How did he know?

Psyhics see through potential futures which then come to pass in their own way, likely not accurate to the vision itself. But this one was quite accurate from this guy, since predicting futures is a hard thing.

I'm not American, but I tried to do some research...

I did some research, he tried to predict many things, the only thing he got right (truly happened) was the detail of the ear. He got all the other details, dates, consequences, etc. wrong. Obviously he also got right that there would be an assassination attack, but you know, it's no different from predicting that "one day it will rain"...

Also because, between us, to say that a failed sniper attempt grazes your ear, is really TRIVIAL! The ear is literally on the sides of the head! Every failed sniping attempt passes through the ear... obviously the Christian prophet did not even predict the correct way in which the ear would be damaged, he only said that: a sniper aiming at the head, failing his attempt to hit the head "went near the ear". What are we talking about? Near what should the bullet of a sniper who fails usually go? The big toe?

What an unreliable "god" the Christian one is: he doesn't even remember the sacred holidays of his own religion. The prophetic vision said that the attack would happen during Easter and instead it happened in July... Not even the basics... what a silly divinity this Yahweh is...

I'm not American, but I tried to do some research...

I did some research, he tried to predict many things, the only thing he got right (truly happened) was the detail of the ear. He got all the other details, dates, consequences, etc. wrong. Obviously he also got right that there would be an assassination attack, but you know, it's no different from predicting that "one day it will rain"...

Also because, between us, to say that a failed sniper attempt grazes your ear, is really TRIVIAL! The ear is literally on the sides of the head! Every failed sniping attempt passes through the ear... obviously the Christian prophet did not even predict the correct way in which the ear would be damaged, he only said that: a sniper aiming at the head, failing his attempt to hit the head "went near the ear". What are we talking about? Near what should the bullet of a sniper who fails usually go? The big toe?

Show more...Show less...Show more...

The thing about these lame clout seeking "psychics" is they can make a million failed predictions but get right once on one detail on a likely outcome and now they're a media sensation and they appear as if they were credible all along.

The thing about these lame clout seeking "psychics" is they can make a million failed predictions but get right once on one detail on a likely outcome and now they're a media sensation and they appear as if they were credible all along.

SO right. Really, brother, that is absolutely true... I was thinking the same lol

I think this was one of those throw things until one sticks situation. He also did get a lot of things wrong.

Regardless if the ear story is real or not, no matter who will be in power they will still be corrupt af. It's all a Haox and people across the globe starting realise it more and pay more effect and attention towards it.

Photos of Trump's Ear Before and After His Rally Shooting Aren't What We Expected

Donald Trump's Ear Appeared Undamaged

Donald Trump speaking © Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Look closely, you can clearly see there is a little nick on the top of his ear in the second photo. His ear doesn't have the same rounded edge anymore, and there is a visible bullet sized "bite" out of it very visible in the second photo.

Just because his ear looks "normal" doesn't mean it is undamaged.

The ear heals very quickly, it is all cartilage underneath, all that needs to happen for it to heal is for the skin to patch over the part that was nicked, with the top level medical care Donald Trump would have access to, it is not strange there would be minimal visible discoloration or scarring from what was essentially a very minor injury.

Look closely, you can clearly see there is a little nick on the top of his ear in the second photo. His ear doesn't have the same rounded edge anymore, and there is a visible bullet sized "bite" out of it very visible in the second photo.

Just because his ear looks "normal" doesn't mean it is undamaged.

The ear heals very quickly, it is all cartilage underneath, all that needs to happen for it to heal is for the skin to patch over the part that was nicked, with the top level medical care Donald Trump would have access to, it is not strange there would be minimal visible discoloration or scarring from what was essentially a very minor injury.

