Other #77138 About women, is this true?

[616Taysha]

Why was it that moderate liberals voted for Trump? Maybe because they could see crime and villainy on the street? Especially in sanctuary cities, where illegal aliens CHARGED WITH crimes such as murder, rape, etc, were allowed to roam freely. Laken Riley act anyone? Oh, libs are also against women - check Riley Gaines vs Lia Thomas.

Who, when Trump won, protested by haiving their heads shaved? Women. Who keeps other, younger women single due to their poor choices and bitterness? Other, embittered women.

Collectivism is the key word. Those girlies who like hanging around together are the same ones who will stab one of her own in tha back - misery loves company after all.

As for womens' compassionate nature... well, I'm not sure about that. It is not up to a man to abort pregnancy. It is not a man who benefits from divorce. It is not a man who divorces a woman becasue he felt unhappy.

And yes, there are those damnable simps - they too are guilty.

 

[AristocraticDragon666]

It is just a quote I read, not my opinion.

"People who can't defend themselves physically (women and low T men) parse information through a consensus filter as a safety mechanism. They do not ask "is this true", they ask "will others be OK with me thinking this is true". Which makes them very malleable to brute force manufactured consensus. If every screen they look at says the same thing they will adopt that position because their brain interprets it as everyone in the tribe believing it. Only high T males and anuerotypical people are actually free to parse new information with an objective "is this true?" filter. This is why a Republic of high status males is best for decision making. Democratic, but a democracy only for those who are free to think".

Of course it's a huge generalisation, since HPS Pythia and others were literally the opposite of this. But I wanted to know is there a basis in the general nature of women which fascilitates this behaviour? Or is it something purely individual soul level?

It is not true.

 

[Acolyte Of Pan 666]

I hate “democracy” so much. Vote for shabbos non-spiritual person #1 or shabbos non-spiritual person #2, rinse and repeat for the last century or so, then wonder why nothing changes, at least not in a positive direction.

yehuborim understand how power really works(money + social influence over elites + brute force, not bitching/protesting or voting for approved Non-Spiritualist) and that’s how they took over the whole West, especially the US. They explain clearly in the protocols.

If someone opposes the yehuborim at a political level, they don’t do any of the approved cattle methods the Potential people of the Gods do, they try to buy the guy off first, then they try to tarnish their reputation and if it comes down to it they’ll try to assassinate them.

Please snap out of the democracy trance. It’s an illusion. Real change comes from real power, as I’ve explained above.

 

[Acolyte Of Pan 666]

I hate “democracy” so much. Vote for shabbos non-spiritual person #1 or shabbos non-spiritual person #2, rinse and repeat for the last century or so, then wonder why nothing changes, at least not in a positive direction.

yehuborim understand how power really works(money + social influence over elites + brute force, not bitching/protesting or voting for approved Non-Spiritualist) and that’s how they took over the whole West, especially the US. They explain clearly in the protocols.

If someone opposes the yehuborim at a political level, they don’t do any of the approved cattle methods the Potential people of the Gods do, they try to buy the guy off first, then they try to tarnish their reputation and if it comes down to it they’ll try to assassinate them.

Please snap out of the democracy trance. It’s an illusion. Real change comes from real power, as I’ve explained above.

Even though I said all this, Trump MAY be an exception to the rule. We’ll see if voting for him truly improves things or not. I have some hope that’s he’s a good guy. He’s had to appease yehuborim, as do all US leaders, but now that he’s in it seems he’s against all the warmongering and wants to deal peacefully with Iran rather than invade it.

 

[616Taysha]

The whole message reeks of self-victimisation and feminism. ‘Oh, women are sooo oppressed! Rise, women! Let’s dismantle the patriarchy!’ - Marxist garbage right there.

Matters concerning men should be decided by men, and those pertaining to women should be determined by women

Doesn’t seem like it. It's a very narrow-minded way of thinking - you’re saying that Trump should not have passed the law forbidding men’s participation in women’s sport?

Women really don't have the time to learn everything about politics.
They think politicians don't lie.
Unfortunately politicians are really evil and use this against women.

