Eugenics, Evolution, Spirituality

For those who wish to establish a relationship with Satan.

Topics of discussion include: Demons, Magick, Satanic Witchcraft and much more!

http://www.joyofsatan.com / http://www.joyofsatan.org
HP. Hoodedcobra666
Posts: 3418

Eugenics, Evolution, Spirituality

Postby HP. Hoodedcobra666 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 1:54 pm

@Norse88 - Here can the reply be found viewtopic.php?f=5&t=17494#p65297

This is an incredibly important sermon, I believe, that could not be more overstated for those of us here with scientific influence in our respective societies. I have had immense trouble convincing my colleagues or friends and family about the truth that evolution is not scientifically grounded, or something we can even consider to be the truthful account of humanities origins. The alternative to evolution isn't creationism in the sense that so many believe will be the case if we can't prove the churches wrong, but rather the alternative is Satanism - only at this stage does a creationist rationale make sense.

If evolution were true, and humanity were getting smarter as time passes, then we would have in the last 100 years gained intelligence, technology, and sophistication unknown to all of humanities collective efforts in the past 2000 years, and, according to the false history we are all allowed to have, has surpassed all collective human ingenuity since we ever became man today as we know it (something modern science is still unclear about, because it looks for answers where there won't be any, i.e., in evolutionary links). To excel as we have these past 100 years is indicative of potential that should have been there since the beginning, from an evolutionary point of view. It is simply too fast for that kind of intellectual progress to be safely within the confines of an evolutionary process. On top of this, no one expects human beings to evolve into something greater still. We are all we are ever going to be, and only individually can we improve ourselves. We don't need genetic purity to try and breed better offspring that might be capable beyond what our pure selves could achieve through hard work of their own.


Darwin's opinion on the subject of evolution is a specific one [he arrayed this theory], but this does not invalidate the greater reality of evolution around the universe, or nature and reality itself. For whatever reason, everyone has only accepted and was forcefed the "Darwinian" take on the said evolution, which is coarse, slow, and limited, but has some actually valid points in it, which are based in nature, which in turns make it partially appealing.

It is just not valid in the time spectrum and understanding we now do possess. Lifeforms 'evolve' or 'spring out' naturally, as microbes or other types of life that simply 'results' when the certain conditions to a specific form of life arise. They also likewise evolve, as this is a natural process.

What was done here is take this greater general concept, and apply it to human beings, a lifeform which is quite advanced (But was not understood as such in the latest centuries scientifically) and try to enforce this brutally on humans as well, a species of life which seems to be a bit more ahead than quite a few other species, and also a species which has heightened (But rejected to the general public) abilities to actually facilitate and control it's own evolution.

One example the dumbest and the most ignorant here on our time and era can understand for the sake of argument, is the ever rising tide of genetic augmentation, or DNA alteration. Primates do not possess this technology, nor do fish. Therefore by default, we have a different relation to evolution than other species.

In the case of Whites, it doesn't even stand, and it appears to not stand in general to humanity as a whole as well. We did not evolve from apes in Africa, and there is no substantial evidence to prove that we actually did. All our ancient cultures were based on the fact we were what is today called 'genetically engineered' and came from another planetary systems, by beings that descended to evolve and give birth to us.

The fact that we were genetically engineered by ET's is really something we knew for a very long historical 'while'. The situation is access to that knowledge is only a recent phenomenon, of the 20th and 21st century, as prior to that, the Jewtrix has kept us completely oblivious to the fact of our own origins. The Sumerian epic is essentially this type of procedure of us being created by aliens or extra terrestrials, who did what we know today to be Genetic Engineering. When the Gods came here, they found species on this planet. Progressively, man was created.

As for your other statement on "We don't need genetic purity to try and breed better offspring that might be capable beyond what our pure selves could achieve through hard work of their own.", we do. Not sure what you mean by genetic purity, but in general, it means something very simple: what we can brand as 'racial hygiene' by another terminology. This is crucial to our existence, life and development, and is nature's eternal law.

Genetic purity is a term for having clear genetic lineage, keeping a line of genetic information, or DNA, unadulterated, with the aim to constantly improve this based on spiritual development, a mode of advancement to be explained below. Without this line kept pure, clean, and by virulent opposition to distortion, we cannot really receive that which has been 'vested' into us by our creators, nor we can really 'evolve' any further.

