Have you even read the whole TOZ.org ? :roll:
Enlil is Baal Zebul. Father Zeus's half-brother.
http://www.angelfire.com/empire/serpentis666/Baal Zebul.htmlExternal ↗
For your own sake if you ever want to learn the TRUTH don't trust everything you read that isn't on TOZ.
"How can I know all on/from the ToZ is the truth?"
Because it's from Zeus and the Gods.
"How can I know that it is?"
By communicating with Zeus and the Gods.
"How can I communicate with Zeus and the Gods to know it is the truth?"
By learning how to communicate with Zeus and the Gods.
"How can I learn to communicate with Zeus and the Gods?"
Surely you can see where this is going by now... By reading the ToZ!
"That sounds awfully christian - just read 'the' bible."
Yes, and those of us who were christians, and who read "the" bible, know that that is all a load of bullshit. You can't know something truly and actually until you experience it. Now the proverbial ball is in your proverbial court.
I've noticed we tend to choose the source of our beliefs based on our intuition, and then work up from there. This is a decisive step because changing the source of our beliefs always requires a conscious effort. One must first accept having been wrong and then research a better source of beliefs. Any poof or external knowledge is seen in the light of that chosen system. This is why it is so hard for the "science only person" types to get into any spirituality. They chose intuitively that the source of their beliefs will be mainstream "materialist" science only and now they will not accept anything that will oppose that system because that system's rule asks for "scientific proofs". This is also why the christians will not care what knowledge or proofs you give them, as long as it does not go in accordance with their source of belief (the bible & Poos) they will reject it flat out. Which makes me conclude that it is essentially a waste of time to argue with people for any extended amount of time in most cases.
Lol, yeah, it is. Some think that "opinions" are the be-all-and-end-all of true and false, right and wrong, correct and incorrect, but it doesn't matter if I think anne frank is the only person who has ever been called anne frank, and the only person who has ever been called anne frank who wrote a diary, or if I think "the" anne frank is one of maybe 2 thousand. An opinion - and debate worthy of such opinions - would be your like of [flavour of thing] versus my like of [flavour of thing]. They are preferences. Facts, on the other hand, are not preferences or opinions. They are facts.
You reminded me of two things -
1) https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/TempleofZeus666/conversations/topics/189503, and
2) with trying to force things to fit into that 'way' or system, that is closed-mindedness - and people say they're open-minded...