The struggle of same-sex activism in a LGBT world.

[SouthernWhiteGentile]

SWG probably wouldn't consider fellatio or frottage as sex anyhow or even mutual masturbation as sex even though it is

They are sexual acts but no it is not. Think of it as like an appetizer for the main dish, except lesbians think they be fulfilled by the appetizer which in this case will be bread rolls, when what they really need is the meat and potatoes (no pun intended) of the main dish to be satisfied and nourished.

So let me get this right.
Based on that you say there's only two given sexual preferences: gay (male/male) and straight (male/female).
You say that only the phallus can cause pleasure and is needed in order to fulfill the sexual needs, and that lesbians are just deluded and should be straight?

Yes.

Wouldn't Goddesses that engage in lesbian sex or that are lesbians would feel like you are disrespecting them?

Your side has lost when the Demons have to be invoked. Goddesses can literally have Sex psychically with their minds. They do not conform to the physical standards of humans.

Having an opinion is different than trying to convince the whole forum that only the male parts make the sex pleasurable and anything else is not normal.

People can think whatever they want about this but facts don’t care about your feelings .

You're still going to try to pick apart what I've just said.

It wouldn’t be a proper discussion if I didn’t.

You cannot change your sexual orientation and preference.

Yes you can, I did.

It is proven that lesbian sex has a higher rate for orgasms.

I don’t believe this for a single second. It is absurd to think that you can have greater pleasure from the finger/mouth than a phallus.

and gay sex have a higher rate for orgasms

True because the male “g-spot” is in the anus.

and that's just because toxic masculinity is still a thing.

What the eff?? Now you sound like a feminist that is of the enemy. End toxic masculinity by rescinding little boys of their testicles or whatever they are saying now.

 

[Aquarius]

So let me get this right.
Based on that you say there's only two given sexual preferences: gay (male/male) and straight (male/female).
You say that only the phallus can cause pleasure and is needed in order to fulfill the sexual needs, and that lesbians are just deluded and should be straight?

Wouldn't Goddesses that engage in lesbian sex or that are lesbians would feel like you are disrespecting them?
Having an opinion is different than trying to convince the whole forum that only the male parts make the sex pleasurable and anything else is not normal.

You're still going to try to pick apart what I've just said.
You cannot change your sexual orientation and preference.

And you say you're gay, right? This might be the cause you say what you say, because it gives you a sense of empowerment. Women and men have their own unique roles, we can work together, bla bla, but the sexual preference is none of anyone's business.

Men have different stimulation points, so do women. It is proven that lesbian sex and gay sex have a higher rate for orgasms, and that's just because toxic masculinity is still a thing. They just lay there not taking care of each other as the act of sex supposes.

This is the opinion of a teenager, who tries to paint his opinions as if they come from the mouth of a grown and mature man. He is still in a learning phase and one in which he's gonna change opinions many times, but does not understand it.
It's the rebellious and extremist behaviour of a SS teenager who doesn't even meditate, I was like that too at exactly his age, but I did my best to meditate everyday so I became more understanding and humble in my views.

 

[Jack]

So let me get this right.
Based on that you say there's only two given sexual preferences: gay (male/male) and straight (male/female).
You say that only the phallus can cause pleasure and is needed in order to fulfill the sexual needs, and that lesbians are just deluded and should be straight?

Wouldn't Goddesses that engage in lesbian sex or that are lesbians would feel like you are disrespecting them?
Having an opinion is different than trying to convince the whole forum that only the male parts make the sex pleasurable and anything else is not normal.

You're still going to try to pick apart what I've just said.
You cannot change your sexual orientation and preference.

And you say you're gay, right? This might be the cause you say what you say, because it gives you a sense of empowerment. Women and men have their own unique roles, we can work together, bla bla, but the sexual preference is none of anyone's business.

Men have different stimulation points, so do women. It is proven that lesbian sex and gay sex have a higher rate for orgasms, and that's just because toxic masculinity is still a thing. They just lay there not taking care of each other as the act of sex supposes.

I don't want to derail your conversation with SWG but i have to note here for public interest that there is no such thing as toxic masculinity and that its just a vague all encompassing term to attack men ,in the ongoing war against humanity.
.

 

[MrIntrepid]

So let me get this right.
Based on that you say there's only two given sexual preferences: gay (male/male) and straight (male/female).
You say that only the phallus can cause pleasure and is needed in order to fulfill the sexual needs, and that lesbians are just deluded and should be straight?

Wouldn't Goddesses that engage in lesbian sex or that are lesbians would feel like you are disrespecting them?
Having an opinion is different than trying to convince the whole forum that only the male parts make the sex pleasurable and anything else is not normal.