The more the above process doesn't go as intended, the more we have to go back and 'repair' or essentially re-advance, which sets us back tremendously both in time and wasted effort on our behalf. We 're-monkey-ize' ourselves if this process is carried out mercilessly, and the enemy is aware of this. (Kalergi plan)

And yes, we are still 'evolving', and 'de-evolving', or rather, advancing or dwindling, but not in the Darwinian sense of the term 'evolving', which rules out that other ways towards evolution do actually exist, one of which ways, meditation, which is something in India the yogis know for thousands of years now. Darwin's time scale theories are also extremely bunk.

It's also known to them if things are left in chance, we take steps in an excruciatingly slow manner, with an emphasis on deterioration, but meditation actually helps us advance. We might as well call this process "evolution" or "acceleration" of this process. On our own, nothing like that really happens.

The fact that the National Socialists did not buy the Darwinian theories as influenced by Eugenics is simple, it's the fact they tried to generate through atavism the higher types that existed before, by breeding specific Nordic Aryan individuals.

From Darwin's standpoint this would be a joke and pseudoscience, but the National Socialists knew better here than to follow this theory, which says that no matter how or what one breeds, one is still left with the prior stock, without many opportunities for sudden or great development. Also, according to this theory of Darwin, it doesn't matter what we do or do not do, as our influence on this process is really minimal and decided solely by nature.

Darwin would get into a coma if Himmler told him he was trying to reverse engineer clearer Nordic types of people, who would in a few generations time, resemble the Gods more and more in all respects. This process is to be coupled by spiritual processes which the SS was already developing. Indeed, this is nothing strange here than what it was in let's say the Vedic or Aryan Hindu times with the so called 'higher upper class' which was essentially aristocratic, or let's say simply the best and most qualified beings in regards to plentiful and quality life and existence.

To the Aryan peoples, all of the scientific theories rediscovered today (such as that evolution is facilitated by spiritual practices, eugenics, racial hygiene, and also, what Darwinism and mainstream science has rebuked, external lifestyle and choices which affect both descendants and person alike) were all known. This was actually the basis of the ancient civilizations, if we are to say, they were only centered around consistent development of species.

This in yoga exists today in the highest schools, both in regards to the knowledge of immortality, slowing ageing, but also, the actual 'evolutionary' circle which is not of Darwin, but is founded on top of spiritual practice. This is why in the East yogis say and have all sorts of cryptic interpolations in regards to what meditation advances someone and for how many 'millions of years ahead'. Advancement exists, but 'evolution' is not exactly what we have been told for species as advanced as ours.

However, this knowledge is very well known to all ancient civilizations, yet, preserved only in one, and guess who it is today, our "FAVORITE" jews, who only take serious eugenics on their upper crust of society, which is the basis of their bloodline, or their Cohen reptile priests. But if the Goyim try to do stuff like that, remember goyim it's all futile and praise Darwin.

Indeed, both great development into species, even in the span of one single generation (For better or for worse) does seem to be a fact of life, as for example race mixing. Evolution can be 'pushed forward' in this sense.

Darwin has went through many misconceptions of his own theories by loosely studied people, such as people linking him with the theory of "Survival of the Fittest". However, Darwin didn't really say "Fittest" as in most intelligent or anything like that, "The Best", but in the most prolific in regards to birth. Ie, those who are the 'fittest' as those who can reproduce, and that's it.

This has nothing to do with the quality of said species. Cockroaches can be considered "Fittest" in their survival, as they reproduce at alarming rates. The rate of production of a species in regards to it's existential quality may even be reversed, as the stupidest and those on the general lower level of any so called 'desirable qualities' do prolifically procreate, while others do not. By Darwinian theory these people would be the "Fittest", while those who are let's say the aristocratic, or exceptional birth, would be lows.

Our conception of Darwin was from the first time literally reversed. For example, when we said fittest (or when the 20th century thinkers said "Fittest") they really meant the most advanced or most evolved, aka, the bottom of the Darwinian ladder, ironically. The jew for example, is the "Fittest" in the environment of usury, or in deceiving stupid people, on a civilization scale.

As from a natural scale, a scale or abilities, or inherent value of life, one can argue they are closer to bacteria, or parasitic viruses.

For example, "Fittest" in the Kalergi plan of the jews, is actually the eternally racially mixed and destroyed bongoloids they are producing as of current. This will be the 'fittest' for survival, within said environment, and adjusted to it, fitting in the theory of Darwin in regards to who is the "Fittest" for survival or life. Sort of like how mold is "Fittest" to grow on old discarded food.