Oh, the victim mindset. If those women - and I bet you’re talking about “I’m a strong, independent woman I don’t need no man” modern women type - are sooo poor and so oppressed, you may want to inundate yourself in watching tons of TikToks and Shorts where women brag about their poor choices and yet take no accountability.

Women are overworked these days.

‘Be like a man! Work as hard as a man! Have a career, have your own home, owe nothing to anybody! You choose, you go girl, you slay queen!” - feminists

And later this woman who succumbed to the feminist propaganda: “Where are all the good men?” Why would a feminist need a man, if she has become the very man she wants?

The average woman has to study so hard,work outside,work at home,kill herself and spend the money she could buy 2 houses with just trying to become barbie_like pretty,find someone to marry,have children and raise them(This is the hardest part).
None of the things we do can be replaced by men so I don't blame them for not even trying to help out.

You do realise that college degrees are worthless? And if a woman has a husband - the naughty h word for a feminist - they can split the bills? Share responsibilities? And why would any woman WANT to buy TWO houses? Unless she willingly divorces a rich man…

This barbie comment - why would you WANT to look like a plastic doll? Oh, right, because instead of listening to what men want, you listen to what your other girlies tell you men want. And who also know next to nothing.

No one is forcing you to have children - if you choose not to, that's fine. Did I mention that if children are not born, we as a species die? And do you know what wants our extinction? Right, the yehuborim.

We are called sex negative,puriteens

You are called sex negative… by who? Victim mentality again.

Other generations could just party for two days with no stress and never cared about the consequences.

Do you actually KNOW anyone from other generations? Times were different, and people used to socialise without mobiles, without the need for constant validation. To say that GenY or GenX did not care about consequences is an outright lie. Too many ‘modern, independent’ women lead a promiscuous life because ‘it’s liberating, because feminism’ and all that.

Technically we don't have any time to fact check everything these evil politicians say.We really don't have the time for that.

What is it then that those modern, independent women are so preoccupied with? Preening? Because the hallmark of GenZ is being on-line 24/7. And ‘evil politicians’ to whom you constantly refer - who exactly do you have in mind?

If politicians and people stop attacking women,women won't use their precious hard earned time to waste it on these politicians but they can't shut up about women. The only thing they talk about is women.

Right, because women are weak, incapable and other such Marxist/feminist drivel.

If you’ve had any idea about politics and not espouse what you’ve learned in college, you’d know yehuborim who are behind feminism have ALWAYS been against women. yehuborim are professional victims, and having imposed this deranged ideology upon women, have turned the sexes against one another.

So, after your rant and my rant, there is a way to reject this feminist nonsense:
https://www.deathofcommunism.com/feminism-the-war-against-women-and-family/
Educate yourself, and see that you are NOT a victim.

 

[Night Sky]

Stop replying on my posts people.
You are wasting my time.
I just wrote a long comment that took 45 minutes to write because it was long as fuck and then I deleted it because I then realised this is never going to end.
As hard as this is I'm not going to answer to any of your replies.
I'd rather do something positive for God.
Bye

 

[Priest - Alexandros Iowno]

It is just a quote I read, not my opinion.

"People who can't defend themselves physically (women and low T men) parse information through a consensus filter as a safety mechanism. They do not ask "is this true", they ask "will others be OK with me thinking this is true". Which makes them very malleable to brute force manufactured consensus. If every screen they look at says the same thing they will adopt that position because their brain interprets it as everyone in the tribe believing it. Only high T males and anuerotypical people are actually free to parse new information with an objective "is this true?" filter. This is why a Republic of high status males is best for decision making. Democratic, but a democracy only for those who are free to think".

Of course it's a huge generalisation, since HPS Pythia and others were literally the opposite of this. But I wanted to know is there a basis in the general nature of women which fascilitates this behaviour? Or is it something purely individual soul level?

Yes, but it is not enough, one must go by other conditioners and overcoming limitations to not be bound by human safety limitations and societal constructs. To the degree that is is challenged, for better or worse yes. This is about the alchemy of the soul.

