BrightSpace666
Active member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2021
- Messages
- 603
I did not write this book at such length, I only analysed one or two phenomena that I think play a morally prominent role in "life". In this post I have taken a small excerpt from the book. I don't know the fate of the book yet, I have mixed feelings about it.
With my next book, I will introduce the reader to Philosophy, or to one or more questions which exist at present but which are rather marginalized or neglected, and which modern man does not deal with because moral and philosophical values such as life, death, the afterlife, false illusion-reality have been forgotten, and which would be worth dealing with.
For man has resigned himself to and accepted that "life" exists, exists around him, and by these standards the average man never concerns himself with questions of what Life really is.
Is what surrounds us, water, earth, people, buildings - everything that has ever existed on Earth, a hoax? If we use the theory that man is imagining everything around him and nothing actually exists in "reality", every physical/natural thing is a figment of his own mind, then what is the point of life?
Man has resigned himself over the millennia to taking life for granted, the people around him and almost everything that comes with life. But with Knowledge in the background, can this paradigm be changed? Going back to the "theory", which is a surreal delusion, the average person would say, but rationally considered, would it really be orbitally stupid?
Let me ask a very simple question - what is 1 mile away from you? What is happening there? You don't know because you're not there. So does anything actually exist there? Then you re-create the landscape and the picture you knew when you actually went there and looked at what was there. But if you're not there and you don't look around, you don't analyze the phenomena that are there, are you sure it's there?
These are all questions and assumptions that can't be dealt with, they just lurk in the mind, in the untamed mind, that unanswered question that may never be answered. The mind is easily fooled - after all, one draws conclusions after a first impression, and that particular 'first impression' can affect one's whole life.
Let's take life as an example - based on the first impression, it is real, isn't it? What would happen if the mind discovered the chaotic but in its own way fantastic phenomenon we call "reality"? For man, reality, life, the world, is what he imagines.
Each person's analysis and conception of the world is different. Would each man float in a cloud of illusion, controlled by a higher entity that is in fact above man? Let me ask you another question - a man comes along the street in front of you, a man unknown to you.
What makes you think he is who you think he is? You can only see him from the front, but what about the back? Is it drawn, is there choreography behind it? Or is it completely useless until you analyse his back? Another example - you read a book, a 140 page book, you turn to page 67 - is the writing printed on the other pages?
Or maybe the other pages would be blank? You don't know until you turn the page and see for yourself. What if, after analysing reality, you realise you are living a lie, that nothing around you is what you think it is?
Then what was the point of existing until now? Why would any ordinary citizen do what they have done? What would be the point of living if your entire existence, concept and perspective up to that point was a lie? These are all questions that man has not dealt with, or would rather not deal with, because his realisation of the reality of life is based on a false foundation, and he has done nothing all his life, he has lived his life in a false, fictitious reality, and every single goal he has striven for has been in vain.
We often talk about how much we know about life, how sure we are of what we are and what surrounds us, but these are all irrational assumptions in a naturalistic life in which man is a 'puppet' controlled by a 'supreme entity'.
Because man wants to believe in something, he wants to believe that something is above him, that he can respect something or someone, and this is in a sense, in the broader but more complex sense of the word, a slave, a subordinate and subjugated mentality.
Without free will, man, every single act and deed he does, is false, because he does not want to do what he really wants to do, but is forced to do it by something or someone. Man is instinctive, driven by instincts, and these instincts are real in their own, physical sense, but would they be false in a metaphysical sense higher than the physical sense?
Man in the role of the puppet and the "Unknown" in the role of the controller.
In the theory of "false reality", they are merely imaginary individuals imagined by "us" or merely living with us in a cloud of illusory reality, not acting or doing anything of their own free will, but being guided by an "unknown" "higher" being or "entity" of moral imagination.
Is it worthwhile for man to exist in such a false life, which is always only a "theory"? Ignoring this paradigm, I would like to take the Christian churches as an example. Should we believe in "God"? Who or what is the concept of "God"? Would it be just a fictitious phenomenon that acts as a subconscious weapon, present in our current multicultural society, targeting only the mind and, so to speak, guiding its every move?
Is not the whole of Christianity more than a mere existential deception, which, beyond the scourge of humanity, besides the rational question that life is possible, is not what we would think it to be. Surely you have noticed, dear reader, that when you happen to have important business and you are in a hurry and you are late with an example, everything conspires against you.