Clearly, this is not nature's affirming in itself advancement, but you can systematically breed these Kalergi Bongoloid children, by your "own" hand, while essentially screwing nature's wills and opinions on natural spiritual or otherwise aristocracy, in which nature is already very scarce.

One can therefore be deceived and likewise deceive others that 'humanity' is 'evolving' or that the humans that live today are the 'fittest' and the 'fittest survive', but remember what really means fittest now, compared to what the word would mean literally. Indeed, a lot of the highest trash of the planet is freely reproducing, replicating, and faring at prolific rates.

So when people throw a tantrum in regards to 'violence of life' and 'survival of the fittest', this is actually the 'fittest' they think it is. It's more like what is more 'well adjusted' to the current pace or aim of civilization.

Whiny whiny about 'survival of the fittest' as an intrinsic mode of life of the best surviving, is not really a rule in the present aims of this 'civilization' as in 'fit the healthiest', the most intelligent, the most powerful, but in many cases, the reverse. We have the inversion to natural fitness in what it means to be 'fit' and live today. Wretchedness is far more likely to help you survive than it is for you to be gifted in some way, for example. This world, if not stopped, will simply turn into a farm of Kalergi's zoo.

-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666
| Joy Of Satan Main Website - https://www.joyofsatan.org or http://joyofsatan.com
| Kabbalah Exposed - https://www.kabbalahexposed.com/
| Exposing Christianity - http://www.exposingchristianity.com |
| SATAN IS GOD PORTAL & Mirror - https://www.satanisgod.org |

http://www.josmarket.org/ Orders Open - Full Natal Charts Open!

Norse 88
Posts: 96

Re: Eugenics, Evolution, Spirituality

Postby Norse 88 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 2:36 pm

HP. Hoodedcobra666 wrote:@Norse88 - Here can the reply be found viewtopic.php?f=5&t=17494#p65297

This is an incredibly important sermon, I believe, that could not be more overstated for those of us here with scientific influence in our respective societies. I have had immense trouble convincing my colleagues or friends and family about the truth that evolution is not scientifically grounded, or something we can even consider to be the truthful account of humanities origins. The alternative to evolution isn't creationism in the sense that so many believe will be the case if we can't prove the churches wrong, but rather the alternative is Satanism - only at this stage does a creationist rationale make sense.

If evolution were true, and humanity were getting smarter as time passes, then we would have in the last 100 years gained intelligence, technology, and sophistication unknown to all of humanities collective efforts in the past 2000 years, and, according to the false history we are all allowed to have, has surpassed all collective human ingenuity since we ever became man today as we know it (something modern science is still unclear about, because it looks for answers where there won't be any, i.e., in evolutionary links). To excel as we have these past 100 years is indicative of potential that should have been there since the beginning, from an evolutionary point of view. It is simply too fast for that kind of intellectual progress to be safely within the confines of an evolutionary process. On top of this, no one expects human beings to evolve into something greater still. We are all we are ever going to be, and only individually can we improve ourselves. We don't need genetic purity to try and breed better offspring that might be capable beyond what our pure selves could achieve through hard work of their own.

...


That's an excellent response, HP HC. Unfortunately, my intended response to this has ended up on another board (to my understanding). I apologise for the inconvenience. My experience with online forums is far less adequate than would be ideal. This is the first online forum I've ever engaged with. If you are interested in my response, it is on Mageson's initial sermon (I hope).

If it doesn't pop up over the next few days then I'll attempt to re-write the response to you again.

Thanks for your reply.
SATAN IS TRUTH; KNOWLEDGE IS POWER.


HAIL SATAN HAIL MARCHOSIAS HAIL BASTET

http://www.joyofsatan.com
http://www.satanslibrary.org -!!STUDY MAKES STRENGTH!!
http://www.kabbalahexposed.com

HP Mageson666
Posts: 2431

Re: Eugenics, Evolution, Spirituality

Postby HP Mageson666 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 3:39 pm

If one looks into the genetics' when it comes to races and Pye mentioned this in his lecture he was given this under the table from a loyalist on the inside of the genetic world. Racial purity is the most important thing each race has a individual template that the smallest different in gene code creates tens of thousands of differences within the over all genetic structure. Each race has gone thought thousands of years strengthening of the genes of the race to the point many of the dross or defects have been bred out. If each race was left on its own and didn't mix and had a wholistic culture the reality of in time it would become perfected.


