Dahaarkan said:
There is no virtue in poverty and suffering. How about society starts praising and giving benefits and wealth to the workers that actually create wealth in a nation, instead of social parasites like celebrities and overpaid sports players. Such people create nothing of value, bring no labor or wealth to their nation. And they make millions while workers that do create actual wealth and important services are ruining their health working in inhuman conditions and barely paid enough to survive.
I.. Agree!
Dahaarkan said:
As an extension of what I've said regarding working regular jobs and traditional labor, also do pay attention to where we are at technologically. The time is fast approaching when practically all of industry is automated. This is being held back and should have happened already.
I suspect many people who rely on jobs as their only income will likely struggle even more as this inevitable change approaches. Jobs are less profitable, harder to find and maintain, and this only gets worse with time.
What do you think is the solution to this, a UBI or something similar? I’m asking because I seriously don’t know.
Invest your time and money wisely, set your minds on creating assets, not finding jobs.
But not everyone can be the stock trader, or the genius investor and realtor, because if you are investing it can fall into the same category as the Athlete or actor that is extremely wealthy even though they haven’t created or done anything meaningful for society. I assume you think that this is different because your wealth hasn’t technically been generated by someone else working for you, but the same principle stated above applies.
Someone has to work the line being a chef/waiter, or ride on the side of a truck all day to pick up your garbage, or stock the warehouse, or deliver a tractor trailer full of food to a grocery store. This is just the way the hierarchy is. The WW2 regime model held the ditch digger in the same light as the successful businessman which I think IS your point. The people doing these “lesser” jobs I mentioned do deserve to be paid fairly, but the problem is how to we determine what that value is? A minimum wage is arbitrary and doesn’t help anything and labor theory of value is an outdated joke. This is another one of those things where I just have to say that I have no idea what the solution is.
Back to the jobs above, you can just wave your hand and say “automation” to all of this but that just isn’t how it works. Even if we feasibly could automate say the restaurant industry, would society even WANT a robot chef or waiter? Probably not. Part of the experience of going out to eat is being in the social setting.
Now you can say that it is unethical or whatever to keep these jobs just because people like it for the novelty even though it would be more “efficient” to automate them. Again these jobs wouldn’t be a bad thing if say the waitress got a proper wage instead of having to live off of the charity of others (tips).
But then we’re back to square one. Everyone agrees that these people are being a shafted and need to be payed a living wage, but who or what determines that wage? That’s about all.