Permanent hair removal

It's as much painful or even more painful than getting a tattoo and expensive. I'd suggest trying photodepilation instead once in a while (few months in between) but I haven't tryied this second option myself, only with laser. It didn't last you'll have to suffer and pay a lot of money for several sessions for it to work.

Egon wrote:

It's as much painful or even more painful than getting a tattoo and expensive. I'd suggest trying photodepilation instead once in a while (few months in between) but I haven't tryied this second option myself, only with laser. It didn't last you'll have to suffer and pay a lot of money for several sessions for it to work.

Would both work to reduce the amount of Body Hairs instead of completely removing them? I personally don't hate body hairs but i just think i have too much if i had less it would be better.

I don't think it's possible to just pick the aspect of hair density by area and make it less dense. Maybe just trim it with a shaving machine?

luis wrote:

Would both work to reduce the amount of Body Hairs instead of completely removing them? I personally don't hate body hairs but i just think i have too much if i had less it would be better.

Egon wrote:

It's as much painful or even more painful than getting a tattoo and expensive. I'd suggest trying photodepilation instead once in a while (few months in between) but I haven't tryied this second option myself, only with laser. It didn't last you'll have to suffer and pay a lot of money for several sessions for it to work.

As far as I know, photodepilation hurts like a burn, and it needs way more sessions than the laser to see results, that's why I was considering the laser. By the way, do you remember what kind of laser you had tried?

Sheer laser.

Maya wrote:

By the way, do you remember what kind of laser you had tried?