 

[Edward Lonsa]

I think they who wrote this quote forget [or purposefully silence down] one single thing: Feminine Power and Wisdom.

Or how then can they explain the fact that Russian women of older generations en mass protect their country from feminism on opinion level? Giving their daughters right perspective on belonging to men. Why are they not "manipulated better" by propaganda then?

Why then when Belarusian youth went to whole country rebellion, only elderly women did not and told openly into faces: this was color revolution [which it was] ? Same for Russian elderly women rejecting liberal parties and seeing them through for what they really are.

People of any sex who are frail and have to be silent are more wise and cunning than those who are not, because they early learn that they have to have "opinion for society" and "opinion for themselves" and these might be different. These are more logically and critically thinking people, actually. And they posses more power than idiotic rebels who can be easily deceived and pawned. As such they are more capable to rule. Being weak and therefore secretive is not equal to being corrupted. Not to mess real corruption and working behind the scenes.

According the logic of the quote 99% of Medieval Alchemists who did not openly worship Pagan Gods during inquisition era were "corrupted" just because they had to conceal their opinion.

They also forget or purposefully silence that rebellious men also "agree" to many things women do not: these are just opposite and purely male things such as becoming self-sufficient, going to war, trying to survive alone, having to fight all the time to get bruises etc. - men "agree" to it all. He agrees with being a man. She agrees with being a woman. He agrees with difficulties and to build himself from zero - and through this he wins, she agrees to belong to the stronger and to depend - and through this she wins. He is a Hero, she is a Reward for a Hero. They both "agree" to their own unique paths (and both can be easily ruled through them when these paths are on the lower octave).

Women rule the world by ruling men who rule the world. Women maintain and govern men who maintain and govern the world. Because only Masculine power can rule the outer world, it is true. Yet only Feminine Power can rule the inner world of a man, this is also true. When woman rules the outer world as sole Czarina she rules through her feminine power as well - through her men, army, through her frailty and belonging. To understand it just watch how magnet rules iron filings on youtube making any shape out of them. She does not need to be man herself because she HAS a man (or whole country of men) at her disposal. We are natural weapons of each other, bulwarks of each other and guardians of each other.

Yehuborim MGTOW, if you read their books that are written by Yehuborim envious women, they hates our potential person of the Gods Women exactly for their Feminine Power. yehuborim themselves know that woman is a greatest weapon of a man and vice versa and they wish to deprive us of our greatest weapons and thus deprive our nations of their power. Yehuborim women teach potential person of the Gods men now to hate their women for their beauty and their natural powers instead of embracing them and the fact that your wife will forever guide you TO YOUR OWN BENEFIT because she is on YOUR side, unlike Yehubor. MGTOW tries to deceive men to refuse their women's help. As well as feminism destroy women through teaching them to refuse their husbands owning them - to THEIR OWN BENEFIT because owning means protection and fighting for her to death.

Kazakhstan was forever shamanic culture venerating Tengri till 19 century and their women still remember how they cleansed their men. It was normal practice - all their women could easily cleanse aura and soul of their loved ones. It was normal for a woman to perform the analogues of all our everyday meditations we do now, on their families. Women played role of Spiritual Guardians to their families. While men were Physical Guardians they should have been. This was just very normal and no one even thought that it might be ever different. Tell these men of MGTOW and they will laugh at you. As well as Kazakh women will laugh reading this thread.

As for that medieval xian law, nature does not need Yehubor-made insecure laws to maintain her creed: men by nature have absolute power over women, their life their death, no laws are needed for it: you live under one roof with someone stronger - you can be strangled any moment, end of discussion. The same for mother-child relationship and for all others. Equality does not exist and it is a GOOD thing. And guess what? No European man did honor killing anyway, whatever hoahide laws inquisition wrote for them. Instead they died in duels for their wives' honor. Why? Because we are not ruled by Yehubor like feminists are. Laws has as much power over people as people let them to have. While yes, men had, have and will forever have 100% physical power over women. Why?