You can't find your shoes/boots, you can't find your car keys, there's a huge traffic jam when you're about to leave, ignoring the fact that not a soul has passed you by until you're in a hurry, and the list could go on and on, but one thing is common: something doesn't want you to get there, or doesn't want you to have free will.
Because what you realize is that you would do everything normally, including putting on your shoes, finding the key, but it would be your own will, and this "unknown" being doesn't want you to decide your fate.
Therefore, He arranges events so that you are placed in a little bubble in an illusory reality where you unconsciously obey the existential signals sent by "Him", even in the absence of free will, and you are part of the illusion bubble of illusion reality created by "Him", in which you lack free will and unwillingly obey the signals He sends you and accept the paradigms He has created for you.
Going back to Christianity for a few words - if it is an illusory reality that we live in, then it is completely unnecessary to believe in it, because free will does not exist by default, it is not a given, and why would you want to push aside your tiny little moral view that you are not commanded? It is pointless to subject oneself to another illusion in a given illusion.
People like to believe that free will exists. They like to believe that what surrounds them is realistic and relevant to the paradigm they live in and call "reality".
Since man is an instinctive being, driven by his instincts, he cannot help it. Humans like to play with terms and words that they have an affinity for, that they can use according to their own individual morality, but in the reality of the tower, this is a purely surreal phenomenon.
You tell someone what you are sure of, but on what basis do you form that opinion?
The human mind can be fooled on such a monumental scale that it is chaotic to the average person. You give an opinion on something you claim is true, but it is nowhere near the truth. You don't know what the other person is like.
You only know what the other person shows you about themselves. This can be ideal for you, but it can also be discouraging. The end result is the same - you submit to what the other person outwardly presents as reality. Many people think they know everything about a person better than you do, but are you really sure that they are showing you themselves?
Hypocrisy is a common enough phenomenon in this society that we have to accept it. The hatred one feels for certain moral values can be wasted by a single contradictory statement. The average man is nothing more than an instinct-driven element in an illusion that becomes reality for him.
If a man does not conform to another man who has an idea of how that individual will look or behave - instinct kicks in in the man, shaped by "Imagination". We want to believe that what we exist in is real. Does death matter in this pattern? Is there death without life?
This is the question.
BrightSpace666
With my next book, I will introduce the reader to Philosophy, or to one or more questions which exist at present but which are rather marginalized or neglected, and which modern man does not deal with because moral and philosophical values such as life, death, the afterlife, false illusion-reality have been forgotten, and which would be worth dealing with.
For man has resigned himself to and accepted that "life" exists, exists around him, and by these standards the average man never concerns himself with questions of what Life really is.
Is what surrounds us, water, earth, people, buildings - everything that has ever existed on Earth, a hoax? If we use the theory that man is imagining everything around him and nothing actually exists in "reality", every physical/natural thing is a figment of his own mind, then what is the point of life?
Man has resigned himself over the millennia to taking life for granted, the people around him and almost everything that comes with life. But with Knowledge in the background, can this paradigm be changed? Going back to the "theory", which is a surreal delusion, the average person would say, but rationally considered, would it really be orbitally stupid?
Let me ask a very simple question - what is 1 mile away from you? What is happening there? You don't know because you're not there. So does anything actually exist there? Then you re-create the landscape and the picture you knew when you actually went there and looked at what was there. But if you're not there and you don't look around, you don't analyze the phenomena that are there, are you sure it's there?
These are all questions and assumptions that can't be dealt with, they just lurk in the mind, in the untamed mind, that unanswered question that may never be answered. The mind is easily fooled - after all, one draws conclusions after a first impression, and that particular 'first impression' can affect one's whole life.
Let's take life as an example - based on the first impression, it is real, isn't it? What would happen if the mind discovered the chaotic but in its own way fantastic phenomenon we call "reality"? For man, reality, life, the world, is what he imagines.
Each person's analysis and conception of the world is different. Would each man float in a cloud of illusion, controlled by a higher entity that is in fact above man? Let me ask you another question - a man comes along the street in front of you, a man unknown to you.
What makes you think he is who you think he is? You can only see him from the front, but what about the back? Is it drawn, is there choreography behind it? Or is it completely useless until you analyse his back? Another example - you read a book, a 140 page book, you turn to page 67 - is the writing printed on the other pages?
