The Female Pornography Use Epidemic

[singularityss]

She was a woman and married. She wasn't a young male ruining his ability to have sex in real life, as Pammy explained what happens. Porn doesn't seem to do the same to women's minds as it does for men, you never hear of women developing an addiction to watching porn.

From the thread: https://ancient-forums.com/threads/valentina-nappi-porn-thoughts.305871/


While this thread is about visual pornography I do think it's worth noting that women have a comparable problem both in scale and severity with literary pornography, it just never gets discussed because it's considered "empowering" and is framed as "romance novels" and "women's literature" when it's just hardcore pornography, often featuring completely outlandish scenarios involving billionaire vampires or anthropomorphic beasts or whatever else. These also very often feature themes like hardcore rape, kidnapping, physical abuse, incest, etc; much of the same themes visual pornography gets criticized for normalizing amongst men. It is also *very* common, in the same ballpark as visual pornography. Every Gen Z women I've asked (maybe 6 or 7) consumes this content at least from time to time, with most of them doing it regularly and a couple being into the aforementioned hardcore shit you primarily find on "fanfiction" sites like Wattpad. I'm not going to pretend this tiny, biased sample is representative of the entire population, but there's no denying this garbage is incredibly popular.

The effects of this consumption are also fairly comparable to male pornography addicts, I've heard women literally say they regularly fantasize about werewolves or some stupid shit while having sex with their partner, it's just less visible both because the pressure of bedroom performance primary rests on men and because if a man cannot sufficiently arouse his partner it's seen as his fault regardless of whether the woman's brain is completely fried - be it from smut or indiscriminate whoring.

The effects in extreme users are also quite comparable. The following is a Snapchat post from one of the organizers of a "romance book" convention in 2025:

This kind of psychotic, porn-brained, sexual predator behavior is something most people assume is solely an artifact of male pornography use, yet here it is on full display from women.

Lastly, I want to point out that this kind of smut contains an additional ideological element that in my opinion makes it even more insidious than standard visual pornography. It often normalizes or pushes tumblr-esque feminist brainrot when it comes to male-female interactions. Visual pornography is often criticized for normalizing unrealistic bedroom dynamics, but literary pornography often normalizes completely unrealistic relationship dynamics, which I would argue is far worse, and far more likely to make you undateable.


For an example I’m going to use the incredibly popular book “Morning Glory Milking Farm”, which is a NYT #1 bestseller with almost 70,000 ratings and 13,000 reviews on Goodreads.

A particularly amusing excerpt from this book is as follows:


"and when the bill arrived, she'd attempted to pull a handful of carefully folded bills from her wristlet, before he'd stopped her.

'No, that's absolutely not happening. Put that away.'

She'd not thought about it until the day after their first dinner together, realizing in mortification that she ought to have attempted to pay her half.

What kind of feminist are you?

She couldn't remember the last time she'd been out and hadn't paid for her half, including her coffee date with Carson Tinsley, which accounted for how infrequently she went anywhere. She had come prepared that night, several weeks of her tips smoothed and tucked into her wristlet.

"But I didn't even offer to pay half the other night and I should ha--"

'Violet.' If the commanding rumble of his voice hadn't silenced her, the heat of his hand dropping to her knee would have. 'I don't want you to feel that you don't have any agency here. I might be the one giving all the orders, but you hold all the cards. Your comfort is the only thing that counts right now, and if I overstep, I want you to know you can tell me so. But that's not happening. Don't think I'm unaware we're at different points in our careers. You can say no, you can say you don't want to see me again, you can tell me to stop coming to the farm when you're working. It's dinner, not a down payment on your time. But I'm in a position to comfortably spoil someone, so when you're with me, I'm spoiling you. End of story'

She was a good feminist, she told herself, and she definitely couldn't be bought. But if he had suggested at that moment that he would have appreciated a blowjob, she would have fallen face-first onto his (you get the picture)"


The above is the kind of self-indulgent feminist circlejerking that has become normalized in literature more generally, but particularly in these kinds of romance books. Women now require 2 paragraphs of psychological hand-holding to be able to accept the idea of a man paying for a date, which they clearly so desperately want. Feminist programming in particular is largely responsible, in my view, for the popularity of anthropomorphic creatures in these books, because it at least partially sidesteps the intense psychological blocks many women have toward dating men. In reading garbage like this, these women are able to fulfill their masturbatory fantasies without even deconditioning themselves to the point where a fictional, hyper-idealized man is acceptable to them. Rather, they now require that fictional, hyper-idealized man to also be an anthropomorphic animal who provides them free therapy about how they’re still a good feminist if they let a minotaur pay for their date.


To summarize – female pornography use is a comparable problem to male pornography use, but it gets next to zero attention because the current social landscape frames it as being empowered women enjoying literature, rather than a sordid den of crackheads unfit to interact with the opposite sex.

