Greetings to all! I know this is a controversial issue, but here goes... I've been following the site for a long time, although my dedication hasn't been that long. Although the change has happened and we recognize ourselves as Zevists, I still prefer the Zevist/Luciferian" mode of worship. Is that okay? Although I recognize all manifestations of Zeus between the ages, Lucifer is what works best for me.
Discussion
I think there has been many great topics covering this once and for all, but if you are asking for guidance then this Ethic may be very good for you to meditate on:
https://templeofzeus.org/life_ethics_resistance.phpExternal ↗
If you are asking if it's okay to prefer the visual dark aesthetic of Zevism, that's fine and a personal choice.
Lead TranslatorThat's up to you as these titles aren't negative. Just make sure you understand why we address the highest God by his true and unadulterated essence:
https://ancient-forums.com/threads/zeus-satya-reforms-the-time-before-satanism-moving-into-the-golden-age-update-1-resources.297769/
https://ancient-forums.com/threads/official-live-ama-video-from-toz.298584/
Satan or Lucifer is not a "manifestation" of Zeus. It's merely another name for the same God. Zeus doesn't become a "dark" being if he is called Satan, if that is what you mean. It's the same being with a different name. If the name Satan conjures up images of darkness, vampires and other enemy stereotypes and that's why you want to use it then don't use it because you have the wrong idea about it. That's exactly why the name was changed, to get rid of these stereotypes.
However, if you do understand that these stereotypes are false and the name is mostly your preference unrelated to enemy stereotypes then go ahead and use it.