Or maybe the other pages would be blank? You don't know until you turn the page and see for yourself. What if, after analysing reality, you realise you are living a lie, that nothing around you is what you think it is?
Then what was the point of existing until now? Why would any ordinary citizen do what they have done? What would be the point of living if your entire existence, concept and perspective up to that point was a lie? These are all questions that man has not dealt with, or would rather not deal with, because his realisation of the reality of life is based on a false foundation, and he has done nothing all his life, he has lived his life in a false, fictitious reality, and every single goal he has striven for has been in vain.
We often talk about how much we know about life, how sure we are of what we are and what surrounds us, but these are all irrational assumptions in a naturalistic life in which man is a 'puppet' controlled by a 'supreme entity'.
Because man wants to believe in something, he wants to believe that something is above him, that he can respect something or someone, and this is in a sense, in the broader but more complex sense of the word, a slave, a subordinate and subjugated mentality.
Without free will, man, every single act and deed he does, is false, because he does not want to do what he really wants to do, but is forced to do it by something or someone. Man is instinctive, driven by instincts, and these instincts are real in their own, physical sense, but would they be false in a metaphysical sense higher than the physical sense?
Man in the role of the puppet and the "Unknown" in the role of the controller.
In the theory of "false reality", they are merely imaginary individuals imagined by "us" or merely living with us in a cloud of illusory reality, not acting or doing anything of their own free will, but being guided by an "unknown" "higher" being or "entity" of moral imagination.
Is it worthwhile for man to exist in such a false life, which is always only a "theory"? Ignoring this paradigm, I would like to take the Christian churches as an example. Should we believe in "God"? Who or what is the concept of "God"? Would it be just a fictitious phenomenon that acts as a subconscious weapon, present in our current multicultural society, targeting only the mind and, so to speak, guiding its every move?
Is not the whole of Christianity more than a mere existential deception, which, beyond the scourge of humanity, besides the rational question that life is possible, is not what we would think it to be. Surely you have noticed, dear reader, that when you happen to have important business and you are in a hurry and you are late with an example, everything conspires against you.
You can't find your shoes/boots, you can't find your car keys, there's a huge traffic jam when you're about to leave, ignoring the fact that not a soul has passed you by until you're in a hurry, and the list could go on and on, but one thing is common: something doesn't want you to get there, or doesn't want you to have free will.
Because what you realize is that you would do everything normally, including putting on your shoes, finding the key, but it would be your own will, and this "unknown" being doesn't want you to decide your fate.
Therefore, He arranges events so that you are placed in a little bubble in an illusory reality where you unconsciously obey the existential signals sent by "Him", even in the absence of free will, and you are part of the illusion bubble of illusion reality created by "Him", in which you lack free will and unwillingly obey the signals He sends you and accept the paradigms He has created for you.
Going back to Christianity for a few words - if it is an illusory reality that we live in, then it is completely unnecessary to believe in it, because free will does not exist by default, it is not a given, and why would you want to push aside your tiny little moral view that you are not commanded? It is pointless to subject oneself to another illusion in a given illusion.
People like to believe that free will exists. They like to believe that what surrounds them is realistic and relevant to the paradigm they live in and call "reality".
Since man is an instinctive being, driven by his instincts, he cannot help it. Humans like to play with terms and words that they have an affinity for, that they can use according to their own individual morality, but in the reality of the tower, this is a purely surreal phenomenon.
You tell someone what you are sure of, but on what basis do you form that opinion?
The human mind can be fooled on such a monumental scale that it is chaotic to the average person. You give an opinion on something you claim is true, but it is nowhere near the truth. You don't know what the other person is like.
You only know what the other person shows you about themselves. This can be ideal for you, but it can also be discouraging. The end result is the same - you submit to what the other person outwardly presents as reality. Many people think they know everything about a person better than you do, but are you really sure that they are showing you themselves?
Hypocrisy is a common enough phenomenon in this society that we have to accept it. The hatred one feels for certain moral values can be wasted by a single contradictory statement. The average man is nothing more than an instinct-driven element in an illusion that becomes reality for him.
If a man does not conform to another man who has an idea of how that individual will look or behave - instinct kicks in in the man, shaped by "Imagination". We want to believe that what we exist in is real. Does death matter in this pattern? Is there death without life?
This is the question.
BrightSpace666