Because this is what Real Women want of us and because this is the only way how men can 100% guarantee women's safety. This is like with a developer: he has to have a full access to the server to guarantee its safety. Real men fully understand that if their woman got hurt - it is on them. They failed to save her and they are to be accountable for this. It stays onto their soul - because Gods gave us responsibility over our women, their life, health and overall well-being for a reason. Because we are alone in physical world who can maintain it. If women suffer - it is upon us. OF COURSE if taking away not only vote rights but any rights at all is needed to save her and protect her health and well-being [for example if she went insane], this is what we must do, this is part of our responsibility and duty. If we did not and woman suffered because this, we are cuckolded race traitors to be hang. We still follow the order of our Loves as we always did but that of their higher Godly selves, not that of lower feminist apehood. THIS is civilized and the only thing that is. And civilization is being built by manpower not by cuckoldry or race treason. Any woman with a bit of brain understands it and stands firm for her man's power. Because it is just a natural rule every animal every insect understands: the more powerful your man is = the more power he has to protect you and guarantee your well-being.

Jews erasing History of the West: “Europe has no its own Culture” Hoax. Answer of the Aryan – White Death of islam

whitedeathofislam.deathofcommunism.com

Vice versa too: men's egos are granted into women's hands and women are responsible for their men's feeling of success and ownership of the world, overall power and victory. Because only Woman's Beauty, the Beauty of Feminine Soul can lead to true victory. Woman feels fault if her boy did not win. This is why legendary widow's loyalty. This is why women jump into men's burial fire - to be with their Lords in it.

 

[616Taysha]

Ooof, a long post By Edward, but WORTH reading.

Giving their daughters right perspective on belonging to men

Oh the evil ‘belong to’ phrase - feminists see it as ‘enslaved by’ - which is obviously far from the truth. In the past for a woman wearing a wedding ring was a sign of pride, NOT enslavement.

Yehuborim women teach potential person of the Gods men now to hate their women for their beauty and their natural powers instead of embracing them

Not really as far as MGTOW (true though, we are suckers for beauty - NATURAL one, mind you), for now it has evolved into “I’m not getting married to avoid being robbed by the state when - mostly WHEN - she divorces me.” With the rise of promiscuity among women, such females have tons of sexual partners (no, not just 2-3, but in tens, sometimes hundreds). Along the way they can get pregnant with a few men and well, decide to leech them via child care. This in itself is detrimental for a child - having no male authority figure, no one to set boundaries.

A side note: I know this is anecdotal, but a male boy who has a lesbian mother and only a limited contact with his uncle looks unbalanced, is effeminate and may have a hard time forming relationships.

Gaoing back to casual sex - it is the very reason why men are discouraged from having it, and even then to be careful when getting married or commiting to the woman, because when married, she may one day (after years of marriage) decide she “does not feel happy” (because things aren’t as they used to be BEFORE getting married) so no-fault divorce due to “irreconcilable differences”.

Why am I mentioning divorce? Feminism is more sneaky than one may think. It has seeped into laws and everyday life alongside all the #metoo, cancellation, blasting on TikTok and what not.

teaching them to refuse their husbands owning them - to THEIR OWN BENEFIT because owning means protection and fighting for her to death

I guess 'to their own detriment' - to women it is detrimental, because if she is owned she gets protection.

Aaaan YES. “If you are my woman, I will go to the end of the world to fight for you - because you are so priceless to me”. The only thing that is required is fidelity. Alas, feminism teaches promiscuity. No, males and females DIFFER. A woman cannot be like a man. The way they have sex differs.

Real men fully understand that if their woman got hurt - it is on them

I hear feminists having a stroke, a heart attack and tearing their hair off xD Though here I’d use the past tense: “it was on them”. A woman having no husband, no boyfriend can only blame herself. But it is a woman who will have the state’s compassion after having made poor choices.

women are responsible for their men's feeling of success

Presently this may not be the case. A man is advised to fight on his own and can find fulfillment in his work, passions, making himself better. An average woman will be shown compassion more often than a man. "Man up", "be a man" - but guess what, we take pride in going solo, whereas women are more social creatures. Both of these are advantages, but with feminism poisining our minds, these strengths can be taken advantage of.