I didn't know about the 'no visible evidence' until I was told, and then I found that when I posted it. To me, the cut on the ear looks to be the wrong angle. Then again, I don't know the angle that the bullet would have travelled. With that in mind, here's what I mean -

It's a crude computer drawing, not an exact Science or Art. Someone suggested that those tiny scisssors one has in a sewing kit might have been held in his hand, because they are small enough to be hidden in the hand, and immediately put his hand up to his ear to cut his ear, but seeing the clip again it doesn't show anything in his hand (although, commenters are saying youtube has deleted the original video, and those commenting about it being deleted have had such comments deleted). In my drawing at the bottom, the angle is straight up-and-down because it's a basic example; in the Twitter pic, it has a slight backwards angle or is slightly triangular. It's difficult to see. Perhaps the angle of a tiny pair of scissors from the right hand and the slight back angle match up? How quickly would he have raised his hand to his ear? A bullet travelling at hundreds of miles per hour, the Brain wouldn't notice it quickly enough (nerves in our Bodies work with the Brain, so that's why we react backwards, e.g when being stung by nettles, before we feel the pain, before the impulses reach the Brain). There was 1 shot, and then another and just before the 2nd shot, he put his hand up to his ear, then a third shot. Maybe he'd keep his hand up to his ear while ducking, rather than putting his hand there briefly, and would use his left hand to hold onto the podium so he doesn't fall over while ducking. One might argue "there was no blood on his hand". When you get stung, you probably hold your finger, hand, whatever but you don't touch the actual point of impact, because it woudl sting and hurt more, so he more likely than not didn't touch the exact spot.

My point, though, is the angle of the cut in his ear. I found an angle of the bullet's trajectory.

[source]
In my bad drawing, I made the sniper be too high. So the angle of cutting/slicing the ear would be much lower, i.e. more horizontal, rather than verticle like in the Twitter picture. I am not a shooter and don't have firearms knowledge, so maybe the bullet interacted with the ear contrary to what seems likely.

That imgur "picture" is supposed to be a video, but it's not loading, despite copying the video link. Clicking on it opens the tab to it, where it also has sound.

I didn't know about the 'no visible evidence' until I was told, and then I found that when I posted it. To me, the cut on the ear looks to be the wrong angle. Then again, I don't know the angle that the bullet would have travelled. With that in mind, here's what I mean -

It's a crude computer drawing, not an exact Science or Art. Someone suggested that those tiny scisssors one has in a sewing kit might have been held in his hand, because they are small enough to be hidden in the hand, and immediately put his hand up to his ear to cut his ear, but seeing the clip again it doesn't show anything in his hand (although, commenters are saying youtube has deleted the original video, and those commenting about it being deleted have had such comments deleted). In my drawing at the bottom, the angle is straight up-and-down because it's a basic example; in the Twitter pic, it has a slight backwards angle or is slightly triangular. It's difficult to see. Perhaps the angle of a tiny pair of scissors from the right hand and the slight back angle match up? How quickly would he have raised his hand to his ear? A bullet travelling at hundreds of miles per hour, the Brain wouldn't notice it quickly enough (nerves in our Bodies work with the Brain, so that's why we react backwards, e.g when being stung by nettles, before we feel the pain, before the impulses reach the Brain). There was 1 shot, and then another and just before the 2nd shot, he put his hand up to his ear, then a third shot. Maybe he'd keep his hand up to his ear while ducking, rather than putting his hand there briefly, and would use his left hand to hold onto the podium so he doesn't fall over while ducking. One might argue "there was no blood on his hand". When you get stung, you probably hold your finger, hand, whatever but you don't touch the actual point of impact, because it woudl sting and hurt more, so he more likely than not didn't touch the exact spot.

My point, though, is the angle of the cut in his ear. I found an angle of the bullet's trajectory.

Show more...Show less...Show more...

Do I really need to make a paint drawing to help you understand? You are denying reality because it suits your own views better, instead of being objective.

The cut in his ear is literally at the exact angle of the bullet trajectory... Can't you see his head in that closeup picture of his ear is angled forward, while when he was shot he had his head raised?

This is not a discussion we are going to have here, it is like flat earth level nonsense. Extremely embarrassing to see this here from anyone.

As a final point. The sniper was located on the roof of a two floor building, if I recall correctly, roughly 200 or so meters away from Trump's stand, which was at a similar height (About 3-4 meters height difference at most). The trajectory of the bullet is not even half as steep as you make it out to be.

Compare the angle of the small nick in his ear with the angle of his face. It is roughly at eye level, coming from a trajectory at a small angle, roughly 10 degrees or so at the most, which can be seen at a glance, and checks out exactly with the trajectory of the bullet from the sniper where he was positioned.