You're still going to try to pick apart what I've just said.
You cannot change your sexual orientation and preference.

And you say you're gay, right? This might be the cause you say what you say, because it gives you a sense of empowerment. Women and men have their own unique roles, we can work together, bla bla, but the sexual preference is none of anyone's business.

Men have different stimulation points, so do women. It is proven that lesbian sex and gay sex have a higher rate for orgasms, and that's just because toxic masculinity is still a thing. They just lay there not taking care of each other as the act of sex supposes.

I don't mean to be pedantic but there are two things I have a problem with here:

• We don't need to bring the feelings of the Gods into this.

• Could we do away with terms like "toxic masculinity?" It would be enough to say that people are selfish in bed.

As for SWG, I think dude just had his own preferences and his opinion is fine because it's not like he's going to go out of his way to prevent other people from thinking differently.

I personally disagree with women needing a man with them to have good sex though.

 

[SouthernWhiteGentile]

Reciprocating would be simple for other people: 69.
Of course, you should not do something you're not comfortable with. I just want to remind you that there are others have no issue with it, and that it can be a mutual thing.

I understand that but it’s still not the same.

if you know what you're doing with your hands, tongue and you and your partner's chakras. You still have no idea.

Meteor I know that you’re a sophisticated woman but please be honest with me, how many lesbians are using their CHAKRAS to fuck?

This also goes back to the same point. You can stimulate the chakras, use the hands and mouth, it does not matter because there is NO PHALLUS.

Try to see it this way. In the case of a man there is a big difference between orgasming from self- masturbation (that’s all lesbians can do) vs a man orgasming from being penetrated anally.

There is nothing a woman can do to satisfy another woman that a man can’t, men can actually do it better obviously. That’s the summary of my thoughts.

My apologies, I may have misunderstood then. I assumed you might be the type who sees women in a prudish way and mainly as romantic partners and someone to potentially have and raise children with, rather than someone to explore the depths of sexual pleasure with, which you'd rather seek on the side with men.
That's why I assumed you would hold back sexually with a woman and that fulfilling her completely wouldn't be as important to you, but perhaps I was wrong.

I see most women in that way but I would make an exception for a special someone and you know what I would even give her oral IF that’s what she wanted. My needs do come first but what could I like that my partner wouldn’t? But I have none of this oral or caring about needs for the average tinder slut. Not a chance.

You made an attempt to understand them based on what you could perceive from an outside perspective, then filled in the blanks incorrectly, like I said.

There was no “attempt” I did and do understand.

Even now, you still lack information. You understand some women, but not all lesbians; that's why you say they're doing it wrong. You know what: some lesbians are doing it wrong, just like some straight people, some gay men, some polyamorous people, and some monogamous people are doing it wrong. Each approach to romance and sexuality comes with its own challenges, and people don't always have the knowledge to overcome or avoid those properly. But through personal growth and spirituality, all of these problems can be solved.

I agree but by being lesbian you are “doing it wrong” by default. There is no right way to do it because an FF relationship doesn’t work in the context of nature.

I'm sorry for pressing the issue, and I know this has occurred before so I hope I'm not being too rude this time; but I'm really curious about the reasoning behind your perspective.

I don’t care anymore. I’m willing to tell all and let everyone take a look inside this brain of mine, I know they want to see. It takes me like half an hour to write something like this because my mind is a formula one racetrack that never stops and is constantly flowing with ideas and thoughts and it’s hard for me to focus on one and put it into words.

The admission that you'd rather perform analingus than cunnilingus seems bizarre to me at face value, although it's not my place to judge. However, I'm wondering now where exactly the difference lies for you.

I think it’s a mental and aesthetic thing for me. I know it sounds gross but you can’t really go wrong with an anus and the buttocks in general, it will always look appetizing to me, while in terms of the female organs it varies wildly from each individual, some are very gross looking while others are more appealing.

You mentioned before that the issue was that a woman might've had sex with dozens of men before. In that case, would you also hate cunnilingus if the person you're doing it to is a virgin who has never been penetrated by anyone before, not even you?

I can’t say for sure, it still seems like a pointless thing to me when I have a phallus that works fine.

 

[sss_moon]

I didn't have a right term for his behaviour so I used that term. I don't believe in it tho. And as of bringing Gods into this, I'm not. I'm just saying it's best we keep fighting for our purpose rather than discuss what's up in everyone's bed.

Wishing everyone the best!

 

[Jack]

....

......

You don't have to be attached to an idea emotionally to have a stern position about it. Your position about polyamory, Promiscuity and casual sex weren't wrong in a general sense.

When you're talking about men and women or relationships, and not about a particular man or woman and their relationship, we must talk in Generalities and invoke statistics, facts and Data to make sense of the world.

