Any dark truths regarding MLK?

He was indeed a communist, also controlled opposition.

Aquarius wrote:View source

He was indeed a communist, also controlled opposition.

I suspected as such. A lot of black people are under his spell. How did he undermine the black community, or more precisely, how did he deceive so many black with his non-violent movement? I know of the answer is ignorance, but what else allowed King to deceive people into believing he was a saint? Lastly, I mis-phrased the question a bit. I should said secrets instead of truths. Are there any other sinister secrets about MLK?

Was Gandhi also controlled opposition for that matter?

Everything said already. A constructed hero for the black-communities in America

Here is some proof, just check who wrote his speeches.

https://in4faqs.com/who-wrote-mlk-speeches/#Who_Wrote_Mlk_SpeechesExternal ↗

Did MLK write his own speeches?
King didn’t write the speech entirely by himself. The first draft was written by his advisers Stanley Levison and Clarence Jones, and the final speech included input from many others.

In the early 1950s, the FBIExternal ↗ considered Levison to be a major financial coordinator for the Communist Party USAExternal ↗ (CPUSA)

Footnote: If someone in the public has "advisors" it is in most cases just PR.

DisillusionedCitizen wrote:View source

I suspected as such. A lot of black people are under his spell. How did he undermine the black community, or more precisely, how did he deceive so many black with his non-violent movement? I know of the answer is ignorance, but what else allowed King to deceive people into believing he was a saint? Lastly, I mis-phrased the question a bit. I should said secrets instead of truths. Are there any other sinister secrets about MLK?

Was Gandhi also controlled opposition for that matter?

I wouldn't call Gandhi controlled opposition simply because his teachings were degenerate, there was literally no real opposition from his side, just wishy washy pacifism.
He was also an extreme pervert, making his niece sleep with him naked.

Ol argedco luciftias wrote:

Read the documents that were recently declassified a couple years ago, from the FBI's investigation on him. It said things like there was at least one time when he helped his friend rape a woman in a hotel room. He held her down so she couldn't get away.

Sorry for necroing this, but which state did this take place in and when did it take place?

DisillusionedCitizen wrote:View source

Sorry for necroing this, but which state did this take place in and when did it take place?

I don't remember the location and time. But you can do an internet search about it.

DisillusionedCitizen wrote:

What were his politics again? Just Pro-Integration?

Additionally, did people learn from his (mostly pacifistic) messages too well? Because I'm suspecting that might be the case, as people did with Gandhi.

1. Pro-integration and black rights, yes. Malcolm-X was pro black rights as well, but he focused on building a black identity, distinct and "powerful", distanced from white people. He essentially never fought to end segregation, was for keeping races separate.

2. The pacifism is actually just completely a psyop.
I dislike MLK, but he was no pacifist. He actively fought against being "moderate" and pushed certain messages that were anti-establishment enough to get him killed.
And what did his "followers" do when he died? Mass rioting. Doesn't sound like they were pacified to me.

The Pacifism actually comes from later influences in the US, notably from the Cold War, where there have been many shady operations to prevent dissent.

The same kind of shit that Communism gets away with, just more veiled. They do play both sides.

OttoHart wrote:

Even the enemy programs need to be "1% rooted in truth".
A complete lie without this kind of trickery would not be popular.

A lie can be accepted, even when it's 0.5% true? That's more absurd than it sounds. Wait, what do we call half-truths if the lies can be 10% true?