I'm probably over-complicating this matter but I'd like a clear answer for it.
I've noticed both being used - The energy or I am. Obviously for black magick you don't want to connect.
But in normal magic people use such as a runic working as an example.
What is the principle difference between using "The energy..." and "I am..."?
One seems like the "tool" or the "specific energy" while the other, "I am", seems like an overall exertion of removing or adding something through your own energy reserves.
Is there really a difference among both? I noticed with some of the workings like freeing the soul possessing "I am". But on the other hand the same thing occurring with Runes whereby people speak specifically of "The [Runic] Energy."
Does it matter or is there more to it?
Greetings.
This is some misconception about you being able to use "black magic" without repercussions. Actually, it's like any other sorcery.
In plan, you when you pick up a destructive force, you become by default its conduit, this is karma, so you want to use destructive force at all, as you are already under the influence. You get involved in events, you get attached to the force and also to those you are dealing with, because there is karma resisting your will. Action begets opposition.
Think about how to protect yourself, for example, develop a plan of protective meditations, competent and regular. You are then creating counteraction to what you are using.
You know how to play with fire, it is safe as long as you know its essence and the limits of your protection, including the variables of nature.
Any magic always touches you IF you initially, intentionally perceive yourself as "I am someone who acts".