suffix in English are perceptually different. In Turkish, it conveys both the present moment and refers to the action in general. In English, however, it refers to things happening in the very moment, in the flow of the present. That is my understanding. Those who know English well will understand what I mean and correct me if I’m wrong. When I discussed this with an AI, it backed me up. If you’re curious, I can elaborate further. How can we use this aspect of our language correctly and establish it as an instantaneous creation?


2) If energy moves only in relation to the present moment and time is not linear, is only the ‘now’ real? If the universe does not know linear time but only perceives the ‘now’, and if there is no such thing as linear time, then this is merely a concept our minds have invented to define time. After all, we are always experiencing the present. This situation raises certain questions. Can the present be bent? Is it perceived differently in every place, as in general relativity? Were the ancient philosophers referring to this when they said ‘everything flows’?

3) When we use the term ‘permanent’ whilst making an affirmation based on the present, are we not stepping outside the present?

Something about your second question made me wonder:

"then this is merely a concept our minds have invented to define time."

Why do you think our minds can come up with a concept that can't exist?

 

[Agartha]

You can ask whatever you want. But I am answering your question truthfully. You can hopefully trust that I have some experience with this and I am telling you the truth. I can tell you that a working will be done correctly with no problem.

Maybe it is being translated differently when I say "worrying" to make it sound worse than what I mean. I mean that you do not need to have a doubt or think that what you are doing will not work. Your magical working is successful. But doubting or believing that it will not work is what can cause it to fail. You do not need to believe that some slight difference between 2 languages will cause a failure. Like there are many words that have multiple different meanings. Could you not use any of these words because "What if it doesn't know which definition I meant?" No, this is not a problem. It does not work that way.

Your intention and what you are willing with your will power, your focus, and your energy of the intention that you are putting out is what it will do. Whatever you mean and intend and focus on is what it will do. You do not need to be doubtful over small details that are not really a problem, because then the real problem is the doubt itself.

That topic from High Priest Zevios Metathronos is about not going around and accidentally cursing people or things like that. And it is about being careful what you are actually focusing on or willing or what energies or forces you are really putting out. If you are having doubts or believing that your working is failed or is not correct, this doubt is the real problem and is what will actually cause it to fail.

The correct answer to help you and tell you what will actually work is literally "Don't worry about it." I am not joking and I am not being dismissive when I say this.

Thank you

 

[Agartha]

Something about your second question made me wonder:

"then this is merely a concept our minds have invented to define time."

Why do you think our minds can come up with a concept that can't exist?

Why not? Bigfoot isn’t real, but I can picture him in my mind, after all. Many theories start out as just an idea in the mind.

 

[Gladius]

Why not? Bigfoot isn’t real, but I can picture him in my mind, after all. Many theories start out as just an idea in the mind.

Ok but pay attention what I said;
I said something that can't exist.Like a New color or two parallel lines intersecting with eachother.

But you're saying something that don't exist. When you're saying bigfoot, you're picturing something big, hairy and monkeylike creature. These all can exist separately.

 

[Agartha]

Ok but pay attention what I said;
I said something that can't exist.Like a New color or two parallel lines intersecting with eachother.

But you're saying something that don't exist. When you're saying bigfoot, you're picturing something big, hairy and monkeylike creature. These all can exist separately.

Our mental capacity may not be sufficient, or they may not exist at all.