Edward Lonsa said:
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
As I read your post I see that while you are trying to balance the original topic (which needs balance) the so called balance seems very questionable to say the least. I have no problem with any idiot flirting me as much as they want - I will still not care, nor will I actually suffer (till they invite their male partner to hurt me of course, actually the worst thing woman can do). But when it comes to "actual crimes like rape or getting beat"...
...
By actual crimes, I mean actual criminal actions. If one engages in this, then you pay the price. The law recognizes actual crimes versus human bullshit, and where actual crimes happen, be these towards males or females, are punished with the power of the law. If you kill a male or a female you go to prison equally.
There are actual crimes in this world, and imagined crimes.
In the 60's, when a woman passed by and men whistled, it was considered maybe agitative, but flattering sometimes.
Now, imagined crimes have reached a point to where the above can be used as nonsense that they try to pass as a crime, which is essentially schizophrenia.
Guilt tripping methods like this are used to make men weaker and weaker. This weakness also has another consequence: Men will be unable to defend women from ACTUAL crimes, because of emasculation that has resulted from being guilt tripped all day because of nonsense, such as that if a man whistled, this makes him a convicted sexual predator.
As far as I do not like any of this, and consider it non "Gentlemany", not all men will know how to behave. But this is the distinction of men, and why men have to improve.
Speaking of men, men were sold as slaves to the slave markets, raped, tortured, send to wars, and blown to bits, taken as war hostages, or lived equally boring and dangerous lives as women did in the older segments of history. Men have had it very hard historically, and nobody ever gave them any consolation.
Today, the suicide rate of men from being daily attacked in the game that we call life, depressed and miserable, is at an all time high. Still, we hear the castration rhetoric that men must be further castrated, with their "offenses" to society becoming more and more imagined, than real.
Meanwhile, somehow, as the above rhetoric takes place, diseased norms that males from Islam or wherever bring, are tolerated.
This is because the Yehubor gives a free pass to this type of diseased pseudo-masculinity, and attacks any normal or improvement based healthy masculinity, necessary to keep civilization going.
For example, the White male is cucked to not whistle as this kills 60 trillion Yehuborim, but an Islamic who has sex with his 9 year old wife, is given honors in legal hearings and always walks around free.
This involves two males in the same "society", with the dual standard being too obvious to ignore.
The second Muslim example is sold as a "victim" while they are the ultimate perpetrator, and the first is sold as a "perpetrator" of a giant holocaust, for whistling at women or something.
Judges and Juries in US and Europe: "Gangraped by muslims with video proof? Oh, they didn't know, Frida, gotta accept this, silence the news from even saying that", you walk around free.
Judges and Juries in US and Europe again: "White boy whistled at you? Cut his balls Frida, nobody will step on your Muh Independent Woman mentality, that's literally a holocaust he tried to do to you, let's get you live on TV for this!", oy vey, oy gevalt.
I will not abide by this cuckery, and would rather die by the sword and as a logical person, than hear nonsense that will flip one's brain.
Yet, this conversation is completely unequal, and I cannot pretend I am 50/50 by supporting the false rhetoric of "women are eternal victims", as I know women have considerable power. The victimization of women begins with the idea that "women are victims".
Women actually could reverse the above situation, but they are coldly uninterested in doing so. Frida currently wants to be delusional that she is a "Free woman" in the current state of affairs, and it's sold to her pretty well.
In the background, she loses all her freedoms, but she has the delusion that she gains them.
Behind the idea that "women are victims", we have the idea that women are inferiors on too many levels, and I do not agree with this idea, as women have endless potential like men.
This idea that "women are victims" is like all the kool aid sold to everyone that "Blacks are victims", that "Yehuborim are victims" and that everyone is a poor victim, without responsibility for themselves, and without the ability for self control, self empowerment, or whatever.
I look at the middle and I am not flabbergasted by nonsense and the eternal perpetual lies that women are solely victims. Men are also victims on a daily basis. Anyone can be victimized.
I consider women powerful enough and responsible enough.
Abyssos said:
...
Take what you have done here, and continue to run with it. Be balanced and speak upon these matters from your honest perspective. If you do this in a reasonable manner from now on, you'll make Ancient Forums immune to one the larger gayop tactics that have been inflicted here for far too long. Rather than demoralize White men, the very demographic that is represented by Satan Lucifer himself, Satan Lucifer being a White man, you will instead demoralize anyone who tries to demoralize White men.
...
Hail Satan!
You cannot judge the credibility of any of my positions and moreso to use invented things as "position 1 vs position 2" as invented by your own head and your emotion, does indeed reek of non proper understanding.
That is bound to create a wrong perception in your head, which is caused by you. The fix here is to look realistically on what is the case or what has been said, for example, in previous topics by me.
This cannot happen as you invent the "positions" on which you answer based on sentimental feelings and assumptions of your own behalf, or likely, because nobody has time to address every formal insanity that might have occurred in a place with 200 posts per day.
I believe your issues have went to the point where you have tried to believe your own points that this wasn't the case before, because you somehow try to equate every idiotic thing you see as the uniform opinion of JoS.
The insistence in thinking that every deranged opinion was actually "JoS", is like picking two loonies from a city of 10 million, and trying to contrast the citizens and presidents to the loonies, and saying that the loonies are somehow a deciding factor in anything.
Which they have been not.
However, you seem to somehow wanted this to be the case, likely due to worry or misplaced pessimism on your behalf.
Maybe you believed the crap you heard on some level, out of worry this could be a real life fuckup.
Further, your misunderstanding and logical fallout has reached a point where you considered a few loonies as some sort of harbringers of facts of the JoS or even their face, forgetting who or what is actually that, versus whom is not.
The above is likely done willingly from an inherent pessimism on your behalf, and likely the dogshit you have heard from people who have a dogshit opinion about JoS, which they tried to feed you on it likely based on your own pessimism combined with your own need to "have things to be critical about".
The above is all coming from misappropriation of what you THINK anyone believed, instead of going back to objective pieces of proof to look out for it.
If you are familiar with anything I have ever said this means that you are making most of this up, likely because of emotional reasons, and not based on any logic on the subject or history based concerns.
I'd ask for more reasonable approaches in the future.