Nature is seeking to perfect its creations if you study the golden mean spiral and the geometry of nature forms are moving in that direction seeking to perfect themselves. It seems from studies done a lot of the spiritual practices are based on activation of the gene expression we got from the Gods. The so called Junk DNA is activated by spiritual practices.


The jews tell us to race mix and they themselves are a strange reptilian mixed and inbred race of mutants and they suffer from the most strange illnesses on the earth and the most genetic diseases out of any race on earth. All the programs they promote from Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Communism and general Globalism all promote race mixing as their central theme. The Jews practiced first cousin marriages for centuries and even their Moses was parented by an aunt and her nephew he was totally inbred. Isaac the founder of Israel married his four first cousins the Jewish religion is based on incest and inbreeding how Chosen of them.

Every teaching the Gods gave the different humans was based on racial purity.

HP. Hoodedcobra666
Posts: 3418

Re: Eugenics, Evolution, Spirituality

Postby HP. Hoodedcobra666 » Sat Feb 02, 2019 4:03 pm

Norse 88 wrote:
HP. Hoodedcobra666 wrote:@Norse88 - Here can the reply be found viewtopic.php?f=5&t=17494#p65297

This is an incredibly important sermon, I believe, that could not be more overstated for those of us here with scientific influence in our respective societies. I have had immense trouble convincing my colleagues or friends and family about the truth that evolution is not scientifically grounded, or something we can even consider to be the truthful account of humanities origins. The alternative to evolution isn't creationism in the sense that so many believe will be the case if we can't prove the churches wrong, but rather the alternative is Satanism - only at this stage does a creationist rationale make sense.

If evolution were true, and humanity were getting smarter as time passes, then we would have in the last 100 years gained intelligence, technology, and sophistication unknown to all of humanities collective efforts in the past 2000 years, and, according to the false history we are all allowed to have, has surpassed all collective human ingenuity since we ever became man today as we know it (something modern science is still unclear about, because it looks for answers where there won't be any, i.e., in evolutionary links). To excel as we have these past 100 years is indicative of potential that should have been there since the beginning, from an evolutionary point of view. It is simply too fast for that kind of intellectual progress to be safely within the confines of an evolutionary process. On top of this, no one expects human beings to evolve into something greater still. We are all we are ever going to be, and only individually can we improve ourselves. We don't need genetic purity to try and breed better offspring that might be capable beyond what our pure selves could achieve through hard work of their own.

...


That's an excellent response, HP HC. Unfortunately, my intended response to this has ended up on another board (to my understanding). I apologise for the inconvenience. My experience with online forums is far less adequate than would be ideal. This is the first online forum I've ever engaged with. If you are interested in my response, it is on Mageson's initial sermon (I hope).

If it doesn't pop up over the next few days then I'll attempt to re-write the response to you again.

Thanks for your reply.


No need to worry, we are just having a conversation, plus, I found your input really interesting, which also created the post. I hope I didn't severely misunderstand you or something, as this tends to happen, especially on such subjects. I also hope you found the reply properly explanatory.

Next time people try to argue with you that we humans do evolve in 'Darwinian' pace, just ask them, do fish use Genetic Engineering? Do fish consciously do breeding of the best lifeforms to create aristocratic families with certain dispositions? The list goes. We are really affecting our evolution more and more as time goes.

Maybe the first primates or the majority of animals on the planet did indeed evolve naturally, and slowly, through the natural process, but not us.
| Joy Of Satan Main Website - https://www.joyofsatan.org or http://joyofsatan.com
| Kabbalah Exposed - https://www.kabbalahexposed.com/
| Exposing Christianity - http://www.exposingchristianity.com |
| SATAN IS GOD PORTAL & Mirror - https://www.satanisgod.org |

http://www.josmarket.org/ Orders Open - Full Natal Charts Open!

SdD
Posts: 375

Re: Eugenics, Evolution, Spirituality

Postby SdD » Tue Feb 05, 2019 11:51 pm

Funny that many things are tweaked and genetically changed !! And “””they””” say we came from the monkey with common evolution ...?
Sure goy :roll: :arrow: 8-)

serpentwalker666
Posts: 190

Re: Eugenics, Evolution, Spirituality

Postby serpentwalker666 » Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:47 pm

This leaves me with a question as for the mixed races, all the different sub races like the mexicans, arabs, and etc. What would the gods want to be done with such a situation? Maybe over many generations and with the gods assisting these people in purifying their genetic line? I hope this doesn't seem like a stupid question. Just something I've been wondering.