Fancymancy, you often want to twist reality in strange ways because you want to see things through your own tinted lenses. That is not what we do on the Joy of Satanas.
If you are going to make claims, you need to do so honestly and with sincerity, and without bias. We are only biased towards the objective verifiable Truth.

This is too ridiculous.

I didn't know about the 'no visible evidence' until I was told, and then I found that when I posted it. To me, the cut on the ear looks to be the wrong angle. Then again, I don't know the angle that the bullet would have travelled. With that in mind, here's what I mean -

It's a crude computer drawing, not an exact Science or Art. Someone suggested that those tiny scisssors one has in a sewing kit might have been held in his hand, because they are small enough to be hidden in the hand, and immediately put his hand up to his ear to cut his ear, but seeing the clip again it doesn't show anything in his hand (although, commenters are saying youtube has deleted the original video, and those commenting about it being deleted have had such comments deleted). In my drawing at the bottom, the angle is straight up-and-down because it's a basic example; in the Twitter pic, it has a slight backwards angle or is slightly triangular. It's difficult to see. Perhaps the angle of a tiny pair of scissors from the right hand and the slight back angle match up? How quickly would he have raised his hand to his ear? A bullet travelling at hundreds of miles per hour, the Brain wouldn't notice it quickly enough (nerves in our Bodies work with the Brain, so that's why we react backwards, e.g when being stung by nettles, before we feel the pain, before the impulses reach the Brain). There was 1 shot, and then another and just before the 2nd shot, he put his hand up to his ear, then a third shot. Maybe he'd keep his hand up to his ear while ducking, rather than putting his hand there briefly, and would use his left hand to hold onto the podium so he doesn't fall over while ducking. One might argue "there was no blood on his hand". When you get stung, you probably hold your finger, hand, whatever but you don't touch the actual point of impact, because it woudl sting and hurt more, so he more likely than not didn't touch the exact spot.

My point, though, is the angle of the cut in his ear. I found an angle of the bullet's trajectory.

Show more...Show less...Show more...

Can't believe I have to do this, but here we are.

Look where the nick in his ear is located.

Now look at this image again:

See where the indentation is located?

It's the exact same location... :rolleyes:

This arguing over whether trump's ear actually got grazed by a bullet or not is a waste of perfectly good autism.

@FancyMancy you are arguing about Trump's ear like it matters something. It really doesn't.

@FancyMancy you are arguing about Trump's ear like it matters something. It really doesn't.

I've seen he or she has this tendency, not of speaking nonsense but always just speaking about it. This is not reddit FancyMency, if you wanna help then do with some quality informations not about every media shit.

You seem like the type of user who would do mor by just being quiet instead of being free to spam the forum with all loads of crap and time wasting info's.

Do I really need to make a paint drawing to help you understand? You are denying reality because it suits your own views better, instead of being objective.

The cut in his ear is literally at the exact angle of the bullet trajectory... Can't you see his head in that closeup picture of his ear is angled forward, while when he was shot he had his head raised?

This is not a discussion we are going to have here, it is like flat earth level nonsense. Extremely embarrassing to see this here from anyone.

Show more...Show less...Show more...

Instead of typing things out, I provided a picture to see it quickly and easily. I'm not denying reality and it's not "my views". I said I don't use guns and don't know much about them, so I'm asking. By being objective, I'm looking at different things that people say, not just focusing on what I think. With the picture from Twitter, it is zoomed-in too far, which makes it look vertical.

If you want to say it's like flat-Earth nonsense, then OK. I'm not on about that. Embarrassment is irrelevant. I see something and I might comment on it. Be mature, instead of being embarrassed.

I said I didn't know how high the sniper was and said it was an example, and then corrected myself. I didn't "make it out" to be that - and you say "if I recall correctly"; I gave an example and actually corrected myself; I didn't state.

If I often "twist reality", then why am I never corrected until it offends people personally with "USA! USA! USA! USA!" politics and politicians who are TV personalities and know nothing about politics - and don't need to? I don't twist reality. I say that things are just my thoughts and I'm nearly never corrected. You don't know whether I "want to see" things through "my own tinted lenses". I want to know what's what.