 

[singularityss]

For anyone interested in further research on this topic, @HilaryLayne on youtube makes very good video essays on literature, including one on so called "women lit":

She also made a follow-up video detailing how the ubiquity of fanfiction (aka smut) has infected literature more broadly with the self-indulgent intellectual laziness that characterizes it:

 

[OuroborphicMystery]

This was disgusting to read and become informed on, even though I was largely aware that this existed. The other side of porn addiction, and "chick flit" ABSOLUTELY IS indisputably porn, is not talked about enough at all. Thank you.

This behooves a conversation anyway, since sensitive women are more susceptible to all of this, I reckon, and we have a lot of sensitive ladies here too. Granted, we are also not degenerate lowlives, so the rate of male or female porn addicts is bound to be very low here... I think. I hope.

Anyway. Good thread, Brother.

 

[OuroborphicMystery]

This was disgusting to read and become informed on, even though I was largely aware that this existed. The other side of porn addiction, and "chick flit" ABSOLUTELY IS indisputably porn, is not talked about enough at all. Thank you.

This behooves a conversation anyway, since sensitive women are more susceptible to all of this, I reckon, and we have a lot of sensitive ladies here too. Granted, we are also not degenerate lowlives, so the rate of male or female porn addicts is bound to be very low here... I think. I hope.

Anyway. Good thread, Brother.

chick lit*

Sorry for the typo. Also, perhaps it'd be a good improvement if we could edit our own messages prior to being approved.

Anyway, good day to you all.

 

[Vicky<3]

Ew.

 

[Ayleth [NG]]

I had a friend at uni who was very proud of keeping up with her “reading list,” but it was things like these "“romance”" smut, brain-dead predictable stories.

Not going to lie, I read acotar and fourth wing to see what the hype was about. If for males the visual is arousing, for females it’s the "perceived" emotional connection these books induce. You’ve got a heroine and a badass, buff guy. Some lame fantasy story, add lines of sarcasm and drama, and there you go: 500 pages. That, in itself, wouldn’t be a problem if it weren’t for the addition and normalization of despicable acts.

The bestiality and absolute degeneration in these porn books is insane. I had no idea about the "morning bullshit" whatever the f that is... sad that I looked, I need to clean my aura after that.

Everything you consume adds up as a form of self‑identification. Emotion is now a commodity to be traded. There is no culture to belong to anymore, and glorifying a specific type of content is what’s “on trend.”

These things can and will be changed.

Redirect your friends to better fanfiction and higher forms of art. And if you do read these things, stop and assess what you’re actually looking at and what you’re looking for in these fanfiction lands. Use meditation practices and ToZ spirituality to understand yourself and free yourself from harmful ideals.

Idealization of protection and strength is not wrong. However, looking for it only in la‑la land, in escapism mode, brings frustration and strange, destructive ideas.

Thank you for raising the topic. The videos are quite informative.
This is a problem for society. Remember the agenda of the jews: for you to live in a pod, consuming and living a fake, harmful life.

 

[Renita]

Truly disturbing.

I remember visiting a book store, and when I walked into the "Women's Literature" this exact type of slop was displayed all over the shelves. Most of the time, these books have no true literary purpose and are only published because female porn-addictions have been put into words instead of images or videos to seem more "safe" or "intelligent". These books are also often labeled as "progressive" and are said to be the books that bring women justice and rights. Women who read these kinds of books will not be able to sit down and read something truly useful such as biographies or non-fiction with actually plot.

((Anyone)) who consciously chooses to publish these books should get their license revoked.

 

[MercuryWisdom]

That’s also beside women do definitely get addicted badly to porn. Porn addicted women are not rare as said.

It’s equally destructive and ruining as to men. I don’t want to mention sources and stuff to look up but trust me it’s BAD.

There are whole communities for porn addicted women to get addicted together and stuff.

Porn as in erotic material is not bad in of itself. But modern porn is a super stimulus very few wouldn’t get addicted or negatively affected by it. As SG Blitzkreig said on this modern porn is brain crack at this point.

 

[krysalis88]

Most of the time these women get along because they are the types that only follow trends and want to belong to a group. There are women out there that don't truly know what they like and simply follow what everyone else (mostly directed by social media) is doing.

I've tried to read some books like this, to see what it is all about. I found it kinda weird, most of the sex scenes seem like they were took out of porn. Wasn't the women complaining about the men not doing oral right? Not knowing where is the clitoris? Now out of nowhere (that we here all know where does it come from) these same women are reading literally hardcore porn with dangerous acts, with questionable characters. Then we see the news, there is an ex killing his girlfriend, not accepting the end of the relationship and all the feminists start yelling that men are despicable, that they are all red-pilled and that girls should all be celibates. These people don't even notice how they are being programmed in their mind...

 

[Nuclear Lead]

At least this member addresses its an issue affecting both genders. Porn needs to be regulated badly. But its not going anywhere. I think thats where my misunderstanding came in the other thread, some people actually believe in banning porn and thats where I draw the line. The types that drift into weird porn fetishistic categories are weird people in general.