This thing called "polyamory " which basically just means an open relationship, even though they claim they're emotionally involved with multiple people (which is not sustainable). This idea and other ideas such as "swinging " ,casual sex etc are just a result of a society that is obsessed with sex and material pursuits.

What is the purpose of a human being in relation to society ? It is to expand their energy to contribute to something greater than themselves, so that that greater idea may be sustainable. But what is the western zeitgeist ?

After the fall of Christianity in the west ,the Greco - Roman pagan values that the Christians had adopted of Community, cohesion etc disappeared. This was replaced by left wing jews for Hollywood culture, drugs, vanity and an overt obsession with individual material pleasure where you just can't stop.

Since the mind is not aware of any other way to expand, it keeps expanding in the falling well of material desires. There should be a good balance between the spheres of personal individual happiness and community welfare.

Human beings are not designed by nature to be promiscuous. Women have oxytocin releases in their brains which causes pairbonding when they have sex with a man. Sex is a very serious and important thing to a woman, which is why she must be very careful with whom she has sex with. But due to contraception, women can have sex without the responsibility (being in a relationship or getting pregnant. ) When a woman has sex with a lot of men ,typically (but not always) her oxytocin release mechanism is damaged beyond repair and she's mentally gone.

She is unable to find happiness in relationships anymore. Its the same thing with men but the only difference is that the average of people men can have sex with until they reach that point is a little higher.

Promiscuity and casual sex causes unhappiness in both men and women. This is not a hypothesis. These are facts of reality.

Women are the most sexually liberated and are having more sex with people, than any other generation of women in the entirety of history and as a result they are the most unhappiest they have ever been. Same goes for men.
https://www.nber.org/papers/w14969

This is because of the lack of values of something higher than themselves. You'll typically hear the story of a woman getting into new age woo woo stuff and if you peel back the layers,you may find that in her past she's been ran through by multiple men and is now above just physical pleasure. Shes trying to find a higher way, in the wrong place.

If you remove values, religion and community and let humans to their basic desires under a hyper materialistic society you will create a society that is addicted to pornography, drugs ,crime and everything from the lowest rungs of the gutter. A majority of both men and women are single and that divide will only keep on increasing.

This is not happening out of nowhere. There is a carefully plotted scheme being executed to destroy men,women, children and sexuality because they intend humans to be patented creatures grown in tubes in the future. They recently announced this, you can Google it. They are trying to market it as a feminist liberation that women don't have to go through pregnancy and can work that time instead.

It's the siege of Babylon. This has happened multiple times in history with the fall of multiple empires. The current Anglo American empire is at the breaking point and at the end of its path. The more serious and pressing concerns are the future of the white race due to the invasion of Europe and America and the inability of the whites to produce enough children to rival the non whites already inside their walls. By 2050 the majority of both Europe and America will be composed of non whites. If something very drastic and serious isn't done in between that time, then there are going to be very serious consequences.

Couple this with the vaccines and the mad scientists trying to sterilize people, and you have an extremely serious problem.

If something must happen, it must happen very quickly in a couple of years and very drastically if you want to be able to fight with the non whites. Because once the population of non whites is above 40% ,its Game over.

 

[SouthernWhiteGentile]

Isn't there also a difference for guys between jerking yourself off and being jerked off by someone else? Touching yourself or being touched by someone else feel very different, regardless of whether you're a man or a woman. This is an example of what I meant when I said that you made some incorrect assumptions while filling in the blanks; it would've been unlikely for you to know that.

The act itself is no different with someone else, intimacy is the only thing added which gives the illusion that it’s somehow a new experience. Ultimately WHO CARES? I can jerk myself off. Why the fuck would I need someone else to do it?

I get a feeling they might not want to talk to someone who rejects their sexual preferences.

Not surprising. Most people with beliefs and lifestyles that don’t make sense can’t engage in discussion because their tower of delusion will come crashing down.

Putting that into the context of human sexual dimorphism (men having more libido and being stronger and more suited for combat than women on average) would suggest that homosexuality would occur in males when they are segregated from women and in a context where they need to apply their physical strength,

Not wrong because in a gender segregated environment like prison or even the military previously hetero men may choose to have homoerotic experiences because it is the only thing available. I’m not sure why else it would manifest. I just accept it for what it is.

while homosexuality would happen in females as a defence mechanism against (potential) abuse from malicious and dominant men.

I’m not the psychological expert but it seems that the best defense from abuse by a dominant man would be another man ready to dominate that male. This doesn’t apply as much in the modern day. Women can have a firearm, mace or other weapons that equalize conflict making male physical strength and power irrelevant.