I didn't make claims. I said it's a bad drawing and then I corrected myself. I never said "THIS IS CORRECT". As I keep saying - read what I say. It's OK for news to talk about things like an ear being cut by a bullet, but not me on here. Great.

This arguing over whether trump's ear actually got grazed by a bullet or not is a waste of perfectly good autism.

Yeah, thanks. Apparently, this is not Reddit, so thanks for that.

@FancyMancy you are arguing about Trump's ear like it matters something. It really doesn't.

It seems to matter.

I've seen he or she has this tendency, not of speaking nonsense but always just speaking about it. This is not reddit FancyMency, if you wanna help then do with some quality informations not about every media shit.

You seem like the type of user who would do mor by just being quiet instead of being free to spam the forum with all loads of crap and time wasting info's.

I thought I shared a lot of important information. I'll share these with you -

and

Apparently none of that is important. Apparently, I don't contribute anything to this forum. Maybe if I had have accepted being a JoS editor, with a title or rank under my username, I'd not be treated like an irrelevant something; rather, an irrelevant nothing, dragged through mud.

I don't spam the forum. I post things of significance - and you say that I'm spamming only now, not earlier, after years of me "spamming the forum".

A member told me recently that they always learn from my posts. Now others tell me I'm spamming and bullshitting. Maybe I am wasting my time. Thanks for letting me know.

...

Look, I wanted to tell you something. I expressed myself poorly when I said that you always tend to post nonsense. That came from my frustration when I see people dedicating so much time and resources to complete trivialities, like that guy's ear, forget about him, who cares? What I meant to say is that it’s much more important to focus on what truly matters and is serious, not on silly things like whether that guy’s ear was scratched or not, true or false. Most of them are put in those positions anyway, so what’s important is to dedicate your time and resources to more meaningful things. Don’t get me wrong, everyone is free to do whatever they want, whenever they want, but that’s why I reacted the way I did. As for you, I don’t know you, and I didn’t mean to be cold or harsh. I’m sorry if I made you feel that way.

Wish you all of the best Brother/Sister!

Look, I wanted to tell you something. I expressed myself poorly when I said that you always tend to post nonsense. That came from my frustration when I see people dedicating so much time and resources to complete trivialities, like that guy's ear, forget about him, who cares? What I meant to say is that it’s much more important to focus on what truly matters and is serious, not on silly things like whether that guy’s ear was scratched or not, true or false. Most of them are put in those positions anyway, so what’s important is to dedicate your time and resources to more meaningful things. Don’t get me wrong, everyone is free to do whatever they want, whenever they want, but that’s why I reacted the way I did. As for you, I don’t know you, and I didn’t mean to be cold or harsh. I’m sorry if I made you feel that way.

Wish you all of the best Brother/Sister!

Show more...Show less...Show more...

No, forget it, it doesn't matter. I realise I go further, deeper into things than most people. In my own attitude, I decide that they don't care and that I care too much. You might have seen in older posts, I go through many points in my reply. e.g. if someone makes a post or a video, I'd go through probably nearly every point, really picking it apart. Like I could go through each thing you said here and reply to each of it (but I won't!), which is how I roll sometimes. In short, I can be pedantic in these things, and I realise most people just skip over most of what I share because it's too much for them - but it's still there if they want to go through it later. Similarly, I make long-arsed posts about a topic to really, really jab at it from all, or at least many, sides, really going into it, e.g. my @Le_CRIF post. One might say that I go over the top, and perhaps I do, but at least it's all together and my arguments are strong (I hope) in arguing against it.

If I retalliate or sound like I'm pissed off with e.g. yourself (when it's not a particular topic), then don't take me too literally. It's all good!

I didn't spend ages on the ear being cut. I just thought the angle of the cut was incorrect.

Trump is probably the best option we got so far but that does not mean he's not a puppet like the others, it's not like the votes or public opinion would matter [because of the enemy current control], it would only matter when we would do something bigger for them to listen and it's not even about them to listen , we would not keep puppets and insects in such positions.

Think and put it this way, instead of spending time, regardless of how much time that would be , one could do other things , meditate , do rituals , promote the Divine and Truth.
Many things that are going on are just mind tricks , they might have done it themselves , it's pointless to talk and think about them when we could do much better things that would manifest into a greater world, reflect upon this.