Norse 88
Posts: 96

Re: Eugenics, Evolution, Spirituality

Postby Norse 88 » Sun Feb 17, 2019 12:57 pm

HP. Hoodedcobra666 wrote:
Norse 88 wrote:
HP. Hoodedcobra666 wrote:@Norse88 - Here can the reply be found viewtopic.php?f=5&t=17494#p65297


...


That's an excellent response, HP HC. Unfortunately, my intended response to this has ended up on another board (to my understanding). I apologise for the inconvenience. My experience with online forums is far less adequate than would be ideal. This is the first online forum I've ever engaged with. If you are interested in my response, it is on Mageson's initial sermon (I hope).

If it doesn't pop up over the next few days then I'll attempt to re-write the response to you again.

Thanks for your reply.


No need to worry, we are just having a conversation, plus, I found your input really interesting, which also created the post. I hope I didn't severely misunderstand you or something, as this tends to happen, especially on such subjects. I also hope you found the reply properly explanatory.

Next time people try to argue with you that we humans do evolve in 'Darwinian' pace, just ask them, do fish use Genetic Engineering? Do fish consciously do breeding of the best lifeforms to create aristocratic families with certain dispositions? The list goes. We are really affecting our evolution more and more as time goes.

Maybe the first primates or the majority of animals on the planet did indeed evolve naturally, and slowly, through the natural process, but not us.


Hi HP HC,

No, you didn't misunderstand me. I'm afraid I misrepresented myself by posting without properly reviewing and revising what I had said before I committed to posting it. Thus, the posts I soon made to clarify a few ambiguities in my initial response became scattered and possibly incoherent. It's okay. I think we all got there in there end (otherwise I suspect I'd have a much more palpable list of critics on these posts as well).

Your response was very explanatory, thank you. I especially appreciated that you were so versed and understood on this true version of "evolution" which underpins the nature of life in the universe, which is much different from the Darwinian rationale as it stands. I was only partially aware of it myself, and didn't know how my knowledge of real evolution stacked up against anyone else's, let alone the JoS. I'm glad you went right ahead and spoke about it. This signals to me that my own ideas and speculations are possibly on the right track (or that we are all deluded together). Either way, it's a great step in a favourable direction when minds of the SS are working and working alike!

Thanks for your suggestion on different counter-arguments to use against Darwinian evolutionists - not that I debate with them much. To help translate the concept of racial purity, however, I often use the argument that bull ants and sugar ants keep themselves separate and pure in their nests, and that they do not mix races with each other despite both being different ants. Neither ant is cruel or a bigot. In fact, nature often keeps its racial subdivisions breeding only with itself on this planet unless human intervention takes places.

Personally, I think human beings are a species which grows, or, evolves, in a unique manner compared to most life on the Earth. Since Satan intervened, we have had no need it would seem of physical adaptations (physical in the crude sense, where the layers of being beyond the massive and slowest vibrations of manifestation - i.e., the solid, liquid, and gaseous body - are considered non-physical; I know that light and the soul is physical in a much more profound and complex sense, but let's be crude for now), but we have a supreme need for psychological and spiritual adaptations. To the extent that gaining knowledge whilst practicing meditation (and whatever other spiritual works and so forth) empowers and changes us on "unseen" planes to the pinnacle of our mortal being - the Godhead - which we then transition to we achieve a stage of completion as humans and gain our immortality, that this seems to be our only hurdle forward in our striving for greatness and what would appear to be evolutionary progress after all these years since Satan's intervention, when compared to the view of Darwin's supporters who argue that through pure breeding a species will create progeny who's physiology suits them better to the immediate environment, and that contrarily we do not change race unless we carry out miscegenation, and never by living in new places (i.e., I am white, and living in Asia will not give me Asian children, so long as my wife is white, and we can expect white children for all future generations so long as no race mixing occurs; neither the providence of the country or district will not violate my racial biology, but transient factors of culture and impermanence will grow and die with each child) that this is the case for humanity, indicates how "evolution" - a word I am emphasising in hopes that it is not mistaken for it's typical meaning by the reader - is outlaid for the human populace.

Thanks for responding, HC.

Hail Satan
SATAN IS TRUTH; KNOWLEDGE IS POWER.


HAIL SATAN HAIL MARCHOSIAS HAIL BASTET

http://www.joyofsatan.com
http://www.satanslibrary.org -!!STUDY MAKES STRENGTH!!
http://www.kabbalahexposed.com


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 17 guests